“Better to write for yourself and have no
public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903
- 1974)
Congress Must Take
Illegal Legislative Power Away From The Courts
By
de Andréa,
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’
Are you worried about the federal courts gaining even more power if
Hillary Clinton is elected president?
Well you should be…But the courts are already out of control, they have
already established their Fabian Communist power base leading American into a judicial
autocracy.
Many conservatives believe all they need to do is elect a
Republican president who will appoint constitutionally conservative judges to
the federal courts, but we have done that already and yet, here we are. In addition it would take so many consecutive
years of Republican presidents hitting the mark on their judicial appointments
to finally turn the courts back around to a Constitutional Republic. Moreover the constitutionality of the courts shouldn’t
rely on its judges they should be held within the boundaries of the law.
Besides, by that point, it will be too late. The courts have been
moving quickly toward a power base in recent years: they have mandated states
fund Planned Parenthood, mandated Socialized Medicine, mangled state religious
liberty laws, made transgender people a special protected class, forced states
to give birth certificates to illegal aliens and tossed out basic voter
integrity laws, just to name a few unconstitutional overreaching orders that
have come out of the despotic courts.
A reminder of what the opinion of the very first Chief Justice
John Jay was regarding Constitutional law. “No legislative act, therefore, contrary to
the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater
than his principal;
that the servant
is above his
master; that the
representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves.” You will notice Justice Jay said “No legislative act…,” Because in those days only
elected legislators made law, not the courts. And any act contrary to the constitution cannot be valid. Court rulings can only stand in a specific individual case not as a
blanket law for the country.
What we need is a Congress with a back bone who will return this
country back to the Constitutional Republic it was meant to be. By now most people don’t even realize that
courts are in fact, illegally making laws.
The truth is that legally courts can’t make law any more than I can. That
would be, and in fact is, tyranny!
The late Justice Antonin Scalia was correct when he predicted “the
theory of a living Constitution would destroy the country and the federal
courts.” When judges usurp power that doesn’t belong to them and they
believe in a so-called fluid or “living Constitution,” it creates a toxic
mixture of tyranny and oppression.
It would be different if they had that power and they, in good
faith, attempted to interpret the Constitution as originally adopted. But they haven’t… it’s worse than that.
We’ve given them the power of the ‘sole and final arbiter’, but at the same
time, they believe the Constitution is unconstitutional. What is there, is
ignored, what’s not there is arbitrarily put in, as if they are dictators.
For example the practice of early voting was not widespread until
recently, yet the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals just overturned North
Carolina’s attempt to shorten the early voting period, claiming the state
intended to discriminate against racial minorities. The court also tossed out
North Carolina’s voter ID law and laws limiting same-day registration,
out-of-precinct voting and preregistration.
The courts are dictating to the states which is legally and totally up
to the states. The ‘Congress’ needs to step in
and say enough of judicial tyranny.
So not only are the courts becoming the sole and final arbiter of
most important policy questions, thereby rendering elections nearly unnecessary,
but they are preventing Republicans from winning elections by forcing states to
adopt election laws that naturally favor Social Democrats.
Even King George didn’t have this kind of power in the Colonies –
I mean, he didn’t get’ involved in the methods and procedures of elections for
the colonial legislatures at all’. They
were fighting taxation without representation; we’re fighting complete
basic social and cultural transformation without representation. It’s the foundation of our
Republic.
The circuit court’s rulings on North Carolina’s election laws are representative
of a larger problem – federal courts are crushing the states, essentially
forbidding them from governing themselves.
A little History: So how
did this happen? It actually began almost immediately after the ratification of
the original constitution, but by 1913 there was enough infiltration of the
left wing tyrants in our government to pass three anti-constitutional and
un-American bills to put the U.S. on a path to socialism and autocracy. These
were the 16th, 17th Amendments and the Jekyll Island Federal
Reserve System. But the 17th
Amendment is the one that ended our Republic and took all the representation
away from the state legislators, leaving the states helpless to have any
influence in the Senate as the framers intended. The people’s representation is
still in the House. The Senate now represents no one but themselves.
We don’t need another constitutional amendment we need to abolish
the 17 Amendment but at some point the states have got to just say ‘No! Politically, we have 32 governors, we control
the trifecta of governance, two branches of the legislature and a governor, in
24 states. We have the potential to grow from there. But we don’t benefit from
it because the despotic feds are crushing us and our Congress won’t do their
job.
The state legislatures have become a joke, with Communist special
interest groups able to vault over their heads with help from the federal
courts.
We need to return state legislatures to the power they had at the
founding, the power they were supposed to have, and it at least starts with
getting the unelected branch of the federal government out of our hair. It’s time to tell the judiciary to go suck an
egg with their despotic rulings.
The answer already lies in the Constitution – Article III, Section 2 to be exact. That section allows Congress to
restrict the jurisdiction of the federal courts to what is written in the
constitution as it says in the 10th Amendment. So rather than a
Republican president or a constitutional amendment, a congressional statute is
all that is necessary to put the brakes on this runaway judicial tyranny.
I’m not saying we don’t need a Republican president, I’m not
saying it’s not important to appoint better judges, but we don’t need a
Republican president to merely appoint better judges. We need a Republican president to sign
legislation putting the courts back in their place of the third part of the
administration not the dictator.
THE BOTTOM LINE: We don’t have to sit and take
this judicial tyranny anymore. This is ‘our’ country, this is ‘our’ Constitution;
they have no right to change it, no right to make law, we need to go back to
our roots, our principles. Let’s take back our country from the unelected criminal
judges. The balance of power that the
framers wrote into the constitution is being ignored. Moreover it is a result
of a hundred years of government socialist expansion and the loss of the
Republic since 1913.
Contact your representative
Here: And tell them to write and pass legislation that will reign
in Judicial power to where it belongs according to Article III section 2 of the
U.S. Constitution. And then rewrite and abolish that part of the 17th
amendment that took away the ability of the State Legislators to appoint U.S.
Senators to represent the individual states.
Thanks
for listening my friend!
-
de Andréa
Please pass on this
article to everyone on your email list.
It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine
Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line
Publishing, All Rights Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of
this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links
to referenced articles as source materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment