Is Another CAIR Director On His Way To Jail?

CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations a most favored organization by the American Government, yields up yet another criminal director. I wonder why that is? Could it be that CAIR itself is a Criminal Terrorists organization? Naw… Not according to our blind and deceived security agencies. Here’s proof…

By de Andréa

So far every director that Cair has ever had has been indicted and found guilty of Terrorist activities. And now, just as I predicted the present CAIR Director Nihad Awad (pictured) has been served with a summons, and the terror-linked Muslim lobby's dinner turns into public relations nightmare.

When the Council on American-Islamic Relations held its 14th Annual Banquet at the Marriott Crystal Gateway Hotel tonight, it was planning to raise funds and honor some of its supporters, but instead several top officials of the Muslim lobby group were served with a summons and complaint for various civil and criminal offenses.

The dramatic surprise was a result of the research work of the Mapping Sharia Project, an undercover project, which found 95% of all Mosques in the U.S. are nothing but terrorist madrassas. Mapping Sharia, headed by Dave Gaubatz who personally served CAIR Director Nihad Awad at the banquet tonight while the deceived Democratic North Carolina state Sen. Larry Shaw, a CAIR national board member and terrorist collaborator, was addressing the festivities.

Four CAIR clients have filed a federal civil complaint alleging criminal fraud terrorist connections and racketeering against CAIR, a self-described public interest civil rights law firm. The lawsuit also names CAIR's national leadership as individual defendants. The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, alleges that Morris Days, the "resident attorney" and "manager for civil rights" at the now defunct CAIR MD/VA chapter in Herndon, Va., was in fact not an attorney and that he failed to provide legal services for clients who came to CAIR for assistance and who had paid for CAIR legal services.

While attorney David Yerushalmi represents the four plaintiffs in this particular lawsuit, two of whom are African-American Muslims, the complaint alleges that, according to CAIR internal documents, there were hundreds of victims of fraud scheme by CAIR and Days.

According to the complaint, CAIR failed to conduct a background check on Days prior to hiring him and when the group discovered the fraud, it set about a cover-up.

The suit charges CAIR officials purposefully concealed the truth about Days from their clients, law enforcement, the Virginia, and D.C. State bar associations and the media. When CAIR got irate calls from clients about Days' failure to provide competent legal services, CAIR is charged with fraudulently deceiving clients about Days' relationship to CAIR, concealing the fact that CAIR had fired him for criminal fraud. "

The evidence has long held that CAIR is a criminal organization set up by the Egyptian terrorist organization the ‘Muslim Brotherhood’ and Hamas to further its aims of stealth Jihad in the U.S.," Yerushalmi said referring to the fact that CAIR has been named by the federal government as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror financing trial. "But our investigation and this complaint make clear that CAIR’s criminal activities know no bounds.” And yet Homeland security uses CAIR to train their security agents, go figure.

The four plaintiffs contacted their attorney David Yerushalmi only after they had spoken to Gaubatz, a private researcher who had been investigating CAIR for its connections to the Muslim Brotherhood and its ties to global jihad.

The complaint identifies CAIR as a racketeering enterprise under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which is a criminal racketeering statute that allows victims to sue the defendants in civil court. In addition to damages, the plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief under this and other statutes to shut down CAIR and to prevent the individual defendants from engaging in public interest legal work in the future.

The named defendants are: the Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network Inc. (dba CAIR); Nihad Awad aka Nihad Hammad, who serves as executive director of CAIR National; Parvez Ahmed, who was the chairman of the board of CAIR National during the relevant time period; Tahra Goraya, who was the national director of CAIR but who has since resigned; Khadijah Athman, who is the manager of the "civil rights" division of CAIR; and Nadhira al-Khalili, Esq., who is in-house legal counsel for CAIR. All were handed subpoenas this evening.

Additional defendants are Ibrahim Hooper and Amina Rubin, CAIR's director of communications and coordinator of communications, respectively.

Also addressing the dinner was Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., one of the nation's Muslim members of Congress. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, reportedly turned down an invitation to address the banquet.

The former legal director of CAIR's Maryland/Virginia chapter shook down Muslim hardship cases for thousands of dollars without providing promised services, officials with the Mapping Sharia Project charge.

Earlier this year, the board also fired Days and closed the chapter's offices in Herndon, Va. The chapter director, Khalid Iqbal, is no longer with CAIR.

CAIR refused to respond to the allegations, which came to light only after American Muslims provided evidence to the Mapping Sharia Project.

"I really don't know anything about this," CAIR spokesman Ahmed Rehab said. He referred questions to CAIR communications director Ibrahim Hooper, who declined comment.

Earlier this year, CAIR launched a $250,000 fundraising campaign that included a promotional on its website touting its mission to help Muslims, particularly those confronting citizenship problems.

"Everyday, CAIR works hard to defend the rights of American Muslims who encounter a delay in gaining citizenship," the group said. When in fact, CAIR has "victimized" poor Muslim immigrants, says Gaubatz.

"CAIR continues to put Muslim Americans at risk through the pretense that they represent them in any way," Gaubatz said. "CAIR is receiving support from big foreign donors, not because of their effectiveness in discrimination cases, but because of their false image in the media." CAIR continues to tout itself as a nonprofit charitable organization when in fact it is a Muslim terrorist organization bent on infiltrating U.S. Government Agency for the purpose of promoting Islamic Jihad.

Gaubatz says CAIR, which last year was named an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal terror-financing case involving Hamas, controls some $7 million in real estate assets in Washington through a limited liability holding company that includes silent Middle Eastern investors.

He says his group has filed a formal complaint against CAIR concerning the alleged fraud with the District of Columbia.

WorldNetDaily reported on CAIR's extensive ties to terrorism .

Although CAIR is a nonprofit organization, it does not disclose complete directories of its staff or advisory boards, and even refuses to make its federal tax filings readily available to the public. But a review of federal criminal court documents, past IRS 990 tax records and Federal Election Commission records detailing donor occupations, reveals that Washington-based CAIR has been associated with a disturbing number of convicted terrorists or felons in terrorism probes, as well as suspected terrorists and active targets of terrorism investigations.

"Their offices have been a turnstile for terrorists and their supporters," said one FBI veteran familiar with recent and ongoing cases involving CAIR officials. At least 14 CAIR officials have been caught up in terror investigations.Congressional leaders say they are warning lawmakers and other Washington officials to disassociate from the group due to its growing terror ties.

"Groups like CAIR have a proven record of senior officials being indicted and either imprisoned or deported from the United States," said U.S. Rep. Sue Myrick, R-N.C., co-founder of the House Anti-Terrorism/Jihad Caucus.CAIR itself recently was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in an alleged scheme to funnel $12 million to the terrorist group Hamas. In the Holy Land Foundation case, federal prosecutors also listed CAIR as a member of the U.S. branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, a worldwide jihadist movement that gave rise to Hamas, al-Qaida and other terrorist groups.

