Ben Carson Vs. CAIR
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:
Ben Carson is proving that, despite his soft-spoken demeanor, he has what it takes to stand up to those who challenge him.
He is arguing that an Islamic advocacy group, the Council on American- Islamic Relations, violated the IRS rules that prohibit a tax-exempt organization from meddling in a political campaign. More specifically, they offered their opposition to his’ campaign, after he came under fire for saying he “would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation.”
Of course what he didn’t say is that we already have a Muslim in the white house and that’s why so-called radical Islam is winning the Jihad all over the world.
Mr. Carson wrote on his petition page:
“The Council on American- Islamic Relations (CAIR), a U.S. Muslim group, recently demanded that I withdraw as candidate for the 2016 presidential race. By doing so, the organization has brazenly violated IRS rules prohibiting tax-exempt nonprofits like CAIR to intervene in a political campaign on behalf of—or in opposition to—a candidate. (Click video link to witness the violation.)
This is not the first time that CAIR has disrespected U.S. laws or America. It has previously lost its tax-exempt status by failing to file federal taxes three years in a row. It had also been named by federal prosecutors as an unindicted co-conspirator in a criminal conspiracy to funnel money to Hamas, a terrorist organization.
The IRS should immediately revoke CAIR’s tax-exempt status. Under the Obama administration, the IRS has systematically targeted conservative nonprofit groups for politically motivated audits and harassment. The agency should now properly do its job and punish the real violators of America’s laws and regulations.”
Mr. Carson even included a link to a video as proof of the violation. In response, Ibrahim Hooper, communications director for CAIR, told MSNBC: “CAIR is not in violation of any IRS regulation in that we did not ‘participate in’ or ‘intervene in’ any political campaign. We, as mandated by our mission as a civil rights organization, merely expressed the opinion of our community that a candidate whose views violate Article VI of the Constitution is unfit for public office.”
Article VI of the U.S. Constitution:
“All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”
The Clause that Hooper is referring to is obviously the last part of the last paragraph, which reads… ‘’but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.” But true to Islamic Taqiyyah (twisting the truth) he pulls a truth out of context and completely ignores the previous part of the paragraph which reads: “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution;” Which constitutionally means that a Muslim can not only ‘not hold’ the Office of President but that of a state or federal legislator. Because the very ideology of Islamic Sharia is not compatible in any way with the U.S. Constitution. We already have a Muslim President and at least two federal legislators that are hold office under false pretenses. One even refused to take his Oath on the Bible and to uphold the Constitution, he instead was allowed to put his hand on the Quran.
One cannot serve two masters both God and Satan.
Hooper’s claim notwithstanding, Mr. Carson has a valid argument, and he’s asking for your support. If you would like to join him in demanding for the removal of CAIR’s tax-exempt status, based on the proven fact that CAIR is a known Muslim terrorist supporting organization…visit his site and sign the petition.
On a personal note: Incidentally, it has been members of CAIR as well as ISIS of Libya that have on numerous occasions threatened my life and the lives of my family. Typical of any Muslim organization. If one cannot win the argument the kill the opponent.
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.