The Bottom Line

The Demise of the Free World

2012-01-24T12:36:00.000-08:00

Obama: Free Government birth control beginning Aug 1, 2012

By de Andréa

The Obama administration announced Friday. Healthcare plans will be required to give free birth control starting Aug. 1, of this year.

The final regulation retains the approach federal health officials proposed last summer, despite the deluge of complaints from religious groups and congressional Republicans that has poured in since then.

“This decision was made after very careful consideration, including the important concerns some have raised about religious liberty,” Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a statement. “I believe this proposal strikes the appropriate balance between respecting religious freedom and increasing access to (‘important preventive’) services.”

Congressional Republicans slammed the decision as an assault on religious freedom.

“This ruling will force religious organizations to violate the fundamental tenets of their faith, or to stop offering health insurance coverage to their employees,” said the Republican Policy Committee. ”Time will tell whether those institutions choose the former or the latter course — but neither option should be necessary”.

So who benefits from this forced sterility? A little background may be in order…

The former self appointed world leader of the Jihadist movement was one of 52 children. Osama Bin Laden’s Father Mohammed bin Awad bin Laden fathered 52 children before he died; Osama himself fathered 27 children before he was killed by U.S. Special Forces in Pakistan.

So what does this have to do with President Obama’s free U.S. Government birth control? Well herein lays the dirty little secret as they say. You see, Barrack Hussein Obama is a Muslim (watch the video). He knows that Muslims don’t use birth control, not necessarily because is against their religion, as it is in Catholicism, but because this is a huge contributing factor to the agenda of Islam’s world conquest.

You see, while the demographics (watch the video) of the Christian and Jewish population… well… actually while all the population of the infidel is shrinking world wide, the Muslim population is exploding.

Why is that you ask? Birth control and abortion…incidentally this is also why Social Security is failing, but that’s another story. Free Abortion, free birth control.

Muslims will continue to have their 5 wives and 20 to 50 kids while the rest of us infidels will with one wife, have none to 2 kids. What better way to surreptitiously eliminate the opposition to Islam. And if in no other way, they will become the dominating force on the earth?

Think about it…

de Andréa

More Proof Obama Is A Muslim Jihadist

2012-01-23T14:27:00.000-08:00

Obama supports and enables the Muslim Brotherhood; the result is the Muslim Brotherhood sees the weakness in our system.

By de Andréa

How I wish it weren’t so, but the facts are overwhelmingly clear. The Obama administration is, and has been systematically and surreptitiously getting cozy with the revived Ottoman Empire, The Muslim Brotherhood.

This is not only affecting our foreign policy in countries like Iran, Egypt, Libya and Syria it’s also affecting our domestic national security apparatus, and “Troubling” does not adequately define what is happening in America, Europe and the Middle East.

If you would like to know where the loyalties of so-called Moderate American Muslims are, click on this.

The video Muslims do not want you to see, Watch this!

Who is Obama? Is he even a citizen of the U.S. much less a legal president? Watch, listen and learn here!

Not only is Obama, as I’ve written for three years, favoring radical Islamist forces–Obama is anti-American, anti-Western, pro-terrorism, building dictatorships, and openly anti-Semitic and anti-Christian–and now even the establishment media is admitting it.

For the first time in U.S. history an American government, to the applause of the vast majority of the mass media, is backing an anti-American authoritarian supremacist movement. Here’s how the New York Times explains it:

“The Obama administration has begun to reverse decades of mistrust and hostility as it seeks to forge closer ties with an organization [the Muslim Brotherhood] ‘once viewed’ as irreconcilably opposed to United States interests.”

Any serious foreign policy analyst should see three red flags in this paragraph:

First, of course the U.S. government must deal with Egypt’s government, but that doesn’t mean it should publicly proclaim that is should play nice with the Brotherhood and give what amounts to an unconditional endorsement of it.

Indeed, Obama and media are using a cheap trick. They confuse the proper, and responsible policy of dealing with those in power while doing something quite beyond that: a self-destructive policy of rushing to insist that sworn enemies of freedom and the United States are really nice warm-fuzzy guys and there’s no problem with having them in power and endorsing their polices.

As I’ve written before, that if a dictatorship is elected, the Egyptian people have a right to do so but that doesn’t mean the West should endorse and enable it.

This is tantamount to President Roosevelt supporting the Nazi regime during the Second World War! That would be treasonous… So hasn’t Obama committed treason by supporting the Muslim Brotherhood the enemy of the free world not only in Libya and Egypt but in the United States?

Does anyone remember that Obama has been apologizing for all the bad regimes America supported in the past? Now Obama is using the exact same argument: claiming that we must be nice to them and support them because they are in power. What’s the difference between that and the historic relationship to the Mubarak regime? At least Mubarak supported U.S. interests. These people do not. They have openly supported murdering Americans, especially in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In 1979 an Islamist revolution occurred in Iran. The United States quickly recognized that new regime, and tried to be buddies with it. How is that working out for us?

Second, why should the burden of reversing “decades of mistrust and hostility” be exclusively on the United States? Doesn’t the Brotherhood, which benefits from U.S. engagement, need to do that also or even beforehand? Why is there no conditionality here, no hint that the Obama Administration or New York Times understands how hostile the Brotherhood has been and continues to be? If the U.S. president won’t demand a quid pro quo (something in exchange for his concessions) who is going to look after U.S. interests while Obama is looking out for the interests of the nation of Islam?

Third, by saying the Brotherhood was “once viewed as irreconcilably opposed to United States interests” the author suggests this is no longer true. We know that Obama says the Brotherhood has changed. Yet there is no evidence in terms of deeds, ideology, or statement made in Arabic that the Brotherhood has done so.

The Muslim Brotherhood began Just 4 years after the demise of the original Islamic Ottoman Empire; it is obvious that it is nothing less than the revived Ottoman Empire under a new name. Incidentally the agenda of the Ottoman Empire was to conquer the earth for Allah; the agenda of the Brotherhood is the same. Leopards do not change their spots.

Obama has given away all U.S. leverage and assets beforehand, just as he did by announcing a year ago, during the revolution’s opening days, that he would be happy to accept a Muslim Brotherhood government. Well of course he would, he himself is an admitted Muslim, and all the baggage of Muslim ideology comes with the package. Was or ‘is’ there any such thing as a moderate Nazi? What would one look like? Do you think he would just moderately kill you and destroy your freedom? Do you think he would just be a moderate supremacist? A Muslim my friend is a Nazi on steroids.

So the Brotherhood’s moderation is assumed. The science is settled; the debate over, Ignorance prevails and deception abounds.

“The reversal also reflects Obama’s acceptance of the Brotherhood’s repeated assurances that its lawmakers want to build a modern democracy that will respect individual freedoms, free markets, and international commitments, including Egypt’s treaty with Israel.”

Wow, yes that’s it. Obama says he believes what the Brotherhood says and not what has been said by Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and others including many Coptic Egyptians. No one has bothered to look at the actual radical record of Brotherhood lawmakers in the last parliament! Obama has chosen his Muslim friends he’s on the wrong side; at least he is not on your side.

“And at the same time it underscores Washington’s increasing frustration with Egypt’s military rulers, who have sought to carve out permanent political powers for themselves and used deadly force against protesters seeking an end to their rule.”

This is nonsense. Of course, the military has used force, though rarely deadly force. But what evidence is there that the military wants “permanent political powers”? On two occasions it put forth some demands and then retreated within a few hours when pushed by the Muslim Brotherhood. Yet even when so-called moderates protested in the thousands the army ignored them.

Doesn’t this tell you something?

In fact, Obama has only criticized and pressured the army, not the Islamist Brotherhood. So here’s an understatement:

“…As the Brotherhood moves toward an expected showdown with the military…over who should control the interim government—the newly elected Parliament or the ruling military council—the administration’s public outreach to the Brotherhood could give the Islamic movement in Egypt important support. It could also confer greater international legitimacy on the Brotherhood.”

It only took a year to figure that out. Yes, the Brotherhood gains more support because of U.S. policy. Some Egyptians argue the Americans back the Brotherhood so they might as well join the winning side. Others argue that the Brotherhood has intimidated the Americans so they are heroes who should be supported.

In other words, Obama isn’t just observing, but is affecting events. Now, note how the Obama Administration avoids this issue:

“It would be `totally impractical’ not to engage the Brotherhood `because of U.S. security and regional interests in Europe,” a senior administration official said.

But we are not talking about holding talks, we’re talking about becoming apologists for Islamic terrorism, a position announced and defended in a detailed explanation by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. It is entirely predictable that as the revolutionary Islamists take anti-American and dictatorial stances, the Western media will underreport them and the Obama Administration will ignore them, if only to defend the mistaken ideas they hold and the Islamic political agenda Obama has staked out.

Notice the use of the word “engage.” Earlier, the Obama Administration spent much of its effort engaging Iran and Syria, claiming this was necessary. One thing about this president, and the complicit media, is that they never examine past failures when the precise same strategy is repeated (domestic example: “Stimulus” followed by “Jobs Bill.”)

How do we supposedly know the Brotherhood is moderate? Because that is what it tells the Western journalists and diplomats. But that’s not what it tells the Egyptian people or its own members: A State Department official said.…”They’ve been very specific about conveying a moderate message”…. Indeed, the State Department tells us that the Brotherhood has pledged to maintain “universal human rights” and previous Egyptian government commitments, presumably the peace treaty with Israel. But alas the Islamic ideology teaches deception. In Arabic, It’s called the “Doctrine of Taqiyyah”. It fundamentally means, lie, lie to the infidel, and lie through your teeth.

But of course, the Brotherhood would never lie to the U.S. officials in secret, easily deniable and non-binding chats that run totally contrary to the policies its leaders have advocated every day for decades (including the same week as this New York Times article appeared) and that fit its ideology. The fact that they doubt Obama would do anything about it if they trampled those commitments also makes them less likely to keep such promises.

The fact that Senator John Kerry is leading this effort is even scarier. He has been wrong about every Middle Eastern issue, notably his failed engagement policy with Syria and Iran. Might Kerry learn something from this experience about how radical forces can lie to you and manipulate you into supporting their repressive regimes? Not!

Will anyone in the mass media compare Kerry’s positions on engaging Iran and Syria with his making the same mistake now by engaging the Arab Islamists in Egypt? Again; not!

So the public won’t hear people say: Hey, hasn’t this policy already failed twice under this administration?

Kerry’s foolishness is endless. He told the reporter, “The Brotherhood’s leaders said they were eager to work with the United States and other Western countries, especially in economic areas.” Oh, they want American money, Sharia compliant money. If that doesn’t prove they’re moderate what does? And I’ve got a Golden Bridge for sale…cheap.

And here’s an interesting twist, the kind of thing that makes the New York Times the kind of newspaper it is:

“The administration’s willingness to engage with the Brotherhood could open President Obama to new attacks by Republicans who are already accusing him letting Islamists take over a pivotal ally. Some analysts, though, said the overtures amounted to a tacit admission that the United States should have begun such outreach to the region’s Islamist opposition long ago.”

Did you catch that?

First, the Republicans will criticize Obama without any basis and, second, the real mistake was that the United States (Bush?) should have engaged Islamists even sooner!

So the idea that Obama is wrong about the Brotherhood is dismissed as a mere partisanship. Thus, there need be no actual discussion of whether this charge is true! The Times readers are conditioned to reject anything associated with Republicans. The idea that Obama let (I prefer the words “helped,” cheered,” and “declared harmless”) Islamists take over a pivotal ally is now officially banished. And if you hear someone say otherwise, know that he is a Republican trying to sabotage Obama so ignore that person. Immediately put hands over ears to avoid truth.

Shadi Hamid, director of research at the Brookings Doha Center in Qatar, is the person quoted as arguing that the United States missed chances to build ties to so-called “moderate Islamists” earlier. Should America apologize for keeping the Brotherhood waiting? And what about the effort to build ties with “moderate terrorist Islamists” like Hizballah, the Iran regime, and Syria’s government which is not Islamist but is just ‘allied with the Islamist bloc’?

But here’s Hamid’s really interesting point: “Now the Brotherhood knows it is in a stronger position and it is almost as if the U.S. is chasing them and they are sitting pretty.” Yes, that’s it. Islam views Obama’s policy not as one of friendship but of weakness. Thus, they will make no concession—except patience and mouthing soothing words in English—in the pursuit of their radical, Hate-American agenda.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Ignorance begets deception, deception begets enablement, and enablement begets destruction…

Think long and hard about reelecting Barrack Hussein Obama, a self-described Muslim terrorist for president in November. Yes click on the hyperlink and listen to him tell you himself.

de Andréa

The Future of America

2012-01-15T14:09:00.000-08:00

In less than a generation, the US will ask itself: Who lost Europe?' Then in another generation, the US will ask how did we lose America? Moreover in the next 50 years the road to this demise will be a treacherous one.

By de Andréa

If you would like a quick easy lesson on the future of your children then this article is tailored just for you.

I have written over 600 articles and numerous essays and books on the subject of Islamic supremacy but I did not write this one. It is copy of a speech by Geert Wilders, who is a member of the Dutch Parliament in the European country of the Netherlands.Geert Wilders, is Chairman, of the Party for Freedom, in the Dutch Parliament. This speech was given at the Four Seasons Hotel in New York City, addressing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad Conference in Jerusalem.

He begins with…

“Dear friends, thank you so much for inviting me.

I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West itself. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization is facing an Islamic Europe.

First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.

The Europe that you know, is gone.

You have probably seen the landmarks. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.

All throughout Europe a new reality has risen: entire Muslim neighborhoods exist, where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It's the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, (or more accurately) slaveholders, walk three steps ahead.

With mosques on many street corners, the shops have signs that you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by Muslims. These are Muslim neighborhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger and larger portions of Europe, surreptitiously growing street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city.

There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in Christian churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church and every public building in the region. Clearly, the signal is: Islam rules.

Many European cities are already more than one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In most cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighborhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys.

In elementary schools in Amsterdam the word farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.

Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark serve only halal food (Sharia approved food) to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear 'whore, whore'. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the ‘East’, the country of origin.

In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is true the history of the Holocaust, it can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.

In England Sharia courts are now ‘officially’ part of the British legal system. Many neighborhoods in France and England are no-go areas for Infidels and women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan.

’Jews’ are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel . I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about the current Islamization of Europe.

A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim in less than 12 years. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority before the end of this century.

Now, these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are no signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that the majority of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. More than one-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favor of a worldwide Caliphate. Muslims demand what they call 'respect'. And this is how we give them respect. We have Muslim official state holidays.

The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept Sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey.

Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. I call the perpetrators 'settlers', because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.

Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, and their countries. Moreover, Muslims are now a powerful swing vote not to be ignored.

The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behavior is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages - at the same time. Islamic tradition recorded in the hadith, tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.

Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. It has an evil god, and a here-after of eternal death, and there will be no virgins. But in its essence Islam is also a political ideology, a theology, a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of your life. Islam means 'submission'. Islam is not compatible with freedom or democracy, because what it strives for is the demands of Sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to Nazism, Communism, or National-Socialism, these are all totalitarian supremacist ideologies.

Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam 'the most retrograde force in the world', and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran, they are cut from the same bolt of cloth. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the deception of the Palestinian narrative, and portrays Israel as the aggressor and the intruder. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense against this oppressive tyranny.

This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam's territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, and Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.

The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West; it is a war against the world. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for global conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can at least temporarily sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming just down the road.

Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances and appease the demands our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything.

So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as 'right-wing extremists' or 'racists'. In my country, the Netherlands, 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat. Yet there is a greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America- as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens, and Jerusalem.

Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe, American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe’s children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so. We have to take the necessary action now to stop this Islamic supremacism from destroying the free world.”

Geert Wilders

THE BOTTOM LINE: As the title suggests and as I said in the beginning, this ‘is’ the future of America and in less than a generation, the US will ask itself: Who lost Europe?' Then in another generation, the US will ask, how did we lose America? Moreover, the next 50 years this road to our demise will be a treacherous one. In Europe --- it ‘is’, and it will be, there is no going back or undoing it without a bloody war. But in America, we still have a chance to turn this inevitability around. That is… if in fact, we do… turn it around.

I have written many articles about Mr. Geert Wilders. He has been outspoken enough to be prosecuted for speaking the truth, he has even spent time in jail for exposing the agenda of Islam in Europe.

Question: Why do you think Muslims leave their own countries and migrate to the west? Well… I can assure you, it isn’t for the cheese.

The world your children will inherit will be a vastly different one than the one you inherited. Watch a video of the changing demographics of the world, and then please take the time to send the link to every free person that you know; it is so very important. The lives of your children and your children’s children depend on it.

de Andréa

In Defense of Capitalism

2011-12-15T14:07:00.000-08:00

Corporatism or Cronyism Isn’t Capitalism

By de Andréa

As “Occupy Wall Street” and anti-capitalism protests gain popularity as the culprit in the ensuing financial collapse and unemployment issue, it is ignorance of just what capitalism is, and more importunately is not, that fuels the ongoing protest. Ignorance is why the bad guys don’t get caught.

Corporatism and its resulting Cronyism are an invention of the Federal Government for the purpose of taxing profits, for the redistribution of wealth and securing dependency of the masses. Corporations, although used in the capitalistic infrastructure, was a tax on the evil profits, the cash-cow invented by the government to finance the growth of big government and the social dependency of the common people.

The truth is - that capitalism is the greatest socio-economic system in human history, because it’s so ‘moral’ and so ‘productive’ - the two features so essential to human survival. It’s moral because it enshrines and fosters rationality and self-interest, the two key virtues we all must consciously adopt and practice if we’re to pursue and attain life and love, health and wealth, adventure and inspiration. It produces not only material-economic abundance but it produces both the aesthetic and sometimes not so moral values seen in the arts and entertainment.

But what is capitalism, exactly? How do we know it when we see it or have it -- or when we haven’t, or don’t?

These aren’t easily-answered questions. Even though everyone has benefited from capitalism, for more than a century it has had more critics than champions. The ‘controlling elitist critics’ have given biased or a bigoted portrayal of what they project is a demonic system. These critics despise capitalism’s Biblical root ethic (self-interest and responsibility) as “evil”, then blithely spin the truth, and report the system harms human beings or sabotages societal peace and prosperity. Anti-capitalist prejudice has been perpetuated for decades by elitist parents, teachers, and preachers alike. They claim that to benefit yourself (egoism) is bad, but to hypocritically benefit and serve others, especially if it is forced at our own expense or sacrifice (altruism, or “other-ism”) is good – that it’s better to give than receive, to be our “brother’s keeper,” to serve or suffer rather than profit or enjoy. If these are such good virtues, and they are, then why must they be perpetuated and mandated, forced or controlled by government?

In truth, capitalism, “the free society”, means people trade value-for-value to mutually beneficial gain. And thereby one can attain the wealth to voluntarily give to others and be ones brother’s keeper as God blesses us. While the socialistic philosophy is that the government is at the center of wealth and ‘it’ is the god that supplies all of our needs.

Historically, capitalism is only about 250 years old – a mere flick of the clock hand relative to mankind’s total time on earth so far (roughly 6000 years, and less than 4000 years in the Americas). Capitalism arose during the Renaissance (1500s-1600s) and the Enlightenment period (1700s), which entailed a re-birth of reason, self-confidence, culture, and commerce – in short, the pursuit of one’s own personal happiness. This was in sharp contrast to what had preceded it for a millennium of superstition, ignorance, oppression, torture, and economic poverty, imposed by church and state alike, amid religious Medievalism and the Dark Ages.

Capitalism has been co-extant with the Scientific Revolution, the Industrial Revolution, and the Political Revolution, the last of which was realized in the U.S. Constitution (1787), which soon also abolished the archaic belief of slavery, a carryover from the oppression of government controlled socialism.

The question of “what is capitalism,” exactly – and likewise, regarding its main rivals, what is “statism,” “socialism,” “social democracy,” “Communism,” “Fascism,” or “Corporatism” – shouldn’t be a matter of mere semantics. These are real political systems affecting real people, whether for good or ill. Political systems are free, un-free and oppressive, or mixed. We cannot legitimately make up terms or equivocate (i.e., switch meanings from one argument to the next, to evade or twist the logic) about these political systems.

We do need however to look down the road we have now embarked on, to see just where it leads. Our once free capitalistic economy has now become a mix of mandated socialism and a not so true free enterprise system that made this country great for everyone, even those that chose not to participate. And as we mistakenly blame Capitalism for our woes, we will shed our freedom and prosperity for oppressive Social Communism where everyone is supposedly equal, equally oppressed, and dependently poor.

Capitalism has been blamed for the Great depression of the thirties and the Recession of 2007-2009 and for the financial crisis and bailouts of 2008, but it is not “capitalism” but the mixed economy of Statism, Corporatism, and ‘elitist Cronyism’ that caused the failure.

We’ve had corporatism in the U.S. for roughly the past century disguised as capitalism, and it’s getting worse over time; it’s also the system we’ve seen in Europe since at least the time of Germany’s Otto von Bismarck, who launched the womb-to-tomb welfare state in the 1870s. In the interim, of course, Europe also imposed communism, socialism, and fascism. The result, we know, was mass murder, world war, and the continent-wide destruction of wealth.

Capitalism’s greatest intellectual champion, Ayn Rand (1905-1982), once defined it as “a social system based on the recognition of freedom, individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned.” This recognition of genuine rights (not “rights” to force others to get us what we wish) is all-crucial and it has a distinctive moral foundation, according to Rand: “The recognition of individual rights entails the banishment of physical force from human relationships: fundamentally, rights can only be violated by means of force. In a capitalist society, no man or group may initiate the use of physical force against others. The only function of the government, in such a society, is the task of protecting man’s rights, i.e., the task of protecting him from physical force. The government acts as the agent of man’s right of self-defense, and may use force only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use; thus the government is the means of placing the retaliatory use of force under objective control. The moral justification of capitalism does not lie in the altruist claim that it represents the best way to achieve “the common good.” It is true that capitalism does—if that catch-phrase has any meaning—but this is merely a secondary consequence. The moral justification of capitalism lies in the fact that it is the only system consonant with man’s rational nature, that it protects man’s survival qua man, and that its ruling principle is justice.”

Elaborating, Rand explained in Capitalism The Unknown Ideal (1966) that historically, politically, economically, and morally, capitalism was the superior socio-economic system, yet also how, for decades, its achievements and virtues had been hidden and buried deliberately by those wannabe power hungry dictators in an avalanche of prejudice, distortion, and falsehood. Rand argued that capitalism is’ a moral ideal, but unlike most Idealistic theories and philosophies it was made real, and to the greatest extent, in America in the 19th century, especially during the Gilded Age (1865-1890). Thus she called the U.S. “the greatest, the noblest and, in its original founding principles, the only moral country in the history of the world.”

Most people today can’t even fathom (let alone endorse or advocate) a government that’s strictly limited to protecting each person’s right to life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness. They assume a government must be controlled by some pressure group or another, in a “zero-sum game” of unavoidable exploitation – that “power” is ubiquitous and ineradicable, while the only question is who wields the big stick and who wins and who loses.

According to French economist and philosopher Fredrick Bastiat “The only purpose of law and government in a free sociality is to protect the rights of its people.”

They say “timocracy” is rule by the military for the sole benefit of the military, that “plutocracy” is rule by the rich for the sole sake of the rich, that “socialism” is rule by labor for the sake only of labor, that “capitalism” is rule by capitalists (or Wall Street bankers) for the singular benefit of capitalists, and that “democracy” is rule by people (i.e., the majority) at the expense of the minority. While this may be true to one extent or the other, notice, by this bizarre approach – with its hidden premise that there can be no harmony of interests among people – that no space is permitted for a political system of liberty, justice and equality (for all) before the law. Why not? Call such a system what you will (semantics aren’t the issue), yet ask: why isn’t this one of the possible systems to choose from? Why is it not an option? Indeed, given what we know from history and human nature, why isn’t it the only system worth adopting? Because capitalism means that there is no-one at the helm, no-one in control but God, that’s why. And today’s political “thinkers” can only imagine a system controlled by a government that is in turn controlled by one distinct group or another, which then by force, systematically oppresses its rivals.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Capitalism is a direct result of freedom. The freedom to pursue the direction of ones own life, whether good or bad, wealth or wanton, happiness or loss. Moreover, the destruction of capitalism will directly result in the destruction of freedom, and the destruction of independence. As the opposite of independence is dependence, the opposite of the freedom of capitalism is the oppression of socialism.

Think about it the next time you vote for a government entitlement or handout.

A free lunch is few and far between and only leaves a bad taste in your mouth…

de Andréa

Christians Protest Against - Christians Protesting Against Islam

2011-11-16T12:42:00.000-08:00

This, my friend is how Islam will destroy the West. Ignorance leads to deception, to enablement, and to cultural destruction.

Opinion:
By de Andréa

Source: From an article found in the Detroit Free Press
“Christians streamed into Ford Field on Friday for a 24-hour prayer event led by a controversial group as about 150 protesters demonstrated outside,” read the opening lines in an article titled “Prayer Event In Downtown Detroit Prompts Protests”

My first thought was…‘The protest must be from local Muslims’, since Detroit, as many Michigan cities, is fast becoming predominantly Muslim. It shouldn’t have been a surprise to me because I know most Christians haven’t a clue to whom or what Islam really is, but nevertheless it was the ignorant Christians of Islmic Detroit who were protesting the informed Christians from the State of Kansas who came to Detroit to protest Islamic takeover of Detroit. ‘I hope that made some sense’.

Chanting, “Stop the ‘hate and spread the ‘love,” said the protesters “the prayer rally inside the stadium promotes division and hatred”. Led by what the Detroit Free press called “a controversial preacher Lou Engle of Kansas”, It Said “the event was organized and promoted by a group that often criticizes Muslims, gays, Catholics, Jews and African Americans. Members have used militaristic language against a variety of people, especially Muslims in metro Detroit.”

Just for the record, there were African Americans in attendance at the Prayer vigil from Kansas. I don’t know if there were any gays Catholics, Jews, or Muslims in attendance but I kind-a doubt it because, it was after all a Christian Prayer Rally, now wasn’t it?

“Their message is not one of inclusion, it’s of hate,” said Jennifer Teed of Detroit, a so-called Christian protester who opposed Engle’s prayer event. “I don’t see how that’s religious at all.” Teed held a sign in English and Arabic that read, “All are people” and “Standing on the Side of Love.”

Well it may not be “RELIGIOUS” Jen…but again just for the record: There is no love in Islam. Love is not taught in the Quran. The Quran is the book from Hell. It was written by a man called Muhammad and inspired by a god called Satan who now calls himself Allah. So “ALL” are not ‘people standing on the Side of Love.’

I find it interesting that inclusion is prohibited by Scripture - we are not to be yoked with unbelievers and we ‘are’ to live as a separate people. “Inclusion” is a feel good multi-cultural politically correct trap set by Satan.

Yes we are to love our enemies but that doesn’t mean we should join them, support, or include them in our circle of friends or in our churches as some so-called Christian churches have already done. This is Christianity out of whack, we have gone beyond enabling and have now become the defenders’ of Hell, against Gods people. Read a previous article titled Chrislam, How Does This Happen and watch the interview of Lauren Green of Fox News titled Churches Open Doors to Muslim Worship pay particular attention to the spokesperson of the church saying, while defending the sharing of their Christian Church FACILITIES with Muslims, that …well we are not FACILITATING Islam! I so’ hope you get the point and made the connection…obviously the spokes person didn’t.

The article went on to say: “Engle and the organizers of the prayer event, known as The Call, have repeatedly targeted local Muslims, saying they are under demonic control. They have tried to include local clergy, but over the past week, a growing number of ministers have denounced Engle.” Guess what my dear ignorantly deceived city of Detroit; Muslims “are' under demonic control” And if you don’t wake up soon, you will be too!

Outside Ford Field, the protesters featured Baptist, Catholic, and Methodist pastors who criticized Engle. (I can just see him putting out his chest in a pharisaical fashion saying) “I’m about the separation of faith and hate,” said the Rev. Ed Rowe of Central United Methodist Church in Detroit. “You can’t hate and be righteous,” [like me] said Germany Bennett, pastor of True Oracles of God, a Detroit church. “Hatred is a sin, and 'we' believe in love.”

Oh! Contraire my ignorantly deceived self righteous pastors, God said to love what is good and hate what is evil. While there may be a fine line between loving the person who is a Muslim and hating Islam --- as a Christian one must fight against the evils of Satan and Islam is directly from Hell my ignorant friend. As Christians are said to be children of God, by the same token, self-proclaimed Muslims are children of Satan. We need to find the balance of God’s teachings in our spirit. And until we recognize this, we will not effectively minister to the Muslim community and so we will lose this battle.

The Rev. Charles Williams of Historic Solomon Baptist Church in Detroit said, “Engle is promoting an extremist agenda that is anti-Detroit and anti-minority. God did not call us to hate,” Williams said.

Well… Why not just call them racists too while your at it pastor??? Extremists are they! Is it extreme to hate oppression? Is it extreme to hate the murder of anyone that is not a Muslim? It is extreme to hate bondage, slavery, and extortion pastor. Is it extreme to hate the mutilation and murder of women? All this and more wonderful horrifying laws are taught in the Quran and the Hadith pastors, you might want to find out just who and what Islam is before you yoke yourself with it and support it instead of protesting those who have. Didn’t Jesus say “take the plank out of you own eye so that you may see the speck in your brothers eye”?

Cheryl Voglesong of Royal Oak held up a sign that read: “Take Thy Fear mongering back to Kansas. We don’t want it. I’m a Christian, and we’ve lived peacefully with Muslims for 100 years in Detroit,” she said. “Lou Engle and these guys are coming here to attack them, that’s crazy.”

You might want to read resent history about the country of Lebanon Ms. Voglesong. Lebanon was a Christian Democracy much like America until just a few short years ago. Not for just a hundred years, but for more than a thousand years the Lebanese lived ignorantly with the Warm Fuzzy Muslims, in their neighborhoods, in their businesses, in their schools, in their government and today instead of Lebanon being a Christian Free Democracy it is a tyrannically oppressed Islmic State, ruled by Hisbala Muslim terrorists.

This is because the Christians of Lebanon were just like the Christians of Detroit. Ignorant, Deceived, Enabling and as a result they were Destroyed. Those are the four steps to the destruction of a Christian culture and it has been repeated over and over and over again throughout the past 1401 years all over the world. The Christians from Kansas might be extremists, but the Christians in Detroit are ignorant, deceived, enabling and it is destroying Detroit and the State of Michigan. The state of Michigan now has a larger population of Muslims than the entire country of Afghanistan. And Islam completely controls some cities that once sported a Christian church on every corner. Today the church bells are silent and if we don’t start being “Extreme” soon Christians will be silenced as well.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Just down the road of time and because of the blind Christian benevolence, all of Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and the Americas as well as the rest of the world will be ruled by our Warm Fuzzy Muslim neighborhood friends that we have been living with for hundreds of years.

Pastors…Where do you think the antichrist is coming from? Just a hint, it will not be from Iceland. The Bible says he will come from the countries surrounding Israel. Today for the first time in history all countries surrounding Israel are Islamic States, controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood… (The revived Ottoman Empire)

Think long and hard about it… And then you might want to pray that God will revive you!

de Andréa

Muslims Take Over Yet Another Christian College

2011-11-15T09:08:00.000-08:00

Muslims are getting smarter as they move their stealth Jihad of infiltration through the Western cultures of Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and the Americas. Oh yes! And for those of you that live in Rio Linda… right here at home too. Ugh!

By de Andréa

Muslims are getting smarter. They have learned some lessons in the past 1401 years, not only from experience, but from history- would that we could do just a little of that.