The government will retry the Holy Land case, which ended in a hung jury.

"There was a lot of evidence presented at the recent Holy Land Foundation trial which exposed CAIR and others as front groups for the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States," Myrick said.

Unbelievably, CAIR is still lobbying House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers and other terrorist sympathetic members of Congress to pressure the Justice Department to expunge its name from the case, arguing the negative publicity has hurt membership and fundraising.

The federal judge during the trial refused a written request by the group to strike its name from the list of co-conspirators. The petition is still pending before the court.

CAIR, which runs 33 offices and chapters nationwide, also recently helped defeat an anti-terror plan by Los Angeles police to map the local Muslim community for extremist neighborhoods.

Critics counter that CAIR has no legitimate voice to make such complaints, because the group is itself an extremist organization that has employed or appointed to its boards of directors and advisers an inordinate number of radical co-conspirators, suspected and convicted terrorists, and other criminals.

Indeed, the list is long and growing, and includes:

Muthanna al-Hanooti: (pictured) The CAIR director's home was raided last year by FBI agents in connection with an active terrorism investigation. Agents also searched the offices of his advocacy group, Focus on Advocacy and Advancement of International Relations, which al-Hanooti operates out of Dearborn, Mich., and Washington, D.C.

FAAIR claims to be a consulting firm raising awareness of Sunni grievances in Iraq, but investigators have uncovered that it is a front supporting the Sunni-led insurgency.

Al-Hanooti, who emigrated to the U.S. from Iraq, formerly helped run the Hamas terror front called LIFE for Relief and Development. Its Michigan offices also were raided last September. In 2004, LIFE's Baghdad office was raided by U.S. troops, who seized files and computers.

Al-Hanooti is related to Shiek Mohammed al-Hanooti, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. He currently leads prayers at a Washington-area mosque that aided some of the 9/11 hijackers.

The FBI alleges al-Hanooti, who also emigrated from Iraq, raised money for Hamas. In fact, "Al-Hanooti collected over $6 million for support of Hamas in the U.S. ," according to a 2001 FBI report, and was present with CAIR and Holy Land officials at a secret Hamas fundraising summit held last decade at a Philadelphia hotel.
Prosecutors recently added his name to the list of unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land case.

Al-Hanooti denies supporting Hamas, although he's praised Palestinian suicide bombers as "martyrs" who are "alive in the eyes of Allah." Earlier this year, his younger brother, Hamid al-Hanooti, was found dead in Iraq after reportedly being held by local security forces as a suspected terrorist.

Laura Jaghlit:
A civil-rights coordinator for CAIR, her Washington-area home was raided by federal agents after 9/11 as part of an investigation into terrorist financing, money laundering and tax fraud. Her husband Mohammed Jaghlit, a key leader in the Saudi-backed SAAR network, is a target of the still-active probe.

Last decade, Jaghlit sent two letters accompanying donations – one for $10,000, the other for $5,000 – from the SAAR Foundation to Sami al-Arian, now a convicted terrorist. In each letter, according to a federal affidavit, "Jaghlit instructed al-Arian not to disclose the contribution publicly or to the media."

Investigators suspect the funds were intended for Palestinian terrorists via a U.S. front called WISE, which at the time employed an official who personally delivered a satellite phone battery to Osama bin Laden. The same official also worked for Jaghlit's group.
In addition, Jaghlit donated a total of $37,200 to the U.S. Based Holy Land Foundation, which is a Hamas front. Jaghlit subsequently was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the ongoing case.

Abdurahman Alamoudi:
Another CAIR director, he is serving 23 years in federal prison for plotting terrorism. Alamoudi, who was caught on tape complaining bin Laden hadn't killed enough Americans in the U.S. embassy bombings in Africa, was one of al-Qaida's top fund-raisers in America, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.

Nihad Awad:
For the first time, wiretap evidence from the Holy Land case puts CAIR's executive director at a Philadelphia meeting of Hamas leaders and activists that was secretly recorded by the FBI. Participants hatched a plot to disguise payments to Hamas terrorists as charitable giving.

During the meeting, according to FBI transcripts, Awad was recorded discussing the propaganda effort. He mentions Ghassan Dahduli, whom he worked with at the time at the Islamic Association for Palestine, another Hamas front. Both were IAP officers. Dahduli's name also was listed in the address book of bin Laden's personal secretary, Wadi al-Hage, who is serving a life sentence in prison for his role in the U.S. embassy bombings. Dahduli, a terrorist like Awad, was deported to Jordan after 9/11 for refusing to cooperate in the terror investigation.

Awad's and Dahduli's phone numbers are listed in a Muslim Brotherhood document seized by federal investigators revealing "important phone numbers" for the "Palestine Section" of the Brotherhood of America. The court exhibit shows Hamas fugitive Mousa Abu Marzook listed on the same page with Awad.

Omar Ahmad: (pictured)
U.S. prosecutors also named CAIR's founder and chairman emeritus as a conspirator in the Holy Land case. Ahmad too was placed at the Philly meeting, FBI special agent Lara Burns testified at the trial. Prosecutors also designated him as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood's "Palestine Committee" in America. Ahmad, like his CAIR partner Awad, is an ex Jordanian terrorist.

(Though both Ahmad and Awad were senior leaders of IAP, the Hamas front, neither of their biographical sketches posted on CAIR's website mentions their connection to IAP.)

Nabil Sadoun:
A current CAIR board member, Sadoun has served on the board of the United Association for Studies and Research, which is a key Hamas front in America. In fact, Sadoun co-founded UASR with Hamas leader Marzook. The Justice Department added UASR to the list of co-conspirators in the Holy Land case.

Mohamed Nimer: ( pictured)
CAIR's current research director also served as a board director for UASR, the strategic arm for Hamas in the U.S.
(Tellingly, CAIR neglects to mention Nimer's and Sadoun's roles in UASR in their bios.)

Rafeeq Jaber:
A founding director of CAIR, Jaber was the long-time president of the Islamic Association for Palestine. In 2002, a federal judge found that "the Islamic Association for Palestine has acted in support of Hamas." In his capacity as IAP chief, Jaber praised Hezbollah attacks on Israel. He also served on the board of a radical mosque in the Chicago area.

Rabith Hadid:
The CAIR fund-raiser was a founder of the Global Relief Foundation, which after 9/11 was blacklisted by Treasury for financing al-Qaida and other terror groups. Its assets were frozen in December 2001. Hadid was arrested on terror-related charges and deported to Lebanon in 2003.

