Obama’s Connection To The Benghazi Attack
And the One World Government
Obama’s chief investigator into the
Benghazi attack Thomas Pickering is tied to the attack itself.
As Obama’s illegal war to overthrow
Gadhafi, the Benghazi
attack was just part of the UN’s adopted “Responsibility to protect” doctrine
(don’t be fooled by the name) aimed at the ultimate “United One World
Government”. And Obama is all tangled up
By de Andréa
November 5, 2012
In my last few articles I pointed out that Obama has for four years, been constructing the foundation, as he said: for…“A fundamental Change in
America”, the infiltration
of Islamic Terrorist Jihadist into every security agency in the U.S. As well as creating
a personal military answerable only to him! Here is a little more insight into the
connecting of the dots and Obama’s grand plan for ONE WORLD ISLAMIC GOVERNMENT run by the revived Ottoman
Empire the world organization of the Muslim Brotherhood.
The Thomas Pickering connection
I find it interesting to say the least, that the Obama administration’s lead investigator into the Benghazi attack, Thomas Pickering, has had secret (non-sanctioned by the DOD) clandestine meetings with Hamas, aimed at opening a dialogue with the terrorist group according to informed Middle Eastern security officials. Sources within Hamas said the June 2009 meeting with
took place in
with two Hamas leaders, Bassem Naim and Mahmoud al-Zahar. Naim is Hamas’s health minister, while
al-Zahar is one of the main Hamas leaders in Geneva . Gaza
Pickering is further tied to the revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa through his role as a member of the small board of the “International Crisis Group”, or ICG, (again don’t be fooled by the name) it’s one of the main proponents of the secret international “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine. Gareth Evans, president emeritus of the ICG, is the founder and co-author of the secret doctrine.
The UN/Brotherhood doctrine is the very military protocol that Obama used to circumvent U.S. Congress and to justify the NATO bombing campaign that brought down Moammar Gadhafi’s regime in
Libya, as well as Egypt and now being supported in , and put
the Muslim Brotherhood in power. Syria
The George Soros connection
Billionaire activist George Soros is on the ICG’s executive board. Soros’s “Open Society Institute” is also one of only three nongovernmental funders of the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, the group that devised the doctrine.
The ICG itself has long petitioned for talks with Hamas as well as normalized relations with the Muslim Brotherhood, for years urging the Egyptian government to allow the Brotherhood to establish an Islamist political party, as reported by WorldNetDaily. The group petitioned the Algerian government to cease “excessive” military activities against al-Qaida-linked groups and to allow organizations seeking to create an Islamic state to participate in the Algerian government.
The Robert Malley connection
Another ICG member is Robert Malley, a former adviser to Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign. He resigned after it was exposed he had communicated with Hamas. In a report by WorldNetDaily, Malley long had petitioned for dialogue with Hamas. Other ICG board members include Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was national security adviser to Jimmy Carter; and Samuel Berger, who was Bill Clinton’s national security adviser.
Military doctrine used to bomb Libya
The ICG is one of the main proponents of the Responsibility to Protect doctrine, championing the doctrine in its official mission statement.
Is all sounds good on the surface, but the future mission of the “UN International Crises Group” is to interfere in, and control anything the Global Government deems as a crises.
Doctrine founder Evans is the ICG’s president emeritus. President Obama’s national security adviser, Samantha Power, helped to found Responsibility to Protect doctrine, which was also joined by several controversial characters, including Palestinian legislator Hanan Ashrawi, a staunch denier of the Holocaust who long served as the deputy of late Palestinian Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat. Last April, Powers was named the head of the new White House Atrocities Prevention Board. All of these so-called protection agencies will become part of a global regime to create a utopian society.
Responsibility to Protect, or “Responsibility to Act”, as cited by Obama, is a set of principles, backed by the United Nations. It is based on the idea that sovereignty is not a right or even a privilege but instead a responsibility that can be revoked by the UN central government if a country is accused of “war crimes,” “genocide,” “crimes against humanity” or “ethnic cleansing.” Note: I said ‘ACCUSED’ not convicted… The term “war crimes” has at times been indiscriminately used by various U.N.-backed international bodies, including the International Criminal Court, or ICC, which applied it to Israeli’s anti-terror operations in the Gaza Strip. The ICC could also be used to prosecute
U.S. troops, or individual
state governments within the . United
for Human Rights Policy, founded by Power, had a seat on the advisory board of
the 2001 commission that original founded Responsibility to Protect. The commission is called the “International
Commission on Intervention of State Sovereignty”. It invented the term “responsibility to
protect” while defining its guidelines. The
Carr Center Carr Center
is a research center concerned with so-called human rights located at the Kennedy
School of Government at . Harvard
The Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect is the world’s leading champion of the modern world military doctrine. Soros’s “Open Society Institute” is a primary funder and key proponent of the Global Centre for Responsibility to Protect. Several of the doctrine’s main founders sit on boards with Soros.
The committee that devised the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine included Arab League Secretary General Amre Moussa as well as Palestinian legislator Ashrawi.
Two of the global group’s advisory board members, Ramesh Thakur and Gareth Evans, are the original founders of the doctrine, with the duo even coining the term “responsibility to protect.”
Thakur and Evans sit on multiple boards with Soros.
The Open Society is one of only three nongovernmental funders of the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. Government sponsors include
Canada, the Netherlands, Norway,
Rwanda and the U.K.
Board members of the group include former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, former
President Mary Robinson and
South African activist Desmond Tutu. Robinson
and Tutu have made solidarity visits to the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip as
members of a group called “The Elders”, which includes former President Jimmy
Carter, another hate Ireland
Annan once famously stated: “State sovereignty, in its most basic sense, is being redefined – not least by the forces of globalization and international co-operation. States are … instruments of the whole.”
Right to ‘penetrate nation-states’ borders’
Soros himself outlined the fundamentals of “Responsibility to Protect” in a 2004 Foreign Policy magazine article titled “The People’s Sovereignty: How a New Twist on an Old Idea Can Protect the World’s Most Vulnerable Populations.”
In the article, Soros said “true sovereignty belongs to the ‘people’, who in turn delegate it to their governments.” Sounds good on the surface but it is muddied with Marxism.
“If governments abuse the authority entrusted to them and citizens have no opportunity to correct such abuses, outside interference is justified,” Soros wrote. “By specifying that sovereignty is based on the people, the international community can penetrate nation-states’ borders to protect the rights of citizens”. And the UN of course decides if and what the abuse is.
“In particular, the principle of the people’s sovereignty can help solve two modern challenges: the obstacles to delivering aid effectively to sovereign states, and the obstacles to global collective action dealing with states experiencing internal conflict.”
One must understand the term “people” here, it in no way defines individuals as people, it is a term use in Marxism as meaning “the ‘Whole, or The Collective’”, such as in “The Peoples Republic of China”. And of course don’t forget about the requirement of disarmament and demilitarization. NO! I mean total, except for the UN of course, something Obama has steadily been working on. And he will use his own private army to achieve that goal.
More Soros ties
“Responsibility” founders Evans and Thakur served as co-chairmen, with Gregorian on the advisory board of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, which invented the term “responsibility to protect.”
In his capacity as co-chairman, Evans also played a pivotal role in initiating the fundamental shift from sovereignty as a right or a privilege to “sovereignty as a responsibility.” Evans presented Responsibility to Protect at the July 23, 2009, United Nations General Assembly, which was convened to consider the principle.
A Marxist ‘One World Government’
Doctrine founder Thakur has advocated a “global rebalancing” and “international redistribution of wealth and power” to create a “New World Government.” In a piece in March 2011 in the Ottawa Citizen newspaper, “Toward a new world order,” Thakur wrote, “Westerners must change lifestyles and support international redistribution of responsibility.” He was aslo referring to a United Nations-brokered international climate treaty “Agenda 21” in which he argued, “Developing countries must reorient growth in cleaner and greener directions.”
In the opinion piece, Thakur then discussed recent military engagements, and how the financial crisis has impacted the
. “The West’s bullying approach to developing
nations won’t work anymore – global power is shifting to U.S. Asia,”
he wrote. “A much-needed global moral
rebalancing is in train,” he added.
Thakur continued: “Westerners have lost their previous capacity to set standards and rules of behavior for the world. Unless they recognize this reality, there is little prospect of making significant progress in deadlocked international negotiations.”
Thakur contended, “the demonstration of the limits to
and NATO power in Iraq and
has left many less fearful of ‘superior’ western power.” Afghanistan
The truth is’ however that it’s not so much the loss of “superior western power” as it is a fundamental change in politics, i.e. the politically correct rules of engagement that hampered the success of actually winning the war for Freedom in the
and did nothing but kill so many Americans.
THE BOTTOM LINE: It is through this same mechanism and theme that Obama plans to disarm all Americans, a UN treaty is now sitting in a Senate committee just awaiting his reelection. According to proponents of the One World Government’s doctrine of “responsibility to protect,” individuals will no longer need personel protection, “the right to keep and bear arms”, as the new Government will now be responsible to protect us all. We will no longer need independent wealth because the wealth will be redistributed to a World Government and we will be dependant on the ‘World god of Central International Government” to provide everything we need. Isn’t that Special!!! And what do you give up for all this protection? Everything my friend, EVERYTHING!
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” -- Edmund Burke
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of
"But you must remember, my fellow-citizens, that eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty, and that you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing. It behooves you, therefore, to be watchful in your States as well as in the Federal Government.” -- Andrew Jackson, Farewell Address, March 4, 1837
If you are truly interested what your future will be like under the next Obama regime, read the Quran, the Hadith, Mein Kampf, and Karl Marx. The combination of those writings will give you at least a philosophical view of what to expect. The only way to fully understand the consequences of a future Obama dictatorship is to vote him back into power. But of course, that’s like jumping off the cliff to find out what it would be like to fly without wings. You just can’t’ click the “undo button”.
Tomorrow is ‘Election Day’, maybe the last, if Obama is reelected you will lose your right to choose my friend. No’ I mean you will lose you right to choose anything, because you will lose your rights, ALL OF THEM! They will be replaced with ‘REASONABILITY’, your responsibility to the ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT…
Thanks for listening – de Andréa