Catholic World News reports that Muslims attending Catholic University of America in Washington DC are using our nation’s anti-discrimination laws against the University: “Muslim students have lodged a another complaint against the Catholic University of America, this time claiming that they are the victims of illegal discrimination because the school does not set aside space for Islamic prayer.” Aw shucks…did anyone tell them that “Catholic University” was a…well…a Catholic University --- and not a Confucius, or Buddhist, or an Islamic University? I guess that would have been too confusing.

A little history

Historical Communist leaders, especially Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937) broke from the violent revolutionary methods of the early Marxists. Today’s smarter Muslims would rather wait to blow up stuff. Like the Gramsci Communists before them, they are working to take over our culture first, from the inside by using our laws against us. No shot needs to be fired. No building needs to be blown up. At least not yet anyway! They are going after the foundational institutions: schools, media, politics, and the courts. This was Gramsci’s contribution to the “Cultural Revolution”. While Gramsci remained a committed Communist, he was a new-breed of Communist. To change the culture, of a country from the inside Gramsci argued, “would require a ‘long march through the institutions’ — the arts, cinema, theater, schools, colleges, seminaries, newspapers, magazines, and the new electronic medium [of the time], radio.”

The complaint to the human-rights commission of the District of Columbia is backed by John Banzhaf, a law professor at neighboring George Washington University, another private Christian University taken over by Islam. Banzhaf has already filed a complaint against Catholic University, alleging sex discrimination, in response to the school’s decision to abolish coed dorms.

So why would Muslims want to attend a Catholic University in the first place? Like everything else, to take it over of course. You don’t believe me? Folks this is why Muslims are here, or did you think is was our food, our fashion in clothes our camels or our breed of horses or maybe our freedom of speech that they love so much???

Why in our own history did humanists attend Christian colleges like Harvard and Yale? To take them over. Oh yes! Harvard and Yale both were also once Christian colleges. The early mottos of Harvard for example were -“Truth for Christ and the Church” and “For the Glory of Christ.” When a student entered Harvard, he would have been introduced to the school’s foundational principles… “Let every Student be plainly instructed, and earnestly pressed to consider well, the main end of his life and studies is, to know God and Jesus Christ which is eternal life (John 17:3) and therefore to lay Christ in the bottom, as the only foundation of all sound knowledge and Learning. And seeing the Lord only giveth wisdom, let every one seriously set himself by prayer in secret to seek it of him (Prov. 2:3).”

Why would an unbeliever go to Harvard? Certainly to get a good education, but also just as the Muslims do now, they wanted to incrementally transform the college. Today, Harvard is a bastion of secularism, promoting among other things, Humanism, and social communism.

We first saw these new tactics when a group of Muslim students at Christian Trinity University in Texas wanted the words “in the year of Our Lord” removed from their diplomas. “A diploma is a very personal item, and people want to proudly display it in their offices and homes.” Said Sidra Qureshi, a Muslim, and president of “Trinity Diversity Connection”, (code name for transforming a culture to the oppression of Islam…) “By having the phrase ‘In the Year of Our Lord,’ it is directly referencing Jesus Christ, and not everyone believes in Jesus Christ.” Of course what she is really saying is that everyone on the planet is ruled by the Islamic law of Sharia. So it should say…”In the year of our god Satan” Excuse me “Allah”. Well… same thing!

The debate started in 2009 when Isaac Medina, a Muslim convert from Guadalajara, Mexico, noticed the wording when he saw pre-made diploma frames in the Trinity bookstore. Muslims have been attacking Christianity since the inception of their religion. They’ve spotted a weakness in our system, the attempt to be diverse and benevolent at any cost, even if it costs us the one thing that made this nation great — its Christian foundation. Muslims totally understand this; most Christians’ haven’t a clue. The Muslim demand for diversity is a wedge to get their foot in your door, open it wide enough for others to follow behind, then once in’, they will pool their collective energies and force Christians and the Kaffaar (non Muslims) into the slavery of oppressive tyranny.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Sound familiar? It should, stealth Islamic Jihadists are repeating this same proven strategy over and over again, not only in our schools but in all fascists of our community and Western Culture, such as government, airports, the work place even in Christian churches.

But this is the way - the dhimmah (Christian or Kaffaar slaves) are expected to behave. And like the good dhimmah that we are, we ignorantly bow in servitude to Islam, enabling Islam in the demise of our Judeao Christian culture our Constitution and our freedom.

Keep up the good work America! Soon we will all build our tents to face Mecca. Wear a Hijaab, ride our green non polluting camels to work, and gladly pay the Jizya to give us just one more day of life as slaves of Sharia. Sounds like a plan…

Don’t you just love it when a plan comes together???

Ugh!

de Andréa

Muslims Can’t Pray To A Catholic Cross

2011-11-15T08:39:00.000-08:00

Several years ago the historic university accepted funds from a Saudi prince. Now Saudi Arabia owns George Washington ‘U’

By de Andrea

George Washington University President John Garvey pictured standing in front of one of the many campus crosses that used to adorn the university (Photo by Rafael Crisostomo)

“Crosses in every room at Washington D.C.’s Catholic University of America are a Sharia violation that prevent Muslim students from praying”, reads the opening remarks of an article on Beliefnet News about a suit by a Muslim organization.

I… am nearly speechless. No! Not because Muslim students say the crosses prevent them from praying, that is totally understandable. What I am nearly speechless about is that this is even an Issue, much less a surprise. I mean really do they teach anything at our colleges anymore that is true, informative, in touch with reality or useful.

Come on! This is Muslim 101, crosses and church bells are strictly forbidden in a Muslim school, or anywhere in Islam. Any Muslim child knows that! But…you say, this is a Catholic University! This is a Christian nation!

Oh contraire my pathetically ignorant deceived enabling blind self destructive dhimmahic slave. There are Muslims here in America--- that makes this an Islamic State. There are Muslims in George Washington University and in the Catholic University of America that makes them Muslim colleges. And the icing on the Islmic camel dung heap is that Islam donated Funds to G.W.U. and they were foolishly and ignorantly (that’s much to kind) stupidly accepted.

My friend! Don’t you know according to Sharia Law the whole world is the Nation of Islam and anywhere Muslims are present Sharia is enforced, Period. There is nothing to negotiate. Muslims do not compromise, Muslims do not assimilate, and at best you are the subordinate dhimmah slaves who pay a Jizya tribute for the privilege of living. If you violate Sharia in any way you are marked for death, Period. No plea, no trial by jury, no expectation of the presumption of innocence no nothing… This is the religion from hell folks, just when… Christians especially--- are we going to get off of our lazy brain dead bum’s and educate ourselves about the very simple fundamentals of this satanic enemy? Their god Satan AKA’ Allah just can’t stand to be anywhere near “THE CROSS”. This should be no surprise, its elementary…

NOW do you understated why they say that they CANNOT pray in the presence of the Cross that Jesus Christ died on to pay for the sins of the world yes He died even for Muslims the children of HELL! Maybe we should tell them that!

If this was something the college did not want to deal with, then why did they accept Satan’s money and invite Satan’s kids into their school. As I said at the beginning, I am nearly speechless.
Do you really think Muslims come to a Catholic college because they want to become good little Catholics and say the rosary or do penance? Or maybe it’s because the Catholics have good toaster strudel. Come on… wake up my deceived friends they came to change the school into an Islmic Madrassa; they came to this country to change it into an Islamic state.

The problem here - is not that the Muslims can’t pray in the presence of the Cross, although that may be their problem, it certainly isn’t ours. The very profound problem here is, that by the time we, the Judeao Christian West begin to understand the simplest fundamental facts about Islam we the “People of the Book” will be the slaves of the Dhimmah Pack. Folks read the Quran, read the Hadith, it’s even in the Bible that the antichrist will come from the Middle East. Read your history books, no, not the new ones, the Muslims that have infiltrated the Dept of Education have rewritten them, get an old one, pre 1960’s, and you will see the repeat of Islamic history over and over again. They do not change, and they do not stop. They did not come here for our babouches (sandals) or our kufi, and they are not here for our Big Mac’s or our dune buggies. The same historical ignorant deception is taking place right here before our very eyes that has been repeated in every Islamic country in the world. And we ignorantly make the same mistake and enable, and support them to our own demise.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I will not apologize for being so truthful and direct. The time is long’ past for diplomacy. We just must understand that we have either to convert all Muslims to our Western Culture today, or deport them tomorrow. This, my friend is the foundation of the Christian Crusades more that a thousand years ago. They waited to long and a 200 year bloody war was the result. If we don’t act now Islam’s Hizb ut-Tahrir حزب التحرير will bury us in the satanic oppression of Islamic tyranny. (Look it up!) “Insanity, is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result”. - Albert Einstein. It shouldn’t take an Albert Einstein to figure this out, after all, I did!

de Andréa

American Jihad

2011-11-10T14:10:00.000-08:00

Just because one cannot see the unholy war of Islam against America, it doesn’t mean that it is not here. What it means is… one is deaf, dumb, blind, and ignorantly deceived. And because of our ignorance and deception, we are enabling our own demise and losing this destructive war…

By de Andréa

Currently nearly 3 million Muslims legally reside within the borders of the United States and an estimated 300 thousand more illegal Muslims have poured through our open unprotected borders with the blessings of our Muslim president. Although they live in every state in the U.S. the majority of them live and very nearly control the state of Michigan. They block streets in NYC and in Washington DC to pray to their god Allah. They live their lives according to Islamic Sharia law, the Immoral, and supremacist code of the Islamic Ideology.

But when Muslims bring legal disputes into U.S. courts, for some unknown reason a legal dilemma often arises, pitting Islamic Sharia law against individual rights guaranteed by American law, and the U.S. Constitution.

Increasingly, U.S. courts have yielded to Sharia. In effect, our own judicial system is failing to adhere to the very laws that govern this country. Sharia advocates are overturning our long-held legal traditions to follow the precepts laid down by an ideology much like Nazism, and whose laws are at odds with our U.S. legal and cultural history.

American law is built on the foundation of Judeo-Christian values and traditions. These have always operated under the precept, "Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's.” This foundational premise under the secular governing structure created the historic distinction between religious leadership and secular authority in the United States. This unique marriage of Judeao/Christian values at the foundation of our legal culture is now being threatened, by a culture of evil brutality that leaves no room for any law but Sharia, and has infiltrated, encroached and invaded the American legal system from our law schools to our courts.

There are now more than 50 cases, which received limited or no media coverage, that illustrate failure by the courts to maintain the integrity of local, state and federal laws.
For just a few examples, see the recent report from the Center for Security Policy, "Sharia Law and American State Courts: An Assessment of State Appellate Court Cases".

Our legal system must insure that constitutional guarantees are not influenced by any outside legal systems, including religious or foreign laws, such as Sharia, which are hostile to our legal traditions. Although some states have past legislation that prohibits any foreign law from influencing law in state courts, Sharia is still running rampant in the rest of the country as well as in our Federal Courts.

Sharia Law

Sharia is Satan’s law, and where there are Muslims, it stands above all laws. This immutable Islamic legal doctrine derived from the Koran and other Islamic texts from Hell. Its interpretations, and rulings, mandates gender apartheid, religious discrimination, Muslim supremacy, cruel punishments and torture, and the denial of free speech and religion, among other things. Requirements are detailed for every aspect of life, from the correct use of the toilet to food to the subjection and enslavement of non-Muslims to proper wife-beating techniques.

Islamic doctrine recognizes men as superior to women in all matters and thus promotes the unequal treatment of women. Under Sharia, the list of inequalities include, a woman's testimony is valued at half that of a man's, she may be convicted of sexual misconduct if she is raped unless she produces four male witnesses. She receives half the inheritance of male offspring, her husband may freely divorce her without providing for her welfare, she may be raped with impunity, and she may be beaten or killed as her husband sees fit. All these abuses, which violate U.S. laws for equal treatment of the sexes, are perfectly acceptable under Sharia law.

Sharia law requires the segregation of Muslims from non-Muslims, assigns a subservient status to non-Muslims called the dhimmah, forbids certain religious activities and observances and mandates death for Muslims who leave the faith -- all of which violate religious freedom, equal treatment under the law, and other guarantees of the U.S. constitution.

Jewish Law and Christian Canon Law

Many who defend rulings that follow Islamic doctrine or Sharia make spurious comparisons to Jewish law and Catholic or Christian Canon law. These comparisons are disingenuous because the distinctions couldn't be more striking between Sharia law and the laws of Jews and Christians. The fact is that Jesus Christ came to set man free from the law, and not to be in bondage to it.

Islamic law or Sharia is supremacist and oppressive. The Koran commands Muslims to change secular laws to conform to Sharia and/or to impose Sharia worldwide. In Muslim countries, the mosque is both the state and the court. Disobeying Sharia will be punished by flogging or death. By contrast, Jewish (Halacha) and Christian Canon laws are never imposed even for Jews and Christians, respectively. Under Jewish law and Canon law, any two parties in a dispute can choose to seek and follow a decision rendered by a religious court, but they are always free to pursue secular redress. In fact, Jews and Christians are required to follow secular law and are under no obligation whatsoever to abide by Jewish or Catholic Church doctrine. The dictum in Jewish law of "Dina d'malchuta dina" translates to "the law of the land is law" and recognizes non-Jewish laws and non-Jewish legal jurisdiction as binding on Jewish citizens. Jewish law does not operate under a supremacist power structure like Islamic doctrine. It is unenforceable, and it is not a replacement for constitutional law.

In contradiction to Church doctrine, for example Catholic men and women can freely initiate divorces without fear of punishment. A Catholic woman can even have an abortion, although abortion is condemned by the Catholic Church. Catholics can be excommunicated from the church, but this doesn't affect their individual liberties or impose criminal punishments or penalties.

Unlike Islamic Sharia, Jewish law and Canon law have no provisions for taking lives, criminal penalties, or monetary compensation for non-money damages. No doctrinal basis exists to create a worldwide Jewish or Catholic government like an Islamic caliphate, nor is there a religious mandate for martyrdom similar to a jihad to fulfill Judaic or Catholic devotion. If a Christian woman engaged in an extramarital affair, she would not be sentenced to death by stoning as she would be under Islamic doctrine. If her father or brother murdered her for her impropriety, they would be incarcerated for life or receive the death penalty by the appropriate authorities...and certainly not be praised for maintaining family honor, as is the case with Sharia. Catholics Christians and Jews are free to change their religions without the threat of punishment of death as it is under the supreme and barbaric law of Sharia.

While Sharia is immutable, Jewish and Canon law has evolved over time to embrace new interpretations. Jewish law allows the latitude for judicial discretion, and innovations are frequently proposed and instituted. Christian Canon has also changed with varying circumstances and has a rich historic basis of evolution, beginning with the First Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Clearly, Sharia is at odds with everything enshrined in our Constitution to honor and preserve individual liberties and freedom. Sharia stands in opposition to equal protection under the law for both of the sexes, all religions, all races, and all ethnicities. Ultimately Sharia replaces the constitution with the objective of submitting to Allah/Satan’s law, which denies freedom, equality, tolerance, and justice. Unfortunately, the United States is now on a slippery slope to allow Sharia to quarter in our American courtrooms. To permit this insidious divergence from U.S. and state law threatens the basic principles and liberties that Americans hold dear. In essence, Sharia law is antithetical to the American concepts of freedom and equality that are given to all human beings by the God of creation that is documented in our Declaration of Independent [Americans].

The purpose of Sharia is to totally control every aspect of mankind world wide. Any independent thinking human being, Atheist, Agnostic, Buddhist, Shinto, Confucianist, Hindu, Christian, or Jew, who would read Sharia law, would identify it with something from the depths of Hell itself. It is the most immoral, evil, barbaric and deceptive ideology on the planet. And it is a bigger threat to the ‘Free Judeao-Christian West’ than all the WMD the world can produce.

While we fight for the defense of the Middle East in Afghanistan and Iraq, we are losing a much larger nearly silent battle right here in our own country. Soon our military our government, and our culture will be irrelevant if this war against Sharia isn’t fought in our towns, cities, and in our state and congressional legislatures. If left up to the courts we as Americans will be at best reduced to slaves of Islamic Sharia, or at worst be reduced to human targets for the pleasure of Allah, the satanic god of Islam.

You still have a choice to fight!

Or not…

de Andréa

Eugenics

2011-11-09T17:44:00.000-08:00

So…Just what is a eugenic? The dictionary defines it as “The Science for the improvement of hereditary qualities.” The U.S. Supreme Court said it was necessary for a “…society to prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.” Individuals were labeled 'degenerate’, ‘feeble-minded’ based on dirty clothing, or unkempt appearances, then they were sterilized.

By de Andréa

This is an example of a government program run amuck. This story not only exposes just how perverted government programs can get, but how governments skew and pervert the words that identify them, making them deceptively reasonable, throwing all moral values and humanity to the four winds.

Performing ‘any’ surgical procedure without the patient's consent in itself, should raise serious legal questions. But the U.S. Supreme Court, the Judicial branch of the Federal government that is charged with (would you believe) upholding the U.S. Constitution, illegally upheld forced sterilization in the 1927 case of Buck vs. Bell, which challenged Virginia's "race betterment" law.

Where perversion leads
The Nazi program of "race hygiene", under which some 2 million Germans were sterilized, came out of that very ruling the U.S. Supreme Court made upholding the eugenic serialization laws in the 1927.

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, noted for his free-speech decisions, wrote a callous brain-dead opinion that approved the sterilization of Carrie Buck, a 17-year-old girl who was labeled as feeble-minded. Carrie Buck was not mentally retarded or abnormal in any way but was sterilized because she had a child out of wedlock, and was considered "morally delinquent.” Well she may have been delinquent, but is that a good reason to cause entire nations to become morally corrupt?

Holmes wrote that "instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for a crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind."

Encouraged by this ruling, sterilization advocates took their campaign abroad. The leading American eugenicist, Harry Laughlin, who never met Buck but testified at her court hearing that she was a "low-grade moron," helped to draft Hitler’s Nazi regime's "race hygiene" law, under which some 2 million Germans were sterilized.

It's time for California to make amends for one of the most horrific and shameful episodes in the state's history. Between 1909 and 1979, more than 20,000 people in California were robbed of their reproductive abilities through a state program of forced sterilization. Under the misleading guise of "race betterment," doctors at California's state hospitals sterilized those who were considered "unfit to propagate." I personally remember a sister-in-law of mine who had Downs Syndrome, and was serialized under the program. I remember at the time the family said it seemed like a good idea.

The origins of California's forced-sterilization program lie in the misnamed eugenics movement of the early 20th century. The term fundamentally means, "Good breeding", and stemmed from efforts to improve plant and livestock breeds. But those who believed that "degenerates" (anyone who was not quite as equal as they were, and the "feeble-minded" (one should take a closer look at just who was feeble minded here) should be prevented from having child[ren], the elite politicians launched campaigns for state laws to force the sterilization of people with such deficiencies.

In 1907, Indiana became the first state to pass a forced-sterilization law, and California followed suit in 1909. Thirty states ultimately enacted such laws, and some 64,000 people -- most of them poor, young women -- were subjected to the surgeon's knife without their consent.

In California, most involuntary sterilizations were performed on patients in state mental hospitals. More than half were diagnosed as manic- depressive or schizophrenic, when in truth most were simply "burdens" on state institutions.

In 1921, the director of the California Agnew State Hospital urged the sterilization of a female patient because she was "depressed" and "further pregnancies would be a hindrance for her remaining stable.” The state director of hospitals in the early 1920s, Dr. Frederick Hatch, sent dozens of "eugenics field workers" into poor neighborhoods, looking for sterilization candidates. One historian wrote of this program: "Individuals were labeled 'degenerate' or 'feeble-minded' based on dirty clothing or an unkempt appearance. Children were labeled 'imbecile' based on a glance from across the room."

California's longtime attorney general, U.S. Webb, urged sterilization for "inebriates, prostitutes, tramps, and habitual paupers found in our county poor-asylums.” The eugenics movement gradually lost influence, through scientific debunking of claims that "moral delinquency" was inherited and through revulsion at its Nazi connections. But the last forced-sterilization law was not repealed until 1979. In recent years, advocates for the mentally and physically disabled have begun redress campaigns for the victims of these laws.

During the last year, four governors have responded with apologies on their states' behalf. Last May, Virginia's governor, Mark Warner, expressed his "sincere apology" to the 8,000 victims of his states law and said, "the eugenics movement was a shameful effort in which state government never should have been involved." In December, then-Gov. John Kitzhaber of Oregon acknowledged the "great wrong" done in the name of eugenics to 2,600 "vulnerable, helpless citizens" of his state. The same month, Gov. Mike Easley of North Carolina said, "I deeply apologize to the victims and their families for this past injustice, and for the pain and suffering they had to endure over the years." Then-Gov. Jim Hodges of South Carolina issued the most recent state apology, on Jan. 8.

California sterilized more of its residents than these four states combined -- close to a third of the national total.

THE BOTTOM LINE: So what does one say about this early form of contraception? What, if any moral lesson could we gleen from this perverted Government program? Just how many brain-dead, warped minded, do-gooder programs are now in effect in our society with no attention paid to the long term effects of some of these perverted agendas?

Should we take a long look at abortion for example? The results being the murder of more than 50 million innocent Americans, and the resulting demise of yet another social program called Social Security because we are short 50 million workers to support the program. And then there are same sex marriage laws that will end reproduction altogether. How about the enforcement of Sharia law in U.S. courts… will we have the stoning of women in the street because they went to the supermarket without wearing their Hijaab, or because they were raped, or drove a car?

It seems that we will always find more ways to shoot ourselves in the foot than existed in the previous millennium.

Could it be that we don’t learn from history or maybe we don’t even know or care about our history? Maybe we just want to sweep it under the carpet like this ugly little part of history was.

Sweeping history under the carpet or outright covering it up doesn’t make it go away. It will always resurface years later as just another tragic, ignorant, stupid Government program.

And people become more and more caulis and blind until they lose their ability to see down the road…

de Andréa

How To Acquire A Socialist State

2011-10-31T11:13:00.000-07:00

So just how does one acquire a Social Communist State? Well like anything else a criminal does -he just steals it…

By de Andréa
October 30, 2011

But of course just stealing it would be too obvious, so the more sophisticated way of stealing would be to steal the money and buy it. And if it fails then…Oh well!

Most of you have at least heard about the Chevy Volt, or Obama’s so-called green car, well…partially green anyway, which costs $41,000 and GM has sold just fewer than 4,000 of these E-gas cars this year. But what you probably didn’t know is that it actually costs $41,000 to make the car. Oh no! It didn’t cost GM $41,000- it cost YOU $41,000…each, in taxpayer money from the so-called bail-out just to produce this useless machine. And then if you want one for your very own, it will cost you yet another $41,000 again of your own hard earned money to put one in your garage. Yeah, and that’s not all, the car uses both gas and electricity, which means that it likely pollutes the environment more than a normal car. Pollution involved in making the special E-batter + pollution from gasoline + pollution from coal-powered electricity = more pollution than just a gasoline powered car alone. But that is only the beginning my friend...

GM is now planning to ramp up production of this failed vehicle, by increasing production to a rip roaring 60,000 vehicles next year, astounding.

This isn't the extent of GM/Obama’s new "green" initiative, far from it. Last year GM filed for and received more "green" energy patents than any other organization in the world. They also spent $3 million of your tax money to install solar panels at a Volt manufacturing plant. This will save them a grand total of $15,000 a year in electricity expenses. Now I have never been very good at math, but lets see…….a….and carry the one….Okay, in order to recoup the cost of the green solor installation through savings, it will take GM approximately 200 years to pay for it. And all to manufacture a car that will produce no profit whatsoever. So how is GM going to survive not making any profit? Well…you see…that’s the catch, GM is, and has been for the past three years or so, a not for profit green corporation owned by Uncle Barrack. Kind of like any other Communist country, the Government dictator owns the business, so it doesn’t have to make a profit. You the slave subjects will make up the difference.

Obama is also planning a hybrid car for the Cadillac line. I'm sure it will be just as successful and cost-effective as the Volt.

You see American taxpayers gave GM about $26 billion dollars, yes that’s billion with a ‘b’, for their bailout. Obama still own 500 million shares of their stock, valued at about $25. At this price “we the people” stand to lose only a mere $15 billion. But why pay back the taxpayers who helped keep you in business when you can waste it installing green solar panels? So glad we were able to help out.

And another "green" energy project circles the drain
Remember the "green" energy business which received $1.2 billion worth of your tax money? Well surprise, surprise; it's also in trouble.

SunPower Oh yes! The California solar power company that was going to build a new facility is now $820 million in debt, $20 million more than the company is worth. It was granted the $1.2 billion of ‘your money’ after it announced it would build a new plant in Mexico to create a hundred new jobs in there in Mexico’ (I know you are glad about that) to build the solar panels for the project. As Human Events points out, if SunPower were a bank with this much debt, the feds would shut it down. But because it's one of President Obama's pet projects, and because a Democrat Congressman and his lobbyist son have an interest/money in the company, it receives ‘YOUR’ money to stay afloat. Just a slight conflict of interest there, but who’s looking?

Oh! But that’s not all. Your tax dollars are about to be wasted again on more "green" jobs! Remember how President Obama took $535 million from you and gave it to Solyndra, which then promptly failed spectacularly? Remember how he also took more millions from you and gave them to SpectraWatt and Evergreen Solar, which also immediately failed? Except for the CEO’s of course, they all walked away with Cayman bank accounts, also filled to overflowing with more of your money.

But Wait! He wants to do it again.

This time the Department of Energy wants to hand out yet another $6.5 BILLION to more "green" energy companies. Yes, just like Solyndra. The administration projects that this money will create a grand total of 283 (non-productive) jobs. That's will cost you 23 million of your dollars PER JOB. Hey, forget the job just give them the money!

One such loan/handout is in the amount of $1.2 billion for a project in California. Another loan will go to a company already worth billions. Why are you and I giving them money when they clearly can afford to waste it themselves?

That's because the "green" jobs movement is not about jobs at all. You see! In order for there to be a job there has to be something produced and the Government produces…that’s right… NOTHING. It's instead about looking and sounding politically correct and lining the pockets of Obama’s FAT CAT donors.

Since Spain’ went bankrupt subsidizing "green" jobs, one company, Iberdrola, has decided… guess what? To move to the U.S. and set up shop here. Why? Because we are printing lots of money and we are green and stupid. These companies just want the socialist government handouts. Spain has already proven that the "green" jobs movement is a complete waste. And President Obama understands that, PERFECTLY. You see he wants to totally break the Capitalist economy, run it into the ground, bankrupt it, and then… he will finish buying his SOCIALIST STATE, with the money he stole from YOU!

"The true engine of economic growth will always be companies likeSolyndra" - President Obama.... This guy is dangerous...

”Solyndra is exactly what the Recovery Act is all about"- Vice President Joe Biden...This disease must be contagious...

President Obama wasted billions of YOUR taxpayer dollars on politically motivated handouts to now bankrupt companies.

If alternative energy were a viable business, start up companies with venture capitalist money would be scrambling to be the first one with the new green widget, especially in America. But President Obama has declared "green" jobs the jobs of the future. Well, guess what? This isn’t the future, this is now, and now we need real jobs, jobs that produce a profitable product but Obama refuses to back down from his belief that these are the only jobs worth creating. Drilling for our own oil alone for example, would make America energy independent in less than 7 years and put America back to work producing a profitable product.

The Department of Energy is spending another, $1.2 BILLION, for a massive new solar panel project in California. This hand out is more than double those three previous failed projects combined.

The FBI raided Solyndra, believing that the company misled the government in order to receive free money. Oh! Oh! Ya think? How many more Solyndras are out there?

The loan/handout to Solyndra was put on a fast-track approval process. One of Solyndras largest investors was a huge donor to President Obama. How many of the other solar loans have been given to President Obama's donors? Payback time…

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) repeatedly warned the administration that the Solyndra loan was too risky. And yet the Obama regime went ahead anyway because risk just isn’t a factor. Just where is Congress in all this?

PricewaterhouseCoopers said there was "substantial doubt about Solyndra's viability”. Yet our dictator gave them your money anyway. This bad loan was supposed to create over 1,000 new non-productive jobs in a new facility, but according to employees at Solyndra, "everyone knew that the plant wouldn't work." The business model for Solyndra was a belief that they could make a product for $6 and sell it for $3. You see, anything works in a Social Communist economy, because it is at best a loser.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) said: “the Obama Administration didn't do their due diligence in researching Solyndra before the loan went out”. Oh contraire my little green friend, he knew exactly what he was doing. ”He clearly didn't properly research Evergreen Solar or SpectraWatt either said the GAO”. Are they deceived or what?

President Obama has hinged his entire Presidency on the viability of "green" jobs. It's all he proposes; it's why he wants to raise your taxes so he can support this drain hole. This my friend, is how one acquires a Communist Socialist State. He believes that the only jobs in the future are Socialist "green" jobs all supported by YOU!

But that is what Obama’s jobs plan is all about.

Thanks to President Obama's "green" jobs loans/handout, one job has been created for every $5.5 million spent. Now he has a plan to tax you and your family, actual job creators, and the wealthy even more, to pay for ‘what’? More "green" handouts. Government jobs are not jobs they produce nothing, they instead, are just a drain on the economy. To DEMAND that Congress do their job and pull the plug on all "green" jobs handouts, CLICK HERE If green was a real savings for anything or anyone or actually was profitable the private sector would be all over it like ‘green’ on broccoli.

THE BOTTOM LINE: In all of this social economics, the truth has been totally lost. The real solution here is… FIRE THE GOVERNMENT! I think it is pretty’ obvious that politicians are totally inept at business and economics. There is something to be learned from the philosophy of the “Private Sector”. The blatant clue here is, the word “PRIVATE”. The very best the government could do for our economy would be to do - absolutely nothing, and make a big issue out of it as well. Then the chips will fall where they will and the American entrepreneurs will pickup the pieces of this disaster and fill the holes made by this ‘Marxist Socialist Communist Community Organizing Dictatorship’.

As it is, the “Private Sector” is afraid to do anything, for fear Obama will just fowl it up again, and he will, I think that has been obvious.

OBAMA! Get out of our pockets, get out of our economy, and take your fake birth certificate and stolen social security number and get out of our country! And take your Communist and your Muslim Crony Czars with you…

de Andréa

Do Christians Have Free Speech?

2011-10-30T12:26:00.000-07:00

According to the IRS, Christians have no first Amendment right of free speech.

By de Andréa

The gag order of Christians is conveniently enforced through the nonprofit status of their Churches. The result is a de-facto law that says: when one becomes a Christian, one gives up, or looses ones right of free political speech. And of course any speech and every speech can’ and is’ politicized and therefore can be forbidden.

This is for those of you that have no idea of how or why free speech even became an issue important enough to warrant at least part of a constitutional amendment. Well… funny you should ask, because it was the right of ‘political speech’ that originally fueled the constitutional fire of free speech, the very right that is denied in the organized Christian Church. Seems like an oxymoron doesn’t it, since a right’ cannot be denied or it isn’t a right at all. Kind of like the second amendment where it says it cannot be infringed, but it is infringed all over the place by every government from local to federal. I really do wonder at times if any of us really have any rights at all anymore!

I am going to let you in on this dirty little secret that no one wants to talk about. And that is, that in midst of it all, the Church has sold its birthright of free speech in America for not for-profit tax free status. This sort of payola actually applies to all 501 (c) (3) nonprofits; but their tax free status comes at a high price.

Now just in case one might ask, isn’t fair to suspend the right of free speech of a large organization that might influence an election in some way. Well my friend, that just doesn’t hold water. What about large corporations for profit, they are not held to that rule! In fact they pay for the candidate’s election. You see the only real difference here is that the nonprofits receive graft or bribery in the form of not having to pay taxes. So in turn they are expected to keep quiet. As I said when one becomes a Christian one looses ones right of free speech, which is a high price to pay for a tax exemption.

That being said:
One religious group is charging the Internal Revenue Service with using a legal loophole to first, tax nonprofits' free speech, then, run away and hide with impunity when challenged in court. This is not the first time this has happened; apparently this is the modus operandi for the IRS, and like a thief in the night they extort churches, and if churches should stand up and fight, they quickly give the blood money back then RUN AND HIDE!

The nonprofit “Catholic Answers” organization got a taste of this tactic firsthand in 2008, when its president, Karl Keating, posted a discussion on the organization's website arguing that, according to church theology, Catholic Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., should not be allowed to receive communion in the Catholic Church because of his support for abortion. Obviously this is a moral and a theological position not a political one, which proves my point that the IRS politicizes everything and anything they want to. So in effect the IRS not only dictates ones personal theology or philosophy but denies ones constitutional rights in the process. This is a direct violation of not only First Amendment free speech but the freedom of religion, as well as the free exercise clauses. But of course here’s the catch…the churches have agreed to this forfeiture of rights for monetary gain. They have sold their soul for 30 pieces of silver, at todays silver price that might be quite a bit, depending on how big the pieces are.

The IRS then levied an excise tax on “Catholic Answers” for engaging in alleged illegal "political speech" against then-presidential primary candidate Kerry, which Catholic Answers paid. So in other words as long as Catholic Answers pays the tax free bribery back in the form of an extorted excise tax (tribute) then they can exercise their free speech rights. I don’t know about you, but I call that extortion plain and simple! Or, looking at it from the churches point view---it might be PAYOLA!

When challenged in court, the IRS simply refunded the extortion or tax, while refusing to change its ruling that Catholic Answers' speech was taxable in an election. Lower courts then ruled Catholic Answers had no course of action against the harassment of the IRS.

But Catholic Answers, together with the James Madison Center for Free Speech, are now asking the Supreme Court to step in, claiming this "tax-run-and- hide" strategy allows the IRS to arbitrarily and brutallly tax churches, charities and religious activists into silence, and then dodge the consequences just in case the nonprofits defend their rights and fight back.

"Not only did the federal courts in this case misapply Supreme Court law, they have encouraged the IRS to engage in trickery and extortion by penalizing nonprofits who exercise their God given right to speak, only to return the money at the last possible second just in case they sue," explained James Bopp Jr. Bopp is general counsel for the James Madison Center and co-chairman of the Election Law Subcommittee of the Federalist Society. "So long as the IRS is allowed to do this, nonprofits like “Catholic Answers” will be deterred from speaking about individuals who are political candidates in any context for ‘fear’ they'll be investigated and fined. Nothing prevents the IRS from doing this again and again. And these groups now have no judicial recourse.” Tyranny by any other name is…well… still just tyranny.

The IRS initially conducted an extensive investigation and concluded that, since nonprofits should not engage in political speech, “Catholic Answers” should be penalized for making a "political expenditure" during an election. You see even though abortion is a moral and theological Issue, IRS conveniently says it is political and therefore illegal. Hey! As I said, anything and everything can be deemed political and obviously is by the IRS.

But Catholic Answers argued its speech was not about the election of a candidate but about the theological issue of abortion within the Catholic Church. Catholic Answers, asked the federal courts to review that decision, knowing that without a change in the IRS's position on its speech, it couldn't make any kind of comments on figures like Kerry again without risking another investigation and penalty.

Catholic Answers was exonerated from any political expenditures or “participation in, or intervention in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.” So it was the opinion of the court that Catholic Answers did not violate its 501 (c) (3) status pursuant to section 4955(f)(3). 9 as the IRS charged. Yet both the California federal district court and the federal appeals court held that because Catholic Answers got its money back, the issue was resolved, and since Catholic Answers no longer had standing there was nothing more for the courts to do. Because Catholic Answers accepted the return of the fine (extortion) the court considered it an out of court settlement. Looks like the wrong ‘answer’ on the part of Catholic Answers.

A copy of the ruling and petition to the Supreme Court can be seen HERE

THE BOTTOM LINE: So if a Christian in connection with his church dares to speak anything publicly and I mean ‘anything’, he stands the chance of ending up in the town square in stocks, until he can prove himself innocent of violating the bribery agreement of the IRS nonprofit rule of silent political censure.

Seems to me that Catholic Answers should have maintained their innocence by refusing to pay the extortion and let the IRS charge them and prove them guilty. Somehow I have always been under the impression that was the way it was suppose to work in America! You know! Innocent until proven guilty… I guess not!

Besides, the right of free speech doesn’t actually belong to the IRS anyway, so they have no right to sell or buy it. It is an inalienable right, and according to the Declaration, our inalienable rights come from our Creator. Now correct me if I am wrong…but I don’t believe the IRS is our Creator, but they are the Gestapo!

And just in case that is not enough government criminal activity for you to swallow all at once, I will leave you with a parting gift. Did you know that every Muslim nonprofit organization collects money from Americans for the support of so-called Muslim Charities? Hey, guess what? There is no Charity, Love, or Benevolence in Islam. It simply does not exist in their Ideology. Charity in Islam is a code word for the support of terrorism… And it is all tax free my friend… and if that isn’t enough, Muslims milk our free speech rights for all they are worth, and no fines from the IRS… No! Denial of free speech, fines, extortion, bribery, and payola are all reserved for Christians, because they mostly just sit and take it. I say Hoooorah! To “Catholic Answers” Inc. They may not have all the answers, but they’ve got grit…

Where is your grit my friend? The next time a Muslim demands time off to say their prayers or demand a foot washing station be provided for them, are you going to show him the time clock and tell him to go buy a bucket, or are you going to bow down to the bullying of Satan’s children and act like a dhimmah slave? Whether it is the Jizya tribute to Islam, or the extortion of the IRS, Christians need stop cowering in the shadows and begin standing up for what is right… Hey! Our God is bigger than their god…

Have a nice day!

de Andréa

The DOJ Considers The Law of Sharia

2011-10-29T06:09:00.000-07:00

There is no Free Speech in Islam. In fact there is no freedom of any kind in Islam.

By de Andréa

One of the many dangerous and noxious doctrines within Islamic Sharia law is the prohibition against “blasphemy” or the “defamation” of Islam and/or the prophet Mohammed, which is an automatic death sentence under Islamic law.

Sharia is a direct affront to our Constitution and our cherished first amendment right of free speech, as it silences any critique or criticism of the tyranny of Islam in any way. This autocratic and barbaric law of Sharia is for the expressed purpose of total submission of the Infidelic Dhimmah to Islamic supremacism and/or the extermination of all who live in the free world. In spite of this fact our ignorant and deceived Department of Justice is considering its implementation.

European countries are already prosecuting people for “speech” against Islam, in effect implementing, and enabling this Sharia prohibition. ACT! for America’s” chapter leader and author Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff is one of those people sued by the United Kingdom of the Islamic State of Britanniah. The Islamic State of Canadah’s Human Rights Commission which of course supports Sharia, went after American author and actor Mark Stein for his outspoken truth about Islam. Could this eventually happen in the U.S.? Well my friend, it is already happening right here in what used to be the Constitutional Free Republic of America.

Consider the latest.

Muslim leaders, including the head of ISNA (Islamic Society of North America, a Muslim Brotherhood terrorist front organization), recently urged the Department of Justice officials to take steps to criminalize among other things, the criticism of Islam. They are calling the criticism of Islam “discrimination” and “racist,” and the DOJ is buying into it, even though only brain dead people are robotically programmed into believing that Islam is a race. I don’t think Nazism is considered a race either, although I might be wrong about that too. This brainwashing program is just to send one down a dead end road so one doesn’t think about the fact that Islam is a supremacist hateful, murdering Ideology not unlike Nazism.

Communist Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also embraces the OIC (Organization of the Islamic Conference) push for a UN resolution calling for an International global law for governments to criminalize defamation of religion. I can’t help wondering if this applies to Christianity as well --- probably not! This is serious folks! I hope you can you see why I am putting so much emphasis on combating Sharia law? They’re now trying to confiscate and destroy our first amendment rights!! Next up is our entire Constitution and then our country… and then well… they get rid of you and me!

In a DOJ hearing this past week:
Top Justice Department officials convened a meeting Wednesday where invited Islamist advocates lobbied them for cutbacks in anti-terror funding, changes in agents’ training manuals, and additional curbs on investigators and a legal declaration that U.S. citizens’ criticism of Islam constitutes “racial discrimination”. Well of course they did, our enemy wants us to stop defending ourselves and just surrender to the supremacy of Islamic tyranny, can’t they see this? This is how powerful Islamic deception is my friend, and then if one couples it with ignorance there is no chance of seeing or understanding the truth.

Holder & Perez, besides Obama himself, are two of the most criminally dangerous and treasons men in America. A little background on Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder --- the reason Obama picked Holder for Attorney General was because Holder made a career out of defending Muslim terrorists in US courts. Yeah! I know… “It’s a dirty job, but somebody’s got to do it.” The thing of it is, is that as Attorney General, Holder is still doing it!

Listen to what an American Muslim lawyer has to say:
“The DOJ’s civil rights lawyers are top of the line — I say this with utter honesty — I know they can come up with a way” to redefine criticism as discrimination,” said Sahar Aziz, a female, Egyptian-Islamic American lawyer. “I’d be willing to give a shot at it,” said Aziz, who is a fellow at the Islamic State of Michigan-based Islamic Jihad advocacy group, code named “The Institute for Social Policy & Understanding”. More like the Institute of Islmic disinformation and deception.

The audience of Islamist advocates and department officials included Tom Perez, who heads the DOJ’s division of civil rights. “We must continue to have the open honest and critical dialogue that you saw in this robust debate,” Perez responded in an enthusiastic closing speech a few minutes after Aziz made her demands at the event. “I sat here the entire time, taking notes,” Perez said. “I have some very concrete thoughts … in the aftermath of this.” I’ll bet you do Tom…

“The DOJ meeting showcased the expanding alliance between [so-called] American progressives [communists] and Islamists”, said Andrew McCarthy, a former federal prosecutor in New York. "Progressives are making these Islamist groups into the political representatives of Muslims in the United States,” he told The Daily Caller.

McCarthy investigated and prosecuted Egyptian-born Imam Omar Abdel-Rahman, dubbed “the blind sheik,” for urging Muslims to kill New Yorkers. Abdel-Rahman was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1996.

“Progressives ally with the Islamic lobby because they think it will be a political voting bloc that will be reliably Democratic,” said Robert Spencer, an author and expert on Islam. None of the Islamist advocates of civil rights officials in attendance, including Perez, objected to Aziz’s call for free-speech restrictions and adherence to Sharia. The conference did not include any influential critics, such as McCarthy and Spencer, who argue that Islamist terror attacks are motivated by Islamic texts. These texts include for example the Koran’s verse 9:5, which says, “when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them.”

Aziz, however, used her invitation to argue that Americans fear of Islamic Jihadist bombs’ has evolved into ‘racism’ towards dark-skinned men. Guess what Aziz, all dark skinned men are not Muslim Terrorists and all terrorists are not dark skinned men, at least not anymore they aren’t. The word “Muslim,” she said, “has become radicalized. … I don’t accept this formalistic cop-out that this is all about religion.” Aziz did not offer any evidence for her claim, which she said justifies the use of Title VI anti-discrimination laws against institutions and individuals who argue that Islamic texts spur Islamic violence. Truth is Aziz, the word Muslim is synonymous with the word RADICAL.

This legal redefinition, she said, “would also take [federal] money away from local police departments and fusion centers who are spying on us.” (By “us”, I guess she means terrorists) Aziz also argued against the commonplace police practice of informally talking with people in communities, including Muslim communities. “This has been a real problem with this outreach stuff,” she said. “Muslims are acting in good faith, and then they find that their imams, who were going to outreach meetings, were being spied on,” she complained. “Some have been deported. Some have been prosecuted.”

Aziz was of course referring to cases like Afghan-born New York Imam Ahmad Wais Afzali who was ordered deported In March after he admitted he lied to the FBI about warning a suspected Muslim terrorist that he was being investigated. That terrorist, Najibullah Zazi, was planning to place bombs in the New York City subway.

“People are going in good faith to talk with police”, Aziz said. “They being very honest about what their grievances are. They telling the government, ‘This what we want you to do … [and] we want you to not spy on our community.” She needs to brush up on her English grammar just a little, but then who am I to criticize. You will notice however that she is vehemently opposed to US counter terrorism departments spying on terrorist activities. Well… I can certainly understand that. What I don’t understand, is why the DOJ doesn’t understand it…

Dwight Holton, a Justice Department legal counsel based in Oregon, said the threat of criminal gangs or terror attacks justifies routine police contacts with locals. “When we go to a barber shop to talk to the community, we don’t tell them you can have a lawyer present,” he said. “You should,” Aziz immediately replied. Aziz’s outburst was supported by a second Islamist advocate, Islamic Society of North America president Mohamed Magid. He argued that “teaching people that all Muslims are a threat to the country… is against the law and the Constitution.” Oh contraire my dear terrorist enemy, it is in fact' constitutional because it is the truth, and has been proven repeatedly in a court of law, and has stood the test of time and history! I’m sure at least Holton caught that!

Magid asked Perez to change the federal government’s rules, would you believe ---governing terror investigations, for more private meetings with top justice department officials, for the reeducation (brainwashing) of FBI agents, and for more arrests of people who oppose Islam, which he labeled “religious bigotry and hate.” No Magid!…it is not bigotry and hate it’s called the truth Magid… and furthermore Magid, Islam is not a religion it is in fact, Ideological despotism. As I said before…”not unlike Nazism”

A little background on Magid
In a 2009 federal court case the United States V’s the Muslim Holyland foundation, the government named Magid’s terrorist organization an unindicted co-conspirator in the successful 2009 trial of three Muslims who smuggled $12 million tax free dollars to the Islamist terror group Hamas and is now on the FBI list of Muslim terrorist supporters. Two of the Jihadist smugglers in that trial received life sentences.

Just as a side note and FYI: the IRS still accepts all of these terrorist fund raising organizations as tax free non-profit Muslim charities. So this is just one of the many hundreds of ways the American people unknowingly support terrorism and enable the enemy of America the West and the free-world.

During his speech, Perez applauded the Islamist lobbyists for persuading government officials to end extra security checks on airline passengers from Nigeria and 12 Islamic countries. The checks which were adopted in 2010 after a Nigerian Muslim terrorist tried to blow up a passenger aircraft on Christmas Day. Yeah! We don’t need to scrutinize Muslim terrorists from Nigeria. They are just warm-fuzzy Moderate Terrorists with bombs in their shoes.

“What did we hear in the aftermath of that? We heard a lot of feedback from people in this room and from leaders across the country that we could be doing a better job [by ending these checks]… and a few months later, and thanks to you, we did just that,” Perez told the Islamic Jihadists.

McCarthy, the former prosecutor, said, “Few people recognize the expanding alliance between progressives and Islamists. Americans just don’t realize that Islamist ideology is among other things, collectivist and redistributionist, so it works seamlessly with the liberal left,” he said. “They disagree over gay rights and women’s rights, [but] on some items they’re on the same page,” McCarthy added, citing Islamist groups’ support for the administration’s health sector law as an example.

Perez repeatedly promised extensive consultations and flattered the Muslim attendees, while speaking in a style that blended the cadences of an academic lecturer and a rural preacher. “There will be times where we have honest differences of opinion, but if we don’t talk and don’t actively listen and if we don’t reflect and recalibrate where necessary, then we won’t be doing our job, and you have our continuing commitment to that end,” Perez declared. Does that mean that there will be a Federal Sharia law coming out of the DOJ that will include the death penalty for sassing a Muslim? I don’t know, but you had better watch for it.

Progressive[s] [Communists], including Holder, Holton, and Perez, choose to ignore the Islamists’ stated goals, Spencer said. “They assume — and force us’ to assume on pain of charges of ‘Islamophobia’ — that all Muslims are moderate, peaceful and have no intentions of bringing Sharia [Islamic law] here,” said Spencer. “No amount of evidence to the contrary, no amount of jihadi plots, and no number of demands for accommodation of Sharia’s provisions, ever disabuses them of this deceptive dogma.” Bravo Spencer!

When the session ended, Perez — a Maryland resident, a progressive communist, a terrorist enabler, and a former staffer to Sen. Ted Kennedy (almost as bad)— climbed the stage to embrace Imam Magid a known terrorist supporter who was born in Sudan and trained at a Saudi Wahhabist Seminary. (Wahhabism is the most extreme form of Islamic tyranny.) Does Perez know this? Well… I know it! Go figure…

THE BOTTOM LINE: My hope in publishing this article is that the reader will clearly see the Islamic satanic spell of ignorance and deception that controls our government. And if those of us, who are somehow miraculously unaffected or shielded from this deception of Islam, fail to do whatever we can to rid this country of this horrifying enemy of haltered and death, then we will soon be in the same quagmire that Europe is just now beginning to wakeup to. The thing of it is, is that Europe is just now finding itself for the second time in their history, in the same quicksand of Islam that they were in a thousand years ago. And that historical mistake resulted in 200 years of what appeared to be civil war, when actually it was Islamic Jihad! One would think that at least they’ wouldn’t make exactly the same mistake again! Yeah! One would think!

Couldn’t we also take a lesson from that ignorant mistake? I guess not…But I am going to pray and pray hard that you do my friend. Your lives and the lives of your children are depending on it…

de Andréa

“Occupy” Community Organizing

2011-10-28T11:33:00.000-07:00

Just what did Obama mean by “Community Organizing”?

By de Andréa

Too bad we didn’t know the answer to that question when he was campaigning for president. Well… some of us did, but the rest just didn’t listen, or think!

I do hope by now however, that the majority of us, at least have some idea of what Obama’s “Change” was really about. “Community Organizing for Change” should have been a red flag. But unfortunately for most, it was a green flag to go ahead and blindly jump right out of the moving train, or worse yet an air plane with no thought of a parachute.

It isn’t as if there wasn’t some need for questions, like maybe Change what? And to What? Or what are we Organizing our Community to do? Well… I guess those are just too obvious to ask. I mean we didn’t want to appear stupid or something did we?

So now’ after the fact, after we have blindly jumped into the abyss - we’re now’ stupid or something! Better late than never, I aways say.

If you are really’ interested in just what the “Change” was, that Obama has been “Organizing your Community” to do, then Watch and listen for yourself. They say a picture with words is worth, well… more than just a thousand words.

Obama’s Community Organizing : Listen and watch “Death to Capitalism” “Death to America” Occupy Wall Street or Occupy your Community, is Communist Community Organization right out of Saul Alinsky’s (pictured at right) Marxist books.

Watch them align themselves with Communists, Nazis, Islam’s Ayatollah Khomeini, and Ahmadinejad, and anyone else who hates and wants to destroy America and its freedom. This is Obama’s Community Organizing my friend; it is to bring about the Change that he so proudly campaigned for.

Whether it is Occupy Europe or the support of Occupy Wall Street in Tehran or Occupy Oakland California it is all the same Communist anti-Capitalism, anti-American and anti-God hatred. All promoted by Obama’s Marxist Community Organizing. Watch them all!

Capitalism is not what destroyed this economy my friend. It instead, was and is, purely the criminal greed for power on the part of the government, and it didn’t begin with Obama. Read a previous article of mine, a study titled “The Federal Brief” .

It is the God given liberty of Free Enterprise and Capitalism that has blessed - not only this’ country, but most of the industrialized world. It is, the GREED of the International Central Banking System not the greed of Wall Street, that drives and fuels the Federal power over education, our property, the food industry, our water, and yes - even the air we breathe --- that took this country down - and half the world with it.

A retired French economist named Fredric Bastiat once said: “In a free country the only rule of law that there can be, is a law to protect and strengthen the rights and freedoms of its citizens. Any other law is oppressive and takes away ones liberty” Our laws, nearly since the ratification of the Constitution, have been designed to surreptitiously destroy freedom and promote Federal Power!

President Bush mistakenly stated that “everybody wants to be free” and “everyone has a right to be free”. While I can agree somewhat with the latter statement, the former just typifies the ignorance of America and the West. Our so-called educational system is turning out more and more brainwashed people that are indoctrinated and programmed to be dependants. They choose to be told when and where to take the next step, to follow a set of autocratic rules no matter how oppressive and brutal they may be, rather than to make the ‘effort’ to do and think for themselves, to appreciate and fight to save the God given freedom they have or could have.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Well there you have it, Obama has Organized “Change” In your Community, I hope you enjoy it, you voted for it. Well…at least the majority of you obviously did. And in the coming election if you want more of the same, be sure to vote for your Community Organizer again and get more of the “Change” you so sadly deserve.

Remember; dependants make good slaves while independent thinkers are trouble makers! But like me, they are still ‘free trouble makers’… de Andréa

Thanks for listening…

Killing Coptic Christians Was Correct According To Sharia

2011-10-26T09:33:00.000-07:00

Correct According To Sharia? Of Course It Was… The problem here is - that Christians, Westerners, and especially the media have no clue about the history of Islam or Sharia Law which has strictly governed Islam since the 7th century. Our ignorance pays for, and supports the murder of Christians. There really is no excuse for this ignorance anymore.

By de Andréa

While I am certainly not excusing the resent mass murder of Christians in Cairo, one would think however that Coptic Christians living in Egypt since the early Christian Church of Alexandria and before the existence of Islam would know exactly what to expect, especially when they decided to renovate and/or make repairs to their church. This supports my warning that ignorance of Islam will do nothing but get one killed, yes even here in America? Where there are Muslims, Sharia applies to everyone.

Egypt is now in the hands of Allah! Thanks to the support of Obama.

But even the Israelis haven’t a clue of whom or what Islam is. If they did, they would never make a treaty with Islam. The Hadith is full of examples of Islamic State treaties indicating that the only purpose of treaties is to simply buy time until they murder the Kaffaar.

Another model of the ignorance of the Islamic ideology that should know better is the county of Lebanon which ignorantly and benevolently invited the Iranian backed terrorist group Hisbala into their Christian Democratic country and culture. Today it is a brutal and oppressive Islamic State. So the Western countries of Europe and the Americas have no exclusivity on the ignorance of their enemy. Living in close proximity to Islam obviously doesn’t guarantee any understanding of this satanic ideology.

Now that the Arab Spring has bloomed out, the Muslim brotherhood (the restored world Ottoman Empire) has taken over the countries of Egypt and Libya; the Islamic law of Sharia will be enforced.

Correct According To Sharia
In doing a little research and looking at the reproduction of the old engraving of Jerusalem's Church of the Holy Sepulcher, in Bat Ye'or's book The Dhimmi, I was looking directly at the reason for the murders of the Coptic Christians in Cairo. What is notable about the image, based on an 1856 photograph, is that the church, said to be at the site of Jesus Christ's crucifixion and burial, has no cross and no belfry. Stripped of its Christian symbols, the church stood in compliance with the Sharia law (The Dhimmah Pact) and traditions of the Turkish Ottoman Empire which ruled Jerusalem at the time. But then we are deceptively ignorant of Islamic history, ancient or modern. Today the cross has been returned to the dome.

I went back to the book to find this image for a reason. It had to do with the recent massacre of two dozen Coptic Christians In Cairo by Egyptian Muslim military and street mobs, which also left hundreds wounded. The unarmed Coptic’s were protesting the destruction of yet another church in Egypt, St. George's, which on Sept. 30 was set upon by thousands of Muslim men following Friday prayers.

Why did this occur? The trigger was, if one knows Muslim history of course, was ‘the repair work’ on the building—work that the local council and governor had approved. Does that explanation make any sense? Not to anyone ignorant of Islamic law. Unfortunately, that criterion includes virtually all media reporting the story as well as those reading the story and the dead Coptic’s who should have known what to expect. Sharia just doesn’t allow crosses and bells my friend. And when Sharia is violated, the Dhimmah (the subservient people of the book) will die.

Raymond Ibrahim, an Islam specialist, Arabic speaker, and author of The Al Qaeda Reader writes an article titled Egypt Destroying Churches, One at a Time, he catalogs the key sequence of events that turned a church renovation project into terror and flames. With repair work in progress, he writes online at Hudson New York, "It was not long before local Muslims began complaining, making various demands, including that the church be devoid of crosses and bells—even though the permit approved them—citing that 'the cross irritates Muslims and their children.” ‘The cross irritates Muslims and their children’. Why do you think that is? And yes, they really cannot stand the cross. This of course is because Islam is a satanic following, and those of Allah/Satan cannot look directly at the CROSS. Their spirit becomes violently tumultuous.

Those details drove me to re-examine the de-Christianized 19th-century image of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher—no cross, no bells. It becomes a revealing illustration of Islamic history repeating itself in this "Shariah Autumn," the deadly but natural harvest of the grotesquely branded "Arab Spring."

Given our ignorant see-no-Shariah hear-no evil media and government, we have no context in which to place or understand such events. That context is a Shariah society, advanced, (but by no means initiated) by "Arab Spring," where non-Muslim—"dhimmah"—occupy a place defined for them by Islamic law and tradition.

Dhimmah (“People of the book” meaning subservient Christians and Jews) are permitted to live in an Islamic state under the terms of surrender as laid out in the “dhimmah' pact”. Such terms, are a well-established part of Islamic law and can be found in the Quran and laid out in countless legal text books. When non-Muslim slaves violate these terms, they become subject to attack.

To place the dhimmah pact in comparable Western terms is to say the West has its Magna Carta; Islam has its Pact of the Ummah (Islamic world rule). Among other things, this seminal pact governing Muslim and non-Muslims relations stipulates, the condition that “Christians or Jews will neither erect in our areas a monastery, synagogue, church or sanctuary for a monk, nor restore any place of worship that needs restoration”.

Thus, this anti-Coptic violence, which for the moment has caught the world's attention, is islamically correct. This is the piece of the puzzle Westerners fail to grasp. For Brotherhood Muslims in Egypt today, ignorantly supported by the west, the act of repairing a church is a flagrant provocation, a breach of the peace, which amounts to a deliberate revocation of one's right to exist in the land. It violates the terms of the contract of the “Dhimmah pact”, and as such, it becomes just another legitimate and legal reason for killing the Kaffaar or Infidel.

In Islamic terms, then, the destruction of the church is no injustice. It is "even a duty to destroy the church and even the lives of Christians who have the temerity to repair their churches against Sharia showing no respect for Allah’s/Satan’s law.” That's because dhimmah who take to the streets to protest the destruction of the church "are rebels who have forfeited their rights (under the pact) to 'safety and protection. As violators of the "dhimmah pact” or contract, they become fair game. We must really understand, as far as Islam is concerned all the world is the Ummah! (The world nation of Islam) All are subjected to Sharia. The Kaffaar or the Infidel (non Muslim) has only three choices, one to convert to Islam --- two become dhimmah slaves of Islam and pay the Jizya, (a tribute tax) --- or to be killed, Period.

This is quite simple stuff, but the theology of Islam eludes us. Why? I think the answer is that to expose the facts about Shariah in the Western milieu[x] is to invite the criticism of Muslims. Such criticism is forbidden under Shariah. So, as to not make waves and keep our politically correct multi-cultural demeanor intact we remain silent—which of course is what good "dhimmah" do. And if we continue down this ignorant path of kowtowing to these Islamic sons of Satan, we will soon not have a choice but to die or exist in the servitude of hell for the rest of time.

Obama endorsed the ouster of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and has since been supportive of the Muslim Brotherhood military regime running the country, which is known to be more militant and radical than any terrorist group in the history of Islam’s use of terrorism and threats of terrorism to advance their agenda.

At this time, the Obama administration continues to pump millions of dollars into Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood terrorist regime. Why? Watch and listen to him tell you that he himself, is a Muslim sleeper Jihadist.

Trying to ‘buy’ Muslim friendship, is more important to the White House than to defend the Christian and human rights of fellow believers in Jesus Christ.

THE BOTTOM LINE: We are not only ignorant of the history and ideology of our enemy, we ignore our own articles of war and the war college manual which in its first paragraph clearly states that before ever engaging in war with an adversary…one must know who the enemy is! Otherwise one risks defeat. Guess what? Our Congress and Department of Defense, hasn’t the foggiest idea of just what makes Islam tick…tick…tick.

A few more ignorant deceptive ticks and we will be defeated…

As a Christian, I am appalled that our tax dollars are going to support our enemy and the Muslim persecution and murder of fellow Christians. Obviously, the Christian faith that President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton are so ready to fraudulently front to the American people, mean little or nothing to them. They would rather support Muslim terrorists than preserve the peaceful lives of real Christians.

But then what can one expect from a Kenyan born Muslim and the Social Communist regime of Barrack Hussein Obama…

de Andréa

Jesus Could Lose His Land

2011-10-25T11:52:00.000-07:00

Did you know that the first Amendment to the US Constitution said that we have: “Freedom ‘From’ Religion?” Well neither did I.

By de Andréa

The First Amendment reads in full:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” I’ll be ‘dog gone’ if I can find the clause “Freedom ‘From’ Religion” in there any where, nor do I find the “Separation of church and State” clause. But I will keep looking!

What it does say however is that, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech…"Etc.

Originally, the First Amendment applied only to laws enacted by the US Congress. However, starting with Gitlow v. New York, 268 and U.S. 652 (1925), the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applies the First Amendment to each state, including any local county or city governments. So according to the Supreme Courts ruling “no one” can make a law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. Mmmm this is interesting in light of the following. More proof that the Constitution has gone through the shredder.

Mountain Jesus could lose His land
A statue of Jesus on U.S. Forest Service land in the mountains over a Montana ski resort faces potential eviction even though He has been paying His rent on time and has had a lease contract for decades, this amid an argument over the “separation of church and state clause”. What separation of church and state clause was that again? (Read more on this subject.)

The Forest Service offered a glimmer of hope late last week for the statue’s supporters by withdrawing an initial decision to boot the Jesus statue from its hillside perch in the trees. But as it further analyzes the situation before making a final decision, the agency warned rules and court decisions are stacked against allowing a religious icon on the 25-by-25 foot patch of land. What rules and what court decisions would those be I wonder???

The Jesus statue has been a curiosity to skiers at the famed Big Mountain ski hill ‘for decades’, mystifying skiers at its appearance in the middle of the woods as they cruise down a popular ski run. But the atheistic “Freedom ‘From’ Religion Foundation” from hell, isn’t amused by the Jesus statue. Even though Jesus has lived here for thousands of years, they say, “He is illegally squatting on US forest service land.” This simply isn’t true He’s had a contract for better than 30 years, and He was paying rent on the little 25X25 foot plot of US land. The group argued that the Forest Service was breaching separation of church and state rules by leasing the small plot of land for the Jesus statue, and is pushing the agency to stand by its original decision to remove the religious icon. There we go again with this mysterious separation of church and state rule.

On the other hand we do have this’ rule folks, one that is obvious, one that is documented, a rule that one does not have to hunt’ for, and has stood the test of time,’ one that overrules any other rule that one might conjure up by some kind of sorcery. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech…" The so-call rule that doesn’t exist violates my rule, my friend. My rule is called the First Amendment and can easily be found in the Constitution of these United States of America. Oh oh say can you see…

THE BOTTOM LINE: What is your rule called, and where does one find it? Just you try to evict my friend Jesus from where ever He chooses to be my friend, and you are gonna wish you hadn’t. Big time!

He lets us live in 4000 square foot homes, on ten acre pieces of land and these brain-dead and spiritually dead folks want to deny Jesus a 625 square foot piece of land… When He owns the whole planet!

Think about it…

de Andréa

Terrorist Thugs From CAIR Threaten Texas Hotel Management

2011-10-21T13:02:00.000-07:00

So, you aren’t concerned about Islam or their Sharia Law in America… Well despite our free speech rights in the Free Republic of America, Sharia prevails with enforcement by Muslim terrorists as well as our own DOJ, no not the U.S. Dept. of Justice, I mean the ‘U.S. Dept. of Jihad’…

By de Andréa

Today it may just be ‘threats’ of violence for speaking out against Islamic Sharia, tomorrow, well… that’s another matter. Once Sharia is established in America, and in some State and Federal courts it already is, then speaking out against Sharia will be a ‘Death Sentence’. I know this because they have threatened me. How and why is this happening? ‘You’ are enabling it. You say well not me! Yes YOU! If you are not doing everything you possibly can right now to fight against the oppression and tyranny of Islamic Sharia, then you are enabling it my friend. You are either fighting against Islamic Sharia or you are enabling and indorsing it, there is no grey area. Read on…

The Hyatt hotel in Sugar Land, Texas, has abruptly canceled a previously scheduled tea-party event at which author and the blog Atlas Shrugs founder Pamela Geller was scheduled to speak on the dangers of Islam and the tyranny of Sharia Law.

Geller said the decision came about because “the hotel management was physically threatened by Muslim terrorist thugs from the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) into censoring her planned speech about Sharia in America.”

She accused the Hyatt Place Hotel of “enforcing Islamic law, or Shariah, under which no criticism of Islam is allowed. In Muslim nations, it is a death penalty offense”.

Geller said. "Free speech, the cornerstone of our constitutional republic, is in serious jeopardy," Geller reported today after being informed of the sudden change. "Under the Shariah, the criticism of Islam is blasphemy (punishable by death in Muslim countries). This is the death of free speech and the continuing Islamization of America."

A Hyatt employee in Sugar Land, who identified himself only as Brandon, said the abrupt change was a "business" decision. But when asked about the links between CAIR and terror, he hung up the phone.

The hotel management refused to answer: "Is Hyatt Place Houston aware that CAIR – the Council on American-Islamic Relations – is tied to Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamic terror organizations. And according to federal prosecutors and the FBI, has been judged in federal court to be a co-conspirator in funding terrorism as brought out in the federal trial of the Holyland Foundation?"

The company also refused to respond to other questions, such as "What specifically changed between the time Hyatt accepted the reservation and when Hyatt canceled the event? Were there outside comments that influenced the decision?" and "What do you mean by 'business disruption?'“

"I will never stay at a Hyatt Place hotel again. Ever," wrote Geller in her column. "Hyatt Place Houston/Sugar Land received a couple of threatening calls and they surrendered to Islamic supremacists without even firing a shot," she said. I agree, and none of you should support a Sharia enabling business either, there are plenty of real American hotels

Robert Spencer added at JihadWatch.org that Hamas-linked CAIR "and other Islamic supremacist groups are conducting an ongoing campaign to discredit and marginalize everyone who dares to stand up against the jihad of American culture and Islamic supremacism. Central to this campaign is pressure against any organization or venue that dares to host a freedom fighter – hence Hamas-linked CAIR's efforts to intimidate the FBI and the military into dropping invitations to me and other counter-Jihadists, and its pressure on universities and private groups that host events featuring pro-freedom activists.” Spencer goes on to say…"Hamas-linked CAIR and its Islamic supremacist and it enabling Leftist allies are open enemies of the freedom of speech, and they're relentless in bringing pressure on any individual, group, or venue that dares to step out of the political correct dhimmi lockstep. … Wherever they succeed in intimidating a group or venue into dropping ‘a talk’ by a freedom fighter, we have to bring just as much pressure to bear for the cause of justice and freedom, and let that group or venue know that we do not appreciate their failure to stand up for constitutional principles when challenged."

Read Geller's newest column about the DOJ, Obama’s Dept of Jihad. Below are just a few examples from Pamela Geller’s column of what our government is doing to ensure that America becomes an Islamic State just like Lebanon and every other Islmic country in the world. Who’ is leading us down this path of destruction? Well… your Muslim Commander in Chief Barack Hussein Obama that’s who! And what’s even worse, like good little dhimmah, you are blindly and ignorantly following!

Obama's Dept of Justice, the Department of Jihad filed this outrageous lawsuit against a school district in December 2010, not to ensure the kids get a good education, mind you, but more importantly, to ensure that the Muslims get special rights and extraordinary accommodations. Obama's Department of Shariah sued to ensure the kids got the shaft but the teacher got the hajj. A round trip paid vacation pilgrimage to Mecca. Does this mean that Sikhs get a paid vacation to Nankana Sahib in Pakistan? And Christians and Jews get a paid vacation to Jerusalem Israel? Probably not!

This is the same DOJ's Eric Holder who spoke at the Muslim Advocates dinner a few months back and reassured Muslims of "DOJ's anti-bias focus," in other words, Obama’s support of Islamic Sharia.

This is the same DOJ that scuttled the prosecutions against Muslim Brotherhood-tied groups, i.e. CAIR et al.

This same DOJ is creating Muslim majority legislative districts by converting a religious class into a political one. Where is the separation of Mosque and State? In Islam my friend, there isn’t one…

This is the same Sharia enforcer Eric Holder who sued a New Jersey county demanding that a correction facility change its rules to allow a female Muslim prison guard to wear a khimar, an Islamic head covering, even though it's a choke hazard, and she will be among prisoners. Well…maybe that’s a good thing!

The Department of Justice sponsored a booth at the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist front ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) convention underwritten by, among others, the Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas-linked CAIR terrorist organization.

Further, Obama's Department of Islamic Justice dropped the "charges" against the Muslim terrorists who blew up the American Navy ship the USS Cole.

All of this, at the leadership and direction of your Muslim Dictator Barack Hussein Obama. This is not only un-American, it is treasonous. But who is going to stop them --- the DOJ, the Department of ‘Jihad’? I don’t so…

This is typical of the deceptive infiltration phase of stealth Jihad. The following is a little lesson on the future of the subservience of the infidel dhimmi, or the people of the Book! As long as we are subservient, we are protected under Sharia. If we challenge Muslim domination and our subservient position of slavery to Islam then we are dead…

This kind of demanded surrender is characteristic of "Sharia enforced dhimmitude," the slavery status of non-Muslims under Islamic rule.

"Dhimmitude" or subservient slavery is the Islamic system of governing populations conquered by jihad, encompassing all of the demographic, ethnic, and religious aspects of the political system. The word 'dhimmitude' as a historical concept, was coined by Bat Ye'or in 1983 to describe the legal and social conditions of Jews and Christians subjected to Islamic rule. The word 'dhimmitude' comes from ancient word dhimmi or dhimmah, an Arabic word meaning 'protected'. Dhimmi is the name applied by the Arab-Muslim conquerors to indigenous non-Muslim populations who surrendered by a treaty (dhimmah) to Muslim domination. Well…Obviously we are already falling over each other in a race to be the first on our block to kowtow to our Muslim conquerors.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I hope that paints a picture for you of the future of America. One simply does not ‘share’ space with Islam. Muslims do not play nice with others, Muslims dominate others, it is their ideology to do so, and they will not change, ever!

I don’t know what more I can say or what I can do to get America to read the history of Islam, whether it is ancient or modern it doesn’t matter, because it’s all the same. For fourteen hundred and one years now, Islam has been conquering one country after another and in spite of their losses and temporary setbacks they have been making progress. More importantly they are getting good at it. What one must do in learning the history if Islamic Jihad, is the strategy, or the pattern, it is always the same. So if one studies just how Islam took over the Democratic Christian country of Lebanon for example one can easily see that same pattern or strategy going on today in Europe and America as well. In criminology it is called the M.O. modus operandi or method of operation. It is nearly as reliable as a finger print because it is characteristic of that particular criminal or gang of criminals, in this case it is the nation of Islam. The M.O. is found in their books of Jihad the Quran and the Hadith as well an in their history.

If a people remain Ignorant they become easily deceived, as a deceived people they unknowingly enable, and in so doing they contribute to their own destruction. This describes the process that is being used by Islam to defeat the West. They are doing it from the inside, and they will accomplish it with our help.

This is why you must become educated about this enemy, because as a whole, the officials that you elected to congress haven’t got a clue about whom and what this enemy is. Your future, your children’s future, and the future of your country depend on it.

de Andréa

The Moral Decay Of China

2011-10-19T17:43:00.000-07:00

Has the culture and soul of China deteriorated to even below the point of shameless and horrifying animalistic barbarism, with no regard whatsoever for the value of a human life? And can it happen here?

By de Andréa

Words do not adequately describe
In writing this story, and recognizing that this was real, I was at a loss for words in explaining just how I felt in watching this horrifying video footage. I really don’t believe that there are’ any words that would adequately describe my outrage as I watched in horror at what was happening right in front of me on my computer screen, and trust me I have seen first hand some of the carnage of life and death. But never before have I witnessed such indifference to the plight of another human being. I wonder how China can still claim that it is a civilized human culture.

Near a busy wholesale market in Foshan, in the Guangdong province of south east China, the driver of a van stops for just a moment --- one would think it was possibly because he presumably realized in horror that he has just hit and run over a child… But then he drives on – this time crushing her again beneath his rear wheels.

What follows, is arguably an even more appalling and horrifying scene:
Just when one would think that this couldn’t possibly get any worse, it does…A dozen or more, passersby ignore the two-year-old little girl named Yueyue as she lies in agony crushed, bleeding, and likely in excruciating pain but obviously ignored, on a busy street in southern China.

Even if this happened to someone’s dog or cat, one would try to stop traffic and attend to the injured animal. But several mindless people simply glance at her bloodied mangled little body as if it were just some kind of rodent before continuing on their way, while still others walk or wheel around her as if having more important things on their minds than a crushed and bleeding child lying helplessly in the middle of a busy street. And if that isn’t bad enough, their apparent and obvious indifference, causes the little girl to be ‘run over again, by yet an even larger truck. And ‘still, no one pays any attention.

As I said there are just no words in any language to describe this unbelievable chain of events that tragically took place in broad daylight on a public street in down town China. ‘WARNING’ this video will be shockingly graphic and emotionally disturbing, as it is the original uncut surveillance camera footage. If you wish to watch it CLICK HERE.

Searching one’s soul
The young girl's fate has understandably prompted horrified soul searching in China, as it should, since the images were aired on a local television station there. Shanghai Daily’ reported that the little girl had died of her injuries at the hospital. But other State media including the news agency Xinhua said that she remained in a deep coma. Doctor Peng an attending physician told the news reporters of the China Daily that she had been declared brain-dead on Sunday and she could die at any time. He said at best she would remain in a vegetative state and on life support. --- I hope God mercifully takes her life.

The China Daily claimed that the woman who stopped is a rubbish collector, and was even told by so-called ‘more educated’ shopkeepers to mind her own business when she tried to help the child. More educated! Is that what it takes to be so dead inside as to not care at all about the tragic pain and suffering of a 2 year old child? My God please help us in our depravity!

Some talked of a new moral low (that’s an understatement) after seeing passersby – including a woman holding a small girl by the hand – walk around two-year-old Yueyue lying there, mangled and now in a smeared pool of blood.

How could this happen and why???
Many internet users around the globe expressed fury, describing those who ignored Yueyue as less than human. "Where did the conscience of China go … What has happened to the Chinese people?" wrote one.

In China, several pointed out that it was a ‘rubbish collector’ who had ‘nothing to loose’ because they are among the poorest and often worst-educated members of society – who stopped to help, while others carried on, mindlessly. “Nothing to lose?” This certainly doesn’t excuse this display of total egocentric and uncaring behavior, but it may explain ‘at least in part’, why the Chinese people have come to such a place of selfish irresponsibility. Some people who responded to the story said that people should ask themselves how willing they would have been to help, before criticizing.

Many say they are too scared, blaming ‘extortion’ attempts by people who have accused “Good Samaritans” of causing their injuries – and judges who have backed such claims.
One said that while the footage was heartbreaking, he would have been "numb" to Yueyue as well. "Would you be willing to throw your entire family's savings into the endless whirlpool of accident compensation? Aren't you afraid of being put into jail as the perpetrator? Have you ever considered that your whole family could lose happiness only because you wanted to be a great soul?” It doesn’t take a great soul, my sorely heartless friend. All it takes, is just the smallest little bit of natural humanity, something that is obviously in short supply in China these days.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The obvious display of widespread reluctance to help someone helplessly in need, and the obvious total disregard for human life and suffering has already led to an anguished public debate in the country. While this fear of reprisal might seem to explain the reason for the indifference of a society to avoid the common act of human empathy, it instead reeks of a total lack of natural human ‘apathy’ and an even the smallest hint of any value of human life. It clearly shows a society gone into the spiritual garbage dump.

Just what has happened in Chinese culture that could cause a society to be so callously indifferent to the agony and helplessness of an innocent child? What could this horrifying incident mean to a people, to be so low on ones list of priorities? Just how does one explain this bazaar and grotesque behavior?

What can we learn from this tragic event?
The core of China’s culture has obviously become a godless self-centered society without the presence of any moral character or values whatsoever. The burning question is: Can this eventually happen in our own so-called Judeo-Christian Western society? My friend, this can --- and will happen, in any society where God is systematically driven out and ignored.

Ops! Has that maybe struck a cord of reality? It should, because if one were even slightly aware of the deteriorating moral values in America, in our schools, in our government, and in our own homes, we would recognize that the spiritual decay of our own country is not far behind that of China. Don’t you have a moral responsibility to protect the fundamental Judeo-Christian values that America was founded on? Or are you going to just stand by and watch your own country slowly disintegrate into the same appalling spiritual garbage dump as China?

Have we possibly taken the philosophy of separation of Church and State a little too far? We may have made it the separation of God and Country. That’s obviously what China has done, and as Paul Harvey used to say, “Now, you know…the rest of the story.”

Think about that the next time you ignore that God shaped void in your own life.

"What does it profit a man if he acquires the wealth and happiness of the whole world for just a few short years, and in the process looses his own soul for eternity?" … Jesus in Jerusalem, foretelling events of the future. Sometime after November 14, 33. No… that’s “33” not 1933.

I’d say: He’s got that question right on target! Now...what is your' answer…?

de Andréa

What Cha’ Ya Gonna Do When They Come For You?

2011-10-18T12:49:00.000-07:00

THE UNITED NATIONS IS COMING FOR YOU AND YOUR GUNS!

We Should Defund the UN Now!

By de Andréa

They are a’comin folks, just as I have been warning you for the past seven years. This first big step in laying the foundation for total control of the American populous is close to being achieved. While you have been asleep, or basking in the sun of freedom sipping your mint juleps by your pool, the Communist elite America haters of the west and your Muslim president Barrack Hussein Obammah have been busy, and are on the final approach to a three point landing right on you Constitutional rights.

The Second Amendment to our United States Constitution is under international attack...and Muslim Barack Obama and Communist Hillary Clinton fully support this abolition of our freedoms!

The United States Presidential Administration has fully ‘endorsed’ a United Nations Small Arms Treaty that threatens the rights of American citizens to own firearms: It will at first, enact tougher licensing requirements, which means more red tape for law-abiding Americans. Then it would allow the government to confiscate and destroy all "unauthorized" civilian firearms. And trust me they will ‘all’ be unauthorized.

It would ban the trade, sale, and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons. It would create an international gun registry, giving Obama and his administration the ability to end private ownership completely.

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John R. Bolton who has had plenty of experience in dealing with this very issue, says the United Nations "is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control and ultimate confiscation."

Larry Bell of Forbes magazine says: “this treaty targets our Constitutional right for law-abiding citizens to own and bear arms."

And Bolton warns, "After the treaty is approved and it comes into force, you will find out that it ‘requires the Congress’ to adopt a measure that restricts ownership of firearms altogether."

The Treaty would be administered by a United Nations agency called the "Implementation Support Unit.” Every country would be required to submit a report to the ISU outlining "all activities undertaken in order to accomplish the implementation of this Treaty, including... domestic laws, regulations, and administrative measures."

My gun - or your gun - or any patriotic American's gun, or any thing else for that matter in this free Nation of America- should NEVER be subjected to international law. PERIOD! We are a sovereign Nation! We are a sovereign people, we are a free people!

Barack Obama is no friend of the Second Amendment or American freedom. He is the most anti-American anti-gun anti-freedom President the United States has ever had.

As a state senator, Obama worked aggressively to expand gun control and gun ban laws in Illinois. As President, he appointed the anti-gun czar Andrew Traver as head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, & ‘Firearms’, as well as the anti-American stooge Eric Holder as head of The Department of Justice. And then he used those agencies to push the illegal gun sales to international criminal terrorists - in order to present "fabricated evidence" that the Second Amendment should be restricted or abolished. And this is your Mafia president… He certainly isn’t mine!

Since he got caught in the middle of that mess, he is now planning to use the United Nations to overthrow America’s freedom - and we must stop him from going around our Constitution and our Congress and ending our Second Amendment rights, and our freedom altogether.

Bolton said, "The Obama administration knows it cannot obtain this kind of congressional legislation purely in a domestic context...They will use an international agreement as an excuse to get domestically what they couldn't do otherwise."

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution reads in part: "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." This, my friend is a gross infringement. And that right is under threat by the United Nations, Barack Obama’s Muslim regime, and Hillary Clinton’s Communist State Department.

The United Nations claims this Treaty is intended to stop terrorist groups, and insurgents. Oh yeah, all in the name of safety. But ‘they’ are the terrorist and insurgent group that we will now be unable to stop once this is implemented. And WHO will decide what constitutes a terrorist group? Is it someone who is a member of the Tea Party, the NRA perhaps, or just the Republican Party? Conservatives have already been identified as terrorists by Obama’s Home land security goon Janet Napolitano.

Like Hitler, Obama is not going to stop his gun ban crusade, so that means those of us who respect and admire the U.S. Constitution as a protector of our rights and freedoms, must keep up our crusade to protect our rights and our sovereignty.

When Obama took his oath of office, he ‘swore’ to defend the U.S. Constitution, but he has butchered it every day that he has been in office, using EXECUTIVE ORDERS, PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATIONS, APPOINTED CZARS and whatever else he can find at his disposal to thumb his nose at the American people and do whatever he wants! In other words…HE LIED.

Little by little, Obama is chipping away at our rights and freedoms, and we have to be very vocal with our representatives and make sure they uphold the U.S. Constitution that Obama has such disdain for.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Our individual, AMERICAN RIGHT to keep and bear arms must not be allowed to be under the jurisdiction of any international agency or organization.

Send an e-mail to your Congressional representative, or if you want to blast your political horn at every senator in Washington then send a fax HERE!

Your freedom and the freedom of your children depend on your ability to defend it. The architects and framers of our constitution knew that’ all too well. That is the purpose for the Second Amendment my friend. Don’t take my word for it, read it for yourself. It says “…being necessary for the security of a free State.”

Click Here: To read about how close we are to losing our freedom and the ability to defend ourselves by way of our own completely useless Supreme Court! Michael Obama hints at the demise of the America we have come to know and love if her husband Barack is reelected.

"But you must remember, my fellow-citizens, that eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty, and that you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing. It behooves you, therefore, to be watchful in your States as well as in the Federal Government.”

-- Andrew Jackson, Farewell Address, March 4, 1837

I concur …

de Andréa

Obama and Google

2011-10-15T08:44:00.000-07:00

Obama and Google are on the same team to stonewall evidence of terrorist groups within the United States. Sound bazaar? That’s because it is. Read on…

By de Andréa

A Book advertisement submitted to Google for the New York Times best-seller "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America" was rejected by the Internet giant as inadmissible material comparable to Nazi memorabilia and Ku Klux Klan collectibles. Watch a video about the book.

The ad, featuring the title "Muslim Mafia," was first rejected by Google's automated system, which flagged key words. A Google representative then resubmitted the ad to the computerized system, and it was again rejected.

A source familiar with Google's automated ad process said it's common for the system to flag an ad because of certain key words and then, upon further review of the context, approve it. "This is how the system is supposed to work," the source said.

Google's first human response regarding the appeal to the rejection was an email reply that classified the ad as “Unacceptable ‘Anti-Content."

The message explained, "One or more of your ads or keywords have been disapproved," said the response: 'Anti' and Unacceptable Violence, Anti- Content: "At this time, Google policy does not permit the advertisement of websites that contain content such as Nazi memorabilia or KKK collectibles or Anti- Content. As noted in our advertising terms and conditions, we reserve the right to exercise editorial discretion when it comes to the advertising we accept on our site. Your ad has been rejected at this time”.

The Google message warned that "repeated violations of our policies might result in your AdWords account getting permanently suspended.” Because of public pressure and the threat of other advertisers pulling their ads, Google has now reluctantly accepted the ad. The criteria of “Anti-Content” I find interesting, especially in light of all the resent attacks on our First Amendment free speech. Does Google just arbitrarily reject anything that is contrary to…well…anything?

The ad originally submitted by “WorldNetDaily Books” for the book "Muslim Mafia" consisted of an image of the book's cover and a page that offers a free copy of the book for a contribution to a legal defense fund. The fund is ironically, for the defense of the book's co-author, P. David Gaubatz, and his son, Chris Gaubatz, in a lawsuit brought against them by the primary subjects of the book, the Council on Amerian-Islamic Relations, (CAIR) whose members I have tangled with a few times. They didn’t sue me they just graphically threatened my life.

The book "Muslim Mafia" presents original material obtained in a six-month undercover operation that documents CAIR's relationship with the international Muslim Brotherhood, the parent organization of all major Islamic terrorist groups such as al-Qaida, Hamas Hisbala, and the Taliban just to name a few. This brings up a question begging to be asked: If this former federal agent and his son, now civilians, could do this without any support from federal security agencies, why then couldn’t at least one of the many federal counter terrorist agencies do the same thing, and stop all the terrorist activities in the U.S.. Answer…Because that just isn’t the agenda of these agencies anymore, in fact, all terrorist organizations in the U.S. are supported by the IRS as tax free institutions. Every one of the so-called police and security agencies in the Federal Government has been infiltrated by a stealth Jihadist Islamic terrorist group, including our own military, and we have already seen several of the consequences of that. We are in the phase of Islamic Jihad that precedes the ‘final phase’, and the final phase is – “the terrorist militant phase” complete and total war. This same strategy of multiple-phase Islamic Jihad has been successfully used in every Islamic State that exists in the world today. Read your history my friend.

Just as a side note: The international Muslim Brotherhood is the revived Ottoman Muslim Empire that was dismantled in 1924. The Muslim Brotherhood was formed in Egypt just 4 years later in 1928 by the people left over from the previous Empire, they’re not going ‘away’ folks! This is the same Brotherhood of Muslim terrorists that Obama has spent millions of your tax dollars supporting in Egypt and Libya, and that are now taking over the entire Middle East in what is called the Arab spring. This same Muslim Brotherhood is also taking over Western Europe and the United States. And what is even more insulting, is that we --- because of our ignorance are deceived into enabling Islam in carrying out our own destruction.

When the book was released in 2009, members of Congress held a news conference urging that its revelations about CAIR's influence on Capitol Hill, the FBI, Homeland security, the NSA and its threat to national security of this nation be investigated. This investigation was abandoned because of lack of support. (Likely orders from the ‘not quite so round’ Office)

CAIR was named by the U.S. Justice Department as an unindicted co-conspirator in a major terrorist-financing scheme “The Holy land Foundation. During the trial, FBI agents presented evidence that CAIR was established as a front for the terrorist group of Hamas. They remain unindicted because of the lack of funds to peruse an indictment, or so they say.

The CAIR legal attack on the author is far from over. The book's revelations have led to formal congressional demands for three different federal investigations of CAIR, which have all fizzled. Read Peter Kings Demand letter to Eric Holder for reasons not to indict the Muslim terrorists on the coconspirator list. That was back in April, Holder still hasn’t responded. And he won’t, on orders from…well you know where.

So what is the connection to Obama? This information has been known by Obama’s DOJ for at least as long as Obama has been president and he has buried it, buried it deep in the bureaucratic round file.

Google is a staunch supporter of Obama. In other words Google and Obama are on the same team, same side, and the same page, how ever you would like to describe it. Perhaps one should describe it like this: Obama and ‘CAIR’ are on the same team, the same side, and the same page. Well…

Obama is a self described Muslim, which is to say that he follows the Muslim Ideology of world domination taught in the Quran. This incidentally, is the same ideology that drives his fellow terrorist groups like CAIR. Obama refuses to prosecute CAIR for reasons that should be obvious, but Republican presidential candidate Cain says if elected “I’ will prosecute CAIR”. Well of course he will, he’s not a Muslim terrorist.

The interesting part of all this is, I don’t believe that Google subscribes to the teachings of Islam. So this is a prime example of the philosophical truth that I have been trying to get across for the past four years. The Ignorance of Google leading to Google’s deception, the deception of Google leading to Google’s enabling and Google’s enabling leading to…and contributing to the destruction of American society and culture.

I should be able to leave it there, but I believe a more detailed explanation is called for.

What this Father/Son team did in risking their lives and going undercover and recovering terrorist documents and writing the book titled “The Muslim Mafia” was to create public documented proof that CAIR is tied to the Muslim Brotherhood. In addition, it proved that CAR is a supporter of terrorist groups within the United States, which have the expressed agenda of overthrowing the government and Judicial System of the United States of America. And then that same unindicted coconspirator and treasonous organization, instead of being brought up on charges of aiding an abetting the enemy of the United States by Obama’s DOJ --- then sues the very people who are presenting the overwhelming evidence against them. This is tantamount to committing a crime and then suing the witness and evidence against you. The suit should not only be thrown out of court but the evidence presented should indict the criminal[s].

THE BOTTOM LINE: Is this a conspiracy to cover up and stonewall evidence, anyone, anyone??? But this my friend, is what happens when your president is the enemy of the State, and is blatantly supporting the same agenda as our enemy. The poor ignorant slobs at Google are just caught up in the disease of political deception that inflicts the majority of Americans.

Obama and his fellow organized crime syndicate should be indicted for treason for refusing to indict all the known terrorist and terrorist support organizations in the United States. But we all know that isn’t going to happen any time soon. I guess there is still honor among thieves as they say. Besides, I don’t think treason is’ against the law anymore.

Come to think of it, nothing Obama does seems to be against the law anymore. Do you think that’s because the constitution has been lost somewhere in the shuffle? Maybe it was ‘accidentally on purpose’, filed in close proximity to the paper shredder.

Do you think we should dredge it back up and send a copy to our representatives and the DOJ? You know…just so they know - that we know!

Remember, if this destruction of America is allowed to continue because you just don’t seem to have the time…most everything that you do, that you think is important to you… will instead- have been done in vain.

Here is Eric Holder’s address at the DOJ, that is, if you feel so inclined to do what ever you can to save that part of you, that the back pockets of your jeans so conveniently cover-up…

The Honorable Eric H. Holder, Jr.Attorney GeneralU.S. Department of Justice950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington D.C. 20530-0001

de Andréa

The Nation of Islam Says...

2011-10-13T10:20:00.000-07:00

The only good Christian is a dead Christian.
The dissection of Ignorance:

By de Andréa

Since Islam is the religion of DEATH, and not PEACE! Then all Kaffaar must die or be subdued into slavery. That is the law…

This from Chuck Colson’s Breakpoint:
“Yousef Nadarkhani is the pastor of a 400-member church in Iran’s Gilan province. As you might suspect, it’s not easy being a Christian in Iran even in the best of times. And for our Iranian brother, these are far from the best of times.

Nadarkhani’s tribulations started when he complained to local officials about his son being forced to read from the Koran. It’s difficult to imagine the courage required to do that, and Iranian officials quickly set about to make him pay the price.”

From another point of view:
First of all Nadarkhani’s tribulations didn’t as Chuck Colson said: “start when he complained to local officials about his son being forced to read from the Koran”. It started fourteen hundred and one years ago when Muhammad wrote down what the lying angel Satan told him to write.

While I personally do feel very afraid and sad for this Iranian pastor’s life and the life of his family as well as anger that these sons of Satan in the Islamic Iranian government are persecuting him for is faith in Jesus Christ --- my outrage however is toward a deeper and just as eminent a danger. It is toward the ‘apostasy’ of the West in its hypocrisy of promoting and enabling Islam in their own counties including America.

Just what do the people of Christendom expect from a people who worship the angel of DEATH? They kill people! That’s just what they do… Come on read the Quran, read the Hadith, it really won’t hurt you, it is just paper and ink. But alas we Christians become ignorantly indignant when Muslims do what Muslims do.

Yes we Christians for some unexplainable reason expect Muslims to be more like us, benevolent and kind and to show the love of Jesus to those around them. Well guess what my poor deceived friend they just aren’t going to do that. This is not the “Religion of Peace” that you have been robotically brainwashed to accept. To expect anything more out of Islam than hate, murder, and supremacy is just pure ignorance and deception.

This is not just my opinion my friend, God told us Himself to expect persecution for “My Sake”. Who do you think this persecution was going to come from, the Mormons? And if you are outraged at Iran or outraged at me for telling the truth that you may not want to hear, well… its irrelevant, because as Christians we are going to be persecuted and not just in some faraway land like Iran or Kenya, no! Right here in America so you had better either get use to it and quickly, or do something about it right here, and right now.

The sad part is not that we are going to be persecuted, no the sad part is, that we have no one to blame but ourselves. I am going to say it once again; and I will write it slowly because I know many of you can’t read fast, okay are you ready --- “Ignorance breeds deception, deception breeds enablement, and enablement breeds destruction”.

Chuck Colson goes on to say: “Yousef Nadarkhani was arrested in June of 2009 and ordered to renounce his faith. When he refused, his wife, Fatemeh, was also arrested as a way to increase the pressure. While she was released four months later, Iranian officials weren’t done with Nadarkhani. He was then charged with apostasy: In this case, converting from Islam to Christianity. Technically, apostasy isn’t a crime under Iranian law – his “prosecution,” if you want to call it that was based on the writings of men like Ayatollah Khomeini”.

This is where Colson is ignorantly wrong, dead wrong if you will; the Islamic law of apostasy is based - not on the writings of Khomeini - but the writings of Satan. It is in the Quran, it is at the very foundation of Islam. It is… Sharia Law my friend, it governs all of Islam and everything they do, and if we continue in our ignorance to enable it, it will oppressively govern us as well. Colson continues, “In their view, it doesn’t matter that Nadarkhani never was a practicing Muslim. All that matters is that his ancestors were”.

This too is problematic; the ancestors of Iran were Persians, not Arabs, and certainly not Muslims. Muslims didn’t exist until AD 610 and then only in Mecca. Persians were either pagans, Christians or Jews. Colson said it was right out of Alice and wonderland. I have news for you Mr. Colson it is straight out of the Quran, it ‘is’ their law. It is as Colson said: …”it doesn’t matter that Nadarkhani never was a practicing Muslim”. But it has nothing to do with who or what his ancestors were, because it only matters what Sharia says. And Sharia says that everyone will be Muslim no matter what, or be slaves, or be dead, period.

Colson again continues: “Nonetheless, Nadarkhani was sentenced to death for his refusal to “repent. The sentence has prompted outrage around the world: Amnesty International called it a “clear violation of international law.” Well first Mr. Colson, Christianity teaches that if one doesn’t repent one will suffer death eternally, but of course unlike Muslims Christians don’t carry out the sentence. And then, I wouldn’t give much credence to what Amnesty International says; and secondly, it is foolish to even bring up international law or any other kind of law for that matter. As I said the only law there is in Islam is Sharia.

Colson continuing, said; “The White House denounced what it called Iran’s “utter disregard” for religious freedom. It said that Nadarkhani “has done nothing more than maintain his devout faith, which is a universal right for all people,” and called on Tehran to release him. I’m grateful for the White House’s statement. I am also thankful for the efforts of groups like the American Center for Law and Justice who are working to bring attention to Nadarkhani’s plight.” Universal rights or not! When are we going to get it? There are no rights in Islam, only Sharia. And this is Islam…

First, the White House isn’t an “it”. It is… ‘Obama’ and I guess if Obama “called on Tehran to release him” Tehran certainly will! Yeah Right! One might ask; why would Obama, a Muslim, go against his own people? Because it is politically the right thing to do, could you imagine if Obama had said; just kill the Kaffaar and be done with it? That would burn his reelection for sure, and he could no longer continue on his programmed quest to destroy America and make it an Islamic socially dependant State.

And lastly, as Mr. Colson said, “I am thankful for the efforts of groups like the American Center for Law and Justice who are working to bring attention to Nadarkhani’s plight”. I am thankful as well for bringing pressure and attention to, hoping, and praying for the lives of these people and it is certainly more benevolent than dropping an atomic bomb on Tehran. But it is still pie in the sky, as the saying goes, to expect Iran to exchange their Sharia Law for our Bill of rights --- especially while we are in the process of dumping our Bill of rights for their ‘Sharia Law’.

THE BOTTOM LINE: When one invites the devil into one’s house, then one can’t really expect anything but the devils rules. And when the satanic law of Sharia is enforced, whether in a far away land or in your own town or city, you might want to become informed of just who and what this enemy is. And fight against it ‘now’ while it is still weak. Islam will not give up – ‘ever’… if ‘you do’, they win! And you will have sinfully enabled the very persecution you find so intolerable.

I want you to know I have the greatest respect for Chuck Colson. He has come a long way since the Nixon years. So why did I pick apart Mr. Chuck Colson’s article? First, because I can, and second, because there is always another side to the story, and I seem to stand in a different place than most. And then, I have the unique God given ability to see through what is be presented, and see the deeper issue that is beginning to take shape just down the road. And while it is important to pray and do what we can for those in faraway lands it can sometimes take ones focus off of what is right in front ones nose. What is going on in Iran my friend is what we will be subjected to right here in our own land. And then who will be left to pray for us?

Pray… but act, and act now!
de Andréa

de Andréa’s In Love

2011-10-12T13:56:00.000-07:00

That’s right, after all these years I have finally found the girl of my dreams. She is likely the girl of everyone’s dreams. Come on! Come dream with me…

By de Andréa

Once in a millennium God shares someone with us that is truly angelic and magical. She’s blond and not only beautiful, but intelligent and articulate as well. She sings like an angel, her name is Jack…and Jack… is now --- 11 years old.

I received her first album “Dream With Me” in the mail yesterday, and if a blue ray can ever be worn out, this one is already well on its way. And as I watched and listened, the tears would come streaming down my old worn out face.

Just three years ago when Jackie was still 8 years young, Jackie Evancho’s parents took her to see the Operetta (the movie) “The Phantom of The Opera”. The following day her mother heard her daughter Jackie singing “All I Ask Of You” and other songs from the movie. Her mothers face literally fell open as she listened to her daughter sing for the very first time. No! I mean her parents literally did not know that their 8 year old daughter could sing…

She was asked; “what happens to you, when you are singing on stage”. She replied; “I become someone else”.

If you study her face when she’s singing, you can see the transformation that takes place, she is truly magical, and she really does become someone else. She is so focused on the experience and expressing the drama of her song… and then… when she is finished, with a great big smile on her face, she becomes a little 11 year old girl once again. If you listen very carefully, only when she sings, you might even detect a slight European accent.

David Foster said of her; she has the voice and the mind of an adult, in the body of a child.

Well… I not going to continue gushing on about my new found love, so in case you have been living under a rock for the past three years and haven’t heard this magical little girl sing, I will share her with you.

Meet Jackie and her producer Davit Foster
Jackie’s debut on “America’s Got Talent”.
PBS Great performances Jackie sings Puccini’s Nessun Dorma.
An interview on the talk! She sings Nella Fantasia.
Jackie sings Somewhere with Barbra Streisand from her album.
Jackie sings Oh Holy Night at the National Christmas tree lighting in Washington D.C.
And finally Jackie sings The Lords Prayer on tour in Dallas Texas.

If you want to hear more of Jackie you can get her latest album at her web site HERE

I truly hope you have enjoyed this marvelous little girl as much as I have.

And yes…I am obviously a big fan!

de Andréa

Obama Sorry For Accidentally Killing A Fellow Muslim Jihadist

2011-10-11T15:03:00.000-07:00

Our Muslim president orders the State Department to apologize to the family of murdered citizen terrorist.

By de Andréa

Obama’s State Department (run by Hillary Clinton) has contacted the family of al-Qaeda propagandist and Jihadist recruiter Samir Khan to “express the condolences” of the president to the family. Samir Khan, the right hand man to U.S. citizen terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki, was accidentally killed along with his jihadist comrade in an air strike in Yemen that took place on September 30.

A Khan family spokesman even went so far as to say he felt the State Department was not only apologetic for killing Khan, but for not giving its condolences sooner.

By way of background, Khan (pictured) along with al-Awlaki was an American citizen; Khan maintained an anti-American web site while he lived in Charlotte, North Carolina. Two years ago, he left for Yemen to help produce Inspire, an English language blog. In an early introductory essay, Khan described himself as “proud to be a traitor to America.” He was also the author of Make a Bomb in the Kitchen of Your Mom. A Muslim bomb maker is what I affectionately call a “Muslim Cook”, the Rachel Ray of Islam.

In case you are wondering if I am condemning Obama’s apology, or the murdering of a U. S. citizen, well, it’s both. Read Obama Assassinated American Citizen. Even though the killing of Samir Khan was collateral damage or a wind fall depending how one sees it, why apologize for a deliberate act. I mean if it was justified to murder one American citizen known to be a terrorist then why apologize for accidentally killing another.

This man Samir Khan was also a self identified enemy of America, if his assassination is justified it should be celebrated, not apologized for. But then this is just typical of Obama, to apologize for any and everything America does or has done.

This like the Bin Laden assassination was not a military operation but a covert CIA mission which should have been classified. But Obama can’t resist the possibility of looking like a hero in the so-called “War on Terror”. I have to admit he needs the kudos, but it leads to unnecessary scrutiny in time of war and national security.

But it doesn’t explain the apology, unless it is just because Obama himself is a Muslim and the killing of Samir Khan was unintended. While he wanted to take credit for the assassination of Anwar al-Awlaki for his own political purposes he is sorry for the accidental death of Khan, which screams out to me that the motive was political and not because al-Awlaki and Khan were treasoness enemies of America in time of war.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I just wanted to point this out because it is just another of the many indications that Obama himself is in my opinion, a “Sleeper Muslim Jihadist”. And is willing to sacrifice the life of a fellow Islamic Jihadist for political posturing, it’s kind of like playing the game of Chess, in that one might sacrifice ones own soldier[s] for personal gain. .

Whether one considers the strategic assassination of a U.S. citizen without a trial as murder or not, I just can’t justify a president apologizing for a deliberate act of National Defense.

If in fact, that is what it was…

de Andréa

Ann…

2011-10-10T14:53:00.000-07:00

Is Ann Barnhardt Americana’s Modern Day Joan of Arc?

By de Andréa

This little fireball may just be what America needs to survive. If her words and her fearless demeanor doesn’t shame and shake America's senses especially those useless people we call our leaders in Washington, then there really may be no hope for the survival of the Western world.

I am not going to write a lengthy article about just who and what an Ann Barnhardt is… because I couldn’t do her the intellectual and spiritual wit and justice she so richly deserves.

I will however let you see, hear, and listen to her for yourselves. This lady says in just a few minutes what I have been trying so desperately to say for at least the last 5 years. But she says it better. She may truly be the most informed person about Islam that I know, and the effect is has, and will have, on the West and the rest of the World. But her knowledge and understanding doesn’t stop there.

She tells the truth in a no holds barred way that should shame all of us. Be aware she is somewhat of a potty mouth but it is used in an honest and powerful way to drive the truth right between your blind deceived eyes. She’s real, she’s honest, she’s truthful, powerful, and she fearlessly doesn’t pull any punches. She, by her own admission isn’t nice.

The following are links to videos and audios, watch, listen, and learn my friend.

Audio interview #1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbiXPg_dAis&feature=player_embedded
#2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdUoppyhTME&feature=related
#3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msg22bgb6Uk&feature=related

Videos
#1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qeyrp-V3Jvc&feature=player_embedded
#2http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_LCLDjPNpf4

#3 Nice (politically correct) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2ugh_DuYMM&feature=player_embedded#!
I Hope you enjoyed hearing from a real American who sees right through the deception, recognizes that we are in a fight for our survival on an even grander scale than we were in the 1940’s against the imperialism of Japan and Nazi Germany. Then we knew it, we understood it. Today we won’t see the train that hits us, because we have taken our eyes off God. As a result we can't see the truth; all we see is the deception.

Ann Barnhardt just may be an angel sent from God…Pray that He send more angels like Ann…To WAKE UP AMERICA!

de Andréa

The Real Big Brother Is Here

2011-10-07T15:24:00.000-07:00

Do you know who is watching and listening to you right now? Is it "Big Brother"? Is it President Barack Obama? NO! ---it's the Federal Reserve Bank! That's right, Ben Bernanke and the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States. This is absolutely ludicrous. And--- It’s ILLEGAL!

By de Andréa

Now "Big Brother" Bernanke, who is really just a representative of “Big Brother”, wants to snoop on everything that mentions the Fed! Yes, the Fed is at it again. Their desire is to CONTROL every facet of your life!

What's more---technically, the Federal Reserve has no Constitutional authority, or even Congressional authority, especially to tell another private entity what they can and cannot do!

Has the government reported on YOU today? The Federal Reserve now wants to "monitor" you in a stealth manner!

FUNDING SHOULD BE CUT OFF for all government and private agencies that listen in on private conversations without your knowledge. It is against our United States Constitution!

Fed Chairman Bernanke wants to eavesdrop on YOU!
In the Federal Reserve proposal, they are asking for contractors to “continuously monitor "conversations" as well as "reach out" to key "influencers."

What business is it of the Federal Reserve about what you are saying or doing on various social media platforms? Your opinions and reactions as it relates to the Federal Reserve is NONE of their business my friend! Again, the "Fed" is a private corporation! It would be like your neighbor somehow listening in on your thoughts, actions, and conversations. If that happened, someone he would go to jail! But who is powerful enough to stand up to the Federal Reserve? After all, they control MULTI-TRILLIONS of our dollars. Yet, they have never been audited, or taxed for that matter!

There is only one organization that is powerful enough to stand up to Ben Bernanke’s FED: and that is the United States Congress. And that is precisely why you must contact your Member of Congress to let them know how you feel about your privacy invasion!

The "Request for Proposal" posted by the Federal Reserve says it all in black and white: "Social media platforms are changing the way organizations are communicating to the public. Conversations are happening all the time and everywhere. There is a need for the Communications Group to be timely and productively aware of the reactions and opinions expressed by the general public as it relates to the Federal Reserve and its actions on a variety of subjects." The Federal Reserve document goes on to talk about them wanting the ability to "monitor billions of conversations and generate text analytics based on predefined criteria. They can also determine the sentiment of a speaker or writer with respect to some topic or document."

"The solution must be able to gather data from the primary social media platforms - Facebook, Twitter, and Blogs, Forums and YouTube. It should also be able to aggregate data from various media outlets such as: CNN, WSJ, Factiva etc."

Do you really think it was just a "coincidence" that several Republican presidential candidates very recently deliberated about expanding restrictions and limits on the Federal Reserve? Think again my friend!

Americans want to know that Congressmen are doing their job by having oversight of the Federal Reserve! Help Congress to hold Ben Bernanke's "feet to the fire" to oversee that they do not do anything more that is illegal or unconstitutional than they already are!

This is outrageous. We need to urge Congress to reign in the over-reach of the all-powerful Federal Reserve that controls our economy. This has a direct effect on you, personally!

Maybe if the Federal Reserve would do less private counter-espionage on American citizens---and concentrated on helping to jump-start the economy, (they won’t do that until it is in their best interest), your life would be much better! Even Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) says that Bernanke must do more to help the economy!

Ever since the "Fed" was created in 1913, it has come under close scrutiny and attack by Americans. But, apparently, "close scrutiny" did not happen if such an enormous organization can announce that they will SPY on every American. This is blatantly ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Your privacy rights will be unashamedly violated!

I am not a big fan of Ron Paul but he has dedicated his political career to opposing the Federal Reserve. He urges: "Throughout its nearly 100-year history, the Federal Reserve has presided over the near-complete destruction of the United States dollar. Since 1913 the dollar has lost over 95 percent of its purchasing power, aided and abetted by the Federal Reserve's illegal profit policy."

But our fight this moment is not only about the economy, it is about your basic privacy rights as a citizen of the United States of America. You will be violated. You will be spied upon. You will be listened to. And we've got to stop this eavesdropping RIGHT NOW!

Please write, call, or e-mail your congressional representative NOW!

For a more in depth study and history of the constitutional illegalities of the Federal Reserve and its criminal activities, and who and what the FED is, and who really owns it… CLICK HEAR.

de Andréa

The Federal Brief

2011-10-07T14:27:00.000-07:00

The Fraud and the Cover-up of the Federal Reserve
This didn’t just happen today, or even yesterday. This is old and forgotten news. But it is why we are in the financial and economic mess we are today, and may never recover from. The cycle of criminal fraud, except for ‘one’ American President just continues unchallenged and unabated, and it cost ‘him his life’...

A study done by de Andréa
Of Bottom Line Publishing
Published October 7, 2011

The interesting thing about this is that it is all part of a carefully orchestrated plan. The original idea however was discovered quite by accident even before America was a free Nation. Then the resulting fraudulent banking system was later foisted on the U.S. government before the ink on the constitution was barely dry. Moreover the only president to try to stop this organized crime syndicate known as “The FED” was assassinated 5 months later. Coincidence? Well…You decide…

Pretty strong words? Well read on my friend…

Before we begin I would like you to keep one thing in mind. Basic Economics, which is the only kind of economics I understand, demands a -stability created by a balance between GNP- gross national product, and the money supply. In other words, if there is more money chasing too few goods, we have inflation or the devaluation of our money. Everything will cost more and more the more ‘printed’ money that is in circulation. Conversely the opposite will happen if there are more goods or things to buy than there is money to buy it with. The cost of things you buy will then go down.

I hope I have made that clear, if it’s a little foggy, please read it again then continue.

The truth about the FED
So just what is the Federal Reserve Bank, and why do we have it? The following is a little history, and a connecting of the dots study, of the inner workings of a central bank and the world central banking industry. It is little known and all but forgotten, “The Federal Reserve Act of 1913”, the accompanying “Internal Revenue Service Act”, and the “Federal Department of Education”. I hope you will find this Interesting…

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 evolved into the Federal Reserve System, then the Federal Reserve Bank, then just the Federal Reserve, and now’ it has come to be known what it is today, simply “THE FED”, but it didn’t start there, and it didn’t happen over night…

The Central Banking System
The FED is a central bank. Central banks are historically supposed to implement a country's fiscal policies. They monitor commercial banks to ensure that they maintain sufficient assets, like cash, to remain solvent and stable. Central banks also do business, such as currency exchanges and gold transactions, with other central banks. In theory, a central bank should be good for a country, and they might be, if it wasn't for the fact that they are not owned or controlled by the government of the country they are serving.

Most people have no idea that the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank is a private entity, no more Federal than Federal Express! When I mentioned this to my stock broker one day, who should know better, he replied with an articulate “Naw!” So I said: Look it up on the stock exchange, and sure enough there it was, a private stock owned corporate bank, created in 1913 by an elitist group of left over socialists from the old colonial empire of early America. Private central banks, including our FED, operate not in the interest of the public good as most people believe, but instead, as any private corporation --- it is for profit. Now I want you to understand that I am not against profit, on the contrary, I am all for free enterprise. What I am against is ‘Syndicated Fraud for Profit’. You might not be totally surprised by who collectively owns all the private stock in the U.S. FED.

Fractional banking and loan
Let’s cut right to the chase. There have been three central banks in our nation's history. The first two, while also deceptive and fraudulent, pale in comparison to the scope and size of the fraud being perpetrated by our current FED. One of the things they all have in common is an insidious practice known as "fractional banking."

Fractional banking and/or fractional lending is the ability to create or print money from nothing with little or no backing. Constitutionally, money is allowed only to be printed by the government Treasury. And while still printed by the treasury it is now on orders of the FED. They then lend the phony money, (no different than the well known Monopoly money printed by the Parker Brothers), back to the government or someone else, and charge interest to boot.

The beginning
The practice evolved from an accidental discovery before banks existed. The predecessors of banks were Goldsmiths, who rented out space in their vaults to individuals and merchants for storage of their gold or silver. The goldsmiths then gave these "depositors" a certificate that showed the amount of bullion stored. These certificates were then used to conduct business.

In time, the goldsmiths noticed that the gold and silver bullion in their vaults was rarely withdrawn. Small amounts would move in and out but on average the large majority never moved. ‘Sensing a profit opportunity’, the goldsmiths issued double receipts for the gold and/or silver bullion, in effect creating money (certificates) from nothing and then lending those certificates (creating debt) to depositors and like the central banks of the future, they charged them interest on the phony certificates as well.

Since the certificates represented more gold or bullion than actually existed, the certificates were as a result only "fractionally" backed by precious metals. Eventually some of these vault operations were transformed into banks and the practice of fractional banking continued unabated. This bullion backed fractional banking eventually evolved into paper backed fractional banking and then into the digital backed fractional banking that we have today, all phonier than a three dollar bank note. I mean Madoff was put in prison for less.

The Bank of The United States

Keep that fractional banking concept in mind as we examine Americas first central bank, the First Bank of the United States or (BUS). It was created, after bitter dissent in the Congress, in 1791 and was chartered for 20 years. A scam not unlike the “Ponzi Scheme” of the current FED, the BUS used its control of the currency to defraud the public and establish a legal or an illegal form of usury depending on how you view it. This bank practiced fractional lending at a 10:1 rate, ten dollars of loans for every dollar they had on deposit. This misuse and abuse of their public charter continued for the entire 20 years of their existence. Public outrage over these abuses was such that the charter was not renewed and the bank ceased to exist in 1811.

The Second Bank of the United States

The war of 1812 left the country in economic chaos, seen by bankers as another opportunity for easy profits. They influenced Congress to charter the second central bank, the Second Bank of the United States (SBUS), in 1816.

The SBUS was more expansive than the BUS. The SBUS sold franchises and literally doubled the number of banks in a short period. The country at the time began to boom and move westward, which required money. Using fractional lending at the 10:1 rate, the central bank and their franchisees created the debt/money for the expansion.

Things boomed for a while, and then the banks decided to shut off the debt/money, citing the need to control inflation. This action on the part of the SBUS caused bankruptcies and foreclosures. The banks then took control of the assets that were used as security against these loans.

The cycle of economic boom and collapse

Pay close attention now while we examine just how the SBUS engineered this cycle of prosperity and depression because this is the blue print that created the cycle that has been at the foundation of all of our recessions/depressions, and phony prosperity through out our history. The central bank caused inflation by creating debt/money for loans and credit and making these funds readily available. The economy boomed again. Then they used the inflation which they created as an excuse to shut off the loans/credit/money.

The resulting shortage of cash caused the economy to falter or slow dramatically and large numbers of business and personal bankruptcies resulted. The central bank then seized the assets again used as security for the loans. The wealth created by the borrowers during the boom was then transferred to the central bank during the bust. And if you have wondered how the big guys always end up with all the marbles, well…now you know.

The Great Depression

Now, who do you think is responsible for all of the ups and downs in our economy over the last 85 years? Think about the great depression of the late '20s and all through the '30s, coming off of a cycle of great prosperity i.e. the “Roaring Twenty’s. The FED could have pumped lots of debt/money into the market to stimulate the economy and get the country back on track, but did they? No; in fact, they restricted the money supply quite severely. We all know the results that occurred from that action, don't we? Nearly 10 years of economic collapse and in many cases, poverty.

How did the FED do this?

The FED pressured banks to make loans on the purchase of stock. Margin buying they called it. The more stock purchased the more the price went up. If the stock went down the margin loan was called. The FED bought stock as it was forced up and up until they started selling their own large blocks of stock in 1929. The market lost 12 percent of it value over night. And the rest as they say is history. The money the banks lost in loans was irrelevant to the FED as they made all their profit in selling the over priced stock.

Why would the FED do this?

Now during that period asset values and stocks were at rock bottom prices, the market at first lost only 12% of its value in 1929 but because of what the FED did, or did not do, by 1932 the market lost over 90%. Who do you think was then buying everything literally at 10 cents on the dollar? I believe that it is referred to as consolidating or redistribution of the wealth. How many times have they already done this in the last 85 years? Do you think they will do it again? Of course they will! And they did the same thing to drive up the price of housing in the recent crash. It’s a great money making “Ponzi Scheme” on a scale to large to comprehend. (Buy low sell high!) especially if one can control the value. Remember this is a for profit company.

Just as a side bar at this point, look at today's economy. Markets are declining. Why? Because the FED has been very liberal with its debt/credit/money. The market was hyper inflated. Who creates inflation? The FED. How does the FED deal with inflation? They restrict the debt/credit/money. What happens when they do that? The market collapses. Up and down, up and down, like a yoyo, buy low sell high.

Gold and the money supply

Several months back, after certain central banks said they would be selling large quantities of gold, the price of gold fell to a 25-year low of about $260 per ounce. The central banks then bought gold. After buying at the bottom, a group of 15 central banks announced that they would be restricting the amount of gold released into the market for the next five years. The price of gold went up $75.00 per ounce in just a few days. How many hundreds of billions of dollars did the central banks make with those two press releases? How much money do you think they are making now?

Gold is generally considered a hedge against more severe economic conditions. Do you think that the private banking families that own the FED are buying or selling equities at this time? (Remember: buy low, sell high.) How much money do you think these FED owners have made since they restricted the money supply at the top of this last current cycle? Trust me you can’t count that high!

When Alan Greenspan was chairman of the FED he said publicly on several occasions that he thinks the market is overvalued, or words to that effect. Just a hint that he would raise interest rates (restrict the money supply), and equity markets had a negative reaction. Governments and politicians do not rule central banks; central banks rule governments and politicians. And more importantly they rule the world economy.

The demise and recreation of the Central Bank.
President Andrew Jackson won the presidency in 1828 with the promise to end the national debt and eliminate the SBUS. During his second term President Jackson withdrew all government funds from the bank and on January 8, 1835, paid off the national debt. He is the only president in history to have this distinction. The charter of the SBUS expired in 1836.

The creation of today’s FED

Without a central bank to manipulate the supply of money, the United States experienced unprecedented growth for 60 or 70 years, and the resulting wealth of individual citizens was too much for bankers to endure. They had to get back into the game. So, in 1910 Senator Nelson Aldrich, then Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, in collusion with representatives of the European central banks, devised a plan to pressure and deceive Congress into enacting legislation that would covertly establish another private central bank.

This bank would assume control over the American economy among other ways by controlling the issuance of its money. After a huge public relations campaign, engineered by the foreign central banks, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was slipped through Congress during the Christmas recess, with many members of the Congress absent. President Woodrow Wilson, who was pressured by his political and financial backers, signed it on December 23, 1913.

I recommend that you read the book “The Creature from Jekyll Island” by Edward Griffin, so you understand the FED and learn more about how and why it was created and by whom.

The act created the Federal Reserve System, a name carefully selected and designed to deceive. "Federal" would lead one to believe that this is a government organization. "Reserve" would lead one to believe that the currency is being backed by gold and silver in reserve. And "System" was used in lieu of the word "bank" so that one would not conclude that the central bank had been newly recreated. Sneaky huh! This is very telling about just how educated our representatives are about American history.

In reality, the act created a private, for profit, central Banking Corporation owned by a cartel of private banks. Who owns the FED? Well bankers of course, people like The Rothschilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg of Germany; and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman, Sachs and the Rockefeller families of New York. Did you know that the FED is the only for-profit corporation in America that is exempt from both federal and state taxes? The FED takes in a profit of more than one trillion dollars per year tax free! The banking families listed above get all that money. And did I say tax free?

Almost everyone thinks that the money you pay in taxes goes to the US Treasury to pay for the expenses of the government. Do you want to know where your tax dollars really go? If you look at the back of any check made payable to the IRS you will see that it has been endorsed as "Pay Any F.R.B. Branch or Gen. Depository for Credit U.S. Treas. This is in payment of U.S. Obligations.” Yes, that's right, every dime you pay in income taxes is given to those private banking families, commonly known as the FED, and it is all tax free my friend.

How it works

As many of you likely did, I had some difficulty with the concept of creating money from nothing, which recently became more apparent as the government loaned or gave money away mostly to the very people who create it. You may have heard the term "monetizing the debt," which is kind of the same thing. As an example, if the US Government wants to borrow $1 million, the government in fact does borrow every dollar it spends; they go to the FED to borrow the money. The FED calls the Treasury and says print 10,000 Federal Reserve Notes (FRN) in units of one hundred dollars. May I remind you these are Federal Reserve Notes, not Gold backed notes or the old “Silver Certificates” that some of us will remember, or even Treasury Notes. No, this is bank issued money just printed by the Treasury Dept. Well… not really, there really isn’t even any money at all, it is just numbers, I’ll explain in just a moment. If this were legal, then any privately owned bank could print their own money. But that would be unconstitutional now wouldn’t it?

The Treasury charges the FED 2.3 cents for each note, for a total of $230 for the 10,000 FRNs. The FED then lends the $1 million in phony money to the government at face value plus interest. To add insult to injury, the government has to create a bond for $1 million as security for the loan. And the FED gets richer and richer. The above was just an example, because in reality the FED does not even print the money; it's just a computer entry in their accounting system. To put this on a more personal level, let's use another example.

Today's banks are members of the Federal Reserve Banking System. This membership makes it legal for them to create money from nothing and lend it to you. Today's banks, like the goldsmiths of old, realize that only a small fraction of the money deposited in their banks is ever actually withdrawn in the form of cash. Only about 3 or 4 percent of all the money that exists, is in the form of currency. The rest of it is simply a computer entry.

Let's say you're approved to borrow $10,000 to do some home improvements. You know that the bank didn't actually take $10,000 from its pile of cash and put it into your pile. They simply went to their computer and input an entry of $10,000 into your account. They created, from thin air, a debt, which you have to secure with an asset and repay with interest. The bank is allowed to create and lend as much debt as they want as long as they do not exceed the 10:1 ratio imposed by the government to Federal Reserve act.

The IRS, part of the Scheme

Now to put the frosting on this cake. When was the income tax created? If you guessed 1913, the same year that the FED was created, you would get a gold star. Coincidence? Yeah right… If you are going to use the FED to create debt, then who is going to repay that debt? The income tax was also unconstitutionally created to complete the illusion that real money had been lent and therefore real money had to be repaid. And you thought Houdini was good. Think about it, the Federal government never needed to tax your income before, why suddenly in 1913. You see the Bankers needed to grow the Federal Government into a big sponge to soak up a lot of debt. Big deficit spending is good for the FED.

So, what can be done

My Daddy taught me that one should always stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand up alone, and trust me I am used to standing alone.

If "We the People" don't take some action now, there will come a time in the not to distant future, when "We the People" are no more, we will be just a manipulated slave work force on the social dole. All the money and all the power will be in the hands of a few corporate elitists.

This brief only begins to scratch the surface as to how far reaching and how powerful the FED is. The URL displayed below for example, is a study of how President John Fitzgerald Kennedy Signed an executive order that virtually gutted the FED On June 4, 1963. A nearly unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to fundamentally strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. Yes Kennedy did that!

JFK V. The Federal Reserve:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.activism.progressive/browse_thread/thread/09ef8b82831c526b?pli=1

The Treasury, under Kennedy’s direction, then issued and put into circulation, treasury notes in 2, and 5 dollar notes backed by silver coin, some of you may remember that. 10 and 20 dollar U.S. Treasury Notes were also printed but never circulated.

A little more than 5 months later on November 22, 1963 President Kennedy was assassinated and the United States Treasury Notes that had been issued were immediately taken out of circulation by the FED. And the Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, more than 99% of all U.S. paper currency" circulating as of 1999 are unconstitutional, illegal, Federal Reserve Bank Notes.

President Kennedy is the only president to go up against the FED and 5 months later he was assassinated…another coincidence? Yeah right.

Incidentally that executive order, though obviously not enforced (I guess no one else wants to die) --- is still in effect. You might want to let your congressional representative know that. Ask why it isn’t enforced by congress.

Thomas Jefferson once said, "If the America people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currencies, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their prosperity until their children will wake up homeless slaves on the continent their fathers conquered." Jefferson saw it coming 150 years ago. The question is, can you now see what is in store for us if we allow the FED to continue controlling our economy and the future of our country?

"The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt." John P. Curran

What can I do?
You should write a letter or send an email to each of your elected representatives. Most of our elected representatives do not know the history or understand how the FED works. Once informed they will not be able to plead ignorance and remain silent. The information in this brief has been sent to all members of Congress please do your part, and tell them what you know, and hold them accountable.

Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can "coin money and regulate the value thereof.” The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and/or regulate currency through the Department of the Treasury.

Ask your representative in light of this information how is it constitutionally possible for the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the Federal Reserve Bank that it created to operate unchallenged? Ask them why this private banking cartel is allowed to reap trillions of dollars in profits without paying any taxes. Insist on an answer. I can almost guarantee you that most didn’t even know that they don’t pay taxes; after all it is a government bank, is it not? It is not! If Obama really wanted to tax the rich he would tax the trillion or so dollars the FED steals from every taxpayer each and every year.

THE BOTTOM LINE: So how does this happen? Why doesn’t America know anything about this? This is just one of the many hundreds of Issues involved in the “Dumbing down of America” my friend, which has been a part of this Nation since its early inception. It is what has been going on behind the scenes and between the lines for nearly 150 years. As I said at the beginning “This didn’t just happen, this is old and forgotten news”. More like secret news.

How this was kept secret
Through the manipulation and downright fabrication of the truth by the National Department of Education created in 1867, ironically 31 years after the abolition of the second American Central Bank, which had already begun in parts of Europe as a powerful organization to control and manipulate education and what is to be made public. The illegal and unconstitutional Office of Education was originally sold to the U.S. Congress as a government agency needed to gather statistical information on the fast-growing educational institutions of the United States. The Reformers, the backers and pushers of the initiative financed by the banking industry, however hoped that the Office would become a powerful federal agency. But even though they were a strong influence in what was taught through our schools, they were frustrated at every turn by Congress. Congress did not want the department to trespass too heavily on the right of the states to control curriculum and educational policy. But In 1967 President Jimmy Carter changed all that by recreating the DOE into the present ED with a lot more power in its punch. The Dumbing down of American schools were reborn as Indoctrinational programming facilities, passed off as schools of education and higher learning.

Connecting the dots
I hope you have a better picture now of how all this works together, the Central banking system FED, the IRS, and the Federal educational system, the DOE now the ED. There are many other illegal federal departments that all work in collusion to bring about the manipulation of our free economy, and the rights, and liberty of every free American citizen.