Siraj Wahhaj: (pictured)
A member of CAIR's board of advisers, Wahhaj was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The radical Brooklyn imam was close to convicted terrorist Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, and defended him during his trial.
He was also a featured speaker at tonight's dinner.

Randall "Ismail" Royer:
The former CAIR communications specialist and civil-rights coordinator is serving 20 years in prison in connection with the Virginia Jihad Network, which he led while employed by CAIR at its Washington headquarters. The group trained to kill U.S. soldiers overseas, cased the FBI headquarters, and cheered the space shuttle Columbia tragedy. Al-Qaida operative Ahmed Abu Ali, convicted of plotting to assassinate President Bush, was among those who trained with Royer's Northern Virginia cell.

Bassam Khafagi:
Another CAIR official, Khafagi was arrested in 2003 while serving as CAIR's director of community affairs. He pleaded guilty to charges of bank and visa fraud stemming from a federal counterterror probe of his leadership role in the Islamic Assembly of North America, which has supported al-Qaida and advocated suicide attacks on America. He was sentenced to 10 months in prison and deported to his native Egypt.

Ghassan Elashi: (pictured)
One of CAIR's founding directors, he was convicted in 2004 of illegally shipping high-tech goods to terror state Syria, and is serving 80 months in prison. He's also charged with providing material support to Hamas in the Holy Land Foundation trial. He was chairman of the so-called charity, which provided seed capital to CAIR. Elashi is related to Hamas leader Marzook.

Hamza Yusuf:
The FBI investigated the CAIR board member after 9/11, because just two days before the attacks, he made an ominous prediction to a Muslim audience.

"This country is facing a terrible fate and the reason for that is because this country stands condemned," Yusuf warned. "It stands condemned like Europe stood condemned because of what it did. And lest people forget, Europe suffered two world wars after conquering the Muslim lands."

The American CAIR organization, which receives financial backing from Saudi and Emirati royalty, denies charges that it has a secret agenda to Islamize America. But a Muslim Brotherhood document declassified in the Holy Land case reveals that CAIR's parent was among Muslim organizations enlisted in a secret plot to destroy the American system from within and eventually take over the country.

Written early last decade in Arabic, the manifesto lays bare the subversive role of CAIR's forerunner, the Islamic Association for Palestine, and other Muslim groups in America to carry out a "grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by the hands of the believers, so it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions."

CAIR's founder Ahmad, while claiming to be a moderate and patriotic American, last decade told a group of Muslims in Northern California that they are in America to help assert Islam's rule over the country.

"Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant," a local reporter quoted him as saying, adding, "The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth."

Ahmad of course, insists he was misquoted. However, an FBI wiretap transcript quotes Ahmad agreeing with terrorist suspects gathered last decade at the secret Philly meeting to "camouflage" their true intentions. He compared it to the head fake in basketball. "This is like one who plays basketball: He makes a player believe that he is doing this, while he does something else," Ahmad said. "I agree with you. Like they say, politics is a completion of war."

What's more, Hooper, CAIR's communications director, also has expressed his wish to overturn the U.S. system of government in favor of an "Islamic" state. "I wouldn't want to create the impression that I wouldn't like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future," Hooper said in a 1993 interview with the Minneapolis Star Tribune. "But I'm not going to do anything violent to promote that. I'm going to do it through education." Though conceding he made the remark, Hooper argues that he's never advocated violence. He says he and Muslims like him are working instead through American government infiltration, the media and use "education" to turn America into an Islamic state.

THE BOTTOM LINE: “He says he and Muslims like him are working instead through American government infiltration, the media and use "education" [of our kids] to turn America into an Islamic state”. This, my friend, is exactly what ‘all’ Muslims are doing in the Republic of America. For those (as our own government officials) that have never read the Quran, this is an order from Allah to ‘all’ Muslims to gain control, make slaves of, and subjugate all the peoples of the earth under Sharia Law and to bow down to Allah the god of this world. Always has been, always will be.

The most unbelievable thing is that this has been happening and is happening right in front of our eyes and we don’t see it. It is call the deception of Islam (Taqiyyah in Arabic) found in the Quran. Our Western governments enable Islam to carry out their agenda of world domination by falling into the deception of lies that are clearly mapped out in the Quran and Hadith of Muhammad.

Just as in the 1930’s no one in the West with the exception of Churchill read “Mein Kampf,” when translated into English means “My Struggle” fashioned after the Arabic word “Jihad”, which means…guess what… “My Struggle”.

The difference here is that Islam will win the war against America before we even recognize that we are at war with the Nation of Islam.

Our Government as has the media, in their innocence taken the politically correct multicultural position that we are only at war with a few bad Muslims that we seem to never run out of. The reason for that is, that the word ‘Muslim’ means ‘Bad’. In other words there is nothing good in Islam for the Kaffaar.

Moreover, you my friend are the Kaffaar…

de Andréa

The Supreme Court to Review Barack's Citizenship

The case challenging his name on the ballot is finally set for 'conference' review on December 5, 2008.

A follow up on previous article titled “Obama’s Birth Location”

By de Andréa

This case challenges President-elect Barack Obama's name on the 2008 election ballot citing questions over his citizenship has now been scheduled for a "conference" at the U.S. Supreme Court. Finally, an official investigation into at least one of the hundreds of shady characteristics of Obama’ past.

These conferences are private meetings of the justices at which they review cases and decide which ones to accept for formal review. This case is set for a conference review on Dec. 5, just 10 days before the Electoral College is scheduled to meet and make formal the election of al-Barrack Hussein Obammah as the nation's first Black-Muslim Socialist president.

The Supreme Court's website listed the date for the case brought by Leo C. Donofrio against Nina Wells, the secretary of state in New Jersey, over not only Obama's name on the 2008 election ballot but those of two others, Sen. John McCain and Roger Calero.

Calero was born in Nicaragua in 1969. He and his family fled to L.A. Ca in 1985. Calero is now a permanent resident alien holding a green card since 1990. While in Los Angeles, Calero joined a socialist movement and helped mobilize support against Proposition 187 in the early 90s. Calero is a convicted felon in 1988 on drug charges. In December 2002, immigration police arrested Calero upon his return to the United States at the Houston Airport from a conference held in Havana, protesting the Free Trade Area of the Americas. He was threatened with deportation in 2002 as a result of his previous conviction in 1988. The fact that Calero was able to run for any office in the United States is problematic. The fact that Calreo was able to run for President speaks volumes to the corrupt and slipshod way the government now operates

In defense of John McCain, he was born in 1936 at Coco Solo Naval Air Station in the Panama Canal Zone, to naval officer John S. McCain, Jr. and Roberta Wright McCain. At that time, the Panama Canal was under U.S. control. Moreover, any child born to an American in the military is considered by law to be born on U.S. Soil.

The case, unsuccessful at the state level, had been submitted to Justice David Souter, who rejected it. The case then was resubmitted to Justice Clarence Thomas. The next line on the court's docket says: "DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008."

If four of the nine justices vote to hear the case in full, oral argument may be scheduled.

The action questions whether any of the three candidates are qualified under the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a presidential candidate be a "natural-born citizen."

According to America's Right blogger Jeff Schreiber, there also was a development in a second case presented to the Supreme Court on the same issue.

His report said the Federal Election Commission now has waived its right to respond to a complaint brought by attorney Philip Berg.

First; "There are a number of reasons why the respondents here would choose not to respond. First, because the court only grants between 70 and 120 of the 8,000 or so petitions it receives every year, perhaps they just liked their odds of Berg's petition getting denied.

Second, because they have made arguments as to Berg's lack of standing several times at the district court level and beyond, perhaps they felt as though any arguments had already been made and were available on the record. Or, perhaps the waiver shows that the FEC and other respondents do not take seriously the allegations put forth by Berg, and did not wish to legitimize the claims with a response," the blogger speculated. "Another thing which is not completely clear is whether the FEC is filing for itself or on behalf of all respondents," he added. "If it were just the FEC filing the waiver, I must say that I'm surprised," Berg told America's Right. "I'm surprised because I think they should take the position that the Supreme Court should grant standing to us. I think they have a responsibility not only to Phil Berg, but to all citizens of this country, to put forth a sense of balance which otherwise doesn't seem to exist.”

"However, if this was filed by the FEC on behalf of the DNC and Barack Obama too, it reeks of collusion," he said, noting that the attorney from the Solicitor General's office should be representing federal respondents and not the DNC or Obama.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Questions surrounding at least this aspect of Obama's shady candidacy are seemingly beginning to see the light of day. Can you just imagine if Obama was now disqualified from the Presidency? This conjures up all kinds of possibilities. It seems to me that heads would role for those on the Federal Election Commission to have allowed it to get this far as well as to totally ignore all the evidence/questions/allegations that have been flouting around from the beginning.

Well, it will be interesting to see if ‘Justice or Corruption’ will continue to prevail. Call me negative, but I have a feeling that corruption has become the standard…

de Andréa

Obama’s Birth Location

It is not going away, not yet anyway.

'Constitutional lawsuits’, more than a half dozen of them, still loom over Obama's birth location and his eligibility for President of the United States

By de Andrea

Presidential Candidate Alan Keyes (pictured) in a lawsuit, warns that America may see a 'usurper' among other things, in the Oval Office

In addition to the fact that President-elect Barrack Hussein Obammah is a trained Muslim from his childhood to the twenty years of study under the Black Muslim leadership of his madrassa and friend Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan, the American National Representative of the Nation of Islam, as well as the indoctrination of Malcolm X. and Elijah Muhammad. But now, Obama may not even be an American. Instead it may be proved in a court of law that he is a citizen of Islamic Kenya and or Islamic Indonesia.

Barrack Hussein Obammah may not only be the first Black President of the United States, and the first Muslim President of the United States, but he may also be the first ‘foreign born’ Black Muslim President of the United States.

‘A country of Law’
As a boy, I remember so-called elections like this one in some third world countries, I never thought this would ever happen in the free and Constitutional Republic of America. Could it be that it is no longer a free and Constitutional Republic.

The California secretary of state Debra Bowen (pictured) should refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast this December for the 2008 presidential election until President-elect Barack Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office, alleges a California court petition filed on behalf of former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others.

The legal action this week is just the latest is a series of challenges, some of which have gone as high as the U.S. Supreme Court, over the issue of Obama's status as a "natural-born citizen," a requirement set by the U.S. Constitution.

WorldNetDaily senior reporter and author Jerome Corsi even traveled to Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. While his research and discoveries yielded no solid answers, it did raise more questions.

As I have so often said regarding the unanswered questions about Obama’s shrouded past, even if none of the plethora of questions and accusations are true, shouldn’t their at least be some answers to these questions or at most a grand jury investigation. Since when doesn’t the public have the right to know as the U.S. and State Constitutions provide?

The biggest question is why Obama, if a real Hawaii birth certificate exists, simply hasn't ordered it made available to settle the rumors, instead of the obvious fake one that he displayed on his website. .

The governor's office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?

Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born, yet there is no record of Obama or his Mother at any hospital in Hawaii. While a video posted on YouTube features Obama's Kenyan grandmother Sarah claiming to have witnessed Obama's birth in Kenya.

The California action was filed by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation on behalf of Alan Keyes, the presidential candidate of the American Independent Party, along with Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson, both California electors.

"Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal," the action challenges.

The petition is a request for the Superior Court of California in Sacramento County to issue a peremptory writ barring Secretary of State Debra Bowen "from both certifying to the governor the names of the California Electors, and from transmitting to each presidential Elector a Certificate of Election, until such documentary proof is produced and verified showing that Senator Obama is a 'natural born' citizen of the United States and does not hold citizenship of Indonesia, Kenya or Great Britain."

It continues with a request for a writ, barring California's electors from signing the Certificate of Vote until documentary proof is produced.

The popular vote Nov. 4 favored Obama over Sen. John McCain by several percentage points. But because of the distribution of the votes, Obama is projected to take the Electoral College vote, when it is held in December, by a 2-to-1 margin.

Named as defendants in the action are California Secretary of State Bowen, President-elect Barack Obama, Vice-President-elect Joe Biden and the long list of California party electors.
Citing the constitutional requirement that a president be a "natural born" citizen, the case discusses other state and federal court cases regarding "aspects of lost or dual citizenship concerning Senator Obama. Those challenges, in and of themselves, demonstrate Petitioners' argument that reasonable doubt exists as to the eligibility of the Democratic Party’s nominee for President," the case said.

"There is a reasonable and common expectation by the voters that to qualify for the ballot, the individuals running for office must meet minimum qualifications as outlined in the federal and state Constitutions and statutes, and that compliance with those minimum qualifications has been confirmed by the officials overseeing the election process," the complaint said, when in fact the only documentation currently in existence is a signed statement from the candidate attesting to those qualifications.

"Since [the Secretary of State] has, as its core, the mission of certifying and establishing the validity of the election process, this writ seeks a Court Order barring SOS from certifying the California Electors until documentary proof that Senator Obama is a 'natural born' citizen of the United States of America is received by her," the document said.

"This proof could include items such as his original birth certificate, showing the name of the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor, all of his passports with immigration stamps, and verification from the governments where the candidate has resided, verifying that he did not, and does not, hold citizenship of these countries, and any other documents that certify an individual’s citizenship and/or qualification for office.

