Friday, July 26, 2013

Nan Is An Idiot, A Liar, Or’ She Supports Gun Violence


Nan Is An Idiot, A Liar, Or’ She Supports Gun Violence
Maybe all’ of the above…

Pulling out all the stops and telling the raw truth…as I say in my profile I don’t pull my punches.

Opinion
By de Andréa
July 26, 2013

Nancy Pelosi says she wants to commemorate (code for celebrate) the one-year anniversary of James Holmes’s theatrical Aurora murder spree.  She wants to remind everyone that she and the rest of Washington haven’t forgotten about their “Constitutional responsibility to enact gun control :”(code for, so they can kill more children in unprotected GUN FREE SCHOOLS).  Moreover there is no “Constitutional responsibility to enact gun control”.  So she’s a Liar…

Pelosi wrote this on her web site, check it out.
“In Congress, there can be no more fitting memorial to [also code for celebrate] the lives lost in Aurora, in Newtown, and across the country than a concerted effort to enact commonsense gun safety legislation [code for Gun Ban].  We must uphold ‘our oath’ to ‘protect and defend’ the constitution and all Americans by expanding background checks and keeping dangerous firearms out of the wrong hands [code for ‘law abiding hands’].  We must restore confidence in the safety of our homes, schools, movie theaters, and neighborhoods by taking clear, concrete steps to prevent [“prevent” in this case is code for promote] gun violence,”  [The words in brackets are the translation of Nancy’s Nazi speak.]

In the real’ true’ Congressional oath, the phrase “protect and defend” doesn’t appear.  The phrase she has massacred or lied about actually reads, support’ and defend,” as you can clearly see by reading it or clicking on Oath of Office below.  So she either lied or maybe she can’t read which would make her an idiot.  And if you are going to support and defend the Constitution Nan, did your mommy ever tell you that this means ‘support and defend the whole thing’.  And that it includes the 2nd  Amendment as well, which also by the way includes the phrase “shall not be infringed,”  which means the same as it means in the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law” Nan…  I guess your mommy didn’t tell you!  And of course the brainwashing robot programming school of indoctrination that you went to - didn’t either.

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will ‘support and defend’ [Nan]  the Constitution of the United States [and that’s the whole Constitution Nan] against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”  ‘Boy Nan’ did you ever violate that oath or what…and as the last phrase reads, maybe you need to ask God to help you.

So you see it is not PROTECT Nan it is SUPPORT.  I guess you must think that if you change the word from “support” to “protect” Mrs. Pelosi, you can make illegal anti-gun laws that you can manipulate like you manipulate words to look as though you are protecting children from murders, instead of supporting existing constitutionally protected guns rights like you swore you would.  Like I said you’re a liar.  And you promote the murder of young children and innocent people by supporting laws that make people totally defenseless rather than upholding your oath of office to support the United States Constitution that would actually protect people.

There is no Constitutional basis for gun control at all; therefore ‘any’ gun law is illegal according to 7 different constitutional laws including the little known 10th Amendment that doesn’t allow the government to defecate unless the constitution says it can, and where it can do it, and how much. 

Legislators should be required to take a test on the constitution or at least be able to demonstrate that they can read at least as well as a 6th grader as Diane so unintelligently pointed out, so maybe she is also a liar, or she is also a promoter of child murder.

So why do I say Nan and liars like her support gun violence?  Well that’s easy, they want more GUN FREE ZONES to kill more children in more schools and in more theaters and more malls and just about more of anywhere.  They know GUN FREE ZONES work’ because we already have them, and we always end up with Aurora’s and Sandy Hook’s and more dead children.  The only conclusion is that they must want more of those types of results.  It was Einstein that said something like, (and he could actually read), don’t keep doing the same thing, and expect a different result.  So even according to Einstein people like Nan and Diane want more GUN FREE ZONES so they can kill more children because they keep doing the same thing and getting the same desired result.

The title of this article reads, Nan is an idiot a liar or supports gun violence”.  There are only three choices here, it has to be one of them, so which is it Nan. Do you want to be accused of being an idiot because you are not intelligent enough to even know that you are promoting murder, or do you want to be known as nothing but a liar when you knowingly are giving a false sense of safety when you promote GUN FREE ZONES, or do you want to be charged with conspiracy to commit murder when you provide a safe ZONE FOR MURDERERS to kill children?  Your choice Nan

If’ politicians like Pelosi truly want to “support and defend the Constitution” as their oath actually says they would work to repeal all federal gun control laws and not infringe on the right that the Constitution guarantees.  The trouble is, that’s not likely to happen with America haters like Pelosi and DiFi as well as Mayer Dumbberg, or Governor homo excuse me Cuomo, not in this lifetime anyway.  So you will be looking forward, as Nan and Diane are, to more school murders of more children, maybe your own children.

THE BOTTOM LINE: It’s been over a year now since James Holmes entered an Aurora, Colorado GUN FREE THEATER where he was, thanks to those like Pelosi, safe to shoot up a bunch of GUN FREE DEFENSELESS movie-goers.  Since then, America hating gun control freaks have capitalized on all these innocent murder victims in their attempt to appeal to the emotions of low information Americans.

When their Aurora debate began to fizzle, the massacre at Sandy Hook conveniently happened in yet another of Pelosi’s and Feinstein’s GUN FREE SCHOOLS.  Moreover, since it involved more people and defenseless little kids, politicians were able to more effectively tug at America’s ignorant heartstrings to convince people of the lie that gun confiscation is really the most responsible thing to do to combat “gun violence.”  But of course she knows better, so she lies, or she is an idiot, take your pick.  But despite the hate America evil gun lobby, the “compromised” Manchin-Toomey bill failed in the Senate.  I guess there must be just enough people left in the Senate that still have at least half a brain.  Or maybe they just don’t want to be charged with aiding and abetting MURDERS!

So now, of course Nan and Diane are just hoping and waiting for the next act of mass murder in one of their GUN FREE ZONES that they are hoping is bigger, bloodier, and even more massive than Sandy Hook, Aurora and Georgia Tech combined.  And when the communist government media prints its disinformation and propaganda, it’ll be equally more entertaining and dramatic, especially when they delve into, dwell on, and/or totally fabricate, the “lone gunman’s” twisted and shocking past and personal life.  Moreover when it is discovered that the gunman, came by his gun illegally they will say, “see’ we just need more gun control laws”. 

No doubt the propaganda distributors/media will feast on it like a parasite, sucking the blood of young innocent victims and churning out increased profits in the form of higher ratings.  And politicians will cry fake tears in exchange for votes, money, and guns. 

Oh well…  I guess I have beaten this dead horse long enough.

For today anyway…

Thanks for listening – de Andréa


Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

No comments: