®™©
By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:
Article VI of the U.S. Constitution:
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Ben Carson Vs. CAIR
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:
Ben Carson is proving that, despite his soft-spoken
demeanor, he has what it takes to stand up to those who challenge him.
He
is arguing that an Islamic advocacy group, the Council on American- Islamic
Relations, violated the IRS rules that prohibit a tax-exempt organization from
meddling in a political campaign. More specifically, they offered their
opposition to his’ campaign, after he came under fire for saying he “would not advocate that we put a
Muslim in charge of this nation.”
Of course
what he didn’t say is that we already have a Muslim in the white house and that’s
why so-called radical Islam is winning the Jihad all over the world.
“The Council on American- Islamic Relations (CAIR), a U.S.
Muslim group, recently demanded that I withdraw as candidate for the 2016
presidential race. By doing so, the organization has brazenly violated IRS
rules prohibiting tax-exempt nonprofits like CAIR to intervene in a political
campaign on behalf of—or in opposition to—a candidate. (Click video link to
witness the violation.)
This is not the first time that CAIR has disrespected U.S.
laws or America. It has previously lost its tax-exempt status by failing to
file federal taxes three years in a row. It had also been named by federal
prosecutors as an unindicted co-conspirator in a criminal conspiracy to funnel
money to Hamas, a terrorist organization.
The IRS should immediately revoke CAIR’s tax-exempt
status. Under the Obama administration, the IRS has systematically targeted
conservative nonprofit groups for politically motivated audits and harassment.
The agency should now properly do its job and punish the real violators of
America’s laws and regulations.”
Mr. Carson even included a link to a video as proof of the
violation. In response, Ibrahim Hooper, communications director for CAIR, told MSNBC:
“CAIR is not in
violation of any IRS regulation in that we did not ‘participate in’ or
‘intervene in’ any political campaign. We, as mandated by our mission as a
civil rights organization, merely expressed the opinion of our community that a
candidate whose views violate Article VI of the Constitution is unfit for
public office.”
Article VI of the U.S. Constitution:
“All debts
contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this
Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this
Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution,
and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and
all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United
States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state
shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to
the contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and
Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state
legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United
States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to
support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a
qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”
The Clause that Hooper is referring to is obviously the
last part of the last paragraph, which reads… ‘’but no religious test shall
ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the
United States.” But true to
Islamic Taqiyyah (twisting the truth) he pulls a truth out of context and
completely ignores the previous part of the paragraph which reads: “The
Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several
state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United
States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation,
to support this Constitution;” Which
constitutionally means that a Muslim can not only ‘not hold’ the Office of
President but that of a state or federal legislator. Because the very ideology of Islamic Sharia
is not compatible in any way with the U.S. Constitution. We already have a Muslim President and at
least two federal legislators that are hold office under false pretenses. One
even refused to take his Oath on the Bible and to uphold the Constitution, he
instead was allowed to put his hand on the Quran.
One cannot serve two masters both God and Satan.
Hooper’s
claim notwithstanding, Mr. Carson has a valid argument, and he’s asking for
your support. If you would like to join him in demanding for the removal of
CAIR’s tax-exempt status, based on the proven fact that CAIR is a known Muslim
terrorist supporting organization…visit his site and sign
the petition.
On a personal note: Incidentally, it has been
members of CAIR as well as ISIS of Libya that have on numerous occasions
threatened my life and the lives of my family. Typical of any Muslim
organization. If one cannot win the
argument the kill the opponent.
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Please pass on this
article to everyone on your email list.
It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom
Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or
in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of
this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links
to referenced articles as source materials.
No comments:
Post a Comment