More Clarification On
What ISIS Is
What’s in a
name?
Opinion.
By de
Andréa
September
9, 2014
This week I listened to two Obama
administration spokesmen, Josh Earnest from the White House, and Rear Admiral
Kirby from the Pentagon about the Islamic terrorist army freely operating in
Iraq and Syria. These two individuals and many other voices out of the Obama regime
refer to them as ISIL (Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant). This
group has professed the establishment of an Islamic caliphate or spiritual
militant leader and actually refers to itself as just ‘IS’ (Islamic State). The
manner in which we should all be referring to this savage and barbaric group is
ISIS (Islamic State in Iraq and Syria).
Or as I do, just Islamic Jihadists.
Why should that matter? What’s in a
name?
First, if you choose to refer to this
group as ISIL, you have basically rewritten the map of the Middle East and
fallen into the trap of not recognizing the existence of Israel and also
Lebanon. If you use ISIL you are then validating the Islamic totalitarian and
jihadist claim that the modern day Jewish State of Israel is an occupation
state and does not exist in the eyes of Muslims.
I need to remind you of the faux pas —
or perhaps purposeful use — by then-Obama counter-terrorism advisor John
Brennan who, at a Ramadan dinner celebration in the White House, referred
to the capital of Israel by its Arab name Al Quds, not as
it is, Jerusalem. What are words or
names for indeed? They convey a certain meaning — just like calling the Ft Hood
massacre, a “workplace violence” and not what is was, a brutal Islamic jihadist
terror attack.
Second, if you fall into the trap of
referring to this group as IS, which it may be in the eyes of Muslims, but then
you’ have validated the existence of an Islamic caliphate and through your
words lend it recognition and credibility. Some may say, so what? Well, here is
the so what: remember when the Clinton administration recognized the Taliban as
a legitimate government and even welcomed their Foreign Minister to the White
House? We have Gaza and the Palestinians
for the same reason…we simply recognized them.
Yeah, well the Taliban welcomed someone
into their arms as well. And look what happens when you send your Secretary of
State to sit and negotiate a cease fire with Qatar and Turkey — two
Islamist-supporting countries — on behalf of a terrorist organization, Hamas. And don’t forget, Barack Hussein Obama’s first phone call as president to an
international leader was made to Fatah chief Mahmoud Abbas, aka Abu Mazen — not
exactly a nation-state or world leader. What are words for? They’re for
realizing what a declared and recognized state is, as opposed to a terrorist
organization that doesn’t deserve validation.
How about the recognition of Palestine or worse Palestinians as a legitimate
people. They’re not! Nowhere in history are there a people called Palestinians. The Roman Empire renamed Israel - Palestine
to wash all traces of Israel from the Earth after its destruction. It’s a made
up name. Jerusalem for example became capital of the Hebrew kingdom after its
capture by David
around 1000 BC;
it was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon
in 586 BC;
and taken by the
Romans in 63
BC; devastated in
70 to 135 AD during the Jewish rebellions against
Rome renamed Palestine by the Romans; it didn’t fall to the Arabs until 637 AD and was never occupied by any people
who called themselves Palestinians until the 1900’s. And that’s also AD my
friend…
Lastly, we need to address this group
as ISIS, Da’ish, Wahhabist’s, or just plain terrorists because it is seeking to
establish an Islamic state within the borders of two recognized nation-states;
Iraq and Syria. ISIS can attempt to break down any borders and not recognize
them, but we must. We cannot allow this group of terrorist Muslims to
reestablish Wahhab or Da’ish or some 7th century regional caliphate, so
therefore we must fight to reestablish sovereignty.
Now, I would much rather use this
crisis as a means to establish something long since needed — a separate country
called Kurdistan, Obama won’t even recognize them as allies even though they
have been the best allies in the middle east that we have, save Israel — but my
focus would be on destroying ISIS and Jihad altogether.
It was the dream of Kemal Ataturk to
have a secular Muslim country, Turkey, but thanks to the Islamist Recip Tayyip
Erdogan, that dream has turned into a nightmare.
So what are words for in this case? They are to properly define your enemy and not
allow them to define their own goal and objective, which we must reject. It
should concern everyone that the Obama Islamic Regime of America seems to be
embracing the ISIL-Caliphate terminology, which reflects their dismissal of our
best ally in the Middle East…Israel.
Am I thinking too deeply in this? I don’t think so. Because America has only been around for approximately
238 years and we fail to realize the nuances of history and what we should
learn from it, such as language and terminology. During the Clinton
administration we didn’t understand the nature of the Balkans and took sides ‘against’
the Serbian Christians. If we had studied the Battle of Kosovo in 1389 it would
have helped us understand why the Serbs still harbor hatred and fear against the
Muslims.
In any event, I will continue to call
it what it is, Barbaric Islamic terrorist Jihad — and I recommend we all do the
same — especially Obama.
Well…What can you expect from a Muslim…
Thanks
for listening – de Andréa
If you
agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for them to hear
the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing - Permission to
reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
No comments:
Post a Comment