Friday, July 03, 2009

Proof of Life in 2012





President Obama may have to prove his eligibility if he intends to run for re-election in 2012

By de Andréa

While no matter what we do at present, it may prove fruitless in Obama’s obvious masquerade as a U.S. citizen. If he were truly a legal natural born citizen, he would gladly show “proof of life” on U.S. soil at the time of his birth.

In 2012 however, it may be another issue altogether. It seams strange to me that it is necessary to write a law that forces one to obey yet another law, but that is exactly what is happening right now in a House committee. It is House Bill #1503

U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican, has become the sixth co-sponsor of a proposal by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., that would require documentation of eligibility from presidential candidates. As stated in Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.

She has joined Reps. John Campbell, R-Calif.; John R. Carter, R-Texas; John Culberson, R-Texas; Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.; and Randy Neugebauer, R-Texas, in support of Posey's H.R. 1503 plan.

The bill's provisions are simple:
"To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the principal campaign committee of a candidate for election to the office of President to include with the committee's statement of organization a copy of the candidate's birth certificate, together with such other documentation as may be necessary to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution."

It also provides:
"Congress finds that under section 5 of article II of the Constitution of the United States, in order to be eligible to serve as President, an individual must be a natural born citizen of the United States who has attained the age of 35 years and has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years."


The sponsors' goal is to have the bill become effective for the 2012 presidential election, and it now is pending in a committee of the U.S. House of Representatives.

A participant at a forum on a political website noted "average citizens have to have a copy of our birth certificate just to apply for a passport, but the president of the United States doesn't have to show theirs??? This doesn't make sense at all."

Besides the support that is growing in the U.S. House, Sen. Tom Coburn R-Okla says he's in favor of both state and federal demands that future presidential candidates have a formal procedure to document their qualifications.

"The bill requires any federal candidates' campaign committee filing with the Federal Election Commission to produce a copy of the candidate's birth certificate," Coburn wrote. "If the bill makes it to the Senate, I will likely support it."

"The last election is over," Posey said in the interview. "I don't think that outcome is going to change. Personally, I think it's futile to go there, but looking toward the future I think it would be reckless if we do not do everything we could to eliminate problems like that in the future. And that's why I filed the bill. I don't think a Supreme Court would remove a president from office if they heard the case. But ... we should make a good faith effort to make sure that things in the future are as they should be," he said.

THE BOTTOM LINE: As I said at the beginning of this article: “It seams strange to me that it is necessary to write a law that forces one to obey yet another law…” Constitutional law clearly states in Article 2, Section 1, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President..." And yet it seams that we must pass a law that says precisely what Constitutional law (the highest law of the land) already stipulates. How a subsequent federal law can offer credence to Constitutional law is a mystery to me. But it is what it is…

Please write, call, or otherwise contact your Senators and Representative, and ask them to support and vote for HB 1503. Needless to say, even if it passes both the House and the Senate, Obama will veto it. So, beyond that, the Congress must have 2/3’s majority to override. If this doesn’t happen we will likely see Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah as dictator of America for as long as he shall live. As of this writing it is being discussed in the oval office of how to go about abolishing the 22nd Amendment which restricts a president to two terms.

Remember your history: The last Socialist President was F.D.R. who was Dictator for nearly four terms, until he died. Moreover, was also bent on the destruction of a “Free Economy”.

In 2012 tell Obama “WE WANT PROOF OF LIFE” as an American Citizen…

de Andréa

No comments: