America as an Islamic State

The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law. What will America look like as an Islamic State? Read the following story and watch the videos of Nonie Darwish who was born into an Egyptian Muslim Family and what it is like to be a Muslim woman.

By de Andréa

Author and lecturer and a Christian American Nonie Darwish recently authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza before immigrating to America in 1978 when she was eight to nine years old.

While still a child, her fathmilitary officer stationed with his family in Gaza. When he died, he was considered aer died while leading covert attacks on Israel. He was a high-ranking Egyptian "shahid," (pronounced shaheed) a martyr for Jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position in Islamic society.

Nonie developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her Muslim culture and upbringing. While still a child, she became a Christian after hearing a Christian preacher on television.

Implications of Islamic Law by Nonie Darwish

Females are possessions of men
In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old and have sexual intimacy with this child, consummating the marriage by 9 years of age. The dowry (payment) is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the private parts of the woman, to use her as a toy.

Even though a woman is abused she can not obtain a divorce. To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses. Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry. The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives 'at will' and he does not have to say why he has beaten her.

The husband is permitted to have (4 wives) and a temporary wife for an hour (prostitute) at his discretion.

The Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman.

Sharia in the West

In the Western World (Europe and America) Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so the wife can not obtain a divorce and he can have full and complete control of her. It is amazing and alarming how many American women attending American Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to Shariah law.

Ripping the West in TwoAuthor and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of Islam is to impose Shariah law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.

She recently authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law. In the book, Darwish warns about creeping Sharia law in the West - what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.

For the West, she says Muslims are working to impose Sharia on the world. If that is allowed to happen, Western civilization will be destroyed and disappear. Westerners generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the dignity of each individual. Islamic law (Sharia) teaches hate and that non-Muslims in this world should be subjugated or killed.

Peace and prosperity for one's children is not as important as assuring that Islamic law rules everywhere in the East, West and in the world.

While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Sharia teaches two systems of ethics - one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims, (the Kaffaar or Infidel). Building on tribal practices of the seventh century, Sharia encourages a side of humanity that wants to take from, and subjugate others.

While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a personal understanding of, and a relationship with God, Sharia advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism.

It's hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being Muslim (apostates) should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West, such murmurings in Islam are silenced through intimidation and death.

While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over time, Darwish explains how petro dollars from the west are being used to grow the extremely intolerant Islamic Jihad in the rest of the world.

Nonie says,
“In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in America to elect a Muslim Imam as President all by themselves! And rest assured, they will do so... You can look at how they already have taken over several towns in the State of Michigan alone, Detroit and Dearborn Mich Hamtramck Mich and many others too numerous to list. America for example has the largest population of Muslims in the world, second only to France. And Michigan has a larger population of Muslims than the country of Afghanistan ...”

There are areas in and around Washington DC that would give one cause to think he was in the Middle East. Many states and counties in the United States have already adopted Islamic Sharia as law in some form, such as Minnesota’s Sharia financial banking system. Giant Financial institutions such as AIG and UBS have incorporated Sharia Finance as part of their investment process.

While America is getting rid of Christianity and erasing God from the lives of children, Islam is growing larger by the minute. Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world, now nearly 1/3rd of the earth’s population.

The Nation of Islam is in the process of the greatest Jihad yet, the Jihad of America. Moreover, Islam will not stop until the world is subjegated to Islam --- not ever...

Watch some video interviews of Nonie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ3T2Y2QksE&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7zGcYaNKTI&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZdyRLOMCo0&feature=related

THE BOTTOM LINE: Now put your head back under the covers so you can't see the boogie man!

de Andréa

Arizona No Longer A State

President Obama like a little child has thrown a temper tantrum and ordered an agent of the Secretary of Homeland Security to announce that Arizona is now a free place for illegal aliens, a sanctuary State. Arizona has been declared by President Obama to be an Open Border State—this apparently is Obama’s answer to the Rule of Law. What is he going to do next, HOLD HIS BREATH?

By de Andréa
May 30, 2010

A top Department of Homeland Security official said his agency would not process illegal aliens, Muslim terrorists, or Mexican MS-13 members referred to them by Arizona authorities.Since Obama cannot have his way with the Arizona illegal alien law he has instead thrown a temper tantrum by taking his ball, bat, and mitt and refusing to play nice, saying he doesn’t like the rules and making an end run around them by just pretending that the State of Arizona no longer exists. I lost respect for Obama as president since before he was elected, moreover, I have lost respect for him as an adult human being.

Imagine the President of the United States, defiantly stamping his foot and announcing openly, that he will not obey or enforce federal laws passed by Congress and signed into law by a previous President. I mean, just who does this jerk think he is, a dictator? Oh yeah!

This is anarchy, from a man who calls a well known Communist terrorist, Bill Ayres a friend. This from a President who had a State department official apologize to China for a State that was enforcing Federal law.This from a man who welcomed a foreign president, the head of Mexico, into the White House, and agreed with him in his denouncing an American State for following Federal law.

Disgrace is not a strong enough word. Bloody Outrage is not a word that conveys the strength of feeling of betrayal by our own President.

Disgust comes closest. If you want to turn in illegal aliens, call 866-347-2423. If you are calling from the State of Arizona I am sorry but please know that your President no longer recognizes you as part of the United States of America.

Well…It will save Arizona from having to secede from the United States in order to protect its citizens from a foreign invasion. I think Obama just gave governer Jan Brewer cart blanch to call out the Arizona State Militia to process and deport all these criminals themselves.

John Morton, (not the one who signed the Declaration of Independence) the assistant secretary of homeland security for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, made the comment during a meeting on Wednesday with the editorial board of the Chicago Tribune.

The article said:

"I don't think the Arizona law, or laws like it, are the solution," Morton told the newspaper. “The best way to reduce illegal immigration is through a comprehensive federal approach, he said, and not a patchwork of state laws. The law, which criminalizes being in the state illegally and requires authorities to check suspects for immigration status, is not good government," Morton said.

This jerk doesn’t have the brains God gave a nematode. Arizona’s law is not only existing Federal law it is U.S. Constitutional law, Article 4 sections 4, read it John! It is good government, it’s responsible government, something you and your so-called leader fail to comprehend. And these jerks are both lawyers!!! No wonder my Dad hated lawyers…

Fox News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano said ICE is not obligated to process illegal immigrants referred to them by Arizona authorities. "ICE has the legal discretion to accept or not to accept persons delivered to it by non-federal personnel," Napolitano said. "It also has the discretion to deport or not to deport persons delivered to it by any government agents, even its own." In other words ICE is a loose cannon resembling the Nazi Gestapo or ‘SS’ doing whatever it desires.

Morton, according to a biography posted on ICE's website, began his federal service in 1994 and has held numerous positions at the Department of Justice, including as a trial attorney and special assistant to the general counsel in the former Immigration and Naturalization Service and as counsel to the deputy attorney general.

Border apprehensions in Arizona, where roughly a half million illegal immigrants are estimated to be living and committing nearly two thirds of the crime in Arizona, is up 6 percent since October of 2009, according to federal statistics. To put this into a little perspective, the population of Arizona is roughly 6.5 million

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-AL, said: “It appears that presedent Obama is nullifying existing law" and suggested Morton may not be the right person for his post if he fails to enforce federal law. "If he feels he cannot enforce the law, he shouldn't have the job," Sessions told Fox News. "That makes him, in my view, not fulfilling the responsibilities of his office." Sessions said: “the U.S. government has systematically failed to enforce federal immigration law and claimed Morton's statement is an indication that federal officials do not plan on working with Arizona authorities regarding its controversial law”

"They're telegraphing to every ICE agency in America that they really don't intend on cooperating with Arizona," Sessions said. The federal government should step up to the plate and play ball…. It's their Constitutional responsibility.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Will America ever finish paying for its lazy complacency? I don’t think so! America has received its just deserves. The damage to this country will never be repaired in the next three life times, even if we started today.

I have to be honest with you. I love this country; this is why I am so disgusted with this government. There is more crime in the ‘DC Belt Way’ than in all of organized crime since the early 1900’s. John Gotti was a choir boy along side of this Communist Muslim Regime of Barack Obama’s.

I know, most of you know and understand that our president is a Saul Alinsky trained Marxist Communist, but I still am getting a lot of flack from some of you because I have accused Obama of being a Muslim. And because I understand that all Muslims are terrorists or terrorists in training and or support the Islamic Jihad agenda. Our President is the enemy of America and therefore should be incarcerated in Gitmo before he has a chance to close it. I have not just accused Obama of being a Muslim, I know he is… What ever you do, please don’t just take my word for it, listen, and watch the terrorist Muslim Jihadist Barack Hussein Obama tell you himself that America is the largest Islamic State in the world --- and that - he – himself – is - a Muslim. Islam has already won the war because we have lost… Oh I forgot, OBAMA said we are not at war with Islam, then just who are we at war with --- Mr. President???
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28

If you have dared to expose yourselves to the truth and watched the video, then I rest my case… Well not really, I will never rest, not until the Muslim terrorists kill me, or they are driven out of my country and back into the ‘Stone Age’ where they belong. These are not God’s children; they are truly children of Satan.

de Andréa

Chicago Style Bribes in the White House

Did Obama commit a felony? Or is Joe Sestak lying? Let’s look at motive.
We have film:

By de Andréa

This is not the first time:
Is there someone in the Obama administration who has committed a crime – and did the president know about it and when did he know it? Analysts say it could be grounds for impeachment.

On Par with Nixon’s Watergate or the Valerie Plame scandal
"This scandal could be enormous," said Dick Morris, a former White House adviser to President Bill Clinton, on the Fox News (Video:)Sean Hannity show last night. "It's Valerie Plame only 10 times bigger, because it's illegal. Joe Sestak is either lying or the White House committed a crime.

So what motive would Joe Sestak have for lying about the President committing a felony? Come on! He is a Democrat running for Senator. On the other hand what would be the motive for Obama offering a bribe to Sestak to bow out of the race? How about to guarantee the nomination of his friend Arlen Specter???

"Obviously, the offer of a significant job in the White House could not be made unless it was by Rahm Emanuel or cleared with Rahm Emanuel," he said. If the job offer was high enough that it also had Obama's approval, "that is a high crime and misdemeanor."
"In other words, an impeachable offense” Hannity said.

"Absolutely," said Morris. The controversy revolves around an oft-repeated statement by (Video:)Rep. Sestak, D-Pa., that he had been offered a job by the Obama administration in exchange for dropping out of the senatorial primary against Obama supporter Sen. Arlen Specter.

Sestak said he refused the offer. He continued in the Senate primary and defeated Specter for the Democratic nomination. But Karl Rove, longtime White House adviser to President George W. Bush, said the charge is explosive because of federal law.

(Video:) Axelrod interviewed by John King on CNN

This is an extraordinary charge:
'They tried to bribe me out of the race by offering me a job,'" he said on Greta Van Susteran's "On the Record" program on the Fox News Channel. "Look, that's a violation of the federal code: 18 USC 600 says that a federal official cannot promise employment, a job in the federal government, in return for a political act.

“If Sestak is telling the truth, somebody violated the law," Rove said. "Section 18 USC 211 says you cannot accept anything of value in return for hiring somebody. Well, arguably, providing a clear path to the nomination for a fellow Democrat is something of value. He continued, citing a third law passage: "18 USC 595, which prohibits a federal official from interfering with the nomination or election for office. ... 'If you'll get out, we'll appoint you to a federal office,' – that's a violation of the law."

"I've said all I'm going to say on the matter. … Others need to explain whatever their role might be," Sestak said on CNN this week. "I have a personal accountability; I should have for my role in the matter, which I talked about. Beyond that, I'll let others talk about their role."

That's not fulfilling his responsibilities, Rove said. He said Sestak needs to be forthcoming with the full story so "the American people can figure out whether or not he's participating in a criminal cover-up along with federal officials."

The Obama White House has tried to minimize the issue.
"Lawyers in the White House and others have looked into conversations that were had with Congressman Sestak, and nothing inappropriate happened," White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs has stated. Gibbs told the White House press corps, "Whatever conversations have been had are not problematic." And on CBS' "Face the Nation" he said, "I'm not going to get further into what the conversations were. People who looked into them assure me they weren't inappropriate in any way."

But the administration also is taking no chances on what might be discovered.
According to Politico, the Justice Department has rejected a request from Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., for a special counsel to investigate and reveal the truth of the controversy.
The report said Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich confirmed no special counsel would be needed. But the report said Weich also gave no indication that the Justice Department actually was looking into the claims by Sestak. "We assure you that the Department of Justice takes very seriously allegations of criminal conduct by public officials. All such matters are reviewed carefully by career prosecutors and law enforcement agents, and appropriate action, if warranted, is taken," Weich wrote in the letter.

Issa had suggested that the alleged job offer may run afoul of federal bribery statutes.
He said in a statement to Politico, "The attorney general's refusal to take action in the face of such felonious allegations undermines any claim to transparency and integrity that this administration asserts."

This is not the first bribe to come out of the White House:
Offering jobs to political friends seems to be "business as usual," but didn’t Obama promise that "business as usual" wouldn't continue in his White House?

The Denver Post reported on a similar case concerning a Democrat Senate candidate in Colorado, Andrew Romanoff. The Denver Post said Jim Messina, Obama's deputy chief of staff and "a storied fixer in the White House political shop, suggested a place for Romanoff might be found in the administration and offered specific suggestions." Romanoff at the time was challenging another major Obama supporter, Sen. Michael Bennet, for the Democratic primary for the Senate seat from Colorado. He has since won top-line position over Bennet in a coming primary. The report said Romanoff turned down the overture, but it is "the kind of hardball tactics that have come to mark the White House's willingness to shape key races across the country, in this case trying to remove a threat to a vulnerable senator by presenting his opponent a choice of silver or lead."

The newspaper affirmed "several top Colorado Democrats" described the situation, even though White House spokesman Adam Abrams said, "Mr. Romanoff was never offered a position within the administration."

Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation, who has been monitoring the Obama administration, said the offer of reward for some government official's actions raises questions of legal liability.

"There's a federal statute and federal law seems to make clear if you offer a government official some sort of remuneration, directly or indirectly, it's an impeachable crime," he said.

Section 600 of the federal statute states:
“Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment, position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit, provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both”.

THE BOTTOM LINE: All fingers are being pointed back to the White House. This Chicago-style Mafia politicking is an assault on our democracy and is downright criminal. President Obama faces a critical choice. He can either live up to his rhetoric of transparency and accountability by disclosing who inside his White House tried to manipulate an election by bribing a U.S. Congressman, or he can allow his administration to continue this stonewalling and relinquish the mantle of change and transparency he is so fond of reminding us all.

Could this be the reason why Congressman Joe Sestak refuses to name names, because the very people who tried to bribe him are now his benefactors? For months, Sestak has repeatedly said without equivocation that the White House illegally offered him a federal job in exchange for dropping out of the race. Was Joe Sestak embellishing what really happened, or does he have first-hand knowledge of the White House breaking the law? If what he said is the truth, Joe Sestak has a moral imperative to come forward and expose who within the Obama Administration tried to bribe him and what exactly the bribe was. On the other hand, the level of the offer may not be an issue. It may not matter, if it was a job as a janitor or a job in the Dept of the Navy. Offering him anything of value to get him to leave a political race is a felony, punishable by five years in jail.

