In a time of universal deceit, the truth is a revolutionary act” – George Orwell
Obama’s Iranian Deal Will Destroy The West
By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:
for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’:
Published May 20, 2015
“For God shall bring every work into the judgment concerning every hidden thing, whether it be good or whether it be evil.” (Ecclesiastes 12:14)
Let me make one thing perfectly clear before you start reading this article. Negotiations and or treaties with Muslims are ignorant, futile and dangerous. Read the Muslim Hadith. If you think otherwise, then please give me one example of a lasting treaty with any Muslim organization and/or country. The only wise approach to Iran is to order them to unconditionally cease a nuclear endeavor of any kind. Iran’s so-called need for peacetime nuclear power is a ruse, they have sufficient cheap power in fossil fuel for an eternity.
The Western allies should order Iran to destroy all of their centrifuges now’, or face total isolation and if they still refuse, they will be annihilated, no threat, just fact. It is the only language that Islam understands. It is the only deal one can make with terrorists. We do have a policy of not negotiating with terrorists, then why are we negotiating. I will again tell you why! Obama totally understands that what I just said is true, but you must see that Obama’s deal is not to stop Iran, OBAMA’S
DEAL, IS TO IMPOWER IRAN AND DESTROY THE WEST!
Obama has known for years that Iran is just months away from a nuclear bomb, yet he kept it to himself until it was convenient, reported Bloomberg Tuesday.
According to the report, the Obama administration has long estimated a two- to three-month breakout time, yet only declassified this information April 1, 2015 “just in time for the White House to make the case for its Iran deal to Congress and the public”.
Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz acknowledged to the news agency that the US has known for “quite some time” that Iran is closer to a bomb than the administration has let on. He added that Iran is “right now spinning, I mean enriching with 9,400 centrifuges out of their roughly 19,000. Plus all the . . . . R&D work. If you put that together it’s very, very little time to go forward. That’s the 2-3 months” estimated for Iran to produce enough fissile material for a nuclear weapon.
Yet all this time, Obama has insisted that Iran was not nearly that close to achieving a nuclear bomb. Back in 2013, before a visit to Israel, Obama told Israel’s Channel Two, “Right now, we think it would take over a year or so for Iran to actually develop a nuclear weapon, but obviously we don’t want to cut it too close.”
That same year, in an effort to downplay Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s more alarmist estimate of six months, but Obama told the Associated Press in October, “Our assessment continues to be a year or more away. And in fact, actually, our estimate is probably more conservative than the estimates of Israeli intelligence services.” I was In Israel at the time.
David Albright, a former weapons inspector and president of the Institute for Science and International Security, told Eli Lake at Bloomberg that he felt the administration was being intentionally vague in 2013.
“They weren’t clear at all about what this one-year estimate meant, but people like me who said let’s break it down to the constituent pieces in terms of time to build a bomb were rebuffed,” he said. Albright and his group came up with their own estimate, measuring only the production of highly enriched uranium, concluding that Iran was a mere month away.
Read an article I published May 27, 2009, about Obama’s warning to Israel about attacking Iran. And another on March 02, 2015 about Obama’s threat to shoot down Israeli planes if they chose to bomb Iran.
A spokeswoman for the National Security Council downplayed Albright’s numbers to USA Today, saying the intelligence community maintains “a number of assessments” of the time Iran needs to become a nuclear threat.
Albright’s position, however, is supported by leaked International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) document, first published by the Associated Press in 2009. It concluded Iran “has sufficient information to be able to design and produce a workable implosion nuclear device based upon (highly enriched uranium) as the fission fuel.”
Kenneth Pollack, a former CIA analyst who is now an Iran expert at the Brookings Institution, told Lake that estimating breakout times is an imprecise business. “The idea there is such a thing as a hard and fast formula for this is nonsense,” he said. “All the physicists come up with different answers depending on what inputs they use.” Bear in mind that the Brookings Institution is affiliated with and supported by the Muslim Brotherhood operating out of Doha Qatar. This makes Obama’s manipulative use of a foreshortened timeline all the more sinister.
On April 2, Obama identified one benefit of the nuclear framework deal, saying, “even if it violated the deal, for the next decade at least, Iran would be a minimum of a year away from acquiring enough material for a bomb.” Obama knows darn well that Iran will in fact violate any deal, he has read the Muslim Hadith and follows it to the max.
Representative Devin Nunes, the Republican chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence doesn’t buy it. “We’ve been researching [the administration’s] claim that a deal would lengthen the breakout time for Iran from two to three months to a year,” he told Lake. “We’re just trying to confirm any of their numbers and we can’t confirm or make sense of what they are referencing.”
Israel has consistently maintained that a nuclear Iran is a dire threat to the security of the entire world, and that successive US agreements with the Islamic Republic have put Israel in grave danger. Netanyahu has said on numerous occasions that “Israel will not allow Iran to develop a military nuclear capability,” or endanger Israeli citizens.
Allowing Iran to achieve nuclear capability is exactly the same as ISIS having a nuclear weapon. Iran is simply using and supporting ISIS to carry out its dirty work in the Middle east, the Sinai Peninsula and in North Africa, and eventually Europe and America.
When or if Iran builds a nuclear warhead this may spark the Biblical war of Armageddon on the Tel of Megiddo or the valley of Jehoshaphat.
Whether one believes in a literal Armageddon or not, I don’t believe that anyone could possibly ignore the danger of Iran/ISIS with a nuclear weapon.
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.