U.S. Public
Schools Force Conversion to Islam
‘THE
BOTTOM LINE’
Posted November 30, 2017
While
the Illegal Criminal U.S. Department of Education forbids the teaching of
Christianity on which this nation was founded, it not only promotes Islam, it
forces conversion, and submission to it, by disguising it as historical curricula.
The parents of a student in a public high school in Maryland filed a lawsuit against the public school for forcing their daughter to convert to Islam.
John Wood, a former Marine,
and his wife Melissa Wood, have filed a civil rights complaint against La Plata
High School, stating their daughter – identified only as C.W. – was forced to
take classes that promotes conversion to Islam and the rejection of Christianity
and Judaism. A violation of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. “Such discriminatory treatment of
Christianity is an unconstitutional promotion of one religion over another,”
President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center Richard Thompson
said.
What is not widely understood is
for non-Muslims, learning and reciting the five pillars of Islam is the
equivalent of converting to Islam. The school failed to clearly make known
to students and their families that a study and conversion to Islam was to be
part of the world history curriculum. The Woods claim that students were also subjected
to disparaging teachings about Christianity.
I can only wonder what part of world history curriculum that is.
“The course also taught false statements such as Allah is
the same God worshiped by Christians, and Islam is a religion of peace’,” Thompson said in the filings.
A school cannot achieve
diversity by punishing and alienating students who hold Judeo-Christian
beliefs, while bolstering the doctrines and teachings of other
religions. Parents must be ever vigilant to the Islamic indoctrination of
their children under the guise of teaching history and
multiculturalism. This is happening in public schools across the country.
And they must take action to stop it.
Exercising ones
First Amendment rights on government property is grounds for expulsion.
Additionally, the suit claims
that Mr Wood was banned from the school grounds after complaining about the
curriculum. The suit also says that, following Mr Wood’s complaint, he was
told his daughter would fail the subject if she were to pull out. The
family is asking for declaratory and injunction relief barring the promotion of
Islam over other religions on school grounds. They also want the
no-trespass order against Mr Wood to be lifted.
The defendants are named in
the suit as Charles County Public Schools, the Charles County Board of
Education, La Plata High School principal Evelyn Arnold and vice-principal
Shannon Morris.
“We are aware of the lawsuit,
but we have not yet been served”, the spokesperson said. “We cannot comment further at
this time.”
However, the school did send a
statement to WTOP, clarifying the curriculum of their world history class. “The particular unit in question is on the
formation of Middle Eastern empires in which students learned the basic
concepts of the Islamic faith and how it, along with politics, culture,
economics and geography, contributed to the development of the Middle East,”
the statement said. “Other religions are introduced when they influence or impact a
particular historical era or geographic region. For example, when reviewing the
Renaissance and Reformation, students study the concepts and role of
Christianity. When learning about the development of China and India,
students examine Hinduism and Buddhism.”
THE BOTTOM LINE: There in fact is no
Constitutional separation of church and State, one of them many historical
proofs of that, is the Framers allowed church to be held in the rotunda of the
Capital building on Sundays. While the
First Amendment protects the practice of any religion in the United States it
is ignorance of Islam and American history to believe that our informed Forefathers
considered Islam to be a religion. It is
clear that they found the practice of Mohamedanism or Mahomet, as it was known by
some at the time, to be an abomination of any religion. It was considered to be
a barbaric political force not a religion. Those who were ignorant and deceived
simply accept it as a religion.
To simply believe in an ideology, makes it a religion, is ludicrous.
That would mean that because one
believes in Darwinism it is then a religion, or belief in Santa Claus makes him
god. There must be criteria.
Very early on some of the
founders were deceived because they were ignorant about Islam, just as we are
today, so in his seminal Letter on Toleration (1689), John Locke assuming they
shared the same God and was peaceful as purported, insisted that Muslims and
all others who believed in the same God be tolerated in England. (The catch
there is, they do not believe in the same God)
Campaigning for religious
freedom in Virginia, Jefferson followed Locke, not because he believed in Islam,
but because he believed in Locke. In demanding recognition of the religious
rights of the Mahamdan, the Jew and the atheist. Supporting Jefferson was his
old ally, Richard Henry Lee, who had made a motion in Congress on June 7, 1776,
that the American colonies declare independence. "True freedom," Lee
asserted, embraces the Mahomitan (Muslim) and the Gentoo (Hindu) as well as the
fundamental Christian religion. Later as
president, Jefferson made war on the Muslims of the Ottoman Empire on the north
coast of Africa for practicing their political ideology or so-called religion, murdering
the crews of American merchant ships in the Mediterranean.
As the people began to become
educated about the so-called religion of Islam, opinions began to change. An
early evangelical Baptist spokesman for example who had studied the Quran, denounced
"Mahomet" as a "hateful" figure who, unlike the meek and gentle Jesus, spread his
religion at the point of a sword. A Presbyterian preacher in rural
South Carolina dusted off one of Huig de Groot’s writings, best known by the
Latinized name Hugo Grotius, Grotius a 17th century lawyer and philosopher
espoused that the "religion of Mahomet [Islam] originated in Baal, barbarism, and
arms, it breathes nothing but arms, is propagated by the force of arms, defies
Natural Law, and therefore should not qualify as an excepted religion."
Note: The earliest known
translation of the Qur'an into the English Language was The Alcoran of
Mahomet in approximately 1649 by Alexander Ross,
One hundred eighty five years ago in
the 1820’s John Quincy Adams, the sixth President of the United States read
the history of Islam, the Quran, and possibly some of the ahadith and the sunnah,
as a result he understood who Muhammad was and what the agenda of Islam is. He
knew the angel Gabriel was an imposter, and was really Satan himself, he knew
Islamic doctrine was an audacious falsehood, violent and brutal, that Muhammad was a
false prophet and he knew as long as Muslims exist, there will be no peace on earth.
The sixth president John Quincy Adams the
son of John Adams the second president who was one of the architects of the U.S.
Constitution and the Bill of rights - during his presidency wrote:
“In the seventh century of the Christian era a wandering
Arab of the lineage of Hagar [i.e., Muhammad] the Egyptian, combining the
powers of transcendent genius, with preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the
fraudulent spirit of an imposter from hell, proclaimed himself as a messenger
from heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of
the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of Mosaic Law, the doctrine of
one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood,
that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation
of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life and of future retribution, he
humbled it to the dust by adapting all the rewards of his religion to the
gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity
at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the
allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war,
as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND
LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE....
Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of
twelve hundred years has already raged. The war is yet flagrant… While the
merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to
human action, there can never be peace on earth and good will towards
men.” John Quincy Adams
The Islamic Quranic
Ideology violates Natural Law and every law in the U.S. Constitution. And
therefore is considered by all American law to be a criminal organization. A
political ideology on par with Tyrannical Cults, Nazism, Communism and the
Sicilian Mafia. It is not therefore a religion
protected by the First Amendment. Read
their books my friend and you will also find the truth.
Then why is
it taught as a peaceful religion in our schools by the very people that
mistakenly believe that there is a separation of church and state?
Because Islam
is promoted by the Global Elites to destroy Christianity and the American culture.
It is useful to the anti-American Deep State because of its destructive quality
and because Islam is incompatible with anything else on the planet.
The only
sure way to fight this atrocity, is for all Americans to pull their children
out of the government public school system.
If that is something you wouldn’t do - then you have only one other
choice my friend, and that is to buy prayer rugs for the whole family. And maybe a compass, so you know which way east is…
Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight
for truth and freedom.
-
de Andréa
Please
pass on this article to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for your friends to
hear the truth.
The Fine
Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights
Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted,
provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible
for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as
source materials.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment