®™©
The Truth About Oregon, Bundy And
The BLM.
The truth will set you free…
By de Andréa
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:
The truth is there is no Siege nor a violence or any kind of overthrow of the Government in Oregon – But there is an Unconstitutional Sheriff, a Despotic Federal Government, and Patriotic Militia.
The media is doing its usual stuff of spinning and twisting
the narrative in Oregon and that's why it is up to the alternative American media
like me, to correct the spin. Several
things need to be addressed and I'll be doing some of that in this article,
though much will have to be corrected in the days ahead.
Among those things is the fact that there is absolutely no
siege on a federal building in Oregon, Sheriff David Ward is not a
constitutional sheriff and the militiamen gathered there are not armed,
deranged lunatics, and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is an illegal unconstitutional
agency.
Understand that the Hammonds, the ranchers the militia came
to stand with, ended up turning themselves in around 1:37pm on Monday and were illegally placed into a
federal correctional facility in California for four more years as political
prisoners.
Like those on Ruby Ridge Idaho, Waco Texas, and the Bundy
ranch in Nevada, the Hamonds were not guilty of any crime and certainly not of any kind of terrorism, something a
federal judge claimed they were. In my opinion, it is clearly an act of Double
Jeopardy, they already fulfilled their sentence, something that is forbidden in
the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.
The Hammonds intended to set what they thought was a
controlled fire on their own property which got out of control and accidently started
nearby federal land on fire. Nothing but
vegetation was destroyed and no one was injured.
On the other hand, the terrorist government agency called
the Bureau of Land Management, (BLM). Purposely burned private land, houses,
cattle, and put human lives as risk. Watch
the video, not one person is holding the Bureau of Land Management
responsible for the atrocious acts of deliberately setting fires that destroyed
cattle, property and endangered the lives of ranchers.
And the media won't show you the truth, including
conservative's precious Fox News!
Let's deal with a
few of the issues.
The building at which the protesters have occupied is not
like a federal building in a major city. In fact, it is open to the public. It
is public property, in a free country, it should be owned by someone, not
government. The constitution does not give arbitrary Cart Blanche for the
government to own property. So there is no illegal occupation of a "federal
building," but rather an area that is owned by the people.
The entire protest by the Bundy’s and the militia has been
peaceful. No one is threatening any violence. That’ usually comes from the Federal
tyrants (ie. Waco, Ruby Ridge, Bundy Ranch siege etc.). Even the reference of
Ryan Bundy, being willing to kill and be killed was quoted out of context by the media. Typical. That statement was with regard to the protesters
and militia being threatened with gun fire by federal officials, the BLM and
the Deputy Sheriffs.
“With great concern and love
and much consideration from prayer, I come to you Harney County Sheriff of
Oregon David M. Ward, rancher Steven Dwight Hammond, and rancher Dwight Lincoln
Hammond, Jr.
I, Cliven D. Bundy, have been
involved for several weeks in the background striving to understand and
comprehend your dilemmas in Harney County, Oregon. I understand that the grass
that was burnt on each side of the fence was grazing rights that had been created
through beneficial use, one side of the fence being private property and the
other side of the fence being private property rights. The fires that were set
were for a good purpose and had good results.
The United States Justice
Department has NO jurisdiction or authority within the State of Oregon, County
of Harney over this type of ranch management. These lands are not under U.S.
treaties or commerce, they are not article 4 territories, and Congress does not
have unlimited power. These lands have been admitted into statehood and are
part of the great State of Oregon and the citizens of Harney County enjoy the
fullness of the protections of the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Constitution
limits United States government.
It is my suggestion, Steven
Hammond, that you go and check yourself into Harney County jail asking for
protective custody. It is my suggestion, Dwight Hammond, that you go and check
yourself into Harney County jail asking for protective custody. It is my
suggestion, Harney County Sheriff David Ward, accept these two ranchers into
your jail, notify the United States Solicitor in Washington DC that you have
these two ranchers in Harney County jail, that they will remain there
indefinitely under your protective custody and the protection of We the People
of Harney County and We the People of the United States of America.
I suggest an Evidentiary
Hearing or a Grand Jury be formed by We the People.
I feel that this action is
immediately important, that it should be taken place before 10:00 am Saturday,
January 2, 2016. I will hold these suggestions private until that time then I
will release this letter to those having state and county jurisdiction and to
the media.
Cliven D. Bundy”
Does this sound like a
terrorist or a criminal? No it sounds exactly like an American Patriot.
The federal government has redefined the term terrorist to mean:
Returning War Veterans, Christians, and People Who believe that the
Constriction Is the Supreme Law of the Land.
The issue is one of law. The issue is the Constitution. And
these men have engaged in the very rights, protected under the First Amendment
of assembly and addressing government for redress of grievances. As well as the
Second Amendment which states that citizen own arms are for the “security
of a free State.”
"These men came to Harney County claiming to be part
of militia groups supporting local ranchers, when in reality these men had
alternative motives, to attempt to overthrow the county and federal government
in hopes to spark a movement across the United States," Said Sheriff Ward in a statement Sunday.
Contrary to what Harney County Sheriff David M. Ward said,
neither the Bundys nor the other patriots that protested or are occupying a
public building on land which is unconstitutionally claimed as federal land,
are not as he said, trying to "overthrow the county or federal
government." Since Sheriff Ward doesn't know the Constitution from
a roll of toilet paper in his office, the fact is that the people are the
government in America, which is why the Constitution begins with, "We
the People," and the people are under the Law of God.
Separate that out from the fact that the Constitution is
for those the people elect to represent them. The Constitution is to be the
boundaries of where those representatives have been given authority.
In fact, the
Constitution is clear about what land the federal government may possess and
for what purposes. Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 of the US
Constitution states:
“The Congress shall have Power to dispose of
and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other
Property belonging to the United States...."
However, that power is limited immensely in
Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 about federal control of land.
“To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases
whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by
Cession of Particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat
of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all
Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature
of the State in
which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals,
dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings.”– (Emphasis added).
The truth is that not one acre of the Bundys, Hammonds or any
other rancher in the US is to be owned or controlled by the federal government
because it is not used for any of the constitutional things cited above.
The criminal terrorist in these issues are not the Bundys
or the Hamonds. The Criminal Terrorists are the agents and elected
representatives and those appointed by them in the federal government. It is not any of those protesting,
but rather a criminal oligarchy, and yes, they do have an agenda.
As for Sheriff David Ward, the people of his county should
mark him as an anti-American, anti-Constitutional sheriff for his blatant
cowardice for not protecting the Hammonds from a tyrannical federal judge, who
had no authority to rule in the matter at all, since this was a state issue.
There must be one or two FBI infiltrators that should be
flushed out and exposed. That, of
course, is par for the course. Infiltrators attempted to get
in the Bundy Ranch too, but a couple were turned away, later to be exploited in the shooting of
Las Vegas police.
This entire fiasco is a result not of ranchers going jihad,
but rather a long extended run of the people allowing their representatives to completely
ignore the Constitution and usurp their power. It's time it ends, and sadly, it
may get bloody to end it if the lapdogs like Sheriff Ward will not uphold the
oath he swore to the Constitution, rather than following orders like a good
little Nazi.
Ammon Bundy is exposing the federal plan to destroy
American families in the following video.
THE BOTTOM
LINE: ”And Jesus said to
them, But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag,
and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one.” Luke 22:36
8 But we know that
the law is good if one uses it lawfully, 9 knowing this: that
the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers
and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 1 Timothy 1:8-9
Constitutional
Law was made to limit the Federal Government, not the People…de Andréa
Need I say
more???
Thanks for
listening - de Andréa
Please pass on this
article to everyone on your email list.
It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom
Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or
in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of
this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links
to referenced articles as source materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment