Raping Children Is His Religion
Is The Islamic Religion Protected Under The First
Amendment?
By de Andréa
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’
Posted August 05, 2019
If you would like to write me direct with a question or a
comment on this or other articles, you can email me at writedeandrea@hotmail.com
You need to make
a decision right now while you still can may friend.
And that is whether
or not to believe the Communist Media or the Government indoctrination centers
known as Public Schools, or lying Muslims committing ‘Taqiyyah’ (Muslims taught
to lie to the infidel in the Quran). Or read and learn the truth for yourself
by reading their own books, the Quran/Hadith and Sunnah, as well as what one of
our Forefathers said about Islam.
The alternative
is to believe the lies and remain ignorant until America has become Europe and
eventually an Islamic State. Moreover if you ignorantly believe that this
couldn’t happen here, you would be historically challenged my friend. It has occurred
in every country that is now an Islamic State and in the same way that is happening
in Europe and America today. It is an
historical documented fact.
In
this article:
The evil rapist is in fact correct. According to the Muslim religion and the
teachings in their books and their evil prophet, as you will soon see, it is
acceptable for men to have sex with girls as young as nine years young, and rape
infidel women at will, married or not. Also it is a directive of Allah to
convert the infidel to Islam or make a slave of him or kill him.
But is the practice of the Muslim
religion protected by the First Amendment as people say? In other words can a Muslim legally practice his/her religion in America?
Well…read on my friend.
The story:
While a Syrian refugee was out on bail for sexually abusing
two young girls, he raped
another two teens. can he
legally be prosecuted? After all, it’s
his religion, and religion is protected by the first amendment, IS IT NOT???
Zohair Tomari, 20, who claims he is a refugee from
Syria, invited a 17-year-old girl and her 15-year-old girl friend to his flat
in August 2014 after befriending them. Once there, the Muslim attacker fed the
girls alcohol before slapping and punching them both and pulling out a knife. He
demanded that the terrified girl spread her legs and, as he undid his belt,
told her that the more she cried, the more he would hit her, before raping her.
Police arrived at the scene after the youngest girl was
reported missing, at which point the other informed them of the incident in
private.
The rapist was granted bail and of course because it was
his religion, Tomari celebrated his freedom by raping 2 more girls aged 13 and
14. As they walked to a friend’s home in the early hours of the morning in
August last year, the pair were enticed into a car – in which Tomari was a
passenger – and given alcoholic drinks and cigarettes before being led to his
flat where he sexually assaulted them.
The following is absolutely
correct according to Islamic Sharia Law.
“Part of my culture and religion, is having
sex with young girls”, Zohair Tomari said, “including prepubescent children.”
The Islamic prophet Muhammad
modeled that pedophilia in the Hadith as acceptable and not sinful in Islam and
is, in fact, a reward from Allah. By wedding his closest companion’s 6-year-old
daughter, Aisha, 50-year-old Muhammad set the standard in Islam for pedophile
and child brides. Since he waited until the child reached age 9 before
consummating their marriage, Muhammad’s union prompted Islamic Sharia law to
mandate that 9 is the legal age to marry or have sex with girls.
“As for rape,” Tomari says “he
is divinely endowed with the Islamic right to rape as many non-Muslim women and
girls as he desires.”
From the Hadith:
As
Muhammad's armies raided town after town, they captured many women, who would
often be sold or traded. Yet, since the Muslim men were a long way from their
wives, they needed wisdom from Allah to guide them in their treatment of their
female captives. Allah revealed:
1.
Qur’an 23:1-6—“The Believers must (eventually) win through—those who humble themselves
in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who
abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or
(the captives) whom their right hands possess—for (in their case) they are free
from blame.”
2.
Qur’an 70:22-30—“Not so those devoted to Prayer—those who remain steadfast to their
prayer; and those in whose wealth is a recognized right for the (needy) who
asks and him who is prevented (for some reason from asking); and those who hold
to the truth of the Day Of Judgement; and those who fear the displeasure of
their Lord—for their Lord’s displeasure is the opposite of Peace and
Tranquility—and those who guard their chastity, except with their wives and the
(captives) whom their right hands possess—for (then) they are not to be blamed.”
