Wednesday, May 18, 2016

Obama’s Support Of Terrorism In The U.S.

Obama’s Support Of Terrorism In The U.S.

By de Andréa,
Opinion Editorialist for    
Published May 18, 2016

For those of you that think that my accusations of treason against Obama have been just a bunch of unfounded hot air with no proof, even though in every case I have provided it. Here is yet another case of treason and it comes from WorldNetDaily, read the full story here.  

It’s about a former Home Land Security officer named Philip Haney.  As a recently retired Department of Homeland Security officer, Philip Haney closely followed the investigation of the
massacre in San Bernardino last December carried out by Syed Farook and his Saudi Arabian wife, Tashfeen Malik.
When the name of the Southern California mosque attended by Farook turned up in a news story days after the attack, Haney sat straight up in his chair and yelled at his computer screen: “That’s my case!”
The case drew the “concern” of the State Department and the DHS’s Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Office. Not because it alerted frontline officers to a threat to the nation’s security, but because Obama believed it unfairly singled out Muslims.
To the astonishment of Haney and many of his colleagues at the National Targeting Center – which provides background and actionable intelligence to Customs and Border Protection agents –Obama ultimately shut down the case.
The intelligence was ignored despite having been used to connect members of the movement to terrorist organizing and financing at the highest levels, including for Hamas and al-Qaida.
In addition, 67 records of individuals and organizations linked to the case that Haney had compiled were shredded by orders from “upper management.”  And you know where that order came from.  I wrote about it in February check it out.
But not only did Obama effectively quash the case, he launched the first of what turned out to be nine investigations against Haney.  You see in Obama’s mind Muslim Jihadist are the good guys, Americans on the other hand especially people at the security agencies hired to ferret – out these sons of Satan, they are the enemy. This has been proven numerous times.  
The “adverse actions” culminated with a Justice Department probe into Haney’s handling of information related to the Boston Marathon bombing. (The episode, recounted in his book, casts astonishing, new light on the Boston attack, exposing the lengths the government will go to protect its narrative and relationships with dubious “allies.” AKA al-Qaida terrorists)
It gets better, or worse, depending on one’s point of view.  Haney points out that Obama also knew about the Boston Marathon bombing before it happened. 
THE BOTTOM LINE: The point is, that in the past seven years and even before Obama was ignorantly elected president I pointed out that Obama was a Muslim Jihadist supporter.  So from my point of view if I knew this then any and every one in the country knew this. Plus I wrote about it, so the information was available to everyone and still the majority of Americans voted for this Muslim terrorist supporting son of Satan.  
So what am I actually saying?  I am saying that either the majority of voters in the U.S. are just plain brain dead, or the voting majority want America to become an Islamic State and will just sit by and watch it turn it into a pile of rubble and camel dung resembling Iraq or Syria. 
Either way the majority of Americans obviously hate freedom as much as ISIS.  They either fight against it, or they certainly don’t fight for it.  You will eventually get what you want or deserve.
Good luck with that…
Thanks for listening - de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.

Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials. 

No comments: