Citizen
Rights in Jeopardy
Texas
mayor denies citizen right to vote
By de Andréa
November 4,
2014
As
a follow-up to an earlier article titled Christians Have No Rights In America, Now it turns out the Mayor, City Council
and City Attorney of Houston Texas denies the citizens their right to vote by
referendum. Keep a close eye on this
because if this is allowed by the courts to stand, this will set a precedent. It is not only Christians that are losing
their rights here, it is the majority of Americans.
One of the pastors subpoenaed
by the City of Houston for all of his so-called anti-homosexual
sermons and other related communications is not just voicing outrage
– he's claiming ballot fraud by city government.
The subpoenas were generated in retaliation by the
Mayor to thousands of signatures on petitions to get the so-called
anti-discrimination law of Mayor Parker on the ballot.
Led by
lesbian Mayor Annise Parker, Houston's city council passed a so-called anti-discrimination
bill, unconstitutionally providing special rights for homosexuals and
transgendered. Many Houston citizens opposed the ordinance and after its
passage they gathered more than 50,000 signatures within 30 days to put the
issue on the ballot.
The
citizen-led petition drive included area pastors, including Steve Riggle of Grace
Community Church, who is one of five pastors illegally subpoenaed as part of a
lawsuit filed against Parker and the City of Houston.
The City of Houston
commits fraud
Riggle,
speaking to Tony Perkins of Washington Watch, said there was fraud involved in
the rejection of thousands of perfectly legal signatures.
"For example," he says, "my
own daughter's petition was denied and the reason given was she didn't sign her
petition. All you have to do is look at the bottom line and she did sign her
petition in the exact place, notarized as exactly it ought to be. And there are
thousands like this."
Denying
the Constitutional Right to Redress of Grievances
The
Houston Chronicle has reported that City Attorney David
Feldman inserted himself into the signature-counting process,
and eventually disqualified the petition drive, after claiming he reviewed
their legality. The same story said City Secretary Anna Russell had already
verified enough signatures to trigger a ballot referendum.
Feldman disqualifying
the petition drive triggered the citizen-led lawsuit, which in turn triggered
the controversial subpoenas of Riggle and other pastors. Here is a
copy of the 16-page subpoena.
Riggle suggests the
situation is so serious there should be an investigation, criminal or not, into
possible wrongdoing.
"When you get to
the end of the day, this is not a personal spat with the mayor. This is not
people after the mayor," he told Perkins. "This
is about a fundamental right to vote. And everybody ought to be
concerned about that everywhere in this country because, whatever happens here,
if this mayor gets by with this, sets a precedent for everywhere else."
THE BOTTOM LINE: So what is the main objection to the Houston so-called
anti-discrimination law? Well…for
starters, it’s the fact that it is touted as an anti-discrimination law, when
in fact it in-itself is discriminatory. It discriminates against people with religious
or moral character which is at the very foundation of this Constitutional
Republic. Second is that it not only
takes away the rights of heterosexuals but it creates special rights that apply
only to a minority of homosexuals, which is totally unconstitutional. We can’t have different strokes for different
folks under the law, the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal protection under the law, not un-equal protection.
As far as the details of the Houston
homosexual law and its main objection, well, there are several parts of the law
that are abhorrent, one being similar to the one in California which has
already created a problem in public schools, which amounts to boys who simply can
say they feel like a girl (transgendered) then they can use the girls restroom
and showers. Another, is if a Christian
Church or religious school for example doesn’t want to hire a homosexual for
moral and/or religious reasons they have no choice, as I said it takes rights
away from heterosexuals or in this case Christians who are denied their first
amendment rights. By the very nature of
humanity we as individuals have the right to be discriminatory in our choices,
morally or otherwise.
This type of unconstitutional
legislation incidentally, is brought on by the incremental loss of our
Representative Republic and the encroachment of a Democratic form of government
which as always in history evolved into the loss of freedom and the onslaught of
tyranny for everyone. As I
said we are all equal under the law!
As it pertains to the
Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court has ruled that any state or local law
that abridges Freedom of
Speech, freedom of religion,
the right to trial by jury, the Right to
Counsel, the right against Self-Incrimination, the right against unreasonable searches and seizures, or the right
against cruel and unusual punishments will be invalidated under section 1 of
the Fourteenth Amendment. This holding is called the Incorporation
Doctrine.
How many parts of this Supreme
Court ruling do you think the Mayor
of Houston violated? It won’t matter if
we just sit apathetically by and let these constitutional violations by our
representatives and elected officials continue with impunity.
Thanks
for listening – de Andréa
If you agree
please pass this article on to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for them to hear
the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing - Permission to
reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
No comments:
Post a Comment