Notice that
Allah commands Muslims to abstain from sex, except with their wives and with
"those slaves whom their right hands possess from battle." Allah gave
the same sexual rights to Muhammad:
Qur’an 33:50—“O Prophet! Surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have
given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom
Allah has given to you as prisoners of war ...”
The Muslim
practice of having sex with captured women is reported often in the Hadith,
where we learn that Muhammad's only objection to sex with captives was his
condemnation of birth control.
Sahih Muslim
3371—“We went out with Allah’s Messenger on the
expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and
we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at
the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual
intercourse with them but by observing azl (withdrawing the male sexual organ
before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act
whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s
Messenger, and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul
that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born Muslim. “
Sahih al-Bukhari
4138—“We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the
invasion of Bun Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab
captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do
coitus interruptus [same as "azl" above]. So when we intended to do
coitus interruptus, we said: "How can we do coitus interruptus before
asking Allah’s Apostle who is present among us? We asked (him) about it and he
said: "It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul till the Day of
Resurrection is predestined to exist, it will exist."
Sahih Muslim
3384—“Jabir bin Abdullah reported that a person
asked Allah’s Apostle saying: I have a slave-girl and I practice azl with her,
whereupon Allah’s Messenger said: This cannot prevent that which Allah has
decreed. The person then came (after some time) and said: Messenger of Allah,
the slave-girl about whom I talked to you has conceived, whereupon Allah’s
Messenger said: I am the servant of Allah and His Messenger.”
Clearly, Muslims
were taking full advantage of Muhammad's teachings about female captives and
slave girls. Nevertheless, Muslims eventually captured women along with
their husbands, so they wondered if Allah would allow them to have sex with
these married captives (since adultery is otherwise forbidden in Islam).
Allah gives his
answer in the Qur'an:
Qur’an 4:24—“Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those slaves whom
your right hands possess ...”
Here's the
historical background for this verse:
Sunan Abu Dawud
2150—“The Apostle of Allah sent a military
expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their
enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of
the Companions of the Apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with
the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So
Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: “And all married women (are
forbidden) unto you save those (captives or slaves) whom your right hands
possess.” That is to say, they are lawful for them when they complete their
waiting period.”
Thus, the Qur’an allows men to have sex
with their female captives and slave girls, and the Hadith provides numerous
examples of how this is practiced. Yet we must follow this fact through to its
logical conclusion. Muslims decided to have sex with their captives, whom they
were later going to sell. Some of these captives were women whose husbands and
families had been slaughtered by Muslims. Others had husbands who had been
captured by Muslims. Would these women gladly consent to sexual intercourse
with men who had killed their families or taken their families captive, and who
were simply going to sell them into slavery when they arrived at the next town?
Certainly not. But since the Qur’an and Muhammad authorized sex with these
women (and said nothing about seeking their permission), we can only conclude
that Muhammad allowed his followers to rape their captives..
Does the First
Amendment protect the religion of Islam?
The First
Amendment text reads: “Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.”
First: “Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion…” And Congress certainly hasn’t made any law
respecting the establishment of Islam religion or not, in the United States,
nor should it. But does the U.S. Constitution protect the free exercise of
the religion of Islam?
Does the First Amendment protect all practices of all
religions? The quick answer is an emphatic NO!
Contrary to the popular concept of the First Amendment protecting the
practice of all religions or the practice of beliefs one can believe anything
one wants to, but if practices or exercises of any religion violate other laws
of the United States then the practices are prohibited under the law. So,
because of what the Muslim religion is according to the teachings in their
books, one is according to law, prohibited from practicing the religion of
Islam.
The Founders placed important qualifications on religious
tolerance. First, religious toleration extended only so far as the religion in
question did not engage in a practice that is deemed by
Christian standards of law to be immoral. For example, even in
a case that went all the way to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in 1815, The
Commonwealth v. Sharpless, the defendant was convicted for simply displaying
in his own home an obscene painting of a man and woman in an “indecent
posture”—an offense against Christian morality (1815).
Likewise, in a number of Supreme Court cases, instances
of Mormon polygamy were prosecuted as violations of Christian morality—though the defense
argued that the practice was justifiable because they were exercising their
religion. They falsely interpreted the First Amendments freedom of
religion just as we are doing today reguarding Islam (e.g., Reynolds
v. United States, 1879; Murphy v. Ramsey, 1885;
Davis
v. Beason, 1890). They could
believe anything they wanted but the practice of it would have to comply with
existing law.
The Founders may never have envisioned the First
Amendment providing sanction for any behavior that is deemed by Christian
standards of which all American law is based, to be immoral or “licentious.”
Yet, now that Islam is making significant encroachments into American society,
with its brazen advocacy of polygamy as well as its brutal barbaric practice of
rape and murder (Surah 4:3; cf. 4:24-25,129; 23:6; 30:21;
70:30). That coupled with the erosion of Christian morality and the appalling
ignorance of Islamic teachings as well as of the founding principles among the
population will inevitably and wrongly sanction such immorality under the guise
of tolerance political correctness and the incorrect interpretation of “religious
freedom.” In other words we will eventually and ignorantly tolerate anything as
long as it is called a religion.
I have personally studied the Islamic books called the
Quran, Hadiths and the Sunnah, for nearly 30 years now, and I can attest to the
fact that there is nothing in the practice of the so-called religion of Islam
that is in anyway compatible with our Constitution or any other law in America.
As I said under our Constitution one can believe anything one wants to, but one
cannot violate all the laws of our country in the name of “the exercise thereof”
or of one’s religion. Anyone who has ever read the Quran with respect to
American law would agree. And yet we have Mosques established all over this
country espousing the overthrow of the United States, its Constitution, and
replacing it with Islamic Sharia Law. Which as I said in and of itself may be a
right. But it’s the practice of it that is most certianly not!
Even Dr. Jasser a self-proclaimed so-called Moderate
Muslim says: “Hizb ut-Tahrir is the Islamic ideology that calls for the destruction
of the principles that America is founded on. While their words are
protected by our First Amendment, their actions and movement must not be
allowed to take hold. The silence of American Islamist organizations like CAIR and
ISNA in condemning the ideologies of Hizb ut-Tahrir and their agenda of insurgency
in America speaks volumes to their own, albeit, more camouflaged Islamist
agenda.”
And finally Does the Quran teach Muslims
to Murder the Infidel (TERRORIST JIHAD)???
Quran 8:12 –Allah: “I will cast terror into the
hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off
every fingertip of them”
No reasonable person would interpret this to
mean just a spiritual struggle. Moreover Devout Muslims interpret it to mean
just what it says: “strike off their heads…” Kill all those that are not
Muslims.
And if
you ignorantly believe that our Forefathers thought that Islam should be
protected by the Constitution then read what John Quincy Adams wrote about the
Islamic prophet Mohammed:
“In the seventh
century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar, the
Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural
energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed
himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an
extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the
Mosaic Law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with
it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle.
Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life,
and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust, by adapting all the
rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual
passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by
degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and
he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion,
against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND
LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE.” [Emphasis is in the original]
John Quincy Adams also described
the Quran in one of his
essays as follows:
“The precept of
the koran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that Mahomet is the prophet
of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute; the
victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the
faithful follower of the prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of
defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always
obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be
performed alike, by fraud, or by force.”
And that my friend is in total violation of American
Juris Prudence. And so while one ‘may’ have the right to believe in Islam, one
may not under the law…practice it.
THE BOTTOM LINE: This My friend is why it is so important to teach the
Constitution and unabridged history in our schools. It would help if every
American would read at least the Quran to discover the truth behind the lies perpetrated
by Islam and enabled by the Communist American media as well as our own ignorant
Congress. But even that is not the only place the truth about Islam can be
found. If our schools would just teach American history as you have just
obviously discovered one would learn that even our Forefathers understood that
teachings of Islam are not compatible with anything in America including our
Constitutional law. So in affect if we are to
survive as a free nation the practice of Islam should be
banned in the United States of America.
If
Islamic Sharia Law is not what you want for your children my friend, you had
better do something about it now while you still can. Or as in Europe, which is
now beyond the point of stopping it…we will have a war for our survival. Or’,
just as every country that is now an Islamic State today, they historically
just allowed themselves to be subjugated under Sharia law, bought a prayer rug,
and a compass, and bowed down in total submission to Allah/Satan.
Think about it…
Thanks for listening my friend. Now
go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.
-
de Andréa
Please
pass on this article to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for your family and
or friends to hear the truth.
The Fine
Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights
Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted,
provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible
for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as
source materials.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment