Socialized School Lunch
Program
Is the purpose of the school lunch
program to make parents dependent on the government to feed their children, or are
they putting something funny in the food???
By de Andréa
October 22, 2013
How many of you remember carrying
your lunches from home when you went to school? I lived on brown bag
lunches through most of my school years including high school, college and
throughout a lot of my working life. If I wanted to eat, I got up, fixed
my lunch and carried it with me, as did millions of other people.
However, thanks to the
dictatorial socialist policies of Frau Michele Obama, the days of brown bag
lunches are quickly vanishing. Mandatory
Social government dependency has entered the child Indoctrination system.
First I received an email with a link
to the site of a deaf mom identified only as
Linda. She posted: Her son “Zion’s
teacher sent a note home asking me to send lunches to school because Zion would
eat anything at the school.” Linda gladly complied and started
sending lunches to school with Zion that he would eat.
Then Linda received another note
from the school informing her not to send any lunches from home unless she had
a doctor’s note stating that it was necessary. Confused about the turn of
events, she tried to call the health coordinator as the note stated, but could
not get an answer or a response. Knowing that Zion would not eat the
school provided lunch, she continued to pack a lunch and send it to school with
her son.
Again, a note was sent home from
the school with a handwritten message at the top from Zion’s teacher. The
message stated: “Please do not send a
lunch to school unless a doctor’s note is sent with it in connection with this
letter.”
When I read this private website
post, I wasn’t sure if it was real or not. So I went searching on the
internet for any other references to schools banning brown bag lunches from
home and I found another occurrence.
This time it took place in
Chicago at Little Village Academy, a public school on the
West Side. Principal Elsa Carmona has banned students from bringing
lunches from home. She explained saying:
“Nutrition wise, it is better for the children to eat at the
school. It’s about the nutrition and the excellent quality food that they
are able to serve (in the lunchroom). It’s milk versus a Coke. But with
allergies and any medical issue, of course, we would make an exception.”
When a reporter showed up at the
school to investigate the policy 7th grader
Fernando Dominquez stood up in the lunchroom and loudly asked his fellow
classmates:
“Who
thinks the lunch is not good?”
Numerous students raised their hands and
began loudly chanting:
“We should
bring our own lunch! We should bring our own lunch! We should bring our own
lunch!”
Fernando turned to the reporter
and said:
“Do
you see the situation?”
The school district says that the
decision to ban lunches from home is up the individual principals and that they
generally make their decision for the nutritional benefits of their
students. But what they aren’t saying publicly is that by banning
homemade lunches, it forces more students to take the school cafeteria lunches
which means more money for the company that provides those lunches. But is that the only reason?
Although more students at Little
Village Academy are taking school lunches, many of them are throwing all or
most of the lunch into the garbage. Erica Martinez, a parent of a student at the
school said:
“Some
of the kids don’t like the food they serve at school for lunch or
breakfast. So it would be a good idea if they could bring their lunch so
they could at least eat something.”
The school may think they are
providing a more nutritional lunch, but what good does it do if the students
don’t eat it and throw most of it way? The end result is that more
students are going hungry through the rest of the school day than they were
before school lunches.
THE BOTTOM LINE: The only obvious thing being accomplished
here is that Frau Michele Obama’s school lunch program is forcing more
socialistic control over school children and their parents. Schools are
taking the rights of the parents to feed and provide for their children away
from them and giving more rights to the schools. Schools are controlling
what the kids can and cannot eat often against parental wishes. In
addition the schools are monitoring the activities of students outside of
school and punishing them for things that the school has no authority over… and
then the courts are supporting the schools.
Funny I thought that only the legislature could make laws. I guess that was before the oppressive
dictatorship.
At the rate things are going, I
expect more radical socialistic changes in the public schools under the Obama
administration. If too many parents protest, I wouldn’t be surprised to
see the parents lose custody of their children like what has been happening in
Germany with parents who want to homeschool. It’s obvious that our
current liberal communist leaders care nothing about constitutional rights,
values or morals. The family institution is a hindrance to them and
taking more control of our children is one of their main ways to destroy the
family and it starts with seemingly little things like a brown paper bag.
And then instead of just being
concerned that the child gets enough to eat, there is the little burning issue
of just why is the government so concerned that children eat the food provided
by the school rather than from home.
Are they putting something funny
in the food…?
President James Madison once said: “Democracy
was the right of the people to choose their own tyrant.”
If you agree, please share these posts with your friends, family and co-workers. The only way to defeat the lies and propaganda of an evil government and its controlled media, is to spread the truth.
If you agree, please share these posts with your friends, family and co-workers. The only way to defeat the lies and propaganda of an evil government and its controlled media, is to spread the truth.
Thanks
for listening – de Andréa
Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing - Permission to
reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
No comments:
Post a Comment