Thursday, August 23, 2012

Islamic Jihad is Not Terrorism?

Islamic Jihad is Not Terrorism?
According to the Obama administration, Homeland Security, Department of Justice, FBI etcetera, etcetera, etcetera, mass attacks on innocent people by Muslims, is not terrorism.  Only domestic so-called hate crimes are terrorism.  What do they ignorantly think Islamic Jihad is?  Or is Obama just protecting our enemy?

By de Andréa
August 23, 2012

Questions are being raised about the inconsistency of the government's standard for what qualifies as "terrorism," as recent high-profile shootings bear that label while a Muslim Jihadist at the Fort Hood massacre does not. 
According to the Patriot Act, terrorism is defined as …”An act of violence that is intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion or to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.” 
Sounds like the Ft. Hood massacre to me, but then I’m not a Muslim, or a Muslim enabler, so what do I know. 

The shooting earlier this month at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin where six people were killed by a self-described neo-Nazi crazy, was publicly described by the attorney general as an act of terrorism motivated by hate. 
"That is precisely -- precisely what happened here.  An act of terrorism, an act of hatred, a hate crime that is anathema to the founding principles of our nation and to who we are as an American people," Attorney General Eric Holder said August, 10.  I can’t help wondering how he “PRECISELY” defined “Fast And Furious”. 

The shooting Wednesday in Washington, D.C., of a security guard at the Family Research Council is also being handled as an act of terrorism a source told Fox News.  An FBI affidavit says the gunman uttered a statement to the effect of, "I don't like your politics," before reaching into his backpack for a gun and opening fire.  So liberals are defined by liberals as terrorists.  That might be ardently correct! 

But the federal government has declined to label Muslim acts of Jihad as terrorism.  Oh!  They know’ that Jihad is terrorism my friend. 

A recruitment center shooting in the summer of 2009 by a man who described himself as an operative for Al Qaeda in Yemen was of course not handled as a terrorism case even though he was an Al Qaeda Muslim terrorist.  It was prosecuted in an Arkansas state court.  ‘Go figure! 

And the Fort Hood massacre in November 2009, where 13 were killed and more than 30 wounded, has never been described ‘officially’ as an act of terrorism even though the shooter was a terrorist Jihadist Muslim and shouted "Allah Achbar," (god is great), as he opened fire and killed and wonded unarmed American soldiers .  "Now, you know, we can have really a legal discussion about whether it's a hate crime or an act of terrorism," Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, told Fox News.  "I just wish there was some consistency here and certainly to me Fort Hood would be the classic case (of) what should be a clear case of terrorism." 

The Defense Department has called the Fort Hood incident, “workplace violence”.  Now I’m not clear on this…did the shooter just go postal or what?  One of the soldiers who was injured, Sean Manning, said that the definition of the massacre as workplace violence was an insult. 

The recent movie theater massacre, in which a crazy neuroscience student killed 12 and wounded 58 others, has not yet been formally described as an act of terrorism -- but Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said at a hearing on Capitol Hill that the federal government is involved so it probably will. 

So does the crazy neuroscience student go to Gitmo and the Muslim Officer who shot 43 of our soldiers go to Small claims court or what?

THE BOTTOM LINE:  I wrote this article to make a point.  It is just one more in a long list that supports the fact that our Government is pro-Muslim.  More important to understand is that our President is pro-Muslim.  This is tantamount to FDR being pro-Nazi during the Second World War.  How do you think that would have worked out for us?  About the Same as this will.

We are making capital terrorists out of nut cases while we are protecting the real Muslim terrorist Jihadist from any negative stigma.  All I have to say is [Ignorance-Deception-Enablement-Destruction].  We need a new Government, now!  Think about that, this coming November…

de Andréa 

No comments: