Sharia Okay In U.S. Courts

...say American Judges. If Islamic Shariah law continues to infiltrate American courts- this is just one example of what you can expect.

By de Andréa

At the risk of sounding trite, it isn’t ‘will’ Shariah take over U.S. courts, it’s ‘when will’ Shariah dominate our court system? It has already begun, and if it isn’t stopped… well…I hope you can see where that‘s going.

This is another article in a series on “American Shariah”. I expect this series will never really be over until Islam is either out of the United States or’ we become just another Islamic State.

Sharia Law:
Muslim "honor killing" or horror killing of 3 North American teenage girls by their own father, and it’s perfectly acceptable in Muslim culture, and what’s more, it’s legal under Sharia law. What’s even more frightening is Shariah is becoming acceptable in America.

KINGSTON, Ontario – An Afghan father, his wife, and their son killed three teenage sisters and a wife in what the judge described as cold-blooded, shameful murders resulting from Muslim honor and the twisted brutal Ideology of Islam.

Mahammad Shafia, 58; his wife Tooba Yahya, 42; and their son Hamed, 21, each guilty under Canadian law, of four counts of first-degree murder in a case that shocked and shook Canadians from coast to coast.

The three declared their innocence of any wrongdoing in the killings of their children and sisters Zainab, 19, Sahar 17, and Geeti, 13, as well as wife and step mother Rona Amir Mohammad, 52, Shafia's childless first wife in a polygamous marriage sighting SHARIA LAW.

Their bodies were found June 30, 2009, in a car submerged in a canal in Kingston, Ontario, where the family had stopped for the night on their way home to Montreal from Niagara Falls, Ontario.

The family killed the three teenage sisters because they dishonored the family by defying Islamic Sharia law on rules of dress, dating, socializing, and going online. Shafia's first wife was living with him and his second wife.

It is difficult to conceive of a more despicable, more heinous crime ... the apparent reason behind these cold-blooded, shameful murders was that the four completely innocent victims offended the Muslim twisted concept of honor ... that has absolutely no place in any civilized society, much less in a Judeao Christian culture. But then, western culture is rapidly being replaced with the culture of Islam, they cannot coexists.

The family had left Afghanistan in 1992 and lived in Pakistan, Australia, and Dubai before settling in Canada in 2007. Shafia, a wealthy businessman, married Yahya because his first wife could not have children... and Muslims, in order to carry out their agenda of world domination and superiority must procreate like rabbits. World demographics have already changed.

But’ you say, well that’s in Canada, this is America it won’t happen here. You would be wrong my friend, it has already happened in the State of Arizona the father who murdered his daughter for the same reason, was found innocent of first degree murder because the jury couldn’t bring itself to believe a father could premeditatedly murder his daughter. America is just as ignorant, my friend.

Murder, honor killings, polygamy, child abuse, and wife abuse, this is how the Quran teaches families to behave under Sharia law, which is secretly enforced by Muslim communities through their mosques all over North America Including the U.S..

We must demand Congress to act now, to stop Sharia law from continuing in any American courts. So far there have been 27 major cases tried in American courts under Sharia law. Moreover, the States of Michigan and Texas have already established Sharia only courts.

The Washington Times has confirmed an LA Times report that Muslim Sharia law can be imposed by liberal judges upon the citizens of Oklahoma, despite 70% of voters demanding limits upon liberal judges, to stop them from applying foreign law above their allegiance to the U.S. Constitution.

The U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, in a ruling released Tuesday, affirmed an order by a district court judge in 2010 that prevented the voter-approved state constitutional amendment from taking effect. The ruling also allows a Muslim community leader in Oklahoma City to continue his legal challenge of the law's constitutionality.

The measure, known as State Question 755, was approved with 70% of the vote in 2010. The amendment would have barred courts from considering the legal precepts of other nations or cultures. 'Specifically, the courts shall not consider international law or Sharia law,' the law reads.

Nevertheless a State supreme court intimidated by Muslim terror groups overturned the law.

Muneer Awad, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in Oklahoma a known Muslim terrorist organization said: "This serves as a reminder that these anti-Sharia laws are unconstitutional. And that if politicians use fear-mongering and bigotry, the courts won't allow it to last for long,” Awad sued to block the law, contending that it infringed on his 1st Amendment rights. (Stephen Ceasar, Los Angeles Times, January 10, 2012).

When citizens try to limit the power of activist judges, by specifically voting to limit their jurisdiction, what can stop those same judges from ruling the people don't have power to limit judges? It's time to impeach a few judges, folks.

Not surprisingly, Judges don't think people have power to limit judicial tyranny. American Judges say Citizens can't stop Judges from imposing Muslim Sharia Law. I say, a national uprising must take place, not just in Oklahoma, but in the entire United States of America.

Imagine waking up one Sunday morning and reading the headline in your local newspaper: 'Supreme Court rules that no one, especially the press, cannot question the president,' and imagine that their ruling cited international case law from nations like China, Cuba, or Iran, where it is illegal to question the word of the executive branch. While this idea may seem far-fetched, with Islamic Shariah already in our courts, it is a certainty.

Congresswoman Sandy Adams (R-FL) has taken a stand for liberty to defend the U.S. Constitution and US law, by sponsoring a bill that stops liberal activist judges from enforcing Muslim Sharia law, or foreign laws, in American Courts.

Adams wrote an op-ed article explaining her bill, saying in part: "Foreign law poses a very real threat to the American judicial system...Our Constitution laid the foundation for our nation’s judicial system, and referencing or using foreign law in American courts will lead to its destruction...

That is why I have introduced legislation to protect our Constitution and federal court systems from this type of practice. My two-page bill, H.R. 973, simply states that 'in any court created by or under Article III of the Constitution of the United States, no justice, judge, or other judicial official shall decide any issue in a case before that court in whole or in part on the authority of foreign law, except to the extent the Constitution or an Act of Congress requires the consideration of that foreign law.'

Not only is using international precedent a transparent disregard for the Constitution, but it could be used to advance a judge’s personal political agenda over the best interests of the nation. Judges have a responsibility to interpret the laws of the land, not legislate from the bench, and the practice of referring to foreign law puts their underlying motives into question. There are three particular Supreme Court cases where judges have cited foreign and international precedent. Lawrence v. Texas, where the court overturned state anti-sodomy statutes; Atkins v. Virginia, where the court held against the execution of mentally retarded capital defendants; and Roper v. Simmons, where the court outlawed application of the death penalty to offenders who were under 18 when their crimes were committed. International and foreign laws were cited in all three cases by our Supreme Court justices in reaching their decisions, setting precedent for future rulings..."

Currently there are over a dozen states that have introduced legislation banning foreign law on the state level - including the state of Florida...[it has] become a fixture of the confirmation process for Supreme Court justices. In her 2010 confirmation hearing, Elena Kagan was questioned by Senator Charles E. Grassley, an Iowa Republican, who asked if she thought international law should factor into a federal court’s decision-making process. She confirmed that she did, stating: “I think it depends. There are some cases in which the citation of foreign law, or international law, might be appropriate.” Well, you’re ignorantly wrong, wrong, wrong, Justice Kagan, this is America, not Egypt, or’ Iran. Shariah especially, is ‘never’ appropriate, even in Isalm. You might want to e-mail your congressman and ask him/her to support Sandy’s bill # HR 973, unless of course you want to be judged by Islamic law.

THE BOTTOM LINE: If one were to read the history of the Middle East, one would find many contributions to the rest of the world, especially in the science of Mathematics. But that was prior to the year 610 AD pre-Islam. Nothing good comes out of Islam, despite what our Muslim president says, (he lies) Islam has never contributed anything good, positive, and/or useful to the rest of the world! Not a thing! Especially their law. Moreover, after more than 1400 years of human oppression and social destruction, they certainly aren’t about to change…

de Andréa