This is tantamount to what Senitor Baker asked during the Watergate investigation in the Nixon administration…What did he know and when did he know it?

Obama! For once in your life, ‘come clean’…

de Andréa

Shape Up Or Ship Out Obama

A 95 year Old Pearl Harbor WW II Battleship Survivor tells Obama to shape up or ship out in a letter to the Whitehouse.

de Andréa

The following was sent to me by one of my readers. It is the patriotic political response to ‘President Obama’ from a venerable and much honored WW II vet who is well known in Hawaii for his seventy-plus years of service to patriotic organizations and causes all over the country. A humble man without a political bone in his body, he has never spoken out before about a government official, that is until now.

Harold is the young one in the Hawaiian uniform.

He dictated this letter to a friend, signed it and mailed it to the ‘President of the United States of America’. .

Dear President Obama,

My name is Harold Estes, approaching 95 on December 13 of this year. People meeting me for the first time don't believe my age because I remain wrinkle free and pretty much, mentally alert.

I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1934 and served proudly before, during, and after WW II retiring as a Master Chief Bos'n Mate. Now I live in a "rest home" located on the western end of Pearl Harbor, allowing me to keep alive the memories of 23 years of service to my country.

One of the benefits of my age, perhaps the only one, is to speak my mind, blunt and direct even to the head man.

So here goes...

I am amazed, angry, and determined not to see my country die before I do, but you seem hell bent not to grant me that wish. I can't figure out what country you are the president of. You fly around the world telling our friends and enemies despicable lies like:

”We’re no longer a Christian nation" " America is arrogant" - (Your wife even announced to the world," America is mean- spirited. " Please tell her to try preaching that nonsense to 23 generations of our war dead buried all over the globe who died for no other reason than to free a whole lot of strangers from tyranny and hopelessness.

I'd say shame on the both of you, but I don't think you like America, nor do I see an ounce of gratefulness in anything you do, for the obvious gifts this country has given you.

To be without shame or gratefulness is a dangerous thing for a man sitting in the White House.

After 9/11 you said," America hasn't lived up to her ideals."

Which ones did you mean? Was it the notion of personal liberty that 11,000 farmers and shopkeepers died for to win independence from the British? Or maybe the ideal that no man should be a slave to another man, that 500,000 men died for in the Civil War? I hope you didn't mean the ideal 470,000 fathers, brothers, husbands, and a lot of fellas I knew personally died for in WWII, because we felt real strongly about not letting any nation push us around, because we stand for freedom.

I don't think you mean the ideal that says equality is better than discrimination. You know the one that a whole lot of white people understood when they helped to get you elected.

Take a little advice from a very old geezer, young man.

Shape up and start acting like an American. If you don't, I'll do what I can to see you get shipped out of that fancy rental on Pennsylvania Avenue. You were elected to lead not to bow, apologize, and kiss the hands of murderers and corrupt leaders who still treat their people like slaves.

And just who do you think you are telling the American people not to jump to conclusions and condemn that Muslim major who killed 13 of his fellow soldiers and wounded dozens more. You mean you don't want us to do what you did when that white cop used force to subdue that black college professor in Massachusetts, who was putting up a fight? You don't mind offending the police calling them stupid but you don't want us to offend Muslim fanatics by calling them what they are, terrorists.

One more thing. I realize you never served in the military and never had to defend your country with your life, but you're the Commander-in-Chief now, son. Do your job.

When your battle-hardened field General asks you for 40,000 more troops to complete the mission, give them to him. But if you're not in this fight to win, then get out. The life of one American soldier is not worth the best political strategy you're thinking of.

You could be our greatest president because you face the greatest challenge ever presented to any president.

You're not going to restore American greatness by bringing back our bloated economy. That's not our greatest threat. Losing the heart and soul of who we are as Americans is our big fight now.

And I sure as hell don't want to think my president is the enemy in this final battle... Sincerely, Harold B. Estes

Read as posted on Congress.Org

Snopes confirms as true:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/haroldestes.asp

THE BOTTOM LINE: I have nothing to add… Except that Harold said it all. Thanks Master Chief Bos'n Mate Ret. Harold Estes for your patriotic service to our Country.

de Andréa

ISI Linked to Times Square Bomb

A secret source says that Faisal Shahzad was taught by trusted Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence agents

By de Andréa

The key word here of course is trusted --- that was our first mistake. Did I ever tell you that you couldn’t trust a Muslim…ever? I will let you in on the secret word, as Groucho Marx use to say on his TV game show ‘You Bet Your Life”. Before your time? I’m sorry. Anyway the secret word that I use in preface to my classes exposing Islamic Jihad is “Deception”. Islam is a deception.

Have you ever been to a Magic show? There’s nothing magic about it. It is called slight of hand. In Arabic it is called “Taqiyyah (deception) the performer encourages you look here when you should be looking there. And then… you are deceived.

MI-6, the British Intelligence agents based in Pakistan have established that officers in the country's Inter-Services Intelligence agency, arranged for Faisal Shahzad to return to the United States after giving him instructions on how to build the Times Square bomb. Obviously he wasn’t a quick study.

No, I do not have a source inside MI-6, but I know someone who does…

The MI6 officers reported that an ISI officer traveled on the same flight that Shahzad took when he flew home. "This could be a potentially devastating blow for the ISI which already has a shaky anti-terrorism reputation in British and US intelligence agencies," said an intelligence source in London.

Shahzad's background as the son of a senior Pakistani Air Force officer brought him into contact with ISI agents who are linked to home-grown Jihadists and are training them to attack Western targets.

The source said: "For some time we have been monitoring a number of trained terrorists like Shahzad who have been introduced into Pakistan's military environment with its prevailing anti-West feelings. Several have left the country and we are trying to establish if they have gone to the U.K. or the United States."

The key word here is “Number”. What do they mean by “monitoring a number of trained terrorists”? First, every Muslim is a potential terrorist. And they are being trained, not only in Pakistan my friend, but right here in the good ole US of A.

The MOA--- no, that’s not the Mini Owners of America, it’s the Muslims of America. It is a nation wide Muslim terrorist training organization, which trains thousands of Muslim terrorists right here, right now, in our own back yard. You must ask yourself, why are they doing so much gorilla terrorist training? Do you think they just might be getting ready for something? Ya think…

I personally have warned and asked the FBI, why do you let Muslim terrorist organizations train right here in our country? Their response, “Thanks, we have them under surveillance. Oh great! They are watching the MOA train terrorist’s right in our front yard. I have to be honest, that is not comforting.

THE BOTTOM LINE: So we are not only trusting and supporting Pakistani intelligence officers in their training of terrorist to make war in this country, but we are watching terrorist being trained right here in our own country. Funny! My Constitution says that our government is supposed to be protecting us from a foreign invasion, not supporting and watching it. I guess I must have an old version.

Is Obama trying to be Reaganesque, saying tear down the border wall? Or is he trying to give away the country to his Nation of Islam .

Oh! The terrorist training camps in the U.S… Watch the videos

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebg6AFylios&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByAAEOqVDXM&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKcaobBaWLA&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eLqbNiP45k&NR=1

Do you have enough training to combat those folks? You have two choices, one, – get them out of your country, or if your too busy, then the second one is, – you better get the weapons and the training.

Think about it…

de Andréa

Holder Supports Terrorist Islam

U.S. Attorney General Erik Holder Supports Terrorist Islam. We have film:

By de Andréa

True to form, Obama’s Muslim Appointee, Attorney General Eric Holder, is obviously in denial that Muslims or Islam has anything to do with Islamic Jihad or terrorism, especially in the U.S. That’s right Eric, Nazis had nothing to do with the “Holocaust” either, that is unless as a Muslim you are in denial of the “Holocaust” as well.

Just as our Muslim President, Barack Hussein Obama who denies that we are even at war with Islam, (I would appreciate him telling us just who exactly we are at war with) Attorney General Eric Holder in a house Judiciary Committee meeting just couldn’t bring himself to say that the attempted Times Square bombing had anything to do with Islamic terrorism or did any other act of terrorism in the U.S. for that matter. Watch the video.

Despite the FBI crediting the Pakistani Taliban with fostering the recent failed car bombing in Times Square, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. was reluctant Thursday to say a Muslim or specifically radical Islam was part of the cause of that and other recent attacks. Well of course he’s bloody reluctant; he and his pal Barack are bloody Muslims.

Mr. Holder, testifying to the House Judiciary Committee, repeatedly balked at a half-dozen questions from Rep. Lamar Smith, the ranking Republican on the committee, about whether "radical Islam" was behind the attempted car bombing, and last year's so-called "underpants bomber" or the killings at Fort Hood in Texas.

"There are a variety of reasons why people do these things. Some of them are potentially religious," Mr. Holder finally told the committee Thursday, though he would not go further than saying “people who hold radical views may have had an ability to have an impact" on Faisal Shahzad, the man the Justice Department says tried to detonate a car bomb in Times Square. Sounds like Muslim Taqiyyah (decepive) double talk to me.

The exchange comes as President Obama and Republicans spar over whether the administration is taking a tough-enough approach to the war on terrorism. Heck, the administration says we are not at war with terrorism, is may be man influenced disasters or some such nonsense. Critics want the president to hone his criticism, while he and his advisers have sought to avoid painting the conflict as a battle against a religious belief or its adherents.

"I don't know why the administration has such difficulty acknowledging the obvious, which is that radical Islam might have incited these individuals," Mr. Smith, Texas Republican, said after the hearing. "If you can't name the enemy, then you're going to have a hard time trying to respond to them.” Amen! Brother Lamar. Rep Smith finally gave up in disgust, saying he didn’t know why he couldn’t get an answer to a simple yes or no question.

In his near daylong appearance before the House Judiciary Committee, Mr. Holder was repeatedly asked about Arizona's new immigration law, which the attorney general has criticized and suggested may run afoul of the Constitution.

Obama has asked the Justice Department to review the law to determine whether the federal government should try to block it before it takes effect at the end of July. Block a Federally Constitutional law that the States supports because the Fed refuses to enforce it. And Obama use to teach Constitutional law ---Chicago style….

Mr. Holder admitted to the committee that he hasn't even read the law, and his criticisms were based on what he's seen on television or read in the newspapers about the law. I am sure glad Mr. Holder is not a doctor or he might be trying to practice medicine with what he has learned on Miami E.R.

Mr. Holder said, "I've just expressed concerns on the basis of what I've heard about the law. But I'm not in a position to say at this point, not having read the law, not having had the chance to interact with people who are doing the review, exactly what my position is,". This may be because Mr. Holder puts more credence in ‘Islamic Sharia Law’ than he does in ‘American Constitutional Law’. I wonder if he has ever red the Constitution…

Last weekend, Mr. Holder told NBC's "Meet the Press" program that the Arizona law "has the possibility of leading to racial profiling.” He had earlier called the law's passage "is unfortunate," and questioned whether the law was unconstitutional because it tried to assume powers that should be reserved for the federal government. Well the problem here Mr. Holder is that the Federal government refuses to do its Constitutional duty to protect this country and its citizens from a foreign invasion. Article 4 section 4, forget the Arizona law, try reading the U.S. Constitution for a change.

Rep. Ted Poe, who had questioned Mr. Holder about the law, wondered how he could hold those opinions if he hadn't yet read the legislation. "It's hard for me to understand how you would have concerns about something being unconstitutional if you haven't even read the law," the Texas Republican told the attorney general.

The Arizona law's backers argue that it doesn't go beyond what federal law already allows, and they say press reports have distorted the legislation. They point to provisions in the law that specifically rule out racial profiling as proof that it can be implemented without conflicting with civil rights.

But critics said giving police the power to stop those they suspect are in the country illegally is bound to lead to profiling.

Mr. Holder said he expects the Justice and Homeland Security departments will finish their review of the Arizona law soon.

Meanwhile, back in the subject, the failed Times Square attack is the latest incident in which the administration has found itself explaining its strategy toward terrorism.

Authorities on Thursday raided several locations in the Northeast and detained at least three people on immigration violations, Mr. Holder said. They suspect the three people were involved with providing funds to the suspected bomber, though it was unclear whether they had knowledge of specific plans to try to ignite a car bomb in Times Square.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The real problem as I see it, is that the war is not in the Middle East, the war is right here in America. We are at war with our own government, a government that has been infiltrated with a foreign theocracy, foreign ideologies, foreign philosophies, and with the same agenda of our enemy.

As for the war in the Middle East is concerned, I must be from another planet or at least another time period. When I went to the War College in Fort Lee Virginia back in 1959, in the first paragraph of the manual were the words “Know who your enemy is…” something this government has yet to do. It is something we might want to think about since we have been in a state of war for nearly 10 years now. Oh! And another thing, the manual… well… at least it used to say…it continued with the words”before a declaration of war is made”. Oh yeah! That’s something we haven’t done yet either. How can we be at war for ten years, not knowing who we are at war with, moreover, we haven’t even declared war? No wonder we aren’t winning this war, it is with someone we don’t know and haven’t declared it a war yet. Why…we could just pack up and go home, and if someone were to asked us why we quit the war? We could honestly say: What war --- and with whom?

Do you think that if we had this problem during the Second World War we would have known what to do? Of course we would. Just get the bloody Nazis out of our country!

Boy times have sure changed…

de Andréa

Obama’s New America

What will this “Change” be like, and how will Obama bring it to fruition?

By de Andréa

First, we must ask ourselves:
Just who and what is a Barack Hussein Obama? That being a direct question, I will answer it directly.

Barack Hussein Obama first and foremost is an Indonesian Wahhabist Muslim. Second, he is a Marxist Social Communist. And third, he is no American.

More than five years ago, because of the blind deception that existed in our government, I predicted that within ten years America would have a Muslim President. I just didn’t realize that it would be a reality in three or four years. At the time, I was accused of suffering from some kind of post 9/11 Muslim paranoia, seeing Muslim terrorists appearing out of thin air. Nevertheless, I knew the infiltration of Islamic Jihad had begun in America.

Despite the terrorist training camps all over the U.S. Americans began blindly electing Muslims to government positions all over this country, and then we elected a Muslim to the Congress of the United States who would only take the oath of office with his hand on the Quran. Then another and another, and then, there was Obama.

While cities, towns, and counties all over the U.S. were losing elections to Muslim candidates, the Political-Correctness philosophy was gaining popularity. We were blindly giving away our country to the Nation of Islam in the name of the new Western religion of Multi-Culturalism.

Senator Ted Kennedy said it best when he introduced the new Senator from Chicago, “Senator Osamah Bamah, Baraaka Mammah Obamah”. So I did a little research on the Senator with the funny name. I found out that he had written a book titled “Dreams from My Father”, and that his father was a Muslim.

Barry Soetoro. AKA Barrack Hussein Obama AKA Barry Dunham was born out of wedlock in the Coast Hospital in Mombassa Kenya. (I have a copy of his real Birth Certificate) While still a baby, he and his 18 year old mother Ann Dunham moved to Honolulu Hawaii to live with his grand parents (his mother’s parents). Later, Barry’s Father, Barrack Hussein Obama Senior, a Kenyan Muslim, joined them in Hawaii, they were married and filed an application in Honolulu for a Hawaiian certificate of live birth for little Barack Junior. They later divorced; Ann Obama remarried another Muslim Wahhabist, Lolo Soetoro from Indonesia, at 6 years old Barry and the family moved to Jakarta. There, Barry Soetoro was enrolled as an Indonesian citizen in a Muslim public school. Barry learned Arabic and the teachings of Allah in the Quran. Years later as a teenager Barry and his Mother visited his Grandfather in Honolulu. Barry’s Mother returned to Jakarta to finish her studies at the University of Jakarta but Barry chose to remain with his Grandfather in Hawaii.

The time Barry spent with his Grandfather was to embark him on a whole new direction in his life. Berry’s Grandfather was a Communist with close ties to the Hawaiian chapter of the communist party. One of his Grandfather’s closest friends was the infamous Saul Alinsky, leader of the local Socialist Communist party. The foundational indoctrination of Islam and Marxism Berry received as a child is what shaped his future. Read a previous article titled “Obama’s Communist Background”

Coming to the US mainland 1979 he applied for a scholarship as a foreign student from Indonesia at Occidental College in Los Angles Ca and attended school there until 1981.

After 2 years at LA’s Occidental Collage Obama attended Columbia law school in New York and graduated there in 1983 he then moved to Chicago Ill and got a job as a Community organizer (code words for social Communism) something he learned in Hawaii from Saul Alinsky. He became good friends with William (Bill) Ayers a known communist terrorist and Louis Farrakhan the American Muslim leader.

By age 27 in the fall of 1988 and with a scholarship from the Louis Farrakhan Muslim Foundation he enrolled in Harvard Law School.

While attending Harvard Law School, Obama not only studied law but he devoured with a ferocious appetite, books written by Marxist Saul Alinsky. Graduating from Harvard in 1991 he returned to Chicago to practice as a civil rights lawyer and to teach constitutional law at the University of Chicago. He was elected to the Illinois State Senate in 1996. In 2004, he was elected to the U.S. Senate.

While living in Chicago Obama and his wife Michelle, attended a Black Muslim church called the United Church of Christ disguised as a Christian church. Under the tutelage of Jeremiah Wright a follower of Muslim leader Louis Farrakhan, there Obama was programmed with the Islamic hate of a free America. Wright coined the infamous speech “No, not God love America, God D#*! America.” Later, during his presidential campaign, Obama would throw all of his

Communist and Muslim friends under the bus to distance himself from his dark and shady past.

In 2007 Obama ran for President. And in spite of his background, in 2008 the American people blindly and overwhelmingly elected Barack Hussein Obama to become the 44th President of the United States. Remember, the same happend in Germany, when the people there blindly and overwelingly elected Hitler.

With two Law degrees and a foundation in Islamic Ideology and Marxists philosophy Obama could see a picture of “Change” for America. Driven by the agenda of world Islamic domination to bring about “Change” in America, Obama had tunnel vision, a vision of a Marxist - Islamic State.

So what will an American ‘Marxist–Islamic’ State look like?
If one has kept up with Modern Islamic history, one will remember the “Change” from a Christian European Democracy to an Islamic State that the Island Country of Indonesia went through beginning in the early 1950’s. Indonesia went from a European Dutch Christian Parliamentary Democratic Colony of nearly 72 percent Christians, to an Islamic State with 98 percent Muslims in less than 30 years. Or the country of Lebanon in the 1950’s was a Christian European Democracy colonized by the French until 1947 when they were given their independence. By 1983 Lebanon was an Islamic State, infiltrated by ‘The Hisbala’ from Jordan in the 1960’s.

Most of Europe, including Great Britain has be infiltrated by the Nation of Islam with the same agenda they have had for the past 1400 years, to dominate the earth and make all the world part of the Nation of Islam. For the past 30 years or more, Islam has been infiltrating the West, Western Europe, the Americas, Australia, and New Zeeland.

The first failed attempt at blowing up the World Trade Center led the ultimate destruction of several of the icons of Western civilization and culture on 9/11. This continuing agenda to destroy every thing Western culture stands for, will not stop until the ‘West’ meets ‘East’ as just another notch in the sward of Islam.

The Icon of the World Trade Center, representing the economic power of the West, the Pentagon, representing the military power of America, the failed attempt at destroying the White house or the Capital building in DC, representing the political power of the West, to the recent failed attempt at the destruction of the Entertainment Icon in time Square in NYC. The infiltration and ultimate destruction of everything representing Western culture is more than underway, it has become an excepted multi-cultural wave of the future in America. Even though we gasp every time it happens, we now turn a blind eye to our country being destroyed, incrementally and surreptitiously by Muslim terrorist infiltrators.

The worst part of this is, is that we blindly enable them. We aid the enemy of the world in their conquest of the West and our own demise.

So what will America look like?

Look at any Islamic country around the world. America will be “Changed” into an Islmic State in the same way. The people of Islam are incapable of original thought they just follow the agenda laid out in the Quran and the Hadith. .

Sharia (the law of Islam) has already been accepted in Great Britain, the Netherlands, and many European countries. Moreover, just incase one might think, well, it hasn’t come to America yet, well, you would be wrong oh future Muslim slave. Canada has accepted Sharia; the State of Michigan is almost entirely run by a de facto Sharia. Today Michigan has a greater population of Muslim terrorists that the entire country of Afghanistan. Minnesota has adopted “Sharia Finance’ to govern their banking and financial institutions.

Islam has successfully infiltrated American schools, Christian Churches, police, and law enforcement agencies, local governments, the FBI, Homeland Security, the IRS, the US Congress, the military, and now the White House. When and where will it stop? It won’t. The plan was written fourteen hundred years ago, the people of Islam have been robotically programmed to carry out this agenda, and they will never – ever – stop.

Obama is just part of this agenda of world conquest. If Islam can control the West, then world conquest is just down hill from there.

Islam is more than a religion it is a theocracy that dominates every part of ones life, from birth to hygiene, to diet, to politics, to finance, to education, to fashion, to architecture, to art, to law, to death, and oh yeah! – To, how to blow ones nose. Everything --- that is what America will look like within twenty years, maybe sooner.

What about Obama’s Social Communist agenda? Well that is just the means to an end, the means by which to achieve Islamic dominance. It is social reforms and American dependence on government programs that will reduce freedom and independent thinking to an indoctrinated programmed society. Moreover it will ultimately lead to an Islamic controlled State.

THE BOTTOM LINE: So why all the doom and gloom? Why all this negative stuff… Oh! It’s not just doom and negative gloom - it’s the truth. But is there any hope for a free America? Yes of course! Get the Nazis out of our country… That’s what we would have done under the same circumstances in 1943. Then we were at war with Nazism, today we are at war with Islam. Then we were in a war for our very survival, today we are also in a war for our very survival. It’s a no brainier.

The question is, will we wake up in time?

What’s more, will we have the stomach for it ???

May God be with us all…

Some additional reading

How about video clips of Obama telling the world that he Is a Muslim.

Video of the Muslims of America training camp in Hancock NY called Islamberg.

More video on the MOA

Video of MOA in Virginia

Video of Terrorists in Ohio

de Andréa

The American Flag Is Now Offensive

No! Not just in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Lebanon or in Iran but in America. Guess what? If my flag offends you, then you can get out of my country…

By de Andréa

It is not just in Arizona or California that our flag is offensive, it is now apparently offensive all over the United States.

“If my flag offends you then I will get right in your face with it and defend it to the death”. That is what a Morgan Hill resident said to a police officer in Morgan Hill Ca. after she was told to put her American flag away during a Cinco de Mayo parade or face arrest. The police officer said that this is their parade and the flag was offensive. The woman said yes, but this is my country and this is my flag. She chose to be arrested instead of hiding her flag.

Several students in a Arizona high school wearing American flag bandanas and American flag tee shirts were told by the school principal that the flags were offensive and to remove the bandannas and to turn their tee shirts inside-out. The students removed their bandannas but refused to remove their shirts. They were suspended from school. Some parents are looking for other schools, some are looking into home schooling, some are considering going to court, and some are just giving in to the pressure, hoping it will just go away. Well, it won’t.

I think I have to stand with the Morgan Hill gal and get right in your face with my flag, if it offends you then get out of my country. This is America, and if you want to wave some other flag like the Mexican, Canadian, or the Hisbala Islamic Jihad flag, then go back to your own country and wave it to your hearts content. But in America, if the American flag is offensive to you my foreign illegal alien, then you are offensive to me.

What has happened to America? Why are so many of us ashamed of our country and of our flag? I’ll tell you why, it’s because we have become a herd of robotic non-thinking Spoiled ungrateful sheep, which have been programmed to follow the robotic leader right over the cliff.

If America’s leader hates America, then all robotically indoctrinated American leaders hate America. Did you know that your so-called President, Leader, your Commander and Chief Barrack Hussein Obammah refuses to wear the traditional American flag lapel pin, (that presidents have worn since lapel pins were invented) because it is offensive to him? He refuses to respect our flag by putting his hand over his heart and face the waving flag when the national anthem is being played.

Yeah, that’s him in the front -left with the broken right arm. .

Did you know that your President is not only ashamed of your country and flag but he hates it? He has not only spent 20 years in a black Muslim church listening to Jeremiah Wright vomiting out hate America propaganda but he spent his entire childhood in Muslim schools, learning how to hate America.

Your President Barack Hussein Obama, travels all over the world apologizing for your country, the United States of America, and bragging that he is a Muslim. Watch a video of film clips. And guess what? Muslims want to kill you --- all of you. They have, for exactly 1400 years and they will never --- ever--- change. It is a frightening thought that Obama is the most powerful man on earth, and the majority of American robotic citizens ignorantly gave him all that power.

Is it really any wonder that we will get arrested if we wave the flag of our country in public, the flag that hundreds of thousands of our fighting men have died to protect - the flag that was razed under fire on Iwo? Is it any wonder that our children are attending ‘hate America’ schools, when we have a hate America leader?

Obama disrespects my flag; and my country --- I respect his office but I have no respect for him.

Folks, this is waaaaaay beyond the preverbal historical tea tax.

Why don’t we make it a point today to get into someone’s face with an American flag? Moreover, if they are offended, offer to put them on the next plane to northern Pakistan.

de Andréa

Arizona Enforces Federal Immigration law

Not only is our President illegal but so is our entire Congress and the Supreme Court, our Government existents at the pleasure of the people. When the government fails to do the job it was elected or appointed to do, it then is in violation of the law, namely the US Constitution and therefore illegal. ‘Our illegal Federal Government’

By de Andréa

The following is a study of the Obama administrations accusation that Arizona’s enforcement of the Federal border law is unconstitutional. I will try to show that it is the ‘Federal Government’ that is in contempt of the ‘US Constitution’, and not the state of Arizona.

First, what makes the Federal Government illegal? As you surely must know by now until Barack Hussein Obama shows proof of his natural born citizenship just as the congress requested of McCain and every other presidential candidate in our more than 200 year old history, then Obama is illegal and every bill or treaty that he has sign into law is constitutionally illegal.

Article II Section 1 US Constitution. “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

That being said and historically documented, the US Congress is in violation of most of Constitutional Law and should be brought up on charges of violation of oath of office and dereliction of duty.

I find it interesting that the most unknown and abused Amendments are also the most powerful tools the people have in maintaining a free and non-oppressive State. The ninth and the tenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. The Ninth: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” And the Tenth: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

As the architects of the constitution knew they would, the Federal government tries from time to time to take rights away from the people by indicating that they are not specifically listed in the bill of rights. This, by the way, is exactly what the “Federalists” were trying to establish when the bill of right were originally installed during the first constitution convention, saying that one could not possibly list all the God given rights that a free people have.

So they listed eight of the most important and followed up with the ninth and the tenth Amendments. (Re-read them if you need to) These two Amendments leave the rights of the people absolutely open ended but totally restricts the rights of the Federal Government to what is allowed and ordered by the people within the in the confines of the Constitution itself, and not the other way around.

Article IV Section 4 of the US Constitution Says: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”

Not only do we have a President possibly born in Kenya, who has refused to prove otherwise, a violation of Article II Section 1 US Constitution, and a Communist Dictatorship a violation of Part ‘a’ of Article IV Section 4 of the US Constitution which guarantees us a Republican Form of Government. But we have a government that refuses to carry out its duty of protecting each of the states against Invasion, and against domestic violence, a clear violation of Article IV Section 4 part ‘b’ of the US Constitution. Moreover a Supreme Court that is charged with riding herd on the Constitution which takes an average of two years and two million dollars for someone with standing to bring to the attention of the Supreme Court which more often that not refuses to hear the case. As I said we have an illegal Federal Government…

As for the Federal Constitutional violation of Article IV Section 4 part ‘b’ of the US Constitution refusing to carry out its duty of “protecting each of the states against Invasion, and against domestic violence”, it is then left up to the States or the People respectively (the tenth Amendment).

America is being invaded by foreign nations committing domestic violence and our Federal Government is not only refusing to do its constitutional duty to stop it, but it is encouraging it and enabling it in a time of war. Oh yes! This is yet another constitutional violation aiding and abetting the enemy in time of war. The Constitution calls it “Treason” punishable by death.

Let me put this into some perspective: Would our previous governments have granted immigration to Nazis during the Second World War or North Korean Communists during the Korean War much less granting Citizenship? I think not! But our illegal Federal government now grants not only immigration to our enemy in time of war but it grants citizenship to them and it looks the other way when they invade our country illegally.

I am not just talking about our Mexican brothers and sisters from across our southern border, although we are in an undocumented war with the Mexican dictators and their partners the drug lords. But more importunately our illegal Federal Government is granting amnesty and citizenship to every one and anyone including from the Nation that has declared war on us and has threatened to kill every one of us. The Nation of Islam…

In defense of the State of Arizona and Gov. Jan Brewer, which has been accused of all kinds of lies and false accusations, is in effect just enforcing Federal law that already exists that our Federal Government illegally refuses to enforce.

Amnesty will in one way or another spell the death knell of this country. 70 percent of Americans support Arizona's dramatic and courageous action to fill the void of federal failure on policing our borders. Moreover, Washington is about to flout the will of the people once again. This is a brazen action to buy illegal votes and to strengthen this Obama Muslim/Communist régime. This is utter contempt for the rule of Constitutional law and the will of the people. It must be stopped, or this will exemplify the genie that cannot be placed back into the bottle, at least not without war in the streets.

Meanwhile, here is the text of a letter of encouragement that I have sent, and you might want to send as well to Arizona’s Gov. Brewer:

"Thank you for your courage in taking a stand on behalf of all American citizens through the signing of the recent illegal alien legislation.

It is the federal government, which has failed your state and the rest of our country by not following the Constitution. Article IV, Section 4 states: 'The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.'