We collectively still hold the trump card if we are only wise enough to play it. This coming Election might just be the time…

de Andréa

Obama Assassinates American Citizen

2011-10-05T13:01:00.000-07:00

At first look, the assassination of Anwar al-Awlaki, the most dangerous terrorist leader in al Qaeda if not the world, may have seamed an appropriate action to take. But as the British so eloquently like to say --- “there is a stickity wicket here old chap”. And if one is not independent in ones thinking, and just gets swept along with the broad broom of the liberal media, one might be inclined to agree with this action by Obama’s Department of Defense. But remember, our government has protested and condemned other countries for doing exactly this. This is not the American Constitutional Republic; this is not the American way. Or is it?

Opinion:
By de Andréa

The stickity wicket here is that Anwar al-Awlaki, is a U.S. Citizen… Oh boy! I would have to bring that up, right?

Yes…Obama killed an innocent U.S. Citizen with all the rights and privileges of a United States of American Citizen. Now! As you are likely saying to yourself as you read this, well…so what! He is an enemy of the state, he’s a terrorist, and we are at war! And you would be right. But, you see… there is still that nasty little problem, he is an American citizen. He is, according to the United States Constitution entitled to a fair and impartial trial, whether it is a military tribunal, or a civilian criminal trial? Every American is guilty until proven innocent in a court of Law. Opp’s! I don’t think that’s exactly correct. But that is nevertheless the logic that must be assigned to this issue to justify al-Awlaki’s assassination. He was accused so kill him! The truth is that al-Awlaki was an innocent man that had not yet been proven guilty in a court of law. According to law, the U.S. government killed an innocent man. We are still a government of law - are we not? Maybe not! Maybe I just need to get out more.

Some of my readers know that I am not a big Ron Paul fan, but I will have to stand with Ron on this. This time I think Ronny is right on target and Obama’s Department of Justice and Pentagon has missed the mark. The last time I checked, all American citizens accused of a crime are presumed inn-o-cent. Yes, no matter who or what he/she is accused of, or no matter what nationality, religion, or political views they might have, they are still innocent, until he/she is proven guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt in a court of law. They ‘are, as I ‘said, inn-o-cent. Read here what Da Tagliare wrote about Ron Paul when he condemned the assassination.

Never in my wildest nightmares did I think for one nanosecond, that I would ever be defending a Muslim terrorist. Well… actually I’m not; I am defending the U.S. Constitution for everyone. If the Constitution isn’t for every American citizen, it isn’t for any American citizen, natural born or naturalized, guilty or innocent.

Author Pentangeli, a guest writer of Godfather Politics, agrees. He wrote: “Assassinating U.S. citizens is murder, and never legally acceptable. The Barack Obama administration apparently has some sort of legal ability to do this but says they have kept their legal reasoning classified due to its supposed sensitive nature. I’m not sure how sound a legal case can be made when you refuse to tell the American people you represent what it is. How can a president be held accountable? Why not just classify everything? Who knows, that time may be coming”.

Just a side bar… My personal opinion, (I can do that, it’s my column) is that the Osama Bin Laden assassination should not have been made public, and the Anwar al-Awlaki assassination should not have been made public either. One cannot publicize a covert mission and then when there are questions about it, then just excuse it by saying oh well, it’s classified, one just cannot put the genie back in the lamp. Government intelligence and/or covert missions are either classified or they are not. Been there, done that, as they say.

An American citizen has the right to trial by jury and due process of law no matter how bad or destructive he is. We haven’t just assassinated accused murderers in the past and if we did, we would go after the one who did the assassinating. Come on! I watch TV cop shows.

It is true that we had terrorist charges against al-Awlaki and he was a known al-Qaeda leader, but we never caught him nor put him on trial. Since when, do we assassinate or execute citizens caught in the U.S. when we only have charges on them for terrorism? Come on! We haven’t even executed those prisoners in Guantanamo Bay and they aren’t even American citizens!

What if al-Awlaki was engaged in terrorist activities in the United States? Unless he was engaged in the imminent act of murder, would’ we have blown up his house with a drone? Of course not!

Those who are accused of treason are even required to be put on trial and either convicted or found not-guilty. The idea that there are ‘exceptions’ in the Constitution to what limits are placed on our Federal government is a dangerous, slippery slope my friend.

Where do the assassinations stop? What defines a legal right to murder a U.S. citizen? And who ‘defines’ that right? It may seem ‘right’, now that Obama has so conveniently defined it as classified. But what happens when our country accepts this assassination as one of those Constitutional “exceptions” that we must act upon in certain situations? We become no better than the Communist lawless Liberals who are trying to destroy our Constitution. What happens when the definition of legal assassinations becomes more and more broad my friend? If there is not a legal fence to limit government power, then where are the boundaries? Well…It’s simple, there are none.

For a government that couldn’t outlaw alcohol without a Constitutional Amendment, we sure do allow it to do some very heinous things all in the name of “national security.” What happens when ‘political opponents’ are targeted in the name of “national security” and assassinated because they are labeled as homegrown terrorists? Ben Franklin said in 1759 "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." What if TEA Partiers are labeled as enemy combatants or terrorists against the United States? Well… they already are, by Home Land Security’s Janet Napolitano. With that kind of distorted logic all Obama has to do to get reelected, is to declare the opposition as home grown terrorists and have them all assassinated. I mean just where is the line here? Truth is, if this is allowed to stand, then there just isn’t one anymore. This assassination of an American citizen has created a precedent that is very real, and very dangerous

Months ago, Obama revealed that he would target al-Awlaki. He even managed to wriggle out of a lawsuit filed by al-Awlaki’s father to prevent the assassination of his son. But the actual legal reasoning the Department of Justice (DOJ) used to authorize the strike is classified. Information that the public or the courts aren’t permitted to read, mull over, and or challenge.

What justification can there be for President Obama and his lawyers to keep secret what they’re asserting is a matter of sound law? This cannot be a military secret while making the mission public. It isn’t an instance of protecting CIA field assets, or shielding domestic vulnerability to terrorism from public view. This is a display of the unlimited power that Obama has in the use of military force against one of his own people. This is a president exploiting official secrecy so that he can claim legal justification for his actions without having to expose any specific reasoning to the scrutiny of law.

Obama hasn’t just set a new precedent about killing Americans without due process. He has done so in a way that deliberately shields from public view the precise nature of the important precedent he has set. It’s time for the president who promised to create “a White House that’s more transparent and accountable than anything we’ve seen before” to release the so-called classified DOJ memo. As David Shipler writes, “The legal questions are far from clear-cut, and the country needs to have this difficult discussion.” And then there’s the fact that “a good many Obama supporters thought that secret legal opinions by the Justice Department — rationalizing torture and domestic military arrests, for example — had gone out the door along with the Bush administration,” he adds. “But now comes a momentous change in policy with serious implications for the Constitution’s restraint on executive power,[to kill American citizens] and Obama refuses to allow his lawyers’ arguments to be laid out on the table for the American public to examine.” What secret to such a public display of tyranny doesn’t he want to get out???

THE BOTTOM LINE: The question that keeps gnawing at me about this predicament is, what have we done in the past and why did this problem just arise now? Well the only answer ‘is’, that we haven’t had this problem in the past, and it just arose now because this is the first time in our history that we have so ignorantly invited the enemy that we are at war with, not only to immigrate to our country, but to become citizens. But the blind stupidity doesn’t end there. Our government has put this enemy that we are at war with, into our military, so they kill our soldiers. They have put this enemy in our congress, so they make our laws. They have put this enemy in our police forces, and put the enemy’s law in our courts. Put their curriculum in our schools; put this enemy in the White House, and on and on --- so they ‘will’ defeat us. This’ my friend, is just what enemies do, anything they can do to defeat ‘their enemy’ the United States of America. Oh yes! They have told us so, over and over again. But we do nothing.
Now we have this dilemma that we shouldn’t have had, and wouldn’t have had if we had just not been so blinded by our own ignorant multi-cultural politically correct and socially political society, and instead, paid just a little attention to history and things like the articles of war and the war college manual. That’s the Military law, that has been ignored since long before 9/11.

We really do deserve this breakdown and loss of our constitution, because we said nothing at the beginning to stop it. And the worse part is that we are saying nothing now either. To prove my point my friend in just one small way, just take a look at how is this enemy Islam, is changing this country into a police state. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that police no longer need a search warrant for example to force entry into anyone’s home. In one court decision the 14th Amendment is gone, all in the name of security that we wouldn’t need if we didn’t have our enemy wondering around our home. We no longer need the majority vote of congress and the ratification by the states to change or abolish our constitutional rights. We again said nothing! And when they come to assassinate ‘you’ or some member of your family simply because you have been accused of a crime against the people or the state, we again will say nothing. And so it goes, a totalitarian police state is born. And then you will wonder, how did this happen. If you know your history, the people of Germany wondered the same thing! But they said nothing until it was too late to say anything.

You see, once this dirty ball gets rolling, there’s no stopping it. All the beautiful deceptive butterflies will have gotten loose from Pandora’s Box, and they have turned into monsters, now it will be too late to put them back.

This blind benevolence to a fault, toward the enemy of the free world has got to be the most unintelligent decision our government has ever made in its short history. And now we are paying for it with the loss of our security our American culture, freedom and the protection of our constitutional rights. The Framers never covered this possibility in our constitution because the never thought the government of America could ever be so’ stupid as to put ourselves in this insane position.

Just a couple of parting questions: Why didn’t we invite Nazis to immigrate to the U.S. during our war with Nazism? Why didn’t we elect a Nazi as president in 1943? The answer should be something like, because we were at war with Nazis stupid!

The assassination was not about whether he was guilty. That had never been determined. It was the seriousness of the charges. Remember that the next time you or a loved one is accused of something my friend.

I rest my case. It is now in your hands. Now the question is: What are you going to do with it? I know…Just say nothing!

de Andréa.

Fast And Furious is an Impeachable Offence

2011-10-03T18:47:00.000-07:00

"Fast and Furious" is Obama’s 'Watergate', or should I say 'Murdergate'

An ongoing investigative study…
By de Andréa

People died and Obama lied… The cover up!
When someone dies during the commission of a crime, even if it is by accident or unintended, is it Murder? And is everyone connected with the crime, guilty of murder? Well, the law says they are, and it doesn’t matter who they are. Can you remember way back when justice was blind, or when it was even served?

The continuing investigation
In the fall of 2009, Eric Holder and, the Department of Justice decided on a mission to add fuel to Obama’s strategy to disarm the citizens of America, and ultimately to destroy our freedom. It was disguised as a mission to combat gun trafficking on the Mexican border, but ‘aw shucks Obama! people died. (click on this and watch the video of Holder stammer and speak incoherently when asked questions by congressman Darrell Issa about his involvement in the crime of Fast and Furious)

Give me an hour with holder and I would have him begging me to video tape his confession. Then I would offer him immunity to give up Obama. Done! Water-board him? Never… Water-boarding is for kids. I got water-boarded as part of my military training. What’s more! I get worse than water-boarded every time I go to the dentist for hygienic teeth cleaning.

Obama didn’t want the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to seize illegal firearms anymore, or to do their legal job description of collecting special taxes; no instead, he wanted them to buy firearms and sell them to members of the Mexican Drug Cartels as well as the terrorist group Hezbollah. This was to support the statement made by Mexican El presidente Felipe Calderon (already proven wrong) that the drug cartels were getting their weapons from U.S. gun runners. As a result of this mission of Obama, called Fast an Furious, hundreds of innocent Mexicans and some Americans died. It turns out the guns Calderon originally spoke about, actually came from Eastern Europe.

For background, and detailed information including a link to congressional transcripts of the investigation on this criminal undercover mission, as well as the subsequent cover-up --- click here, for a previous article.

Just how high up, in the Obama regime does this illegal covert mission and cover-up go? Apparently my friend, all the way to the very desk top in the oval office, read on, my friend.
Dennis Burke, the attorney general of the state of Arizona - (a Democrat Obama criminal operative, appointed by Janet Napolitano who is also another Obama criminal operative) - resigned in an attempt to avoid the consequences, of participating in this criminal fiasco of fraud, international weapons trafficking and death. Middle management at DOJ and ATF has already been thrown under the bus in an effort to cover this mess up. The acting director of the ATF Kenneth Melson, has already been defenestrated.

For those of you that are old enough to remember the comity team Laurel and Hardy Ollie says to Stanly in the Laurel and Hardy murder case: "Here's another nice mess you've gotten me into." I can only guess that Holder might be thinking: …Obama, here's another nice mess you've gotten me into.

For his part, Obama has denied that he and Attorney General Eric Holder green-lighted the mission, stating, “My attorney general has made clear he certainly would not have ordered gun running to be able to pass through into Mexico.” This is less than credible my friend—how could the head of the DOJ not know about an operation of this magnitude involving at least 4 states handled by the DOJ? And how could President Obama not know what is going in his administration? And why, if the DOJ is uninvolved, do they want a copy of Kenneth Melson’s confidential interview with Congressional staff? Are we to believe that the mind doesn’t know what the tongue is saying?

This crime involves other government security agencies, especially the FBI and the DEA who supplied taxpayer funds to commit this crime. Read the Congressional Document.

Just how far reaching is this crime, and does the involvement of Obama’s gunrunning mission, include the support of the Islamic terrorist group Hezbollah that has invaded Mexico as well as the U.S.? Watch a video.

This scandal runs all the way up the chain of command, all the indicators say it does, and it is certainly an impeachable offense. This is a high crime, not just a misdemeanor. Pushing an operation designed to destroy American rights and freedoms that ends with the death of Americans is not only illegal, it is unconscionable. And unlike Iran-Contra, it wasn’t done for the right reasons. It was however, done to DISARM AMERICA. It seems I remember someone else doing that same thing…Oh yes! I think it was Adolph Hitler, that is, if I remember correctly.

Late breaking news:
“Fast and Furies” is not the only one of its kind, their may be as many as nine States involved and many other like illegal missions with other names such as “Wide Receiver” the New York Post supports the fact that the DEA, FBI Immigration, Customs, the IRS and the US Attorney’s office are all in this quicksand up to their illegal necks. The N.P. reports, “Among the e-mails was a photograph of a powerful Barrett .50-caliber rifle that had been illegally purchased in Tucson and recovered in Sonora, Mexico, raising the possibility of a second “gunwalking” program, this one called “Wide Receiver.”

Like Fast and Furious, the ATF-supervised scheme that saw thousands of weapons “walk” across the Mexican border for reasons no one in the Justice Department has yet satisfactorily explained, Wide Receiver was apparently a joint operation that also included the Drug Enforcement Administration, the FBI, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the IRS and the US Attorney’s office. It’s likely there have been others, in such states as Florida and Indiana". Read the full Story.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Question --- What happens when your President is a criminal? Answer, the Congress investigates, indicts, and impeaches him. But what happens when the Congress is generally corrupt??? Answer, one can pray that there are a “few good men” left in the government that will do the right thing, so that the rest of the otherwise corrupt congress will be forced to support it, or get voted out of office.

If you could find just a little time to do ‘something’ to save your country and your future freedom for your children, would you do it? If you think a little of your precious time would be well spent to save what is left of your independent freedom and liberty then please contact your member of congress. And ask him/her to support the Fast and Furious investigation that is going on right now in congress, and if necessary, the impeachment and indictment of president Obama, and then ‘pray’ my friend…Pray ‘long and hard!

de Andréa

Obama’s Conspiracy to Disarm America

2011-09-26T12:04:00.000-07:00

Hopefully this could just be Obama’s undoing. Obama’s conspiracy to violate international gun trafficking laws has led to the death of hundreds, maybe thousands, of innocent Mexicans as well as Americans.

By de Andréa

Obama’s top secret mission, named Operation Fast and Furious was led to its exposure by the unplanned murder of Brian Terry, a U.S. Border agent. The law states that if someone dies in the commission of a crime then all involved are guilty of murder. So what is Obama’s top secret mission “Operation Fast and Furious”? Well read on my friend…

For those who might not be up on all the details of the ever-ballooning Obama “Fast and Furious” scandal, a short primer may be in order, you will find a link to the full story below.

The government-sanctioned gun running conspiracy operated for two years, beginning in 2009, out of the BATFE office in Phoenix, Ariz.—though evidence is mounting that similar scams were also run in other locations, such as Houston, Texas.

Under “Fast and Furious,” BATFE street agents were instructed to stand down as felony violations of federal firearm and smuggling laws—punishable by decades in federal prison—were committed. When conscientious, federally licensed dealers reported illegal straw sales involving large numbers of guns, they were told by agency officials to allow the felonious sales to be completed on the spot and to look the other way in the future

Agency superiors thus forced field agents to passively observe the “walking” of as many as 2,500 illegally acquired firearms beyond agency control into the cave-darkness of criminal commerce—in Mexico.

The cover story was, to trace those guns to drug “kingpins” across the border.
According to William Newell, the man in charge of the Phoenix operation, “The goal of the opperation and investigation was to disrupt and dismantle an entire firearm trafficking network in Mexico.”

The question begging to be asked is how could that even be remotely feasible when neither Mexican law enforcement at any level, nor BATFE representatives stationed as guests of the Mexican government, were even made aware of the operation? It was top secret.

In truth is, the scheme originated as a means to “trace” guns back to U.S. retailers from Mexican crime scenes in order to prove the Obama administration and media big lie—that 90 percent of the firearms used in Mexico’s narco-anarchy come from federally licensed U.S. gun dealers. The purpose of that entire campaign was to glean power and money for BATFE—power in the form of more gun laws and more bureaucratic restrictions on the rights of law-abiding private citizens. Ban semi-autos. Shut down gun shows and gun registration. In other words carry out Obama’s agenda of disarming America.

The logic of the BATFE/Justice Department agitprop goes this way—this is what we are all supposed to believe: Mexican society is terrorized by narco-anarchy, with over 35,000 unarmed citizens murdered during the past four years. For the law-abiding, Mexico has the most restrictive gun laws in the hemisphere. Therefore, American freedom and the rights of our citizens must be equally restricted, since our guns can be illegally acquired and smuggled to that terrorized nation.

Proving that insanity is what “Fast and Furious” is really all about.
Some in the media have called “Fast and Furious” a “plan gone horribly wrong.” Led by President Barack Obama’s blithe admission that there were “mistakes made,” the administration is saying, “Nothing to see here folks, let’s move on.”

This was not a mistake. Illegally moving guns to Mexico was not a mistake. The intended purpose “Fast and Furious,” when you get down to it, is a criminal conspiracy on the part of BATFE leadership and officials in the U.S. Department of Justice and the Obama administration. It was a conspiracy hatched for Obama’s anti-gun propaganda purposes. The deaths and bloodletting in Mexico were the natural results of a government conspiracy gone completely wrong.

For the planners of “Fast and Furious,” the free big-media ride ended a few days before Christmas 2010 in a lonely canyon in Arizona near the Mexican border, where Border Patrol agent Brian Terry in the wee-hours armed with a beanbag gun versus 7.62×39 mm firefight—was easily gunned down. Two of the semi-automatics at the scene were the product of Obama’s “Operation Fast and Furious.”

The death of Terry, a family man and veteran, changed everything.
Were it not for Terry’s death, the operation doubtless would have continued unabated, with U.S. gun-control forces ghoulishly pointing to the ever-mounting body count south of the border to further their agenda of disarming America.

For the full story including transcripts of a congressional hearing click here! You have a right to know…

de Andréa.

Obama’s Operation Fast and Furious

2011-09-26T11:45:00.000-07:00

The full story and cover-up

President Barack Obama and his cronies at the Department of Justice are now circling the wagons in a full-blown cover-up through the promotion of hostile witnesses as investigators within BATFE.

By de Andréa
September 25, 2011

As the sordid details of “Operation Fast and Furious” unfold, the Obama/BATFE/Justice Department conspiracy of arming violent narco-terrorists in Mexico, continues to be unveiled, Obama’s response was to promote a central facilitator of the scandalous conspiracy to the rogue agency’s central internal affairs division. The fox will investigate why there are so many dead chickens in the hen house. Or in this case so many dead people. The congressional investigation involves the question of “what did he know and when did he know it” of members in the highest echelon of the Justice Department and the BATFE as well as the President himself.

The lengthy story below includes transcript testimony in a congressional investigation. I truly hope this doesn’t just go away…

The promotion of William McMahon (the fox) to the agency’s Office of Professional Responsibility and Security Operations is seen as a warning—actually, a threat—to agency whistle blowers.

So…just what is, or what was “Operation Fast and Furious.” Obama, like Hitler in Europe, has a, not so secret, agenda of disarming America. Once that has been accomplished there is very little the American citizen can do to preserve his freedom against Obama’s Communist Muslim agenda of social oppression and dictatorship.

A little more than a year ago president Felipe Calderón of Mexico accused U.S. gun owners of supplying guns to the Mexican drug cartel. It gave the Obama administration and the anti-gun activists in the U.S. the ammunition; so to speak, that they needed to promote gun bans in the U.S. that is until it was proven that the guns were not coming from the U.S. but instead from the Eastern Block Nations of Europe. Disappointed in the loss of the needed momentum, Obama pressured attorney General Erik Holder of the DOJ to enlist the help of the BATFE to reverse this bit of bad luck, and regain the upper hand in the war against the Second Amendment right of Americans to keep and bear arms.

Subsequently the BATFE coerced gun dealers in the Border States to illegally and secretly sell guns to the Mexican drug lords, thereby recreating the fiction of American guns killing hundreds of innocent Mexican people. Only this time it was real and these BATFE guns not only killed Mexicans but Americans as well. The whole sordid operation may have been successful if it hadn’t been for one little problem, Patrol Agent Brian Terry was shot and killed in December 2010 with one of Obama’s guns. The *^~&# had hit the fan so to speak and the cover-up began. The cover up may have also been successful if it was for the courageous efforts of conscientious individual BATFE agents who stepped forward to expose what is proving to be a Justice Department criminal conspiracy as high as the White House. That conspiracy was to passively watch continual violations of federal firearm statutes, international anti-smuggling laws, and violation of Mexican sovereignty, not to mention the ugly trail of dead.

As the deputy assistant director for BATFE’s Western Region, McMahon supervised Special Agent in Charge William Newell, who ran “Operation Fast and Furious.” McMahon told Congress he was in daily contact with Newell over the scheme that allowed thousands of guns to be “walked” into Mexican criminal commerce—a scheme held secret from both Mexican authorities and U.S. officials in Mexico, including most BATFE operatives.

Among the most cogent red flags over the McMahon move was a posting on the BATFE dissident-insider website, CleanupATF.org: “The promotion itself was a message that DOJ intends to charge full speed ahead on its defense-slash-deflection of ‘Gunwalker.’ But it’s also the sound of a shotgun chambering a round for street agents … telling their agents to be very careful what they say, and to whom.”

Part of the cover up is the agency’s Office of Professional Responsibility and Security Operations. According to the 2005 BATFE annual report announcing the then-newly reorganized internal affairs apparatus, OPRSO (ironically pronounced “oppresso”) “determines adherence to ATF and DOJ organizational policies, regulations and procedures.”

Under the heading “Integrity,” the report declares that, “OPRSO conducts employee misconduct and integrity investigations, either criminal or administrative. It speaks of an early warning detection system to … strengthen adherence to organization policies and procedures.

But what if those BATFE “policies and procedures” are politically and criminally corrupt and motivated? What if those “policies and procedures” are in violation of U.S. law and foreign sovereignty, as was the case of “Fast and Furious”? Those are the questions now pursued by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and his House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and by Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.

Coupled with President Barack Obama’s failure to acknowledge congressional oversight of the BATFE scandal and his insistence that an internal investigation will suffice, McMahon’s appointment gives more than the appearance that any internal look at misconduct will be a whitewash. McMahon’s capacity for forthrightness can only be measured by his recent public performance before Congress.

McMahon’s transfer as internal ethics watchdog came just days following his July 26, 2011 appearance—as a forgetful, foggy, petulant, recalcitrant, cranky witness and self-proclaimed inattentive supervisor—before Rep. Issa’s hot-on-the-trail inquiry into the two-year-long “gun-walking” operation. McMahon gave the committee the impression that, as the Western District supervisor, had slept through the whole scandal and simply wasn’t paying attention. Aw shucks!

Newell’s and McMahon’s passive aggressive non-cooperation with the committee was counter pointed by the dramatic testimony of BATFE supervisors and field agents, including officers serving in Mexico who had been locked out of any knowledge of “Fast and Furious.” These men spoke with revulsion as to the very concept of allowing guns to “walk”—where by law-enforcement supervisors ordered that contraband arms be allowed to slip into criminal commerce out of any possible control. Well of course this was the whole idea, to prove out of control guns.

And it has been clear from the outset of the Issa and Grassley investigations that there is absolutely no doubt guns were “walked.” That truth was the centerpiece of Chairman Issa’s first congressional hearing June 15.

During the second House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing, the practice was proven a certainty. Jose Wall, the current BATFE senior special agent serving in Tijuana, Mexico, told the committee: "I could not believe that someone in ATF would so callously let firearms wind up in the hands of criminals. But it appears that I was wrong, and that hundreds and quite possibly thousands of guns have been allowed to reach the hands of organized crime in Mexico. … These firearms are now in the hands of people who have no regard for human life, pose a threat to all of us, a threat to which none of us is immune.”

His sentiments were echoed by another agent also serving in Mexico, Carlos Canino, a 23-year agency veteran and acting BATFE attaché to the Mexican government. “Never, never in my wildest dreams would I think that ATF agents were ordered or participated in actually following known gun traffickers and just walking away,” Canino said. “That is to me inconceivable. And to this day I’m still trying to get my head around this.” He said the supervisors “went to the shredder and shredded the best practices, all the techniques that you use to investigate a gun trafficking case. As to fault”, Canino said, “In my professional opinion, this investigative strategy was flawed. It was allowed to continue due to ineffective oversight in the Phoenix field division, and possibly beyond.”

In fact, the two individuals holding the buck on all of those scores—egregiously bad management, judgment, leadership and oversight—were sitting at the far end of the same witness table: William Newell and William McMahon. McMahon and Newell, reluctant star witnesses before this second hearing on the BATFE scandal, hardly ever answered straight questions with straight answers. At one point, an angry Issa called Newell a “paid non answerer,” and in another exchange, U.S. Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., chairman emeritus of the committee, warned Newell that he was testifying under oath, implying his evasiveness might be skirting perjury. Newell’s actions during the hearings exuded a comfortable contempt for the committee’s investigation.

Further, after listening to and reading testimony from BATFE witnesses in this and earlier hearings, Newell and McMahon dug in on the central issue of “gun walking.” According to them, it never happened.

Issa and other members drew out Newell to agree that “Fast and Furious” guns that he allowed to be illegally purchased at licensed dealers had, indeed, ended up traced back from Mexico. No doubt. But as for walking?

From the transripts, consider this exchange between Newell and Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah.

Chaffetz began: You testified today in your opening statement; ‘It is not the purpose of the investigation [‘Fast and Furious’] to permit the transportation of firearms into Mexico.’ That’s today … Yet in … January 8, 2010 … you write, ‘Currently our strategy is to allow the transfer of firearms [to Mexico] to continue to take place.’ … So it was the goal. It was the intention of the program to allow guns to be trafficked to Mexico based on this memo. Is that correct?

Newell answered: No, sir.

Chaffetz shot back that he was reading from Newell’s own statement:. “It also says in here, a number of different seizures in Mexico. It seems very inconsistent at best to suggest that it was not the purpose to allow them to go to Mexico.”

Newell’s answer was pure double-talk: Well, sir, if I may, and I’m, I’m glad I’m given the opportunity to clarify that paragraph that has been obviously well publicized. The wording in that, the way my understanding was when that briefing paper was drafted was that our efforts to allow the transfer to identify additional co-conspirators was so that we could further the investigation, takeout the whole organization. Otherwise these individuals would in fact continue in a probably a larger …

In utter frustration, Chaffetz said: So you allowed hundreds or thousands of weapons to continue to flow through this program and go into Mexico?

Newell, pumping the fog machine, replied: I’m sorry; can you repeat the question, sir?

Chaffetz: How many hundreds or thousands of weapons did you allow to be purchased knowing that they were going to Mexico?

Newell: The purchase was being done by a criminal organization, a large scale …

Chaffetz: But you facilitated it. You allowed it, did you not? You were a part of the program. Allow these straw purchases to happen so that the guns could end up in Mexico? And you know in 2009, that that’s happening.

Newell: Sir, again, the goal of the organization, the goal of the investigation was to disrupt and dismantle the entire …

Chaffetz: … the problem is you were purposely, knowingly allowing the guns to go to Mexico. And you have information in 2009 that it’s being successful.
Yet you never put a stop to it. It’s meeting the goals and intentions you laid out in this memo in January 2010and it continued on and on. And consequently there were thousands of weapons that ended up in Mexico killing people.
That’s the reason that we’re here today. When did you first know or think that guns were walking?

Newell: Sir, in this investigation, to the best of my knowledge we didn’t let guns walk from that perspective.

And so it went over and over.

On that question of “gun walking,” especially involving a straw buyer allowed to violate multiple gun laws in the purchase of 730 civilian AK variants, Chairman Issa pushed Newell to come clean.

Issa: So from day one you had a straw purchaser with no credit, no means of support, buying hundreds of weapons, providing them to his intermediary … You had an individual who could be charged with his participation on the actual trafficking of weapons. You had somebody who was trafficking specifically for the intent of getting it to the drug cartels providing huge amounts of money.” Issa pressed on: “It seems like you knowingly allowed these weapons to get out of your control, knowingly to someone you knew was trafficking into Mexico. You saw the results. You allowed it to continue, and now you’re telling us, ‘We don’t let guns walk.’ Well, I’ve got to tell you, before this investigation ends, I’ve got to have somebody in your position or at Justice to admit you knowingly let guns walk, because right now your agents, both the agents here today from Mexico and the agents that were part of Phoenix and part of this program who became whistleblowers, had told us you were letting guns walk. It’s only you and Mr. McMahon and other people at Justice who continue to come before this committee and say, ‘We don’t let guns walk.’ Are they lying or are you lying?

Newell replied, mumbling: A, sir, in this investigation it is my opinion that we did not let guns walk.

Chairman Issa snapped back: You’re entitled to your opinion, not to your facts.

End of transcript testimony.

If the elevation of McMahon was an in-your-face insult to Congress and to anyone deeply concerned about the rogue nature of the Obama/Holder Justice Department, the DOJ’s chief prosecutor in Phoenix doubled the insult to an unspeakably low level by slapping down the family of slain Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.

But no less grievous an insult as the one the Obama administration, through its Justice Department, has foisted on Congress and the American people by its continuous attempts to confuse and cover up the facts. The facts that show it intentionally allowed guns to go to Mexican drug cartels to further fuel its desire to pass more gun control laws here in the United States

More Moves For A Cover-Up
If you think the McMahon appointment was an in-your-face insult to Congress and to whistleblowers, try this explanation from the agency’s PR office: “On Aug. 1, 2011, Special Agent Newell, who had been selected as Country Attaché Mexico City, was reassigned to the Office of Management to assist with the OIG investigation and congressional inquiry.” The man who is at the center of an insane project with the intended consequence of tracing guns to bloody Mexican crime scenes is promoted to “assist” Eric Holder’s internal investigation of that scandal. If there were ever a question that the Obama White House was not ordering a total whitewash, this answers it.

Further evidence of the cover-up is what is touted as an “independent” investigation by the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General came with a request from Attorney General Holder that Rep. Darrell Issa surrender to him transcripts of meetings that the chairman, U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley, had with BATFE Acting Director Ken Melson—a figure the Obama administration was prepared to crush under its bus. Since Holder may well prove to be a part of the “Fast and Furious” conspiracy, his involvement corrupts OIG’s supposed neutrality. In addition, Issa and Grassley upped their lawful demands for production of documents that Holder has refused to supply for congressional oversight.