"To this date, in this regard, SOS has not carried out this fundamental required duty."
The case said “a simple attestation from the candidate or his party is not sufficient documentation according to law”.

"Historically, California Secretaries of State have exercised their due diligence by reviewing necessary background documents, verifying that the candidates that were submitted by the respective political parties as eligible for the ballot were indeed eligible.

In 1968, the Peace and Freedom Party submitted the name of Eldridge Cleaver as a qualified candidate for President of the United States. The then SOS, Mr. Frank Jordan, found that, according to Mr. Cleaver's birth certificate, he was only 34 years old, one year shy of the 35 years of age needed to be on the ballot as a candidate for President. Using his administrative powers, Mr. Jordan removed Mr. Cleaver from the ballot. Mr. Cleaver unsuccessfully challenged this decision to the Supreme Court of the State of California, and, later, to the Supreme Court of the United States."

Similarly, in 1984, the Peace and Freedom Party candidate Larry Holmes was removed from the ballot.

The "certificate of live birth" that was posted by the Obama campaign (now conveniently removed) cannot be viewed as authoritative, it is obvious even to a layperson that the posted document is a fake, the case alleges.

"Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence," the document said. "The only way to know where Senator Obama was actually born is to view Senator Obama's original birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him as well as a document ID number ."

The case also raises the circumstances of Obama's time during his youth in Indonesia, where he was listed as having Indonesian citizenship. Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship, raising the probability of Obama's mother having given up Obama’s previous citizenship.

Any other subsequent possible U.S. citizenship then, the case claims, would be "naturalized," not "natural-born."

"Based on all of the above, it is the duty of the SOS to obtain proper documentation of Senator Obama's citizenship to confirm his eligibility for the office or the President of the United States," the case said.

Just this week, WorldNetDaily has reported on more than half a dozen other legal challenges have been filed in federal and state courts demanding Obama's decertification from ballots or seeking to halt elector meetings, claiming he has failed to prove his U.S. citizenship status.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Among the States where cases are being tracked are Ohio, Connecticut, Washington, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Hawaii, and there were reports of other cases being developed in Utah, Wyoming, Florida, New York, North Carolina, Texas, California, and Virginia.

Get Brad O'Leary's blockbuster book detailing the agenda for the upcoming Obama White House, "The Audacity of Deceit."

Can we ask, just where our socialist/communist/Muslim Congress is, in all this?

No! We can’t…

de Andréa

Is America At War With Satan? More on prop 8

More on prop 8

Sparks fly as a 'gay' mob swarms Christians: “We're going to kill you. We know who you are, we are going to follow you home and kill you”

By de Andréa

If it isn't the Muslims that want to kill us, it's the "Gays". Moreover it's the Muslims that want to kill the both of us. Eventually someone will be lift standing...

Following an attack on a church on Sunday morning in Lansing Michigan, attacks on Christians by the so-called Gay Community are now becoming common place in the U.S.

Hundreds of ‘Gays’ rushed out of bars and swarmed a group of Christians who were singing songs in San Francisco's Castro District – and some threatened to kill the Christians.

A group of Christians had been singing and praying in the "gay" district for several days, but they never expected an angry mob would attack them. However, that's exactly what happened Friday night.

One woman who was attacked told her story (Watch video of attack on Christians in the Castro of San Francisco) with Pastor Lou Engle at the International House of Prayer in Kansas City. She explains that the group's fellowship had been peaceful for several nights before the riot began.

"People would come and stand with us and join us," she said. "We got to pray for some people."

But then angry men began yelling profanities and warning the Christians to leave the district. One asked, "Why are you here?" The leader of the group said, "We're here to worship God, and we're here because we love you.

A group of men approached the Christians and covered them with a large cloth, backing them into a corner. Then the angry mob began swearing and growing larger. The bars began emptying out, and a crowd completely surrounded the Christians.

The terrified worship group began singing "Amazing Grace," while an estimated 500 "gay" advocates sang, "We Shall Overcome."
The woman said she and her friend were doused with hot coffee. One man took a Bible from her friend, hit her on the head with it, pushing her to the ground, and began kicking her. People began lunging at the Christian group, blowing whistles in their ears, saying, “we're going to kill you,” she said. "They started taking our pictures and saying, we’re going to kill you. We know who you are."

Then she said a man jumped through the crowd and punched her in the face. Just then, a squad of police officers arrived in riot gear, surrounding the Christians and forming a protective human wall.

She said the police told them, "You have to leave if you want to make it out."
When the group continued praying, an officer came back and said, "You don't have a choice anymore. We're going to escort you out."

The officers then took the Christians to their cars. The angry mob began lunging at them through the riot gear and chanting "Shame on you!" Some yelled, "We are going to follow you all the way home!”

One man screamed into the camera, "We don't ever want them coming back. Do you understand that, Christians? Do you understand that, Mormons? I'm talking to you, people. Yeah, you, stay out of our neighborhood if you don't like us!"

The woman said her group had merely organized a peaceful fellowship and wasn't there to condemn homosexuals.

"We hadn't preached," she said. "We hadn't evangelized. We worshipped God in peace, and we were about to die for it."

The following day, approximately 20,000 people marched in San Francisco to protest passage of California's Proposition 8 protecting the rights of traditional marriage.

Learn more about the intimidating tactics and brilliant marketing techniques being used by "gay rights" activists – read David Kupelian's controversial blockbuster, "The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as Freedom."

THE BOTTOM LINE: Thousands of Gays are now conducting protests around the Nation in cities such as Manhattan, Chicago, and Los Angeles. According to reports, many protesters feeling emboldened by the recent so-called “election” are chanting, "Yes we can!” – a slogan popularized by Barrack Hussein Obammah who many now regard as the leader of their cause. (Little do they know, that Muslims will kill Homosexuals) whom they hate almost at much as Christians and Jews.

These radical minority groups will feed off of each other until one will eventually rise to the top and destroy all the others.

As our National government radically moves closer and closer to the left, and minority groups of any kind become more embolden to act out their political ideology in the streets of America we should prepare ourselves for more of this type of confrontation.

Moreover, as these acts of violence become more and more frequent, the police will incrementally, be inclined to take the side of the perverted minority groups, at first just to defuse the situation, as in this case. However this will set a president and soon the authorities will forget all about who has what rights and the so-called right of the minorities will be enforced at the expense of the majority.

Whether it is the rights of Islam to enforce Sharia law, or it is Gay rights or Sadomasochism or Communist Socialist political rights, the rights of child molesters, or the right of the government to disarm the American people. The perversion of moral alienable rights will abound, and anarchy will loom its ugly head.

It may have already happened, but from the quagmire of confusion and anarchy a totalitarian dictator, a “Messiah” will arise to restore order, and the anti-Christ will rule a world now filled with chaos.

Then Jesus will return…

de Andréa

California Burns…Again!

Why???

My thoughts, by de Andréa

Even though I am all too familiar with the threat of wild fire, as I watch the raging devastation in LA on TV from the comfort of my home, it nevertheless seems so surreal.

On the news, as I listened while a firefighter articulates how he has been fighting fires like this for twenty years, I couldn’t help but thinking…Why? . Have we actually been so busy fighting fires in California for the past twenty years, that we do not have time to do some fire prevention? The same type of land, if not in some cases the same land, burns over and over again. And yet we do little or nothing to prevent it.

In many cases it is a contrary issue that causes the land to be especially susceptible to fire, meaning that we purposely allow the land to become a fire hazard.

Whether it is done purposely or because it is political or the lack of foresight, the result is the same, we are faced with perpetually UNCONTROLLED WILDFIRES.

If less than half the time, and only half the money, were spent on prevention and a plan of how to put them out, we might still have fires, they would however, be controlled. But alas, we instead continue to give in to the air-head eco-nuts and leave everything to “Nature” so instead of a controlled fire we have wildfires causing damage beyond anyone’s worst night-mare.

Earlier this year, the fires went wild and totally uncontrolled in my area as well, causing me to ready myself to evacuate, not once but twice. Thank God the fires were stopped before they reached my neighborhood here in the foothills of northern Ca. Many were not so lucky. If you have ever seen the aftermath of a wildfire, it is truly devastating. One homeowner likened it to an atomic blast. There is just nothing left standing, save an occasional residual skeleton of a chimney, moreover, the ground is just ash, ash, ash and more ash.

One of the reasons I know that just a little prevention goes a long way, such as a fire break for example; even in the hurried pressure of fighting the fire that approached our town, a doublewide firebreak was hurriedly cut at the edge of town as a last minute ditch effort to save the town. This last minute bit of prevention is what finally saved the entire town and sent the fire racing across the apron of the ridge toward the community college. They again made a bulldozed path; this time around the perimeter of the college, and again the result was that the college was saved as well.

Too little, and too late, for many living just outside and below the town, the fire raced uninhibited across miles of grassland strewn with the fuel of underbrush, live and dead trees with not a break in its path, many homes were lost until a hurried break was cut.

If just the wild land surrounding towns were systematically grid [ed] with fire breaks and the underbrush and dead fuel were removed and a plan to stop any wildfire racing toward homes and towns before the next fire starts, and it will; then the devastation and loss of homes and property could be cut to a bear minimum. The wild land will eventually recover on its own, that is just the nature of things, but a home, even though it can physically be rebuilt, is lost for good and the cost is phenomenal.

One would think…That is, if in fact one would actually think, put aside for a moment ones ecological ideology about the untouchable nature of things, and look just a little ahead and down the road, pursue solidarity regarding the reality of the need of defense against the ravages of this uncontrolled devastation, we could make the future of wildfire a little less wild.

When ones own philosophic well meaning but misdirected ideologies are either the cause, or even just promote such disasters, then it may be time to re-evaluate ones programmed indoctrinations. The cost for this kind of Idealism has proven to be too great.

Humanity my friend, and what we hold dear, is also part of the ecological equation…

de Andrea

More on Prop 8

Liberal Socialists Homosexuals Attack Lansing Michigan Congregation In The Middle Of Sunday Worship
This is apparently, how the liberals believe a Democracy should function.

By de Andréa

While this shouldn’t be the way a Democracy functions, it is in fact the way a Democracy will and is destine to function. The reason we see this kind of anarchy happening now is because the CAT of Socialism, (the destiny of Democracy) is now out of the bag.

With the demise of our Constitutional Republic and the introduction of Democracy now nearly one hundred years ago, this is approximately the length of time in every case in history that is takes to for a Democracy to evolve into anarchy and then a dictatorship.

This, my friend is the beginning of anarchy. This is what we're up against. The picture above was the scene at the church, the terrorists were dressed in Muslim garb.

On Sunday morning, amidst worshiping congregants and following unifying prayers that our President-elect be granted wisdom as he prepares to lead our nation through difficult global, social, and economic challenges, the Michigan liberal communist socialists dressed as Muslim terrorists declared open war on a congregation of peaceful church goers.

They did it with banners, chants, blasphemy, by storming the pulpit, by vandalizing the church facility, by potentially defiling the building with lewd, public, sex acts and by intentionally forcing physical confrontations with worshipers.

This didn't take place in some dystopian, post modern work of fiction and it didn't take place in San Francisco or Berkley. This was the scene at a Bible believing church in Lansing, Michigan.

On Sunday, November 9, 2008 Michigan liberals sat deceptively through announcements, worship and prayer for the sick, our nation and our President-elect before staging a coordinated, disgusting and repulsive attack on worshipers and the broader concept of the church itself at Lansing's Mount Hope Church.

These communist liberal socialist homosexual creeps, were a part of an organization known as Bash Back Lansing and their collection of radical blogs, including one of the state's most widely read "mainstream" progressive blogs (and none which will receive a link on this website) called on "queers and trannies" from across the state and the region to converge on Lansing for what they refer to as an "action." While many of the members claim to be anarchists (they drove on roads, ate non-garden grown foods, printed materials on products created by government protected free markets, wore clothing, talk incessantly about "organization," etc etc etc) their broader goal is stated plainly on one of their communist blogs.

"I can tell you that we are targeting a well-known anti-queer, anti-choice radical right wing establishment."

Mount Hope teaches respect for all human life and the Biblical sanctity of marriage as an institution between one man and one woman.

This is what Michigan liberals label a "radical right wing establishment," and over 30 of them showed up in force, wearing secret-service style ear pieces and microphones they received the "go" from their ringleader and off they went.

Prayer had just finished when men and women stood up in pockets across the congregation, on the main floor and in the balcony. "Jesus was gay," they shouted among other profanities and blasphemies as they rushed the stage. Some forced their way through rows of women and kids to try to hang a profane banner from the balcony while others began tossing fliers into the air. Two women made their way to the pulpit and began to kiss.

I'll let them tell you in their own words... from another of their liberal blogs:
"(A) video camera, a megaphone, noise makers, condoms, glitter by the bucket load, confetti, pink fabric...yeh."