There is little question that a silent invasion of our country has been underway for too long. There comes a time when our government disobeys the law and fails its citizens, that the citizens of the many States must take action to insure the right of liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The action taken by you and your legislature is restrained, reasonable and is just common-sense. Washington is not living up to its own legislation to build the double border fence that would alleviate many of the problems Arizona and other border states are having.

I hope this letter serves as encouragement to you and your citizens. America stands with you and appreciates you very much"

Is the Arizona immigration bill unconstitutional as Obama says it is?

Many so-called “progressive” opponents of the Arizona immigration law are arguing that the law is unconstitutional because foreign affairs are exclusively the province of the federal government. Read the argument. The statement that foreign affairs are exclusively the province of the federal government is commonly asserted. But it is a myth – at least if one respects the Constitution’s text and original understanding it is.

Before explaining why, I have to say that a claim that the Constitution reserves powers exclusively for one level of government is an unusual argument for “progressives” to make. In general, of course, the most vocal “progressive Communists” could care less about what responsibilities the Constitution assigns to what levels of government. It is not just that they favor the federal government invading the sphere that the Constitution reserves to the states. It’s also that they have repeatedly urged state and local governments to invade the supposedly exclusive sphere of the federal government. Remember all those campaigns for state and local governments to adopt nuclear-freeze resolutions, South Africa boycotts, and nuclear-free zones? Anyway, let’s move beyond the limitless subject of political hypocrisy to describe just how the Constitution does distribute foreign affairs authority.

That being said: the Constitution gives the federal government supreme authority over foreign policy. Congress and the President can pre-empt an issue by exercising one or more of their enumerated powers. If Congress dislikes a state action in that realm, Congress can pass a law overriding it.

If, however, Congress has not acted or acted incompletely, the states have certain reserved powers to act on their own. In other words, the Constitution acknowledges concurrent, although subordinate, state authority over foreign affairs – including immigration into their respective states

How do I know this? From both the constitutional text and from the record left by those who debated and ratified the Constitution.

Here is the evidence

* Instead of simply stating that states have no foreign affairs powers, the Constitution (Article I, Section 10) only lists a few specific foreign affairs powers denied to the states. For example, a state may not make a treaty or enter into a confederation with a foreign government.

* Under a rule of interpretation widely recognized by the Founders, the Constitution’s listing implies that all foreign affairs powers not denied remain with the states (subject to veto by federal law or treaty).

* In addition to prohibiting the states from exercising a few foreign affairs powers, the Constitution lists a few others subject to congressional pre-approval – such as the power to make non-treaty compacts with foreign governments. If foreign policy power were exclusively in the federal government, the Constitution would not recognize that states had any ability to enter compacts with foreign governments.

* Nowhere does the Constitution include language such as “all state authority over foreign relations is hereby abolished.” On the contrary, at several points the document assumes some state authority over the subject is retained. For example, the Constitution explicitly acknowledges state power to tax foreign goods to fund inspection programs. It elsewhere assumes that if Congress chooses not to adopt a “uniform Rule of Naturalization,” the states may adopt their own laws.

* The historical record confirms what the text suggests. For example, the records of the Constitutional Convention tell us that the delegates considered whether states could impose embargoes on foreign goods, and deliberately decided to leave that power with the states. A committee of the First Federal Congress recognized this power also.

The doubt about the judicial fate of Arizona’s law arises only because of the Supreme Court’s occasional practice of striking down state laws that Congress has decided to leave alone. This occurs primarily in the area of commerce and foreign affairs, and appears to be driven in part by the historically-false claim that federal power in those areas is exclusive.

On the other hand, the Supreme Court also sometimes lets such enactments stand. So what the Court would do with the Arizona law. if anything is anybody’s guess.

THE BOTTOM LINE: It is not the State of Airizona that is in violation of the US Constitution, it is clearly the Federal Government. More over Arizona did not pass a law that overrides suspends or supersedes Federal law but instead supports and enforces it.

These are the kinds of issues the lead to ‘State Secession’ or even civil war. This is certainly not the time for that, not in the middle of an international war. The citizens might temporality have the support of the Islamic enemies that because of the dereliction of our government already reside within our borders. But then what? If we crush our own government as we did in the Revolutionary War we then become even more vulnerable to the Terrorist Nation of Islam and MS 13, the terrorists of Mexico that have already infiltrated and are thoroughly embedded in our county.

The only way to protect what we have left of our freedom and liberty and reengage the track that we were once on, is to effectively defeat this evil Muslim/Communist government at the polls starting in November and again in 2012. As I said: “We have an illegal Federal Government”---that has totally lost my respect and I hope yours as well. .

As ‘American Citizens’, we have the right and the obligation to overthrow this oppressive and dangerous Treasonous Communist government…I truly do not want to have to invoke the Second Amendment as may be “necessary to the security of a free State”

See you at the polls.

de Andréa

Joe The Plummer

You remember Joe the plumber, the real American that saw right through Obama’s Communist deception while campaigning in Ohio. Yeah that’s the one, the real American the Dem’s ridiculed and wrote off as just a stupid plumber. Well he isn’t just fitting pipes anymore. Joe the Plumber has plunged into party politics.


By de Andréa

Samuel "Joe" Wurzelbacher, who was hailed by Republican John McCain's presidential campaign in 2008 as a true American, has just won one of nearly 400 seats on the local Republican Party committee in Ohio's Lucas County.

So what has Joe been doing while Obama has been destroying the country?

Joe Wurzelbacher hasn’t exactly been in hiding, he has since written a book, spoken at conservative gatherings and has even spent a few weeks as a war correspondent in the Gaza Strip.

He's resisted calls to run for Congress and has criticized Democrats and Republicans alike. He's also taken shots at McCain, confessing in his book that he did not want him as the GOP presidential nominee.

Wurzelbacher remains an icon for many antiestablishment conservatives. He drew cheers at a tea party rally last month in Cincinnati when he told the crowd not to let "a bunch of liberal pansies" take away their rights.

"Illegal immigration?" he said. "Put a fence up and start shooting."
Wurzelbacher has never been shy about sharing his views even if they open him up to critics.

He told Christianity Today in an interview last year that he believes gays are "queer" and said he won't allow them near his children. "I've had some friends that are actually homosexual. And, I mean, they know where I stand, and they know that I wouldn't have them anywhere near my children," he said. "But at the same time, they're people, and they're going to do their thing."

He also said that “too many Republicans use God to invoke sympathy or invoke righteousness, but they don't stay the course."

Although a little early to say he has become a politician, the group he has been elected to meets only a few times a year to elect the county chairman and sets the party agenda. Wurzelbacher won the seat by a 38-24 vote Tuesday in his suburban Toledo precinct.

He became an overnight sensation almost two years ago after questioning then-Sen. Barack Obama on the campaign trail about his socialistic economic policies when McCain repeatedly cited "Joe the Plumber" in a debate.

He was held up by the GOP as an example of the middle-class worker who would be hurt economically by an Obama presidency.

Because of Joe’s outspoken opinions he was thoroughly scrutinized by governmental agencies. Look at a few of these background searches.

THE BOTTOM LINE: At the risk of stating the obvious… Independent thinking among Americans like Joe Wurzelbacher is rare. One could attribute this phenomenon to his lack of a formal indoctrination or robotically programmed brain washing by the federally controlled University system. What ever the reason, Joe, as in the case of the obvious majority of American robots, was not deceived by the lies of “Change”, that Obama was mesmerizing the American public with.

No Joe “The Plummer” Wurzelbacher has certainly escaped the systematic programming of androids that the majority of Americans have obviously been subjected to. If nothing else Joe is an old fashion independent thinker, the kind of individual that founded this once free nation of ours.

Our early history records that our freedom was won from an oppressive government much the same as the one we now find ourselves subjected to. Let us hope and pray that we as a nation can break away from this collective programming and once again develop a heart for independence freedom and liberty.

Thanks Joe!

de Andréa

Obama’s Communist Background

If you are deceived into thinking that Obama was just a left leaning social liberal since the beginning of his political career, then you will want to read --- the rest of the story…

By de Andréa

When, where, and how did President Obama first met the Communist Weather Underground terrorist-group founder William (Bill) Ayers. – It is much earlier than previously believed.

The picture at right is of William (Bill) Ayers

The two were actually brought together by a student of radical community organizer and former Hawaiian Communist party leader Saul Alinsky, who Obama has known since he lived with his Grandfather (his Mothers father) in Honolulu. Saul Alinsky’s name also emerged in Obama's autobiography "Dreams from My Father."

Obama has deep ties to an anti-American extremist nexus that has been instrumental not only in building his political career, but in crafting current White House policy.

Research has exposed an extremist coalition of communists, socialists and other radicals working both inside and outside the administration to draft and advance the current White House policy goals of destroying a Free America and rebuilding it as a ‘Social Communist’ regime. .

Until now, it has been known Obama launched his political career at a 1995 fundraiser in Bill Ayers' Chicago apartment and that the two served alongside each other from 1995 to 2000 on a hundred-million-dollar education foundation, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.

Ayers was founder of the CAC; Obama was hired as the group's first chairman. CAC documents that were dug up during the 2008 presidential campaign revealed Ayers was in a working group of five who assembled the initial board of the CAC, which hired Obama. The documents also revealed Obama and Ayers had a working relationship at the CAC.

Watch a video of Bill O’Reilly interviewing Obama citing his CAC position as evidence of his qualification for public office.

However, those probing Obama were left to speculate ex actly how Ayers was so familiar with him that he hired the future politician for the CAC and hosted the 1995 fundraiser.

Some in-depth research uncovered that Obama worked directly with Ayers as early as 1988 and that the two were brought together by a radical Alinsky acolyte who was trained by Alinsky himself.

The picture at right is of Saul Alinsky

Ayers, the Weathermen founder, earlier resurfaced after going underground amid multiple criminal charges related to his extremist activities such as blowing up police stations in NYC and in S.F. The charges were later dropped due to prosecutorial misconduct.

In 1988, in response to a Chicago summit that documented the poor quality of education in the city, Chicago United, a group founded by Ayers' father, the late Thomas Ayers, formed a community advocacy coalition called the Alliance for Better Chicago Schools, or ABC. Thomas Ayers was the chairman and CEO of Commonwealth Edison.

When he created his ABCs Coalition in June 1988, Thomas Ayers included Obama in the coalition. Obama at the time was director and lead organizer of the Developing Communities Project, or DCP, an institutionally based community organization on Chicago's Far South Side. Obama's first job in Chicago was his DCP position.

The contact for the ABCs Coalition, on which Obama served, was none other than William Ayers himself, who at the time was at the University of Illinois at Chicago

Research uncovered that Ayers started attending the ABCs Coalition's monthly meetings, in a conference room on the 57th floor of Chicago's First National Bank downtown headquarters.

Obama disguised Alinsky radical?
Obama, meanwhile, took his DCP job in 1985. In "Dreams from My Father," Obama relates his first job in Chicago as a community organizer and claims the name of his boss at DCP was "Marty Kaufman." Kaufman, however, doesn't exist. The DCP chief at the time was actually Marty Kellman, who was trained by Alinsky himself.

Obama as director, received two grants. One grant was for $40,000 in 1985 and another for $33,000 in 1986 from the ‘Catholic Campaign for Human Development’, a Communist group that promoted Alinsky-style organizations.

There can be no doubt, that Obama and Ayers were well-acquainted by 1988, brought together through an acolyte of Alinsky.

"Perhaps this period serves as the missing link, providing background to understand how Ayers was so comfortable with Obama's capabilities that he later would hire the future politician to head the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, or CAC, a job Obama would in turn claim had qualified him to run for public office."

Research uncovers radical nexus
Research has uncovered, among many other things, Obama's early years, including his previously overlooked early childhood ties to Saul Alinsky and a radical, far-left ‘Black Muslim’ church, pastured by Jeremiah Wright connected to Ayers' ideology.

Research has also unmasked, important aspects of Obama's carefully covered-up college years, with new details of his student career at Occidental College where he applied as a foreign student and later at Columbia University.

Obama's associations with the Nation of Islam, Black Liberation Theology, and black political extremists are no longer a secret.

Also uncovered, is detailed information of Obama's deep ties to the criminal organization ACORN, which are much more extensive than previously documented. How socialist-led, ACORN-affiliated union helped to facilitate Obama's political career and now exerts major influence in the White House.

Note, President Obama ignoring the National Anthem

Obama's health-care policy, has been masked by moderate populist rhetoric, and was pushed along, and partially crafted by social extremists, some of whom have revealed that their principal aim is to achieve corporate socialist goals and a vastly increase government powers to the point of oppressive bondage.

Even mainstream Democrats should be alarmed that their party has been hijacked by a extreme-left fringe cue, bent on permanently changing the party to fit its radical Communist agenda.

Obama's involvement with the Communist party has the explicit goal to infiltrate and eventually take over the Democrat Party and mold it into a social Communist organization at least partially dependant on the promotion of illegal dependant aliens. .

I first exposed the Obama’s association with Ayers etc. in 2007, I was among the first to expose that Obama's "green jobs" czar, Van Jones, founded a communist organization and called for "resistance" against the U.S. government.

Barack Obama is backed by, and deeply tied to an anti-American fringe nexus that was instrumental not only in mentoring Obama and helping him to build his political career, but essentially in overthrowing the moderate wing of the Democrat Party and in securing and powerfully influencing Obama's presidency.

As yet to be seen, these Communist and Muslim associates not only will continue to influence Obama and White House strategy, but some are directly involved in creating the very policies intended to undermine, over-throw, and or radically transform the United States of America from a ‘Free Republic’ into a ‘Communist Muslim State’

Just in cast you might be convinced that Obama is in fact a Communist but can’t quite come to terms with the fact that he is also a Muslim, (the very people that we are at war with, the people that attacked us on 9/11) then you might want to see and hear him tell you himself. Watch the video of film clips.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Even if Obama’s “Cue de taunt” of transforming America into a Muslim Communist State is not totally successful, it will take at least a generation or three, to undo the damage that has been done in the last year alone, if in fact it can ever be completely undone.

The infiltration of ‘Communist Socialism’ and ‘Islamic Theocracy’ into the very fabric of American Western culture is so far reaching that the inertia of these evil and vile philosophies hasn’t even begun to rear their ugly heads.

Attempts at socializing American business and the recent Islamic terrorist attacks are just the beginning, just a sour repugnant taste of what is to come because of this blind deceptive ideology that our country seems to be caught up in.

Promises of government handouts, the amoral religion of political-correctness and the multi-cultural guilt of our past are helping to fuel this deception of “Change”.

“I firmly believe that Americans are not ready to abandon the Constitutional principles of limited government, nor are they ready to allow the federal government to continue to overstep those principles. We have achieved the greatest freedom of any people on earth, and history has not provided another prospect for bettering mankind. What it has shown us is that government must be bound from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”
Thomas Jefferson, 1799

"It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.”
U.S. Supreme Court in American Communications Association v. Douds

“America may have needed change, but this is truly not change, this is digression. Our Forefathers came from this type of bondage and oppression; we progressed, and advanced from there to freedom, so soon --- we forget”
de Andréa, 2010