That e-mail is proof positive that BATFE’s gun-running scheme was intended to garner power and funds to prove a big-lie campaign claiming that federally licensed gun dealers were the virtual sole source of firearms used by the murderous Mexican drug cartels.

“We are looking for anecdotal cases to support a demand letter on long gun multiple sales,” Chait wrote to McMahon and his direct subordinate, William Newell, the Phoenix special agent in charge, who directed the guns-to-Mexican “Fast and Furious” criminal enterprise.

And of course, despite specific prohibitions in federal law, the Department of Justice has blithely gone ahead with the “demand letter,” which is in reality a long gun registration scheme in the border states of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas that is being challenged in federal court by the NRA. Ironically, it was just that kind of information voluntarily provided by dealers to BATFE with respect to highly suspicious multiple purchases by law-breaking criminal buyers that kicked off “Fast and Furious” in the first place.

And in that case, those buyers were encouraged by BATFE leadership to repeatedly commit felony acquisition of firearms. In the Phoenix operation, dealers who reported obvious illegal activity were told to let it continue, and continue, and continue.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The death of Terry, a family man and veteran, changed everything. Were it not for Terry’s death, the operation doubtless would have continued unabated, with U.S. gun-control forces ghoulishly pointing to the ever-mounting body count south of the border to further their agenda of disarming America.

Out of all the outrageous, treasoness, criminal acts by Obama in the past three years, this truly should be the one that will put him away. But it too will likely be treated like so much fodder from the racist conspiracy people on the far right and swept away in a dust pan and deposited in the historical round file.

de Andrae.

The Constitution or Sharia?

2011-09-24T10:29:00.000-07:00

Is the Constitution of the United States, whose adoption we celebrate every Sept. 17, the supreme law of America, or is it Islamic Sharia?

By de Andréa

First let me make this perfectly clear…Obama, as every president before him, took an oath to uphold, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Let's just take a short look at what Barack Obama, is empowered to do and then see if he might have allegiance to different ideology.

In Article II, Section 1, he is sworn to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.” Section 2 names the president as commander in chief of the armed forces, grants him the power to make treaties with the advice and consent of the Senate and to appoint ambassadors, federal judges, cabinet officials and other federal officers. In Section 3, the president "shall take care that the Laws be faithfully executed…” Not violated. In his two years and nine months in office, Barack Hussein Obama has compiled a spectacular record of Constitutional violations. Here are just a few of the ways his administration has failed to uphold and execute the laws while using raw, unauthorized power. You will notice that it was the Constitution that Obama swore to obey, not Sharia. But are you sure? What did he actually come to “Change?”

He violated the Defense of Marriage Act - On Feb. 23, 2011, Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. announced that, under Obama's direction, the Justice Department would no longer defend DOMA, which is under attack in several federal courts, DOMA, which was passed by overwhelming majorities in Congress and signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1996. It defines marriage for all federal purposes as the union of a man and a woman, and allows states under the Full Faith and Credit clause not to be forced to recognize unions from other states that do not comport with their state marriage laws. Forty-five states have moved to strengthen their marriage laws, with 30 enacting constitutional amendments.

He violated the 15th Amendment - At Obama dictates, the Justice Department has effectively become a race-based enforcement unit. After New Black Panther Party members were caught on tape intimidating voters at a Philadelphia polling place in 2008, the Justice Department declined to defend the convictions, and thus sent the message that baton-wielding thuggish-ness on Election Day is no longer a big deal, so I guess we can expect more of the same in the future. Former Justice Department attorney J. Christian Adams, who laid out the case before the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, described the administration's dismissal of charges as "lawless hostility toward equal enforcement of the law."

He has promoted Illegal Immigration - The Obama administration has ignored the illegal actions of "sanctuary cities" and instead sued the state of Arizona in July for enforcing federal law. Then, in August, the administration announced a new policy that, in effect, ends enforcement of illegal immigration completely, providing the illegal aliens meet the requirements of the DREAM Act, a bill that Congress failed to pass. So, Obama is ignoring current federal law while creating rules based on a law that never was legislated. In defense of Arizona, at the end of Article 1 of the Constitution it says: “No State shall, without the consent of Congress…engage in war, unless actually invaded or in such eminent danger as will not admit delay.” Arizona has been invaded. And Article 4 sec 4 the law says: “…and [the government] shall protect each of them [the States] against invasion.” This forces Arizona to do what the Fed refuses to do under the law. Read about “America’s secret war”

Cap and Trade - In 2010, the Senate rejected a sweeping environmental bill that would have created a massive federal carbon regulation system. Despite this, the Environmental Protection Agency announced that it would treat carbon dioxide (the air we breathe out and the gas that all vegetation needs to live) as a pollutant, and begin cracking down on America's businesses and power plants. The EPA has become a law unto itself. The Obama Administration also has ignored a federal judge's ruling that he acted illegally in prohibiting new drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

He violated the Fifth Amendment - The Constitution guarantees that no one is deprived of their property without "due process of law" or without "just compensation.” The National Labor Relations Board's absurd order to Boeing not to open a newly built $750-million Dreamliner facility in right-to-work South Carolina because unions in Boeing's home state of Washington violates that guarantee. Even liberal New York Times columnist Joseph Nocera commented: “Seriously, when has a president ever tried to dictate where a company makes its products?”

He violated the First Amendment - The NLRB struck again this year, declaring two Catholic universities -- St. Xavier University in Chicago and Manhattan College in New York -- as not sufficiently "religious.” If the holdings stand, the schools may see the NLRB assert jurisdiction and rope the faculty and employees into a union election.

Right out of the gate, there was his bowing of allegiance to the Muslim Saudi king and Obama’s declaration in the course of a 2009 speech at Cairo University that; “I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight negative stereotypes of Islam wherever I find them”. That is of course found in Article 8, the Presidential-Responsibility-To-Fight-Negative-Stereotypes-of-Islam- section of the Constitution, just kidding. But it is Sharia law and it is found in the Quran, and under Sharia it is punishable by death. You see, if America knew what Islam was, we would totally understand why Obama is the way he is. He is a Muslim first and foremost, and is commanded by his god Allah to obey and enforce Sharia, not the Constitution. If you don’t believe me, then maybe you will believe him. Watch his Video telling us exactly that.

More frightening is Obama's heavy-handed seizure of the nation's healthcare system and ObamaCare's unconstitutional mandate for everyone to purchase health insurance. Nowhere, not even in the much-abused Commerce Clause, does the Constitution give the government the power to force citizens to engage in commerce. If ObamaCare is upheld, government bureaucrats can pretty much order us to do anything they want.

This list, which is actually much longer, should include Obama's failure as commander in chief to lead our armed forces with honor. Can you imagine George Washington's or Gen. George S. Patton's response to the Obama administration's doctoring the results of a troop survey, leaking misleading "findings" to the press, ignoring strong opposition by combat troops, and ramming through a policy of homosexualizing the armed forces? This violates 235 years of tradition in the world's finest military. Paraphrasing Ted Koppel's comment about the Ten Commandments, the Constitution is not a set of ‘suggestions’. The Constitution's enumerated powers and limitations ensure maximum liberty for a people as part of a Free Republic.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Just how many times can ‘anyone’, not just and oath sworn president of the United States, ‘but anyone’ --- so blatantly violate the supreme law of America and not be brought up on charges. When the chief enforcer shows such profound contempt for the Constitution, he needs to be impeached and at the very least charged with multiple contemptuous violations of the law and the abuse of power.

Obama is now under investigation in the Solyndra scandal (the misappropriation of taxpayer funds). The FBI is investigating what happened with Solyndra, a solar panel company that got more that a half a billion of your money with the help of Obama over the objections of federal budget analysts. Then Solyndra immediately went bankrupt, Americans lost jobs, taxpayers got stuck with the bill, Solyndra executives are living high and taking the “fifth”, and Obama and members of Congress are now in deep dodo.

And then there is the Fast and Furious scandal of the DOJ and the ATF where the BATFE was ordered by the Department of Justice to supply the Mexican drug cartel with guns. Several U.S. boarder agents were killed with those guns as a result. Eric Holder of the DOJ answers directly to Obama. Can you make the connection? Is President Obama connected to a crime where innocent Americans were killed? Should he be brought up on charges of conspiracy to commit fraud if not murder? I mean I could go on and on hear for at least another 50 or so pages, but I won’t.

There is only one place that I would actually come to visit Obama, and that would be in federal prison where he belongs.

de Andréa

The Sharia Pandemic

2011-09-23T10:52:00.000-07:00

If for some ignorant reason you believe that Sharia is just the law of the Middle East, you would be deceptively wrong.

By de Andréa
September 10, 2011

History repeats itself in Germany…for the third time.
As in the case of Pancreatic Cancer, or a vicious contagious virus once one becomes aware of its symptoms one can be nearly assured of certain death. For the third time in its history, Germany is becoming aware of a terminal disease which is exemplified in a new book titled "Germany Does Away With Itself,"(not available in English). The first time Germany began to be overrun by Islam was in approximately 800 AD. It took the bloody Crusades three hundred years to save the country and the rest of Europe. The second time was in the 1930’s in the form of Nazism, Islam was Hitler’s only ally, and took a world war to save Germany and the rest of the world. And now history is again repeating itself, for the third time, different people, different time, same scenario, and the same blind deception. One might think the German people must not be educated in their own history but this same blind deception is affecting every Kaffaar (non-Muslim) on the planet. What will it take to stop Islam this time?

According to the Muslim bible, the Quran, Sharia is the law that governs the world. The spread of Islamic Sharia law in Germany for example is far more advanced than previously thought. German authorities recognize that they are now "powerless" to do anything about it; this is according to a new book about the Muslim shadow justice system in the Islamic State of Germany. This is the result of allowing the Muslim foot in the door. An unsuspecting benevolent country that goes down the slippery slope of Islamic deception, will eventually find itself beyond the point of no return. As you read ‘this’ account, remember Islamic Sharia law has already found its way into American courts. And unless you want to be subjected to barbaric Sharia law and Islamic oppression, you had better do what ever you can to help stop Sharia in your state and in America. And you had better do it right now!

The 236-page book titled "Judges Without Law: Islamic Parallel Justice Endangers Our Constitutional State," (not yet available in English) which was authored by Joachim Wagner, a German legal expert and former investigative journalist for ARD German public television, says “Islamic Sharia courts are now operating in all of Germany's big cities. This parallel justice system is undermining the rule of law in Germany”, Wagner says, because Muslim arbiters-cum-imams are settling criminal cases out of court without the involvement of German prosecutors or lawyers before law enforcement can bring the cases to a German court.

Note: In most cases this involves Muslim crimes against Muslims. But in some cases it involves cases of non Muslims against Muslim Sharia law, and the latter is on the increase both in Europe and in America.

In an interview with the German broadcaster Deutsche Welle, Wagner said political correctness in Germany is enabling the problem: "I've studied 16 recent crime cases here with Muslim citizens involved. In almost 90% of all cases where Muslim arbitrators were commissioned, the perpetrators were acquitted by German courts or the cases were dropped altogether by the prosecution for lack of evidence. It's an alarming finding, and it throws a bad light on our courts."

In fact, German judges often refer and/or defer to Sharia law. For example, the Federal Social Court in Kassel recently supported the claim of a second wife for a share of her dead husband's pension payments, which his first wife wanted to keep all to herself. The judge ruled they should share the pension.

In March 2007, Judge Christa Datz-Winter, a judge at Frankfurt's family court cited the Islamic Koran in a divorce case involving a 26-year-old German woman of Moroccan origin, who was terrified of her violent Moroccan husband, a man who had continued to threaten her despite having been ordered to stay away by the authorities. He had beaten his wife and he had allegedly threatened to kill her. Judge Datz-Winter refused to grant the divorce, arguing that a woman who marries a Muslim should know what she is getting herself into. In her ruling, the judge quoted Sura 4, verse 34 of the Koran. She wrote that the Koran contains "both the husband's right to use corporal punishment against a disobedient wife and the establishment of the husband's superiority over the wife."

In February 2011, Germany's Federal Labor Court ruled that a Muslim supermarket employee can refuse to handle alcohol on religious grounds. The case in question involved a Muslim man who was employed in a supermarket in the northern German city of Kiel. He refused to stock shelves with alcoholic drinks, saying that his religion forbade him from any contact with alcohol, and was dismissed as a result in March 2008.

In an interview with the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel, Wagner described the Islamic shadow justice system in Germany as "very foreign, and for a German lawyer, completely incomprehensible at first. It follows its own rules. The Islamic arbitrators aren't interested in evidence when they deliver a judgment, and unlike in German criminal law, the question of who is at fault doesn't play much of a role."

When Der Spiegel asked why it was wrong for two parties to try to resolve a dispute between themselves, Wagner replied: "The problem starts when the arbitrators force the justice system out of the picture, especially in the case of criminal offenses. At that point they undermine the state monopoly on violence. Islamic conflict resolution in particular, as I've experienced it, is often achieved through violence and threats. It's often a dictate of power on the part of the stronger family."

Wagner's findings largely confirm a report published by the German Interior Ministry in 2009 which warned that Islamic groups in Germany want to live under Sharia law in Germany. Unlike any other people on the planet, Muslims do not assimilate. Wagner's book comes at a time when Germany is immersed in a heated national debate over Muslim immigration. That debate was launched in August 2010 with the publication of a best-selling book titled "Germany Does Away With Itself,"(not available in English) which broke Germany's long-standing taboo on discussing the impact of Muslim immigration. Authored by Thilo Sarrazin, a renowned German banker who is also a long-time member of the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), the book is now on its 20th edition. At last count, more than 1.5 million copies have been sold, making it one of the most widely read titles in Germany since the Second World War. Sarrazin's book has resonated with vast numbers of ordinary Germans who are becoming increasingly uneasy about the social changes that are transforming Germany, largely due to the presence of millions of non-integrated Muslims in the country.

German President Christian Wulff has tried to defuse the row ignited by Sarrazin. During a keynote speech(in German, you can translate using Google) to mark the 20th anniversary of German reunification on October 3, 2010, Wulff proclaimed that "Islam belongs in Germany" because of the four million Muslims who now live there. Germany has Western Europe's second-biggest Islamic population after France, with Turks the single biggest minority. [Wulff is wrong, truth is, Germany belongs to Islam]

Opinion polls show broad public support for Sarrazin's argument that Muslim immigrants shut themselves off from Germany, do not speak German, and do not share the German, European or Western culture or worldview. Why is that? In our Western culture we understand that a people will immigrate from one country to another mostly because they hate their own culture and want to adopt yours. While this may be true in most cases, it does not generally apply to Muslims. Muslims generally immigrate to your country because the hate your culture and want to change it to their own. We can’t understand that much less comprehend it. And that my Western friend is because we have no concept of Muslim Ideology.

According to a poll conducted by the mass-circulation Bild am Sonntag, 89% of those surveyed say Sarrazin's arguments are convincing. "For them, Sarrazin is somebody who is finally saying what many are thinking," according to the pollsters.

The Friedrich Ebert Foundation, a think tank linked to the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), recently published a survey which found that many Germans believe their country is being "overrun" by Muslim immigrants. It also found that these views are not isolated at the extremes of German society, but are to a large degree "at the center of it."

An opinion survey, "Perception and Acceptance of Religious Diversity," conducted by the sociology department of the University of Münster, in partnership with the prestigious TNS Emnid political polling firm, shows that only 34% of West Germans and 26% of East Germans have a positive view of Muslims. Fewer than 5% of Germans think Islam is a tolerant religion, and only 30% say they approve of the building of mosques. The number of Germans who approve of the building of minarets or the introduction of Muslim holidays is even lower. Fewer than 10% of West Germans and 5% of East Germans say that Islam is a peaceful religion.

As the political winds shift, so are German politicians. After initially distancing herself from Sarrazin's views, German Chancellor Angela Merkel recently said Germany's roots are Judeo-Christian. She also said: "Now we obviously have Muslims in Germany. But it is important in regard to Islam that the values represented by Islam must correspond with our constitution. What applies here is the constitution, not Sharia law.” But the proliferation of Sharia law in Germany suggests Merkel is mistaken: Sharia law ‘does’ apply in Germany, and now, there is nothing they can do to stop it short of a bloody civil war.

As Europe begins to wake up from the deception of multiculturalism and political correctness, it finds itself sinking in the quagmire of Islamic ideology and oppression. As I have said so many times before, once a culture begins to open their deceived eyes and understand what Islam is about, it is too late.

I have written similar articles about France, Holland and the U.K. as well as America. Allowing a Muslim to put his foot in the door of your country, is tantamount to jumping out of an airplane at 10 thousand feet, there is just no going back.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I will repeat what I said at the beginning: This is the result of benevolently allowing the Muslim foot in the door. An unsuspecting benevolent country that goes down the slippery slope of Islamic deception will eventually find itself beyond the point of no return. Remember Islamic Sharia law has already found its way into American courts, (read a previous article). And unless you want to be subjected to the supremacy of Sharia law and Islamic oppression, you had better do what ever you can to help stop Sharia in your state and in America. And you had better do it right now my friend!

If you continue to delay, soon everything else you do or that is important to you will be moot! Your appeal to a higher court will simply be to another Muslim court.

Islam has already infiltrated every other aspect of American government, Federal, State, and local. The Infiltration of public schools and our courts has already begun. Soon we will be at the same stage of Islamic Jihad as most countries in Europe. And then war will be the only way to stop the “World Nation of Islam”.

Is that what you want???

de Andréa

On A Lighter Side

2011-09-22T10:23:00.000-07:00

No, not the light we walk into when we die, the light the Government forces us to buy and use. On second thought, it might ‘be’ the light we walk into when we die.

On a personal note: I hope you find this amusing or as I was, ‘fighting mad’. And it’s true, all true.

By de Andréa

And God said: “Let their be light”… or was that the government?

Most of you, have been reading my column long enough to know that I will fight the government regulatory agencies all the way to the mat. I have fought them in the trenches; I have fought them on the mountain tops. For thirty years I fought them in and out of the courts; until I was so exhausted and broken I finally walked away from my business and retired early. With that being said, and now refreshed, I’m ‘back’ and ready to fight!

Several months ago the electric company called me and said that a federal regulatory agency has ordered them to replace all the light bulbs in America, starting with our local rural and residential areas with these more efficient (dreaded) CFL’s, I think it means Curly Fried Lights, but don’t quote me on that. Oh! That’s not all; they also had to replace all the ceiling light fixtures with the new ones that use a circular florescent bulb with the curious and flamboyant name of “Circular Florescent Bulb”. They said the new circular one would give me a lot more light, use half the electricity, and last for years. Up to ‘five’ years she said. And it was all free. Well now, ‘I’ know, there’s no free lunch or light, as in this case. So I asked… just who is paying for all this free stuff that the government says is so good for me. Well the government is of course! Soooo! I said, then… I am paying for it. NO! It’s free, all free she said, installation and everything.

Now I could have gone into a long dissertation of how the government doesn’t produce anything to earn the money to buy the free stuff to give away, so they have to get it from me and you…but I didn’t. So I thought if I have already paid for this free stuff, I might as well accept it. Besides --- I was going to save money, right? And get more light too.

We made an appointment and two nice young men came and took down my old fixtures and replaced them with these wonderful brighter energy saving green ones. No, they weren’t the color green, they had a green philosophy, and they didn’t make carbon footprints all over the house. Again I was tempted to say, well…my other lights didn’t leave footprints, but again I was very gracious and bit my tongue. When they finished removing my old fixtures and replaced all my other familiar round bulbs with those scary little curly CFL’s, I very graciously thanked them and they left.

While I didn’t notice a significant increase in lumens, lumens, that’s light talk for more light, ‘or’ a drop in my electric bill, a few months later however, I did notice a difference when the light stopped coming out of one of my new free fixtures. One of those with the wonderful new circular free bulb in it, you know, the one that is so appropriately called “The Circular Bulb”, the one that was supposed to last for years, up to ‘five’ years I believe she said. Or was it five minutes, I don’t know anymore, I can’t remember.

Anyway, no use crying over a burned bulb right, or is that something spilled? No matter. I mean they were all free anyway. I didn’t even begin crying until I got to the hardware store. Oh! They had replacement bulbs alright! That wasn’t what made all the water well up in my eyes; it was what I read on the little sticker on the package that caused all that burning salt water to leak down my sweet taxpaying cheeks. $9.98 it said, plus tax. No… this was not for a whole case of bulbs, this was for one single light bulb that doesn’t give me anymore light and doesn’t lower my electric bill and doesn’t last too long. And what’s this plus tax, didn’t I already pay for this with my taxes? Oh that’s right --- it was free. Oh! Wait… That’s not all; it cost $5.00 at the hazardous waste site to dispose of the free one that no longer emitted any light or lumens either, just wonderful free silver colored mercury, no, it was silver not green. But we must remember it was free, paid for with my taxes and yours. As I recall they said they would replace my refrigerator too, if mine were one of the old inefficient kind. For free. Boy! Am I’m sure glad I already had one of the new types. What if I had an inefficient car or horse, I mean house, would they replace them too? For free? I …don’t think I can afford anymore of this free stuff.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Well…as I said, there is still a little fight left in me so I’ll show em. I’ll just put my old light fixture back up, with my old round bulbs, the ones that are not free and not green, the ones they say leave those nasty carbon footprints all over and are cheap and last a long time and contain no mercury. Mark my words, this is truly ‘war’ my friend, footprints or no. And I defy the government light police to check my bulbs, whether they be round, Circular, or the scary Curly Fried ones.

I can tell, that you see I still have a ‘little’ fight left me, and you would be right. Be it very little…

Now I'm wondering if those free fixtures have microphones and cameras in them. Just remember there’s no free lunch…or as in this case, “Free Light”.

-de Andréa

Life on the Reservation

2011-09-21T14:15:00.000-07:00

See the future of America as a Socialist State:
If you want to read a true story about what socialism has already done in the free nation of America then read on my friend. This is truly like looking into the future of American liberal socialism…

By de Andréa

Beginning in 1944, Mr. Rousas Rushdoony served for eight and a half years as a missionary to the Shoshone and Paiute Indians on the Duck Valley Indian Reservation in a remote area of Nevada. It was this time spent on the reservation where Rushdoony deduced correctly that the state “is the giver of all things, the source power, of land, food, clothing, and (having built a reservoir for irrigation here) even of water"…

The government’s “mismanagement” of the Indians totally ruined their lives.
Rushdoony told about the impact of this process in “Life on the Reservation”, an article published in 1954 in Essays on Liberty, a publication of the Foundation for Economic Education. As you read it, note how Rushdoony’s reservation experience has broadened in scope to include a majority of Americans who are now becoming --- just part of a much larger reservation.

His story…
“Life on the Reservation” By Rousas J. Rushdoony 1954 Essays on Liberty

"The reservation Indian is becoming less self-sufficient and more dependent upon what he calls the Great White Father in Washington. Instead of freedom, the Indian has government-guaranteed “security.” Instead of individual responsibility, he has a government bureau to handle his personal affairs. There are special laws governing his right to own land and to spend tribal money. Under that system of bondage it would surprise no one to find that the many thousands of Indians have remained uneducated, hungry, diseased, mismanaged, and helpless dependants.

One of the surest consequences of a government of “welfare” and “security” is the rapid decline and death of responsibility and character.

Whatever the pre-reservation Indian was—and his faults were real—he was able to take care of himself and had a character becoming his culture and religion. He was a responsible person. Today he is far from that. The wretched security he has had, beginning with the food and clothing dole of early years, designed to enforce the reservation system and destroy Indian resistance, has sapped him of his character. The average Indian knows that he can gamble and drink away his earnings and still be sure that his house and land will remain his own; and; with his hunting rights, he can always maintain the illusion of eking out some kind of resistance.

Governments too often hamper and impede the man with initiative and character. This is because their program inevitably must be formulated in terms of the lowest common denominator, the weakest Indian. In addition, the provisions of the government for the “welfare” and “security” of the Indians remove the consequences from their sinning and irresponsibility. The result is a license to irresponsibility, in which all the touted government projects cannot counteract.

And I believe the results would be no better, for the best hundred or thousand persons selected from any society after a generation or so of the same kind of “welfare” and “security” government.

Many of the men in the Indian Affairs Service are sincerely and earnestly trying to improve the Indian’s welfare. And herein may lay the problem, as well as the solution that they are faced with, this is the constant dilemma: All their zealous and patient efforts to help the Indian simply tend to become another crutch that the Indian depends on. Those Indians who have ‘left’ the reservation have become progressive and independent, they apparently have done so because of personal, and religious factors totally unrelated to the government program"… END

So what does this story about Native Americans have to do with today’s economic downfall and the current American government administration or (regime)? Well first, since 1944 the reservation Indian is still no better off. He still lives in poverty; he still drinks more alcohol than the free water food and clothing he receives, and because he has never learned to be responsible for himself, we have made a lazy welfare sucking dependant out of him in one generation. The proof of the putting here, is that most of the Indians that have left the reservation for what ever reason, have become self sustaining productive Americans.

The Third World America
This statement made by your president Obama caught my attention: Obama quipped this in response to the proposed ‘Republican’ budget plan, which is to let the American citizen take more control of the economy. “We will be a nation of potholes” he said, “and our airports will be worse than places that we used to call the ‘Third World Governments’, but who are now investing in infrastructure.” Obama failed however to elaborate on which third world countries he thinks should be models for the United States, and how his government welfare policies, as in the reservation Indian, have secured America’s status as part of the declining and dependant third world.

THE BOTTOM LINE: If you want to see and understand a microcosm of what Government intervention and social programs can and will do to our nation, then pay very close attention to these words of Mr. Rousas Rushdoony and his story about the social and economic demise of the Native American Indian, in… “Life on the Reservation”

You might want to e-mail this to a fellow American who also - may want to remain free from social economic tyranny…

de Andréa

Who Are We at War With?

2011-09-19T12:20:00.000-07:00

We are certainly at war with the Nation of Islam and the Jihadist ideology of supremism, but we may also be at war with our own government’s ideology of elitism.

By de Andréa

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: “The right of the ‘people’ to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

The purpose of the Fourth Amendment is to protect ‘citizen’s privacy’ and private property rights. But if we lose our Fourth Amendment, then we will soon lose all of our constitutional rights and protections.

“The only purpose of law in a free country is to protect the rights and freedoms of its citizens” Frederic Bastiat.

Just as a herd of sheep, we are led to the slaughter of our rights freedoms, and human dignity every time we board a plane in the U.S. All because our government refuses to do its constitutional job of protecting this nation from a foreign invasion, THE INVASION OF MUSLIM JIHADISTS.

Just where is the warrant and/or probable cause to search one’s person in an American airport? As you have just read the U.S. Constitution clearly states that we have the right to be ‘secure’ in our “’persons’, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures”. And this “shall not be ‘violated’,” Well it is violated. “and no warrants shall [be] issue[d], but upon probable cause”, and it must be “supported by oath or affirmation”. How many violations of the 4th amendment can you count?

Illegal legislation from the bench is now actually ‘taking away’ our rights and freedoms. So according to Bastiat and the definition of law in a FREE NATION, America is no longer a free country! And unless we rebel against these atrocities ‘now’, we will get what we deserve --- an oppressive Police State.

The dismantling of our Constitution and our Fourth Amendment by governing authorities who don’t even know who the enemy of western civilization is, has led to such violations as the stripping down of a 95-year-old leukemia patient and young children by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agents. And it has also led to the killing of an innocent Iraq War veteran by law enforcement.

Personally I would not be so adversely opposed to this kind of airport security if it were used as a last resort in the fight for our very survival, but this kind of insanity is being used as a first line of defense and it is used reactively. This kind of abuse proves that our government isn’t as interested in proactively winning this so-called war on terrorism as much as it is in terrorizing our own American citizens. Truth is, that most all of the failed attempts at terrorism since 9/11 have been as a result of ignorance on the part of the terrorist, such as the underwear bomber ‘or’ smart and prompt civilian action such as in the case of the shoe bomber.

“It’s something I couldn’t imagine happening on American soil,” said Jean Weber, the daughter of the 95-year-old leukemia patient who was stripped of her Depends adult diaper by TSA agents and held for one hour so the agents could inspect the contents of her undergarments.

Americans are in a battle with their own government whether they know it or not. And if we continue to sit on the sidelines and allow our rights to be taken from us, then more innocent Americans will lose their right to defend themselves against harassment, intimidation, and unwarranted search and seizure of their persons and property.

If our government were to do their (#^&*) constitutional job of protecting this Nation against a foreign invasion as it says in article 4 section 4 of the Constitution we wouldn’t have the enemy of the free world running loose in this country. Let me ask you this, did we allow German Nazi’s to run free in the U.S. when we were at war with them? Of course not, it would have been insane. Then why do we, not only, allow Middle Eastern Muslim Terrorists to run free in America, but we encourage, enable, and protect them. Isn’t it just as, or more insane??? And as a result we Americans pay the price by losing the very thing we are fighting for…our Constitutional rights and freedom.

“We need to be doing better police work and doing less of the universal giving up of our freedom to live our life the way we would like to live our life,” Sen. Paul said to John Pistole, the administrator of the TSA at the DHS, during a Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on invasive TSA searches.

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety, – Benjamin Franklin

Recently, a Tennessee woman was added to the list of those who stood up for their rights at the TSA line and paid the price by being arrested. Because the woman refused to go through the TSA’s airport screening machine, and refused to allow her daughter to be patted-down by a TSA agent, she was arrested by police at the Nashville International Airport on a charge of disorderly conduct. According to a police report, the mother told TSA agents that she didn’t want her daughter to be “touched inappropriately” or have her “crotch grabbed.” The mother was also prevented from taking a video of the incident on her mobile phone. Of course the Gestapo doesn’t want to be photographed while performing their indecent duties.

Please send your free messages to your State Representative and Senators — tell them to Oppose DHS Police State Measures here!

Meant to be a part of the war on terrorism, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently released a series of terrorist-watch videos called “See Something, Say Something“ that while it addresses the obvious of reporting suspicious activities anytime you are a witness, it ignorantly and in a politically correct way depicts the suspicious characters as western men not Middle eastern men. It effectively tells Americans to spy on each other. The USSR paid people to spy and turn in their fellow Russian’s citizens for speaking out against Communism. These video clips, in the name of the war on terror, depict western Americans as terror threats, and then advise citizens to report the behaviors of their fellow Americans. Dispite the fact that all foreign terrorism and acts of war on the west including 9/11 have been done by Middle Eastern men between the ages of 19 and 37, Our brain dead federal government obviously believes that our enemy must be 95 year old sick grandmothers, Catholic Nuns, young girls and European looking American men.

One of the DHS videos displays newspaper clippings of Americans who have committed acts of terror, such as Ted Kaczynski the Unabomber, and Timothy McVey one of the men involved in the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Yet, the video fails to show pictures of the 19 9/11 hijackers, or members of al-Qaeda, Hamas and Hezbollah, or members of other foreign terrorist organizations.

Unfortunately, these profiling tactics aren’t new, because according to documents written by the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) in 2009, if you display the Gadsden flag, (similar to my website logo) or consider yourself a Libertarian or a supporter of the liberty movement, or a Constitutional conservative, then you just might be considered the biggest threat to our national security. It is politically correct to profile every other ethic, religious, and/or political group in America except Middle Eastern Muslims. And as the Nazi’s in the 1940’s we are at war with the Nation of Islam, not Freedom loving patriot Americans.