The video camera they put to good use as they attempted to provoke a violent reaction. The image of the pink-clad folks above is one of theirs, stating in a picture worth more than a thousand words the goals of these Michigan anarchists

The "open minded" and "tolerant" “multi-cultural” homo-liberal communists ran down the aisles and across the pews, hoping against hope to catch a "right winger" on tape daring to push back (none did). And just in case their camera missed the target, they had a reporter in tow. According to a source inside the church yesterday there was a "journalist" from the Lansing City Pulse along for the ride, tipped off about the action and more interested in getting a story than in preventing the vandalism, the violence, and anti-Christian hatred being spewed by the lefties. We'll see what he files and what his editors see fit to print.
Props were readily on display as well, though some of the condoms were put to even more nefarious use.

An hour after police and security had collected and removed who they thought were the last of the liberals anarchists, a volunteer security person discovered two more, hiding, together, in a restroom. While their compatriots engaged in openly violent protest in front of everyone these two snuck away to potentially stage their own protest of sorts, and only by the grace of God did one of the hundreds of kids at the church not happen upon that particular restroom in those moments.

The church's response? After things settled down, the blasphemy ended, the lewd props removed and the families safe from fear of additional men and women running into and past them the pastor took the stage and led the congregation in one more prayer... not for retribution, or divine justice or a celestial comeuppance (that's what I'd have prayed for) but instead that the troubled individuals who'd just defiled the Lord's house, so full of anger and hate, would know Jesus' love in their lives and God's peace that exceeds human understanding.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This defines the difference between a church of believers and Michigan hate-America homosexual communist liberals. It also illustrates in shocking, painful detail precisely what we are up against in the future of America now that we have an admitted hate America socialist pro-gay, pro-abortionist Muslim for president.

Now that we have turned this page of history, and have elected an oppressive government in America, we have now gone farther and faster than I ever thought we would, down the road toward the nightmare that I saw more than twenty years ago. It is the same nightmare, it is just becoming more defined.

Some have called me, from a nutty conspiracy theorists all the way to the other end of the spectrum of ‘a Prophet’. I am neither. I can simply see philosophically down the road in front of me. You can too if you just open your eyes.

It has been said that “there is nothing new under the sun.” There may be a lot of truth to that observation. If everything has been done or tried then it becomes increasingly important to learn from history. But alas, history has either been distorted or not even taught anymore. We are now paying the price for that mistake.

Even the Jews in biblical history didn’t recognize that it was the turning away from the moral fabric of Gods word that led to their captivity.

Today, after all the repeated history we have documented, we still are too blind to see the inevitable that is so visible just down the road. Yes, it has, all been done before with the same result… Wake up! America…

de Andréa

The Sharia Saudi bail out of Great Britain

...It comes with devastating consequences

This affects all of our financial futures, and the future of freedom in the entire WORLD.

By de Andréa


As a follow up to my previous articles on Sharia Finance and with all eyes fixed upon the elections in the U.S, few have even heard of --- much less paid attention to --- the progress of Muslim Sharia Finance since I wrote about it the first of this year and again on November 6th..

In a recent trip made by Great Britain’s Prime Minister, several thousand miles in the opposite direction, Gordon Brown, the new Prime Minister of Great Britain accompanied by his new best friend the Business Secretary Lord Mandelson, “went hat in hand” to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states to ask them to help bail out the stricken economies of the West by pumping billions into the ‘International Monetary Fund.’

The picture is of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia meeting with Prime Minister Gordon Brown

It is more than a little strange that the British Prime Minister should have apparently taken it upon himself to speak on behalf of the IMF.

But the real concern is that asking for help from Saudi Arabia is like tapping your friendly Nazi bank manager during WW II for money to finish the war against them.

Not only that, but this loan comes with a devastating IOU — nothing less than a big slice of control over Britain and America by a regime which at the heart of is, the attempt to bring about the oppressive Islamization of the free world. In other words we are war with these people; moreover we are adopting their ideology.

Granted, the West is facing a truly grave financial crisis. But does this mean we should re-mortgage our future to those whose most radical elements are actively engaged in seeking our destruction?

Alarming
As you know, I have long been concerned by Western Europe and America’s failure to acknowledge the true nature of the threat from global Islamism. This latest move is yet more alarming evidence of that continuing surreptitious process.

Saudi Arabia is at the root of the Islamic onslaught against the West. It is Saudi’s Wahhabist form of Islam which, along with its Shiite counterpart in Iran, aims to restore the dominance of Islam in the world and destroy rule by ‘unbelievers’.
It is Saudi money which has fuelled the enormous spread of Wahhabi mosques, preachers and educational institutions in America and in Western Europe, delivering the message of Jihad and radicalizing millions of Muslims.

And it is this Saudi ideology which was the inspiration for Al Qaeda.
Saudi Wahhabism seeks to conquer the West through a pincer movement comprising violence on the one hand and cultural infiltration and takeover on the other.
At the very least, Saudi Arabia speaks with the most lethal of forked tongues, and we should actively be seeking to diminish its influence over our affairs.

But instead we are effectively offering it yet more opportunity to control us.
Prime Minister Brown claimed he did not want such investment to be used to gain political influence. But Lord Mandelson blurted out the truth when he acknowledged that the Saudis and other Gulf states would expect a bigger role in global institutions in return.

Charities and Terrorism
For years now I have been writing about the fraud of so-called “Islamic Charities”. One of the fundamental doctrines that I learned early on about Islamic theology is that there is no benevolence or charity in Islam. Not as we in the Western culture understand it anyway.

All --- that’s correct, “all” so-called “Islamic Charities” are set up to support Islam and the agenda of Islam, which is to ultimately bring the peoples of the entire earth under the submission and control of the oppressive and totalitarian “Sharia Law”

One of the features of”Shariah-Compliant Finance” is that financial institutions who participate in it would be helping to finance terrorism through monies contributed to ‘Islamic Charities’.

As the article written by Phil Leggiere New paper examines how Al Qaeda uses moderate Muslims to ‘microfinance” terror reveals, that “some”, not all, of these so-called “legitimate” charities have been funding and continue to fund terrorism. Phil Leggiere as most people, while they are not ready it seems to take the complete step towards the truth, are at least just beginning to wake up.

Takeover:
The Islamic world has bought the British Manchester City football club.

This should be enough to chill the Western bone marrow. Islamic influence is already spreading in Europe and America, way beyond Muslim communities themselves.

The Islamic world is buying a financial stake in increasing numbers of Western institutions. Among its latest acquisition is the U.K. Manchester City Football Club, which was sold to the ruling family of Abu Dhabi, and Barclays Bank, which has secured an almost £6 billion capital injection from Abu Dhabi and Qatar.

Extremist Islamist ideology is also being spread through Islamic study centers attached to universities. According to Professor Anthony Glees, eight universities in Great Britain — including Oxford and Cambridge — have accepted more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995, spreading radicalism and helping create new identities and a new allegiance within Britain. The same is going on in our most prestigious universities in America. Even some private Christian Colleges are now Islamic Madrassas.

'Bribery' and Intimidation
Shockingly, “Saudi blackmail has also forced Britain to suspend its own Parliamentary rule of law by ditching the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems, in response to an explicit threat made by the Saudi authorities that, if the case continued, ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk”

Those aren’t my words, they are from Britain’s former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles.

Just as in The U.S. the Islamists are already pulling British strings through the supremely manipulative combination of the threat of violence and the lure of unbridled wealth.
Apparently oblivious to all this, however, Mr Brown has pledged to make London the global centre of Islamic banking. Accordingly, Britain’s major banks are eagerly embracing ‘Sharia finance’, on the basis that it is a source of vast wealth. Instead it will prove to be a source of dependence and oppression.

What they fail to realize is that Sharia is also a deceptive project for Islamizing Western society, and wherever it is embraced it will use its position to do precisely that. The assumption is that Sharia banking — which has at its heart the prohibition of interest — accords with ancient Islamic religious principles. only partially so...
.
Sharia banking was devised by mid-20th century Islamist ideologues specifically to further their strategy for global Islamic rule by creating separate administrative systems.
Muslims are required to donate a proportion of their income to charity, including the money that goes through the Sharia banking system. Since there is no charity in Islam the so-called charity money goes to Islamic terrorists organizations.

The clerics deciding where this ‘charity’ money should go are the spiritual godfathers of terror, such as Sheik Yusuf Qaradawi, who supports suicide bombing in Iraq and Israel, and Sheik Muhammed Taqi Usmani, who ran a madrassa that supported the Taliban, yet who sits on the Sharia supervisory board of the Dow Jones Islamic Index Fund.

It’s no surprise, then, that all charitable donations end up being channeled straight into terrorist organizations such as Hamas and Hezbollah.

But apart from being a global money-laundering exercise for terrorism, Sharia banking is also a beachhead in the attempt by Islam to infiltrate British and Western society.
'Seductive' and deceptive

The key point is that Sharia does not recognize the superior authority of the secular law of the land.

Sharia financial institutions are purposely and deceptively not be making this clear — they don’t want to frighten people away — but at some future time, when it is to late, they will certainly do so. This is just one of the many ways they are endeavoring to spread Sharia law and the oppression of Islam world wide.

There are already examples of Sharia regulations over-riding commercial decisions. Citibank, for example, launched the Saudi American Bank (SAB) in Jeddah and Riyadh. In 1980, the Saudis abruptly seized the SAB, denied Citibank all future profits, and ordered it to train Saudi staffers because the bank was judged insufficiently Muslim.

When trillions of pounds and dollars become locked into Islamic banking and Saudi and other Islamic institutions, who will be in a position to argue with the Islamists when they finally call in their IOUs?

THE BOTTOM LINE Our politicians and financiers seem blind to this prospect — because they are mesmerized by the seductive and deceptive prospect of so much wealth.
Moreover, the British establishment does not believe that what we are being subjectedto is a religious war. That is why their response to the steady encroachment of Islamic supremacy in our society is so weak.

And that is why I fear that Western Europe and the United States of America is in grave and immediate danger of selling the entire Western culture and the freedom we enjoy to those who are intent upon destroying it

“More than giving hostages to fortune, we are enabling fortune itself to hold our world hostage”.

de Andréa

Prop 8, We The People

Do you know what we the people are doing? Demonstrations in S.F. Sac. and L.A. and Palm Springs

By de Andréa

Prop 22/8 back in court again…
The people of California have a unique power that few States have; it is the ’Initiative Referendum’ of directly making law, and bypassing the legislature altogether. This is actually an indirect result of the loss of our Republic, and the introduction of Democracy in America which occurred in 1913 by the passage of the 17th Amendment.

The Initiative Referendum is actually a sophisticated form of vigilantism. This becomes necessary when the representative system no longer works, or as in our case, has been distroyed.

In 2000, 61% of California voters used this Initiative and approved a ballot measure, Proposition 22 that said "only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized in California."

And then, this year the California Supreme Court struck down this new law made by the people on same-sex marriage in a broadly worded decision that would invalidate virtually any law that prohibits marriage on the basis of sexual orientation. In the 4-3 ruling the court declared that the state Constitution protects a fundamental "right to marry" that extends equally to same-sex couples. It tossed a highly emotional issue into the election year while opening the way for tens of thousands of gay people to wed in California, starting as early as mid-June.

So let’s recap.
First, the State legislature refuses to write a law that the people want, so the system of representing the people fails. Second, the people use the people’s initiative to pass a law that the people want, (prop 22). Third the court overturns the people’s law and writes a new one. Forth, the people pass yet another law, (prop 8) overturning the court legislated law, and now fifth, the new peoples initiative referendum, will end up in court once again. Did I get that about right?

This, my friend, all because we ignored Constitutional law back in 1913 and with the seventeenth Amendment destroyed the Representative Republic that the Constitutional architects designed and in its place created a true democracy. Democracy’s, by there very nature do not, and never have worked.

So the vigilante people must do the only alterative left and that is to take the law into their own hands, which is what the people did through the initiative process, prop 22 in 2000. This was a legal process. The court on the other hand, violated the Federal and the State Constitutional law when they over turned the peoples law and made a new law they liked better. Courts, not even the Federal Supreme Court can make law. Not legally anyway.

Equal protection clause
All the quibbling aside, the homosexuals stand on the equal protection under the law clause, which does apply, but not the way the Homosexuals want it to. If one is equally protected under the law then the law applies to every one equally. Therefore homosexuals are protected under the same law that heterosexuals are---equally. You see, the issue is equal law for equal people. Homosexuals do not want to be protected equally under the law as the law states; they want to have a special law that protects just their small social group, and folks, that ain’t equal.

Then they run and play the race or gender card
Homosexuals then want to use the discrimination law, of gender or race. Again, it doesn’t hold water, because gender and race discrimination are not the issue here. Homosexuality is a choice gender and race is not. Then of course they run again and say that homosexuality is not a choice either. This my friend, then needs to be defined and proved scientifically and in the court, so far is has not.

The people say that it is not legal to marry more than one partner, and or not legal to marry your pet. People say that it is not legal to marry a child; and it is not legal to marry someone of the same sex. The people have spoken, but will the Democratic Government listen to the people, or has America already become a totalitarian police state dictated by the law of the court and the dictatorial minoity.

So if you thought this was over, well--- think again, this is not a Republic any more, where laws were absolute and your government electorate represented you. A democracy, as I have always said, is nothing less than MOB RULE and will always lead to a dictatorship, when the unelected judge can make law, then the judge rules, and the people do not.

Think about it. A Government for and by the PEOPLE this is not.

Not any more…

de Andréa