This is a prime example of an imposing police state, where the government tasks citizens with the job of spying on their neighbors, instead of using the government’s resources to protect patriotic Americans from the real terror threats like getting the Nazi’s out of this country, or in this case, the Muslim Jihadists.

How much longer will you remain silent and continue to be pushed around before you stand up and tell every member of Congress to stand up and protect ‘your’ Fourth Amendment Constitutional rights?

Law enforcement kills innocent Iraq War veteran
Right now, SWAT teams can invade your home without probable cause or warrent. And if you dare to protect your home and your family from an intruder, not knowing that the “intruder” is law enforcement, then you could be shot and killed if you are armed. This is what happened to Jose Guereña, a young Marine and Iraq War veteran who was killed by a SWAT team that invaded his home and fired 71 bullets — 22 penetrating Guereña’s body — all because his brother, who did not live with him, was suspected of drug trafficking. Jose Guereña had a clean record, and police never found anything suspicious in his home. Now his young wife is left to raise their child as a single parent.

The loss of our rights is happening across the country because the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Kentucky v. King has effectively and illegally revoked Americans’ Fourth Amendment protections — the SCOTUS decision gives police the authority to stage a search and seizure of your property without obtaining a warrant from a judge.

What this means for you, and your law-abiding friends and family members, is that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision has effectively stripped every citizen of their Fourth Amendment protections! The Fourth Amendment was written to protect us from police excess and police mistakes. The warrant requirement ranks among the fundamental distinctions between our form of government – where officers are under the law – and the police-state, where they are the law.

“Most Americans would agree that requiring third-party judicial oversight is what protects all of us from living fear, where those doing the arresting are answerable only to themselves,” Sen. Paul said.

Our un-American renegade Supreme Court decision has opened the door to allow a nation-wide abuse of power, and there is nothing that we can do – ONLY CONGRESS CAN TAKE ACTION!

Along with thousands of your fellow Americans, you can join me to DEMAND that members of Congress circumvent the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision by voting for a law that will reclaim and secure our Fourth Amendment protections!

Please send your free messages to your State Representative and Senators — tell them to Oppose DHS warrantless Police State Measures Please click here!

‘Or do nothing’, and thereby help the elitists dictators take away, one by one, your God given rights and freedoms. You will get what you deserve with no effort at all…

"No man is entitled to the blessings of freedom unless he be vigilant in its preservation.” -- General Douglas MacArthur

de Andréa

The Millennium Papers and Agenda 21

2011-09-16T15:38:00.001-07:00

Warning, Big Brother Is Here
George Orwell’s Movie of 1984 about the predicted Global big brother, may be a little late in coming but ‘he’ is here and has been for some time now, if not in the obvious then in the form of a quietly implemented U.N. program called Agenda 21, code name “Smart Growth”.

By de Andréa
September 15, 2011

Totalitarianism is here in the form of Agenda 21: Watch the video
Most Americans are totally unaware that among the obvious, and since 1992 one of the greatest threats to our freedom is a secret United Nations program known as Agenda 21. The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for “Sustainable Development” created “Agenda 21” as a sustainability agenda which is undoubtedly an amalgamation of social communism and extreme environmentalism fraught with American capitalist hatred. Agenda 21 has been signed into law in more that 170 countries including the United States of America and is secretly being implemented right here, right now in your community.

Watch a video by David Spaldy of Americans For Prosperity (AFP) about the effect of Agenda 21 on your private property rights. Click Here!

A detailed history on sustainable development, definitions, and critical actions can be found here. Section III of the Agenda 21 Plan addresses local community sustainable development. The Preamble and Chapter 28 discuss how Agenda 21 should be implemented at a local level. The United Nations purposely recommends avoiding the term Agenda 21 and suggests a cleverly named alternative, a code name: "smart growth.” The United Nations Millennium Papers - Issue 2 (page 5) says this of Agenda 21 and smart growth:

“Participating in a UN-advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy-fixated groups and individuals in our society such as the National Rifle Association, citizen militias and some members of Congress. This segment of our society who fear 'one-world government' and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined 'the conspiracy' by undertaking LA21. So, we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management, or smart growth” [ red emphasis added].

Undoubtedly, residents of any town, county, or city in the United States that treasure their freedom, liberty, and property rights couldn't care less whether it's called Agenda 21 or the code name “smart growth”. A recent example of this can be found in Carroll County, Maryland, where a smart growth plan called Pathways was drafted by the County Planning Department. The plan, if enacted, proposed a hidden breathtaking reshuffling of land rights: Rezoning of thousands of acres of beautiful, low-density agricultural farmland and protected residential conservation land into office parks and down-zoning of agriculture land to prevent future subdivision by farmers, up-zoning of low-density residential land around small towns into higher density zoning to permit construction of hundreds or possibly thousands of inclusive housing units, including apartments and condominiums, inclusive housing with placement of multi-family construction on in-fill lots within existing residential single family communities.
And endorsement of government-sponsored housing initiatives (subsidies) to ensure so-called healthier, balanced neighborhoods

Carroll County, Maryland is one of 1,168 cities, towns, and counties worldwide that are members of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) - Local Governments for Sustainability, which is an international association of local governments as well as national and regional local government organizations that have made a commitment to sustainable development. The ICLEI mission statement closely resembles that of Agenda 21. In fact, the ICLEI has Special Consultative Status with the UN Economic and Social Council and coordinates local government representation in the UN processes related to Agenda 21.

Clearly, smart growth plans will impact Americans' future choices in where and how they live. Furthermore, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other federal and state agencies may attempt to deny grant funds to states and cities that do not adopt smart growth plans.

Most Americans will remain unaware of the implications of smart growth and Agenda 21 until after it is promulgated in their own backyards, then it will be too late to hit the undo button. Ironically, these plans are more insidious than the unconstitutional expansion and liberalizing of the Eminent Domain ruling by the Supreme Court in the case of Kelo v City of New London. Under Eminent Domain rulings, property owners usually receive compensation for their losses.

Conversely, smart growth municipal plans under Agenda 21, required by statute, enable municipalities to change zoning laws and engage in other regulatory actions that devalue property, restrict off-conveyances, and otherwise erode property values without payment of any compensation to the property owner. Regardless of political orientation, two indisputable facts remain. Agenda 21 is a direct assault on private property rights and American sovereignty, and it is coming to a neighborhood near you.

The United Nations Agenda 21 was signed by the United States in 1992 and 14 years later, people are still in the dark. If you were to ask at random the question, "Have you heard of Agenda 21?" the answer would be an over-whelming "No," although it is being implemented in every local community throughout the United States.

In conclusion:
Agenda 21 is a part of the environmentalist agenda of Power and Control.
Agenda 21 is a 40 chapter document listing goals to be achieved globally. It is the global plan to change the way we "live, eat, learn and communicate" and has absolutely nothing to do with "saving the earth." It will instead destroy the earth…

"Its regulation would severely limit water, electricity, and transportation - and deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas, it would monitor all lands and people. No one would be free from the watchful eye of the new global tracking and information system," according to Berit Kjos, author of Brave New Schools the indoctrination of America through its children.

Maurice Strong, Secretary-general of the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro said, "...Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class - involving high meat consumption and large amounts of frozen and convenience foods. [We will be reduced to eating government oatmeal three meals a day.] The elimination of fossil fuels, appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning, and suburban housing that are not sustainable. A shift is necessary which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations”. George Orwell was a visionary that was way ahead of his time my friend.

In other words, the Global plan is for us to live on the level of third world nations. That means no box mixes or microwave meals, limited use of fuel of any kind, no air-conditioning, and very little meat. When the cost of Freon skyrocketed, when mad cow disease hit, the National Animal Identification System introduced, the price of fuel soared, it has become apparent that given time, these sustainable controls will be put into place - one way or another - and the Global Governance is very powerful.

In 1992, Agenda 21 unknowingly began to change our lives. In that same year, Al Gore wrote his book, Earth in the Balance. To advance his cause, he has written another piece of fiction entitled, An Inconvenient Truth about global warming.

Although groundwork had been laid, it took a Bill Clinton to actually introduce something so invasive to our nation and get by with it without the public becoming aware. President Clinton appointed his "President’s Council on Sustainable Development" and he literally gave away the rights and freedoms the framers of the Constitution had provided.

People in the United States may not know about Agenda 21 and the President’s Council on Sustainable Development, but people around the world do. They know for example that Chicago has one of the greatest numbers of activities existing at the local, neighborhood, and/or micro-regional level. They also know that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitors and promotes activities in this field through their Office for Sustainable Ecosystem and Communities.

Found on a Slovakian website: "To the leading countries in the field of development but especially of practical using of sustainable development indicators belong to the U.S.A. At the top level these activities are promoted by the President’s Council on Sustainable Development (1996), which defined a set of ten national goals toward sustainable development. These goals express in concrete terms the elements of sustainability. Alongside the goals are suggested indicators that can be used to help measure progress toward achieving them.”

Agenda 21 is certainly not a secret anymore but it is introduced to local communities in a secret deceptive way and many times it is implemented by unsuspecting community leaders. The internet is full of how Agenda 21 has been fulfilled through Smart Growth planning, land use, sustainable development, and extreme environmentalism. Agenda 21 is grant driven to your city council or county board disguised with terms like - sustainable, visioning, partners, tourism and stakeholders, along with consensus and other terms with the intent to make you believe we are running out of all our resources and we must do our part and "save for tomorrow. [See Agenda 21's Table of Contents.]

It has nothing to do with “saving anything” – it has everything to do with “ power and control.” Sadly, very few congressmen even know Agenda 21 is actually running our country when they are voting to send grant money to their constituents. Agenda 21 is incentive driven, as the planners know that greed in the heart of man will be his downfall.

Another example of the power of Agenda 21 is the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, better known as ANWR, it has oil we need to be drilling for the security of our nation. Environmentalists don’t care that we are dependent on foreign oil from nations who hate us, and that our nation’s defense is at stake. The area where drilling would occur is just a dot in this vast land, yet they would gamble the strength of our nation in behalf of their agenda of tyrannical power and control.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The main goal of Agenda 21 is to redistribute the wealth of western nations to third world countries and to bring our great nation to its knees in the name of socialism, fascism, communism or some other “ism.” Our founding fathers founded this nation on the belief of a Sovereign God and because of that we have been blessed. Do you know anything about the gods of the nations to which we would become equal?

I think I am going to Mars…

de Andréa

Social[ist] [In]security

2011-09-14T17:27:00.000-07:00

Is Social Security a Ponzi scheme? Well if it isn’t, it is surly a socialistic system that can only work under the most ideal conditions and then for only a short while, until the foundation crumbles under its own weight. I ask again, is Social Security a Ponzi scheme?

By de Andréa

What with the diminishing demographics and the selfish irresponsibility of abortion we are systematically destroying the American dream and American freedom. Although a socialist program, Social Security may just be one of those dreams.

Social Security is in the news. Are people finally telling the truth: Is it a government sponsored Ponzi (Pyramid) scheme? Isn’t it interesting that after defeating the policies and ideologies of Nazism we then adopt those same policies and ideologies.

Read on about the history of Social Security, where it came from, where it’s going, who really designed it and why.

The financial structure of Social Security
In the beginning, and even though everybody was not in the system the costs of Social Security were not all that great. In fact, Congress had exempted itself. Most federal and state workers were not in the system. Public school teachers were exempt. They could opt for a private system. Members of Congress had their own private government (taxpayer funded) system. This didn’t change until 1984, and not unlike Obama’s healthcare system, it became mandatory. Compared to today, the cost of Social Security was small. Those in the system paid less than two percent (employee and employer pay-in combined) on just $3000 per year income for a total of only $60 per year. Now it’s nearly 15.5 percent on more than $106,000 per year, that’s as much as $2000 per year. This will eventually have to be more than 50.000 per year, per worker. Sound ludicrous? Exactly!

According to the Social Security board of trustees, there were 42 “contributing workers” per Social Security beneficiary in 1945. In other words for every person receiving benefits, 42 people paid for that single recipient. Seemed like magic, except that few people anticipated the “birth death rate,” a decline in family size, legislated abortion (government murder of small people), increased SS benefits, and a larger recipient pool. And then there’s the fact that taking money from one person only to give it to another is immoral and unconstitutional. But we’re talking about “government funding,” here, and “Immorality” is its middle name.

According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics - since 1945, the number paying into the system has changed dramatically:
There were only 1.75 full-time private-sector workers in the United States last year [2010] for each person receiving benefits from Social Security, and the Social Security board of trustees. That means that for each husband and wife who worked full-time in the private sector last year, there was a Social Security recipient somewhere in the country taking benefits from those two people. Soon it will be one to one and then each working person will be supporting two retired seniors as well as their own families, of course it will collapse long before that. Now! Does privatization sound good?

Most Americans don’t know much about the ‘history’ of Social Security. So here goes: In William L. Shirer’s book The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich we learn about the origin of Social Security policies, and the effect they had on the German people. Our Social Security System was actually engineered by German Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck in the 19th century, (yes the fellow the Nazis named the giant battleship after). His policies gradually made the German people value security over political freedom and deceptively caused them to trust in the State as a benefactor and a protector. Between 1883 and 1889 Bismarck had put through a program for social security far beyond anything known in other countries at the time. It included compulsory insurance for workers against the inevitability of old age, sickness, accident, and incapacity, and though it was organized by the State it was financed equally by employers and employees. Does this sound familiar? It should…this my friend, is American Social Security!

Adolf Hitler took full advantage of the German state of mind and Bismarck’s early progress in turning the nation into a model of socialist reform. Hitler remarks in Mein Kampf, “I studied Bismarck’s socialist legislation in its intention, struggle, and success.” It was Hitler’s social security policies and promises that helped get him elected. What is the real “intention” of Bismarck’s Social programs that Hitler so diligently studied? One word…DEPENDENCE.

Hitler was not alone in his admiration of Bismarck and what he was able to accomplish. FDR was no different; he along with Hitler borrowed Bismarck’s socialist agenda and created what became known as the American Social Security System. Bismarck said, “…the State must take the matter in hand, since the State can most easily supply the requisite funds. It must provide them not as alms but in fulfillment of the workers’ right to look to the State where their own good will can achieve nothing more.” Roosevelt and his socialist admirers agreed. P. J. O’Brien, writing in Forward with Roosevelt, links Bismarck’s social policies with those of Roosevelt: “[The quotation by Bismarck] might have been lifted out of a speech by President Roosevelt in 1936”, but the socialist Iron Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck uttered it in 1871.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Well there you have it, simple, direct, and to the point, and as usual I pull no punches, just the raw truth. The American Social Security System is nothing less than warmed over Fascist Nazi Socialistic program. With the beloved and heralded Franklin D. Roosevelt at the helm, (Americas first successful dictator) his socialist policies extended the length of the recession of 1929 to a full-blown 10 year depression by 1934. This lasted until the 1940’s when the freedom of capitalism began producing a military powerful enough to guarantee our survival, ironically ‘against’ the same tyranny of socialism that was becoming prevalent in our own government.

Government guaranteed socialism in any form has never been the answer to long-term security. And yet we blindly continue to create failed social policy after failed social policy, even to the extent of adopting our own enemy’s social policies and programs.

Have we become our own worst enemy??? Remember, “Ignorance leads to deception and deception leads to destruction”…de Andréa

Obama’s Money Laundering Scheme

2011-09-10T08:13:00.001-07:00

How to divert American taxpayer money to a Muslim terrorist organization in one easy lesson, if this story were written fifty or even twenty years ago it would be a scandal, today --- it is just normal.

By de Andréa

First, at the risk of taking away in a physical and in an emotional sense from all the sincere thought and hard work that went into the memorial commemorating and remembering the thousands of people who lost their lives on 9/11 2001 --- I have to say that in a political sense, I believe it is quite another story. The hypocrisy of political correctness bleeds through the thin veneer of sincerity and stains the memory.

It is just one day until we celebrate the 10th anniversary of the successful Islamic Jihad attack of (9/11) on our once free Christian Nation. It is not enough that we want to build a Mosque near the site to celebrate the event, but in a few days we will celebrate the politically correct anniversary of the biggest most successful attack on the biggest buildings in the biggest city in Muslim history. It has only been a few decades since we brought down the USSR, the biggest most powerful Communist Socialist country in the world. Then three years ago in the wake of this memory we elected a ‘Social Communist Muslim’ as President and Commander-in–Chief of this free Christian Nation, and then we wonder why America is now becoming a Muslim Communist State.

Scandals of the past are normal today
President Obama's Kenyan Muslim brother runs a Muslim Charity Foundation (code for Islamic Terrorist Jihad organization) that collects funds in the United States to spread the poisonous ideology of Islam here and abroad. While these organizations seem to operate freely in America with the blessings of the IRS since Islam began to take over the U.S. in September of 2001, --- this one however is just a little different.

Below, is a picture of Barack’s brother Abongo holding a picture of Barack and his brothers dressed in Muslim garb.

Abongo Malik Obama, AKA "Roy" Obama (no record of him ever immigrating to America) has been illegally or legally, take your pick, running his Muslim charitable foundation since 2008, interestingly enough, since Obama took office. It was discovered earlier this year however, that the Foundation had never been approved, or ever had oversight, as a 501 © 3, but Abongo or Roy or whoever he is, was able to get a quick (unheard of) retroactive approval of a tax-exempt status from the Internal Revenue Service in a record time period of less than a month.

The Barack H. Obama Foundation, which runs out of a private commercial mail drop in Arlington, Va., has solicited tax-deductible contributions on the Internet since 2008. But it first submitted an application for its tax exempt status in May of 2011, and was granted the status in June, according to records.

Abongo Malik Obama continues to serve as the founder and president of the Barack H. Obama Foundation, which, since it was set up in 2008, has illegally asked for tax-deductible contributions on the Internet, listing addresses and telephone numbers both in the U.S. and Kenya, but without disclosing that the group lacked an IRS determination letter. This week, the IRS confirmed that the Barack H. Obama Foundation received a determination letter in June, conveniently awarding the group tax-exempt 501(c)3 status, retroactively to 2008.

When did the foundation file with the IRS?
As recently as last May, Alton Ray Baysden, a former State Department employee and director of the Barack H. Obama Foundation, at whose home the charity was founded in 2008, told the New York Post that the foundation had neglected to apply for tax-exempt status with the IRS. "We haven't been able to find someone with the expertise to do this," Baysden told New York Post reporters Isabel Vincent and Melissa Klein for a story published May 8. "We are scouting for an executive director, someone who knows how to register the charity," he said. [Come-on! A former State Department employee, and the founder is the Presidents brother, and they couldn’t fine anyone to advise them???? For three years???? But suddenly after being caught they are granted legal status in less than 30 days…Right!]

The New York Post also reported that the foundation was not even registered in state of Virginia at the time the article was written in May, despite’ a Virginia legal requirement that an organization register before soliciting donations in that state. "Since one of the Obama Foundation's founders and directors, Mr. Alton R. Baysden, stated publicly in May 2011 that the foundation had not even applied for tax-exempt status. It is inconceivable that the IRS can now claim that the status was granted the following month in June 2011, retroactive to 2008," said Ken Boehm, the head of the National Legal and Policy Center

In May, The National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) group, also a 501(c)3 organization, filed an official complaint with the IRS asking for an investigation of why the Barack H. Obama Foundation was being allowed to solicit tax-deductible contributions from the public even though the foundation had not applied for or received an IRS determination. "This appears to be political favoritism to the president's brother," Boehm a NLPC spokesman said. "It cries out for an investigation.” Boehm said that receiving an IRS determination letter typically takes six months or more after an organization seeking tax-exempt status has filed a formal application with the IRS.

No oversight
The concern of the National Legal and Policy Center was that the foundation might have violated federal and/or state postal and tax laws by soliciting via the Internet and U.S. mail, tax-deductible contributions without having made required filings and without having received necessary IRS tax-exempt determinations and oversight.

The Foundation's limited or nonexistent financial reporting
An IRS Form 990-EZ required for tax-exempt organizations was filed on May 23, only days before the IRS determination letter was sent. The Form 990-EZ appears to have been hand-written by Abongo Malik Obama himself, complete with an unorthodox page of calculations evidently included to evidence the amounts entered into the form. The form reported the foundation had received $24,250 total gross income for 2010, derived from contributions, gifts and grants. "We were not very successful this past year because of limited contributions," Abongo Malik Obama reported on the Form 990. "The Foundation sponsored a Youth Tournement (sic) and embarked on construction of community bridges." The Form 990 listed Samuel Andika Obiero of Arlington, Va., and Andrew Mboya of Hackensack, N.J., as directors, in addition to Abongo Malik Obama.

The Form 990, filed only 12 days after the New York Post article referenced above was published, did not list Baysden as a director.

GuideStar.org, the private website that posts for public view IRS documents regarding nonprofit organizations, said for the Barack H. Obama Foundation no audited financial statements were available for the Barack H. Obama Foundation, going back to its origin in 2008, other than the five-page Form 990 filed for 2010.

The website homepage of the Barack H. Obama Foundation prominently features a photograph of Barack H. Obama Sr. and a statement that the foundation is "a fully tax-exempt (501(c)3) charitable organization."

Abongo Born in Kenya to Kezia
Born in Kenya, on March 15, 1958, Abongo Malik "Roy" Obama was the first child born to Barack Obama Sr. The son of Kezia, Obama Sr.'s first wife, Abongo Malik "Roy" Obama was only 18 months old when Barack Obama Sr. arrived in New York on a BOAC flight on Aug. 8, 1959, in transit from Kenya to begin his undergraduate studies at the University of Hawaii in Honolulu. Having abandoned Kezia in Kenya, Obama Sr. subsequently married Stanley Ann Dunham, Barack Obama Jr.'s mother, while in Honolulu. In September 1962, Obama Sr. abandoned Stanley Ann Dunham and his second son, Barack Obama Jr., as he headed for Cambridge, Mass., to begin graduate studies in economics at Harvard University. As WorldNetDaily reported, Barack Obama Sr., on Aug. 17, 1962, in filling an Immigration and Naturalization form requesting to extend his temporary stay in the United States, listed Abongo Obama as his only child, neglecting to list Stanley Ann Dunham as his wife or Barack Obama, Jr. as his son. This was because Barack Hussein Obama Sr. never married Stanley Ann Durham.

A convert to Islam
Abongo Malik "Roy" Obama is a major character in Obama’s autobiography, “Dreams from my Father” A key passage in the autobiography concerns Obama's reaction to his half-brother when Roy joins Barack to be the best man at his wedding to Michelle. Noting that Roy had converted from Christianity to Islam, Obama wrote on page 441 that Roy had "sworn off pork and tobacco and alcohol.” Obama continued: "Abongo's new lifestyle has left him lean and clear-eyed, and at the wedding, he looked so dignified in his black African gown with white trim and matching cap that some of our guests mistook him for my father.” Pointedly, Obama observed that Roy was "prone to make lengthy pronouncements on the need for the black man to liberate himself from the … influences of European culture."

A Social Security number
Abongo has a Social Security number, issued in Washington, D.C., between 1985 and 1987, and associated with both the names "Roy Obama" and "Abongo Malik Obama," names that he appears to use interchangeably in the U.S.

A private investigative report shows that Roy Obama has been identified since 1988 with 22 different rental addresses in the Washington, D.C., area, including addresses in Prince Georges County and Montgomery County, Md. According to a recent report in the Los Angeles Times, Roy Obama, a frequent traveler between the U.S. and Kenya, has declared himself to be the "president" of Kyangoma-Koeglo, the family's ancestral village in Kenya.

THE BOTTOM LINE: So how does President Barack Hussein Obama fit into all this? Well… we may never know, just as we may never know the answer to hundreds of other questions such as --- why Barack has a social security number issued in the state of Connecticut when he never lived in Connecticut. Or, why he doesn’t seem to have a valid U.S. Birth Certificate. Or what is his connection to the sales of guns to the drug cartel in Mexico by the ATF on orders from the DOJ, which Obama has oversight? Or what happened to the millions of taxpayer dollars spent on his and Michael’s many extravagant vacations? Was some or most of that money diverted to the illegal Barack Hussein Obama Islamic Terrorist Foundation for the expansion of Islam in Kenya and the U.S.? Follow the money my friend.

The Islamic Jihadist attack of 9/11 on America didn’t end in 2001. It has only just begun…

From Obama's book Audacity of Hope: "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."

de Andréa

Shariah Law ‘Will’ Reach Inside Your American Home

2011-08-27T08:37:00.000-07:00

Under Islamic Sharia law you could be arrested just for eating the wrong kind of food…

By de Andréa

You've seen on television the so-called "Arab Spring" riots in Egypt, Libya, Yemen, and Syria. The British street riots, the riots in Paris and many other countries that have looting and killing in their streets. Many have been reported as "youth gangs"--- however, the truth is, the rioting is done by those who want the evil law of Shariah to reign over the earth!

That includes YOUR HOME!

Yes, ISLAM is infiltrating ‘your’ town, ‘your ‘community, ‘your’ schools, ‘your’ courts, and ‘yes’, eventually even your home. It starts very slow---just like they have been doing for more than 1400 years. Part of that is now the infiltration of the United States Court system.

It has already begun in your state

Here are the facts: Islam possesses a religious law called "al-Shari'ah" which TOTALLY governs the life of everyone, yes even you. Muslims consider this law to be the embodiment of the "will of Allah."

Their goal is that one day the whole world will be governed under Shariah law!

The Quran is the source of Shariah Law. These strict Islamic laws are responsible for the death of literally MILLIONS of people around the world. It served as a guide for the 9/11 attacks. It drives the consistent attack on hundreds of thousands of Non-Muslims in every country in the world.

Shariah Law is now a genuine threat to the United States of America; and yet, few Americans even know about it, or can say what Shariah really is! Muslims embrace this evil Law and adhere to an all-encompassing Islamic political-military-legal doctrine known as Shariah. Shariah obliges them to engage in Jihad (Islamic Holy War) to achieve the triumph of Islam worldwide through the establishment of a global Islamic State governed exclusively by Shariah, under a restored 12th Caliphate.

This means that the freedoms that you enjoy under our U.S. Constitution are no longer valid if Shariah Law infiltrates our court system--- and it has already begun! Shariah Law supersedes every law---including the laws that protect your rights.

If you don’t believe it can happen, then let me ask you --- what would it take to convince you? How about the fact that the Islamic population in Europe is growing at twice the rate of the indigenes European population? And in many areas in Europe Sharia already rules. How about the fact that every Islamic countries in the world today, were once Christian, Jewish, or Pagan? Not’ Islamic. How about the fact that Australia and Canada are fast moving away from the western culture of freedom and rapidly moving toward the Islamic oppressive culture of Islam? How about the fact that the Islamic culture and ideology, rather than Christianity is taught in the public schools all over America and in some schools, it is now mandatory? How about the fact that court cases are now many times decided according to Sharia law? No… not just in Saudi Arabia, right here in America. How about the fact that there are already ‘Sharia only’ courts in three states in America where you can be tried under Sharia law? In the state of Michigan Americans have already been arrested and tried for violating Sharia law. Yes! I ask you again…What would it take, to convince you that Islam is a bigger threat to America than the Nazis were in the 1940’s, and then, we were fighting for our very survival. What would it take??? I can tell you this’ my friend, by the time the majority of the west is convinced that Islam is bent on taking control of the world and destroying their freedom…. it will be too late to stop it, just as it was in Indonesia and Lebanon in recent history.

We must STOP SHARIAH LAW from continuing to enter our U.S. court system. U.S. Rep. Sandy Adams (R-FL) has introduced H.R. 973 which forbids foreign laws (including Shariah Law) from our Federal Court system. However, there are ONLY 68 co-sponsors! Many more Congressmen must be held accountable! How about your Congressman? Where does he or she stand? Is he or she a Co-Sponsor of this necessary bill?

I can guarantee you that Mr. Obama is NOT going to stop Shariah Law, because he is himself a Muslim watch his video. Besides it would spoil his 80 percent "approval rating" among Muslim Jihadists in the United States! Shariah Law is being introduced in the American courtroom---and you and I must fight back! Will you help keep Shariah Law out of the U.S. Courts by contacting your congressional representative?

The heart, soul, and survival of America are at stake. The American way of life---as you and I know it---is at stake!

In addition to crucial campaigns on FACEBOOK and GOOGLE, a potent television ad will be shown in key areas, as well as on various networks and, of course, the Internet. CLICK HERE TO VIEW TV SPOT!

In the United States, there have been multiple reports of Islamic "HONOR KILLINGS" where Muslim fathers have literally murdered their own sons and daughters for leaving the Muslim faith or violating Sharia!

On July 28th 2011, local police, not the military, stopped a Muslim soldier from killing more service men and women at Ft. Hood.(The DOD didn’t learn anything about Muslims in our military the first time or the second time and will not at anytime.) Far from investigating the Muslim soldier, the Army had given him "conscientious objector" status because he said he could not go to Afghanistan to fight Muslim terrorists. (What was he doing in the military? Answer…He wanted to kill Americans. An ‘awake’ gun shop owner notified the Killeen, Texas police of the Muslim's purchase of gun powder. PFC Naser Abdo, who was AWOL at the time, had weapons and bomb making materials in his motel room near Fort Hood when captured. The U.S. military ignorantly recruits Muslims to prove its political correctness. Rule number one: one just doesn’t put one’s enemy in one’s own military! But we do… That should give you some indication that after 300 years of war with the Nation of Islam, our DOD still hasn’t a clue who this enemy is. And yet, in the first paragraph of the War College manual it says, “Know who your enemy is”. This rule that we have adopted and has served us so well throughout history, is completely Ignored. Could it be that ‘political correctness’ will ignorantly and deceptively, lead to our demise? The New York Times, while immediately claiming the bombing in Norway was done by a Christian, they have yet to identify Abdo as a Muslim, and probably never will. Why is this happening? It is no accident my friend, Click Here watch and listen to Guy Rodgers, Executive Director of Act for America tell you how Obama has eliminated the threat of Islam by simply ignoring it. And then watch and listen to a clip presented by former FBI counter-terrorism expert John Guandolo, tell you how the DOD and intelligence agencies are kept in the dark about whom and what Islam really is…Click Here.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT: TWO-THIRDS of the number of people killed during 9/11 is approximately the same number of people KILLED EVERY SINGLE WEEK around the world for their "faith" in something other than Shariah. Do you ever hear about this…NO? Do you think you are being kept in the Dark by your president? Do you want to know why? It’s because he/Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim Jihadist, a friend of the “Muslim Brotherhood”. Please don’t take my word for it, if you haven’t already done so, open your eyes, ears, and listen to Obama tell you himself. Click Here

EVERY FIVE MINUTES A CHRISTIAN IS MURDERED! Every year, 105,000 Christians are killed by Muslims because of their faith. And soon it will happen here. This shocking figure was disclosed by Italian sociologist Massimo Introvigne, representative of the OSCE (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe) in a report titled "Combating Intolerance and Discrimination against Christians," at the International Conference on Inter-religious dialogue between Christians, Jews and Muslims, sponsored by the Hungarian Presidency of the European Union (EU) in Godollo, near Budapest. "Every five minutes," Introvigne said in his speech, "a Christian is killed because of his faith."

If one were to research the recent riots on the streets of England, you would find that they are much more than just "youth gangs.” So as not to anger the Muslims Jihadists, they are simply reported as generic youth gangs!

THE BOTTOM LINE: This is Islamic Jihad my friend and it’s coming to a neighborhood near you…

Islam will dominate the West and more, East and West Europe, Russia, Canada, America, Australia, and inevitably, the rest of the world. How? One way is Demographics, watch a Video. And why? Because we are obviously asleep at the switch.

de Andréa